OMNI
WIKILEAKS/ASSANGE
NEWSLETTER #10,
January
30, 2012.
Compiled
by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace
(#9 July 21, 2011).
Here
is the link to all OMNI newsletters: http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/ For a knowledge-based peace, justice, and
ecology movement and an informed citizenry as the foundation for change. Here is the link to the Index: http://www.omnicenter.org/omni-newsletter-general-index/
See Manning Newsletters and Snowden.
Contents of #9 Wikileaks/Assange
Timothy Vaslett: Defense of WikiLeaks, Assange, Manning
Vaslett, Anonymous: Monkeywrenching to Defend WikiLeaks
Amnesty International Praises
WikiLeaks
Assange Wins Gellhorn Prize
WikiLeaks Blog by Greg Mitchell
Contents of #10
Help Wikileaks Expose
Petition for Assange
Rolling Stone Interview of Assange
US Persecution from Manning to Assange
Manning Opponent of War Crimes
Assange and Manning for Nobel Peace
Prize
Tens of Thousands More
Justice Foreclosed
Films About Assange
Here
is the link to all the newsletters on all subjects archived in the OMNI web
site: http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/
Help #WikiLeaks Liberate the
Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiating Text!
Just Foreign Policy
info@justforeignpolicy.org via uark.edu
August 17, 2012 to jbennet
Dear Dick,
Help free the TPP! Make a pledge to
donate to WikiLeaks should it publish the TPP text--and check out the campaign!
Take ActionOn September 6, negotiators
will go to Leesburg , Virginia , for the latest round of secretive talks on the "Trans-Pacific
Partnership" agreement. This proposed agreement threatens access to
essential medicines in developing countries, threatens environmental
regulations, and threatens internet freedom. Even Members of Congress and their
staffs have been blocked from seeing the draft text, while corporate representatives
have been allowed to see it.
Americans - and citizens of the other
countries that would be covered by the agreement - have a right to see what our
governments are proposing to do. Parts of the draft negotiating text have been
leaked. We want to see the whole text!
So we're issuing a reward for the
liberation of the TPP negotiating text. But our reward has some special
features: we want as many people as possible to contribute what they can to
raise the reward. That means you.
Check out the campaign and make a
pledge here: http://www.freetpp.org
So why are we trying to raise a reward
for WikiLeaks to publish the TPP?
First of all, we want WikiLeaks to
publish the text. We want this because it will show that WikiLeaks is still
relevant to citizen demands for government transparency, that releasing U.S. diplomatic
cables wasn't the end of WikiLeaks' contribution to public knowledge of
government misdeeds. And we want this because it will show that the WikiLeaks
campaign for government transparency isn't just about national security issues.
This week, Ecuador
granted political asylum to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange from the threat of
political persecution by the United
States - as thousands of Americans had urged
them to do through Just Foreign Policy's petition. But the UK authorities have refused to grant Assange
safe passage to Ecuador , and
he remains trapped in Ecuador 's
embassy. Meanwhile, the corporate financial blockade of WikiLeaks has starved
WikiLeaks of resources, while the legal fight to protect Assange from the
threat of extradition to the United
States has drained resources.
The reward isn't to whoever leaks the
document, but to WikiLeaks if it publishes the document. In addition to helping
WikiLeaks, this path will shield the leaker against any claim that they leaked
the document for personal gain. It will be clear that they leaked the document
to promote the public interest.
Second, we're
"crowdsourcing" our reward. Instead of asking one rich person to put
up the money for a reward, we're asking you to make a pledge to make a
financial contribution to WikiLeaks, if WikiLeaks publishes the draft TPP
negotiating text. If many people make small pledges, that will add up to a big
reward. And the reward will grow over time, dramatizing public concern about
the secretive TPP negotiations, about the lack of transparency [1], about the
threat to access to essential medicines in developing countries [2], about the
threat to environmental regulation [3], and about the threat to internet freedom.
