OMNI
WIKILEAKS/ASSANGE
NEWSLETTER #11, May 25, 2018
Compiled by Dick
Bennett for a Culture of Peace
(#9
July 21, 2011; #10, Jan. 30, 2012).
See OMNI Manning Newsletters.
Contents Wikileaks/Assange Newsletter #11 (Newsletters 1-10, 714pp.)
Books by Assange:
The Wikileaks Files: the
World According to U.S. Empire.
Freedom
and the Future of the Internet.
Film
About Assange:
Ales Gibney, We Steal
Secrets: The Story of Wikileaks.
Catching Up with Assange
2017-2018
Roots Action
5-18, Petitioning Equador Not to Cave to US Pressure
Catching Up with Assange 2016 Amy Goodman: UN Panel Says Assange
Being Arbitrarily Detained. What Will
Happen Now?
Jan. 2016
Wikileaks/Assange Google Search Feb.
4, 2016
Strong ACLU Protest against 6 Years of
Arbitrary Detention Feb. 6, 2016
Veterans for Peace: Give Assange his Freedom, Feb. 12
New Paperback Edition of The Wikileaks Files: The World According to
US Empire. Verso, 2016.
Assange 2012-2015
Assange, Google is Privatized NSA
Assange, Cypherpunks
Gibney, Film about Assange
Greenberg, Wikileaks vs. Secrecy
Hayase, Assange and the Tilted Scale
of Justice
Moon, et al., Saving the Internet
OMNI Newsletters
Wikileaks/Assange Newsletters Nos. 9
and 10
CATCHING UP WITH ASANGE 2017-18
Urge Ecuador to Protect WikiLeaks
from Persecution by Team Trump
5-24-18
|
10:16 AM (3 hours ago)
 |
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
CATCHING UP WITH ASSANGE 2016
|
||||||||
|
Friday,
February 12, 2016
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been wrongly subjected to
arbitrary detention for five and a half years, according to a ruling by the
United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. The UN Working Group
on Arbitrary Detention says that Assange should be able to leave the embassy
without facing arrest or extradition. VFP agrees with the UN panel.<Full Statement>
Wikileaks/Assange Google Search, Feb. 4, 2016
Recent News and Articles Not Yet
Appearing in This Newsletter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange
Wikipedia Julian Paul Assange (born 3 July 1971) is an Australian computer programmer,
publisher and journalist. He is editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, an organisation ...Chelsea
Manning - WikiLeaks - Sarah Harrison - Embassy of Ecuador, London
Julian Assange is in arbitrary
detention, UN panel finds
The Guardian - 13 hours ago Julian Assange argued he was illegally confined to the embassy because he risked arrest if ...
The Guardian - 13 hours ago Julian Assange argued he was illegally confined to the embassy because he risked arrest if ...
Julian
Assange is being 'arbitrarily held', UN panel to say - BBC News
BBC News - 9 hours ago Holed up in Ecuador's embassy, WikiLeaks' Assange to win support from U.N. panel
BBC News - 9 hours ago Holed up in Ecuador's embassy, WikiLeaks' Assange to win support from U.N. panel
https://twitter.com/wikileaks
2 hours ago - View on Twitter
.@JohnPilger: Freeing
Julian #Assange - The Last Chapter www.rt.com/op-edge/331328… #WikiLeaks
#UNWGAD More: justice4assange.com/
2 hours ago - View on Twitter
Australian FM
@JulieBishopMP seeks advice over Assange UN rulingwww.sbs.com.au/news/artic… More:justice4assange.com/
2 hours ago - View on Twitter
President Correa complains
about UK espionage operations against Assange embassywww.panorama.com.ve/mundo…
People also ask
Where is Julian Assange?
Who is Julian Assange and what
did he do?
How long has Julian Assange been
at the embassy?
What happened to the guy from
Wikileaks?
www.bbc.com/news/world-11047811
BBC
A profile of Julian Assange, founder of the
whistle-blowing website Wikileaks.
www.theguardian.com/media/julian-assange
The
Guardian
Julian Assange's embassy showdown:
what it means and what happens next. Published: ... Julian Assange to be questioned by
Swedish prosecutors in London.
www.ted.com/.../julian_assange_why_the_worl...