[4]
Can you help us launch this campaign
by making a pledge to donate to WikiLeaks if it publishes the draft TPP
negotiating text? You can make your pledge here:
http://www.freetpp.org
Thank you for all you do to help bring
about a more just foreign policy,
Robert Naiman, Chelsea Mozen, Sarah
Burns and Megan Iorio
Just Foreign Policy
Please support our work. Donate for a
Just Foreign Policy.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate
References:
1. "Trans-Pacific Partnership
Talks: Senators Demand Access To Controversial Documents After Leak," Zach
Carter, Huffington Post, 06/25/2012,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/25/trans-pacific-partnership-documents-sherrod-brown-jeff-merkley-ron-wyden-robert-menendez_n_1624956.html
2. "Trading Away Health: How the
U.S.’s Intellectual Property Demands for the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Agreement Threaten Access to Medicines," Issue Brief, MSF Access Campaign,
August 2012,
http://aids2012.msf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/TPP-Issue-Brief-IAC-July2012.pdf
3. " The Trans-Pacific
Partnership Agreement (aka NAFTA on Steroids): What it could mean for the
Environment ," Sierra Club,
http://www.sierraclub.org/trade/downloads/TPP-Factsheet.pdf
4. "Trans-Pacific Partnership
Agreement," Electronic Frontier Foundaton, https://www.eff.org/issues/tpp
UK :
Don't Allow US
Extradition of Assange
Since June 19, Wikileaks' Julian
Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London while his application for political
asylum is reviewed. Meanwhile, Ecuadorean officials have been trying to reach a
diplomatic resolution by seeking assurances from the US ,
UK , and Swedish governments
that Assange will not be extradited to the United
States if he travels to Sweden for questioning. But all
three governments have remained silent on the issue. It is also being reported
that the Swedish government has refused an offer to interview Assange at the
Ecuadorean embassy.
But there is still hope. A senior
legal advisor to the Ecuadoreans told the Guardian that the UK must waive what is called “specialty” for
Assange to be extradited to the US
after proceedings in Sweden
are complete. If the UK were
to give assurances that they would not waive specialty, Assange would be safe
to venture to Sweden
for questioning.
To date, there hasn't been much public
pressure on the UK
government to declare its intentions with regard to Assange. Let's change that.
Sign our petition pressing the UK
to publicly declare that it will not waive specialty in the case of Julian
Assange.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/uk-dont-allow-us-extradition-assange
Thanks!
US the Real Betrayer
“Michael Hastings Interview With
Julian Assange”
Rolling Stone, January 18, 2012, RSN
Excerpt: "'The question is, where
has the United States
betrayed Madison and Jefferson, betrayed these basic values on how you keep a
democracy? I think that the US
military-industrial complex and the majority of politicians in Congress have
betrayed those values.'"
READ MORE http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/367-wikileaks/9503-focus-michael-hastings-interview-with-julian-assange
Subject: Manning & Assange: Manning Prosecution Lays Basis for Terror
Charge Against Assange By Naomi Spencer The United States government is
seeking to use its prosecution of Manning, to lay the basis for extraditing
Assange to the US and either prosecuting him as a terrorist or locking him away
indefinitely in a military prison without any recourse to the courts or due
process. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30075.htm
Bradley Manning: Traitor or Hero? By Marjorie CohnIf
Manning had committed war crimes
instead of exposing them, he would be a free man today. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30071.html
From Sue S 12-26-11
Bradley Manning, Julian Assange
Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
DJ Pangburn, Death And Taxes Magazine, Sept. 29, 2011
Pangburn writes: "And while a
Nobel Peace Prize nomination might not help Manning avoid prison time or get
Assange released from house arrest and his legal charade, it certainly is a
form of vindication for both men; many people across the world admire their
principled stand."
READ MORE http://www.readersupportednews.org/opinion2/287-124/7637-bradley-manning-julian-assange-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize
WikiLeaks Publishes Tens of Thousands
More Cables
Mark Hosenball, Reuters, August 26,
2011
WikiLeaks is in the process of
releasing tens of thousands of previously unpublished U.S. diplomatic cables, some of
which are still classified.