The controversial website
WikiLeaks collects and posts highly classified documents and video. Founder Julian ...
www.telegraph.co.uk
› News › World News › Wikileaks
The Daily
Telegraph
17 hours ago - More than three years ago
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fled into the embassy of Ecuador in London. But why is he
there, and will he ever ...
https://justice4assange.com/
Journalist John Pilger's article
'Julian
Assange:
The Untold Story Of An Epic Struggle For Justice' is to date one of the best
accounts of the miscarriages against ...
www.vanityfair.com/news/2011/02/the-guardian-201102
For his WikiLeaks
bombshells to land with maximum force, Julian Assange needed the
mainstream media. Sarah Ellison reports on the Faustian pact between ...
www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/06/07/no-secrets
Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, oversees a populist
intelligence network. Credit Digitally altered photograph by Phillip Toledano.
www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/magazine/30Wikileaks-t.html?pagewanted...
Is Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, a
puppet master of the news media? He would like you to think so. But The Times's
dealings with him ...
Searches
related to Wikileaks, Assange
The
WikiLeaks Files: THE WORLD ACCORDING TO
US EMPIRE By WIKILEAKS. Introduction
by Julian Assange. Verso, 2016. http://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/246213/the-wikileaks-files-by-wikileaks-introduction-by-julian-assange/
What
Cablegate tells us about the reach and ambitions of US Empire. Published in
collaboration with WikiLeaks.
WikiLeaks
came to prominence in 2010 with the release of 251,287 top-secret State
Department cables, which revealed to the world what the US government really
thinks about national leaders, friendly dictators, and supposed allies. It
brought to the surface the dark truths of crimes committed in our name: human
rights violations, covert operations, and cover-ups.
The
WikiLeaks Files exposes the machinations of the United States as it imposes a
new form of imperialism on the world, one founded on tactics from torture to
military action, to trade deals and “soft power,” in the perpetual pursuit of
expanding influence. The book also includes an introduction by Julian Assange
examining the ongoing debates about freedom of information, international
surveillance, and justice.
An
introduction by Julian Assange—writing on the subject for the first
time—exposes the ongoing debates about freedom of information, international
surveillance, and justice.
With
contributions by Dan Beeton, Phyllis Bennis, Michael Busch, Peter Certo, Conn
Hallinan, Sarah Harrison, Richard Heydarian, Dahr Jamail, Jake Johnston,
Alexander Main, Robert Naiman, Francis Njubi Nesbitt, Linda Pearson, Gareth
Porter, Tim Shorrock, Russ Wellen, and Stephen Zunes.
SEE
MORE
PRAISE
“Long
after the debate over the publication of these cables has been forgotten, the
documents themselves will remain a valuable archive for scholars and students
of US foreign policy. The essays that make up The WikiLeaks Files shed critical
light on a once secret history. ”
—Edward
J. Snowden, July 2015
“A
deep dive into what the cables reveal about America’s dealings with a variety
of states. It will be left to other books to argue whether WikiLeaks is right
or wrong in their mission and approach. This one gives solid context to the
cables themselves, explaining what they mean to the wider world.”
—Kirkus
Reviews
“Takes
on a huge amount of data and delivers a thorough introduction to the narratives
of US policy that the cables reveal [and] … makes the information in the cables
accessible to a wide audience of readers who may not otherwise have the time or
background knowledge to search through the data themselves.”
—Publishers
Weekly
“Provides
accessible insight into nearly every major news topic of today.”
—Portland
Press Herald
“From
government to big business, if you have a dirty secret, WikiLeaks is your
nightmare.”
—Guardian
“I’ve
heard the impact of these releases on our foreign policy described as a
meltdown, as a game-changer and so on … Is this embarrassing? Yes. Is it
awkward? Yes.”
—Bob
Gates, US Secretary of Defense, 2010
“The
guy ought to be … and I’m not for the death penalty, so if I’m not for the
death penalty, there’s only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a
bitch.”
—Bob
Beckel, Fox News
“The
whole weighty book is a missile aimed at breaking the plate glass of US
diplomacy and revealing its motivations.”
—Sydney
Morning Herald
WIKILEAKS,
Google Search, 9-13-16
https://www.amazon.com/WikiLeaks-Files.../B00NEUI...
Amazon.com,
Inc.The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to
US Empire - Kindle edition byWikiLeaks, Julian Assange. Download it once ... By Ignoramus on February
4, 2016.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/
On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a
searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from
Hillary Clinton's private email server while ...
https://wikileaks.org/
WikiLeaks
Transcribed meeting
records of a 19 March 2016 meeting between the top two IMF officials in charge of
negotiating the Greek debt crisis - Poul Thomsen, the ...
www.inquisitr.com/.../wikileaks-issues-torrent-insurance-encrypted-file-...
Jun 19, 2016 - WikiLeaks has released an
encrypted "torrent insurance" file for download. ... Torrent WIKILEAKS INSURANCE 2016-06-03 (88 Gb
encrypted) ...
www.goodreads.com
› Writing › Journalism
Goodreads
Rating: 3.9 - 113
votes
The WikiLeaks Files has 113 ratings and
18 reviews. ... Sep 02, 2015 Blair marked it as unfinished · review of
another edition. Shelves: ... Sep
09, 2016.
www.penguinrandomhouse.com/.../the-wikileaks-files-by-julian-assange
Sep 20, 2016 | 624 Pages ...
The WikiLeaks
Files exposes
the machinations of the United States as it imposes a new form ... From the
Trade Paperback edition.
www.washingtontimes.com/.../2016/.../wikileaks-...
The
Washington Times
Jul 27, 2016 - Wikileaks put up a page
containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by ... 9, 2016, file photo, Republican
presidential candidate Donald Trump ...
The Wikileaks Files: The World According to US Empire -
The Bell House www.thebellhouseny.com/event/939735-wikileaks-files-world-brooklyn/
All ticket-holders will
receive a free copy of The WikiLeaks Files with entrance. .... EMCF 2016: Haunting Renditions
Live: All-Glaz/ser Edition with Eliot Glazer, ...
www.cnbc.com/2016/.../wikileaks-releases-hacked-democratic-nati...
CNBC
Jul 27, 2016 - WikiLeaks has released files of what it said were
audio recordings pulled ... releases audio files from stolen DNC
emails Thursday, 28 Jul 2016 ...
https://www.theguardian.com/media/wikileaks
The
Guardian
WikiLeaks posted medical files of rape victims and
children, investigation finds ... Edinburgh 2016: Private Manning Goes to
Washington review – an urgent, ...
|
Respect UN, Drop US
Espionage Case Against Julian Assange
 Dear Dick,
Call on the U.S. government to drop threats of prosecution
against Julian Assange and commit to not seek Assange's extradition to the
U.S.
The UN
working group on arbitrary detention has found that WikiLeaks
founder Julian Assange has been arbitrarily detained in London for more than
five years and should be released immediately. [1]
Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU, said: “In light of this decision, it’s clear that any criminal charges against Mr. Assange in connection with WikiLeaks’ publishing operations would be unprecedented and unconstitutional. Indeed, even the prolonged criminal investigation of WikiLeaks itself has had a profound chilling effect. The Justice Department should end that investigation and make clear that no publisher will ever be prosecuted for the act of journalism.” [2] Urge the U.S. government to end all criminal investigations and threats of prosecution against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks for publishing by signing our petition at MoveOn: http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/respect-un-free-assange Thanks for all you do to help make U.S. foreign policy more just, Robert Naiman, Avram Reisman, and Sarah Burns Just Foreign Policy Help support our work! If you think our work is important, support us with a $15 donation. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate References: 1. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=17012&LangID=E 2. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/feb/05/julian-assange-un-panel-uk-sweden-deprivation-of-liberty  |
|||||||||
2012-2015
Julian Assange: Google Is the
Privatized NSA
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange being
interviewed by Sky News. (photo: Sky News)
Sarah Hewson, Sky News, Reader
Supported News, Sept. 20, 2014
Excerpt: "Julian Assange
described to Sky News how Google is essentially a privatized NSA, and discussed
his new hope that he will be able to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London
soon."