READ MORE http://www.readersupportednews.org/news-section2/367-wikileaks/7188-wikileaks-publishes-tens-of-thousands-more-cables
For Julian Assange, Justice Foreclosed
·
Every once in a while, a situation arises
that so completely captures the spirit of the time—in this case, the horror
moving like an amoeba under the surface of our pleasant days, our absurd
distractions, our seemingly serious politics—that ordinary assumptions,
ordinary arguments and their limited conclusions serve only to obliterate
honesty, and so any hope of grappling with the real. Such is the case of Julian
Assange now.
About the Author
JoAnn Wypijewski is a writer in New
York . Contact her at jwyp at earthlink.net.
Also by the Author
For what the ancients called avarice and
iniquity, Alex’s hate was pure. No writer had a deadlier sting against the
corruptions of empire.
When it comes to the distant past, there’s
a lot we don’t know about what occurred sexually.
He is the wanted man. Wanted for the
purpose of conducting criminal proceedings, ostensibly on sexual misconduct
allegations in Sweden , but
maybe not; maybe on charges of espionage or conspiracy in the United States instead; maybe to
face indefinite detention, maybe torture or life in prison. It’s so hard to
know… But one thing is not mysterious: the law is no more capable of delivering
justice in his case today than it was for a black man alleged to have raped a
white woman in the Jim Crow South.
I am not comparing the founder of
WikiLeaks, a white man benefiting from not only white-skin privilege and
straight-man privilege but also class and celebrity privilege, with black men
on the other side of a lynch mob. This is not about the particulars of
oppression; it is about the political context of law, the limits of liberal
expectations and the monstrosity of the state.
Liberals have no trouble generally
acknowledging that in those rape cases against black men, the reasoned
application of law was impossible. It was impossible because justice was
impossible, foreclosed not by the vagaries of this white jury or that bit of
evidence but by the totalizing immorality of white supremacy that placed the
Black Man in a separate category of human being, without common rights and
expectations. A lawyer might take a case if it hadn’t been settled by the mob,
but the warped conscience of white America could do nothing but warp
the law and make of its rituals a sham. The Scottsboro Boys might have been
innocent or they might have been guilty; it didn’t matter, because either way
the result would be the same.
With Assange, the political context is the
totalizing immorality of the national security state on a global scale. The
sex-crime allegations against Assange emerged in Sweden
on August 20, 2010, approximately four and a half months after WikiLeaks blazed
into the public sphere by releasing a classified video that showed a US Apache
helicopter crew slaughtering more than a dozen civilians, including two
journalists, in a Baghdad
suburb. By that August, Pfc. Bradley Manning, the reputed source of the video
and about 750,000 other leaked government documents, was being held without
charge in solitary confinement at the Marine Corps brig in Quantico , subjected to what his attorney,
David Coombs, describes in harrowing detail in a recent motion as “unlawful
pretrial punishment.” In plain terms, Manning was tortured. He faces
court-martial for aiding the enemy and has been denounced as a traitor by
members of Congress.
For disseminating classified materials that
exposed war crimes, Assange has been called a terrorist. A coloring book for
children, The True Faces of Evil—Terror, from Big Coloring Books Inc.
out of St. Louis ,
includes his face on a sheet of detachable trading cards, along with Timothy
McVeigh, Jared Lee Loughner, Ted Kaczynski, Maj. Nidal Hasan and Bill Ayers. A
commentator on Fox News urged President Obama to order his assassination. Vice
President Joe Biden called him a “high-tech terrorist” and suggested that the
Justice Department might be angling for a prosecution; that was two years ago.
Indications of a secret grand jury investigation and imminent indictment have
helped ratchet up the rhetoric and tension in and around the Ecuadorian embassy
in London ,
where Assange has received political asylum.