READ MORE http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/25981-focus-julian-assange-google-is-the-privatized-nsa
Cypherpunks:
FREEDOM AND THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET
JULIAN
ASSANGE. OR Books, 2013.
With JACOB
APPELBAUM, ANDY MÜLLER-MAGUHN and JÉRÉMIE ZIMMERMANN
"Cypherpunks is gripping, vital
reading, explaining clearly the way in which corporate and government control
of the internet poses a fundamental threat to our freedom and democracy". Oliver Stone
"Cypherpunks: Freedom and the
Future of the Internet is an important wake-up call about a possible
dystopian future, which is a technological reality now… While messengers of
dangerous outcomes are always met at first with hostility and even mockery, history
shows that we disregard such warnings as these at our peril." —Naomi Wolf
"Obligatory reading for everyone interested in
the reality of our freedoms." —Slavoj Žižek
"The power of this book is that it breaks a
silence. It marks an insurrection of subjugated knowledge that is, above all, a
warning to all." —John Pilger
Cypherpunks
are activists who advocate the widespread use of strong cryptography (writing
in code) as a route to progressive change. Julian Assange, the editor-in-chief
of and visionary behind WikiLeaks, has been a leading voice in the cypherpunk
movement since its inception in the 1980s.
Now, in
what is sure to be a wave-making new book, Assange brings together a small
group of cutting-edge thinkers and activists from the front line of the battle
for cyber-space to discuss whether
electronic communications will emancipate or enslave us. Among the topics
addressed are: Do Facebook and Google constitute “the greatest surveillance
machine that ever existed,” perpetually tracking our location, our contacts and
our lives? Far from being victims of that surveillance, are most of us willing
collaborators? Are there legitimate forms of surveillance, for instance in
relation to the “Four Horsemen of the Infopocalypse” (money laundering, drugs,
terrorism and pornography)? And do we have the ability, through conscious
action and technological savvy, to resist this tide and secure a world where
freedom is something which the Internet helps bring about?
The
harassment of WikiLeaks and other Internet activists, together with attempts to
introduce anti-file sharing legislation such as SOPA and ACTA, indicate that
the politics of the Internet have reached a crossroads. In one direction lies a
future that guarantees, in the watchwords of the cypherpunks, “privacy for the
weak and transparency for the powerful”; in the other lies an Internet that
allows government and large corporations to discover ever more about internet
users while hiding their own activities. Assange and his co-discussants unpick
the complex issues surrounding this crucial choice with clarity and engaging
enthusiasm.
Publication
November 2012 • 196 pages
Paperback ISBN 978-1-939293-00-8 • Ebook ISBN 978-1-939293-01-5
Paperback ISBN 978-1-939293-00-8 • Ebook ISBN 978-1-939293-01-5
IAR EXCLUSIVE
INTERVIEW: DOCUMENTARY FILMMAKER ALEX GIBNEY TALKS 'WE STEAL SECRETS: THE STORY
OF WIKILEAKS'
Wednesday, 29 May 2013 15:22
In 2010 Esquire magazine
called filmmaker Alex Gibney “the
most important documentarian of our time” ….
I recently had the
pleasure of sitting down with documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney over
lunch at the Four Seasons Hotel in Los Angeles to discuss his work on We Steal Secrets: The Story of
WikiLeaks, as well as his upcoming film Lance Armstrong: The Road Back. The Oscar-winning
filmmaker discussed his new movie, why he decided to make a documentary about
WikiLeaks, how his opinion of Assange changed
throughout the course of making the movie, why the WikiLeaks founder refused to
be interviewed for the film, Bradley Manning and
the New York Times role in the story, what the future holds for Assange, and the
current status of his upcoming documentary about disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong.
Here
is what the acclaimed filmmaker had to say:
IAR: To begin with, can you
talk a little bit about how you choose the subjects for your films and what was
it about Julian Assange’s story and WikiLeaks that fascinated you and made you
want to make this movie?
Alex Gibney: Well, it was actually brought to me. Universal called me up and
said, “Would you like to do this movie?” Sometimes I pick up topics and
sometimes they pick me. In this case I couldn’t resist. What was interesting to
me about this one, at least at the beginning and it had changed during the
course of the movie, was I thought it was a classic “David and Goliath” story,
about an itinerant guy with a computer who was going around the world holding
the powerful to account What a story. Then it was about a machine, it was about
this new device, a new leaking machine that was going to change the balance of
power. That’s what I thought it was about to begin with and that’s what made me
leap in.
Did your opinion of Julian
Assange and the story that you wanted to tell change as you were making the
film and as you discovered more information about him?
Gibney: Yes, it changed. With Julian it
changes and I think the first half of the film you’re going, “Go for it dude,
you’re my man.” Then it does change because I think Julian changed. Frankly, my opinion of Julian also changed. My opinion of it changed
about the value of what WikiLeaks was. I think it’s still very important, but
he began to become the very thing he was railing against. Secretive, paranoid,
and somebody who believed the end could justify the means. He’s supposed to be
about truth, but he ended up telling lies about himself and his own operation.
In that way I felt it was important to point out because we can’t allow the
foibles of people in positions of power, and I would say Julian had power, to blind us to their faults
and to put us in the position of having to say, “Oh, because he’s working for a
good cause then anything he does is okay.” No. We should be able to pick and
choose, and we should be able to have the a la carte menu. The moral a la carte
menu where we say, “No man, what you did here was wrong, and it doesn’t have
anything to do with what you’re trying to do with WikiLeaks.”
I understand that you tried to
contact Julian at several points in order to interview him for the film and he
made that very difficult for you to do, correct?
Gibney: He sure did. One of my executive producers had put up some of
the money for his bail and she was my initial contact to him, and she was a
good contact. As a result, I met him a number of times and I ended up going to
his 40th birthday party and toward the end when it seemed like it wasn’t going
to happen, we had this big six hour meeting that I recounted in the film. So I
had high hopes it was going to work. I tried very hard to make it work, but at
the end of the day I didn’t. It’s a little bit bizarre. At one point in the
email exchange I joked with Julian that
I might have been the only person on the planet that didn’t get an interview
with him because he’s given zillions. For whatever reason he decided not to.
You know he likes to feel like the puppet master, and that he’s always in
control of everybody. I told him in no uncertain terms that I didn’t work for
him, but I wanted to hear what he had to say and that wasn’t good enough.
Is it hard to construct a
documentary around a subject that won’t talk to you?
Gibney: Sometimes it’s unexpectedly beneficial. It was unexpectedly
beneficial on a film I did that was called Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer. With Ashley Dupre, I tried for a
long time to interview her. I was in touch with her and many of her handlers.
It seemed like it was going to work and then it didn’t. She actually asked for
final cut of the film. But in a way that was great because she didn’t cooperate
and I ended up finding this other woman, Angelina, who’s actually far more important to the
story than Ashley was.
So it was a blessing. In Julian’s case, I think his refusal to be interviewed
made me do two things that were very important. One was to focus more on the Bradley Manning story, which I’m so glad I did. The
second thing was to reach out to this filmmaker/journalist Mark Davis who had something special, which was Julian Assange before he became famous. In fact, he
had footage of him just at the moment when he became famous, when he walked out
the door and crossed the street to the Frontline Club. I had to see that, and I
had to integrate that, to know how to present it. I could’ve asked Julian myself, what was it like? But maybe he
couldn’t even remember now. So Julian not
giving me an interview ended up making the film good in some unexpected ways.
Since you brought up Bradley
Manning and his role in the WikiLeaks story, do you believe that Adrian Lamo
betrayed him?
Gibney: Yes. Adrian Lamo lied
to him. Adrian Lamo said
what he was saying off the record. He was not going to betray his trust when in
fact what he was doing was he was mining for information. It’s still unclear
what Adrian
What do you think Bradley
Manning’s motives were?
Gibney: There’s the poignancy of the story. I said to you earlier, I
thought it was a film about a machine. Turns out it’s a film about human
beings. Bradley Manning now
is looking out at the world and he’s seeing collateral damage being posted.
Suddenly he’s in this position where he’s done this huge thing, this enormous
leak and nobody can know about it. But he’s also going through his own personal
torment. He’s tried to make a difference in society and he’s trying to make a
difference in his own life, maybe even change his sex. He needs somebody to
talk to. He’s alone. We know from his friend that we interviewed that when he
was in Iraq
As a documentary filmmaker, how
much of you own opinion about the subject you are documenting plays into your
films? Do you try and keep your opinion out of the story to a certain degree,
or do you find that your own opinion often helps to drive the narrative of your
movies?
Gibney: My opinion helps drive the narrative. I can’t
keep my opinion out, but what I do is…well, there was a filmmaker I was a big
admirer of named Marcel Ophus and
he did a film called The Sorrow and the Pity. He had a great saying. He
said, “Every film has a point of view.” I always have a point of view but the
key is showing how hard it is to come to that point of view. It’s a way of
integrating that opinion with other opinions so that you’re not saying, this is
the truth, and everyone else is a liar. It’s a way of saying that this is what
I believe where a lot of other people believe something different.
You mentioned that your opinion
of Julian Assange changed while you were making the film. Did you have to go
back and edit or change anything as you gathered new information, and how did
you know when the film was finally finished?
Gibney: Early on I wasn’t sure we were even going to deal with Swedish
episode. But I became convinced along the way that we had to deal with it
because it was not a private matter. It was something Julian made into a public matter. I think, by
the way, it’s also what made him famous. He wouldn’t be nearly as famous as he
is now if that storyline hadn’t been integrated into the transparency
storyline. That’s an example of trying to reckon with a change and then
understanding it within the broader complexity of the story. Because I felt in
a film that’s about truth and lies, if somebody’s constructing a grand lie,
while saying to everybody he’s a truth teller, it’s something that’s worth
telling.
It seemed from the movie that
most of Julian’s followers are no longer following him, and that he’s still
hiding in the Ecuadorian consulate. What do you think the future holds for
Julian Assange and those that believe in what he was trying to do with
WikiLeaks?
Gibney: I don’t know. He said
he’s going to run for the Senate in Australia
You said that when you began
making the film, you thought it was about a machine. Do you still believe that?
Gibney: Turns out it was about people. Not only about Bradley Manning and how he meets ultimately Adrian Lamo, thereby
confounding the anonymity of the leaking machine, but also as a publisher Julian regarded himself as a transparency
radical. You get all this shit, and you publish it all, end of story. But at
the end of the day it turns out that judgments aren’t really necessary. You
can’t be mechanical about it. Because if you’re being mechanical about it, you’re
making a certain kind of judgment whether you like it or not. It’s a moral one
and sometimes it’s a moral one saying, lives aren’t so important to me, it’s
the principal that’s more important to me than human life. We don’t know
anybody that was killed that was a result of unredacted names. I’m just saying Julian allowed himself to put people in
danger because of his radical transparency ideology.
Can you talk about the New York Times role in the WikiLeaks
scandal?
Gibney: The New
York Times behaved badly! They behaved badly I think, and I don’t know,
because they were threatened. They felt threatened that maybe this is a new
kind of journalism. A new kind of platform that’s making them look bad and that
therefore they were more vicious towards Julian Assange than
they might’ve been from another kind of source who might’ve been a mobster.
They deal with a lot of sources of questionable origin and I’ve never seen them
go after somebody in such a petty fashion as they went after Julian Assange.
·
This Machine Kills
Secrets: How Wikileakers, Cypherpunks, and Hacktivists Aim to Free the World's
Information by Andy Greenberg
MORE OR
TITLES
Mon Mar 4, 2013
1:11 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"david sladky" VFP
802 Days and Counting
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/15/julian-assange-and-the-tilted-scales-of-justice/
Julian Assange and the Tilted Scales of Justice by NOZOMI HAYASE
Justice is one of the most important virtues of a healthy society. The basic idea is that when a wrong is committed, there is a system to help right that wrong in a way that is equitably applied. Marcus Tullius Cicero, orator and statesman of Ancient Rome once said, "Justice commands us to have mercy upon all men, to consult the interests of the whole human race, to give to every one his due." Justice is a scale that does not give favor to one side or the other, but stays in balance equally for everyone.
When something is not just, one will always find an oppressive force at work. Acts of injustice are usually carried out in secret or covered up after the fact. Unless a society loses its legitimacy by devolving into a form of blatant tyranny, those in power will always try to appear to act justly. The oppression of a nation or section of a population is typically rationalized with what appears to be sound reasoning couched in political rhetoric. Examples of this are seen in the ever-expanding ‘war on terror’, activating fear with portrayed threats to ‘national security’ from the Middle East and justifying illegal invasion of a country that is no threat to the attacking country. The rationale often put forth is that they are fighting for ‘democracy’ and ‘humanitarian intervention’, as in
Oppression produces inequality. Once it is normalized within society, it becomes invisible and is not easily challenged. Large parts of the population remain unconscious of it and then quietly support it. History is rife with examples of inherently unjust states and their systematic normalization. In the development of the US, the system of slavery, colonial genocide for land and resource extraction and oppression of minorities and women have all historically been carried out despite this nation’s great founding ideals of equality and freedom.
This normalization of oppression is spreading around the world: secret dirty wars and drone attacks; police brutality and extreme surveillance. Government secrecy helps veil the violence and inequality. When oppression is covered up, the public is kept in dark about the consequences and effect on their own lives. In this ignorance, the scale of justice is going askew and society is descending into tyranny.
A shift occurred in 2010. With free flow of information and communication on the Internet, it became harder for those in power to control public perception. The rise of the whistleblower site WikiLeaks, built on the new medium of global internet connection, sparked an awakening. With courageous whistleblowers like Bradley Manning, leaked documents have revealed key aspects of worldwide systemic oppression that is carried out through interlocking systems of collusion between governments and transnational corporations. Along with these leaks that shed light to governments wrongdoing, intense attacks on the organization and its founder Julian Assange exposed the invisible hand pushing the scale in this unbalanced direction.
In a way, Assange has become a symbol of the tilted scale of justice, triggering vitriol and vilification by the controllers of the levers of power. The full force of corporate media outlets, governments and individuals worldwide have carried out unprecedented and prolonged attacks on Assange using all the classic tools of character assassination. As of mid February, he has been detained without charge for 802 days, 240 days at the Ecuadorian Embassy, due to
Attacks on Assange and journalists and activists like him are best understood within the social and political reality from which they emerge. In his case, Assange happens to be a founder of an organization that has become extremely influential in the world. Wikileaks’s allegiance, not to a particular country or private institution, but to global justice as a primary principle, exposes systematic oppression around the world that has been covered up and normalized.
In a cable originating from Tel Aviv, racist Israeli policies towards black Jews were revealed that has led to decline in population and living standards. It also showed Israeli official’s motives and techniques of their insidious oppression of
As a result of massive exposure of government wrong-doing, Julian Assange was officially declared an enemy of the State by the
George Orwell once said, "political language… is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind". The official rhetoric and the corporate media discourse now veils the crimes of the powerful and maintains the appearance of legitimacy. When the scale weighs one side over the other with obvious bias time and again, this skews the court of public opinion and the broken scale of justice is normalized. 20 years ago, no President could openly claim the right to assassinate anyone without widespread outrage. Now this is happening and there is hardly a whimper.
In this system, those who challenge the broken scales are punished and eventually society as a whole loses its sense of reality. Secret reinterpretation and subversion of laws and media spin have become global trends. The NDAA destroys any semblance of Constitutional balance of power in the
Attempts to be neutral in a situation where injustice is entrenched can lead to one becoming complicit in perpetuating the oppression. Along with worn out manipulation of words like ‘terrorist’, now a new label has emerged. Jemima Khan, Associate Editor of the New Statesman, who supported WikiLeaks in the past, has now called Assange supporters cultish. Khan argued in her recent article that WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange has alienated his allies:
"The problem is that WikiLeaks – whose mission statement was ‘to produce . . . a more just society . . . based upon truth’ – has been guilty of the same obfuscation and misinformation as those it sought to expose, while its supporters are expected to follow, unquestioningly, in blinkered, cultish devotion".Toward the end of the article, she associated Assange with L Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology.
Khan has every right to criticize Assange, as anyone does in any case, yet her portrayal of WikiLeaks supporters as "cultish" is concerning. It corrals together countless people from all over the world and all walks of life and portrays them as worshipers of a personality.
In the same article, Khan wrote about her concern involving two women in
Journalist Glenn Greenwald responded to those people hailing Khan’s action. He pointed out that Assange, like every other public figures is subject to criticism. Yet, he opined how this is nothing to do with courage and that there is nothing brave about criticizing "easily one of the most hated people by western governments and establishment media outlets". When the larger scale of justice is so out of balance, perception is easily distorted. In light of three years of prolonged character assassination, there is little balance to begin with in mainstream discussions of this situation. This word ‘cult’ being used by a high profile person like Khan spread like a contagion to extend character assassination to all supporters of Assange. It has helped obscure or delegitimize the very real threats to WikiLeaks and Assange by the most powerful political and military force in the world and to marginalize supporters in the eyes of the public. Most of all, it aids the normalization of systemic injustice.
Established media has become a blatant mouthpiece for power with monopolized airwaves and manipulation of content. Now people are stepping up to crowd-source information through social media and have begun to counter the drastically tilted scale so weighted toward entrenched power. One might call it cultish devotion or see it as supporting a move toward a more just society.
Jemima Khan is the executive producer of the recent film about WikiLeaks called "We Steal Secrets". She wrote about a conversation she had with Assange about the film:
"I suggested that he view it not in terms of being pro or anti-him, but rather as a film that would be fair and represents the truth. It would directly address the claims of his critics, which needed to be included so that the film could be seen as balanced and could reach people beyond the WikiLeaks congregation. He allegedly replied: ‘If it’s a fair film, it will be pro-Julian Assange.’"Whether Assange actually said those words is not clear. Yet, put into actual context, this statement is true. When the scale of justice and ‘perception management’ has already tilted so severely anti-Assange, with years of unprecedented character attacks and often outright lies repeated thousands of times, any real attempt to bring balance to the discussion naturally would have to bring verifiable facts that tend to vindicate Assange’s legal and ethical positions. One does not reach this conclusion from blind worship, but can get there through an open-eyed commitment to restoring justice.
Simply using the title, "We Steal Secrets" directly misrepresents what WikiLeaks does. WikiLeaks doesn’t steal secrets, so a film said to portray WikiLeaks in a neutral way starts out with a misrepresentation right in the title itself. No matter how one tries to justify it, this appears to follow the other anti-WikiLeaks scripts.
Rebalancing the scale of justice depends on each person developing a sense for what is right and also what is true. History has shown how, once the scale of justice is broken by vested interests it leads society toward despotism. We have seen this in the decline of the
Nozomi Hayase is a contributing writer to Culture Unplugged, and a global citizen blogger, at Journaling Between Worlds. She can be reached at: nozomimagine@gmail.com
For research
purposes, specific subjects can be located in the following alphabetized index,
and searched on the blog using the search box. The search box is located
in the upper left corner of the webpage.
Newsletter Index: http://omnicenter.org/dick-bennetts-peace-justice-and-ecology-newsletters/dicks-newsletter-index/
Newsletter Index: http://omnicenter.org/dick-bennetts-peace-justice-and-ecology-newsletters/dicks-newsletter-index/
No comments:
Post a Comment