It has been common for the media to
compartmentalize: on the one hand, there are complaints of sexual misconduct
against Assange by two women in Sweden, which must be seen as a straightforward
matter for law enforcement; on the other hand, there is his political activity,
also his “attention-seeking,” “narcissism” and “arrogance,” which, come to
think of it, sound a lot like traits in a rapist’s profile. Only rarely has
anyone—notably Naomi Wolf and the team from the Australian Broadcasting
Corporation’s Four Corners program—begun with the intrinsic political
challenge posed by WikiLeaks and proceeded from there to scrutinize the Swedish
prosecutorial machinery.
That machinery is tricky. Police were so
quick to initiate the arrest process that one of the women who came to them—to
see if Assange could be forced to take an STD test after she’d had unprotected
sex with him—became distraught and refused to give further testimony. The
Swedish prosecutor’s office issued an arrest warrant for rape and molestation
on one day and withdrew it the next, saying there was no reason to suspect
rape, and that the other claim wasn’t serious enough for a warrant. About a
week later, the Swedish director of prosecution reopened the investigation, and
a court later approved her request to detain Assange for rape, molestation and
unlawful coercion. By then he was in London ,
having been told he was free to leave Sweden . Assange was working with
the New York Times and the Guardian in advance of launching the
Iraq War Logs when the Swedes issued an international arrest warrant. He was
readying the release of a cache of diplomatic cables when Interpol got
involved, issuing a “red notice” for his arrest. In London , his legal efforts to block
extradition were rejected by the High Court—whose strained decision was praised
by the New Statesman’s David Allen Green as the ultimate in reasoned
justice—and by the UK Supreme Court.
If the Swedish claims against Assange had
involved anything but sex, it’s unlikely that liberals, and even some
self-described radicals, would be tiptoeing around this part of the story,
either by asking “So I guess he’s a bad guy?” or by arguing “Of course he needs
to answer for his crimes.” If it were anything but sex, we would insist on the
presumption of innocence. We have instead gotten comfortable with presuming
guilt and trusting in the dignified processes of law to guarantee fairness.
“Believe the victim” entered the lexicon
decades ago for historically understandable reasons. Women had been denied
their own due process, in a sense—their right to make a complaint and expect
justice, not vilification or worse. They are still being denied and derided, as
the idiot spewings of Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin illustrate. The
mutation of basic rights into an imperative for belief, and of full citizens
into victims, has not made women any safer, but its cultural
manipulation—particularly in high-profile cases—has struck at the foundations
of civil liberty in a way that may not have been anticipated.
So here is the spectacle of Assange, as yet
unindicted, bearing the dual brand of Sex Offender and Terrorist, the subhuman
beings of the twenty-first century. The fusing of abuse and terror in his case
thus implies two victims who must be believed, the women and the state. But the
women’s claims are murky, and the state is not credible.
It should be possible to imagine a
resolution outside the criminal justice system for problems that arise in the
course of consensual sexual coupling: dissatisfaction over the use (or ill use)
of condoms, constraints that keep people from expressing their wishes or
intuiting those of another, selfishness, insensitivity, confusions as “yes”
slides into “no” and back to “yes,” perhaps wordlessly—all issues that seem to
apply in the Assange case but exist beyond it. That will require a braver
sexual politics (and at least another column), and it does not demean
experience to recognize that the language of punishment is a poor substitute
for the lost language of love.
About the state, though, there must be no
illusions. A nation that goes to war on fraud, that insists “We don’t torture”
when evidence to the contrary abounds, that kidnaps foreign nationals and puts
them on planes to be delivered to dungeons, that spies on its people, asserts
its right to lock them up indefinitely and lets documented CIA torturers off
the hook of accountability because they were only following orders: that nation
will plot, and it will double-cross, and it will kill. Sweden participated in the US program of
extraordinary rendition. The United Kingdom
has threatened to storm Ecuador ’s
embassy. The United States
now says it does not recognize the historic right of persons to seek diplomatic
asylum. Assange’s lawyers have said that he will go to Sweden if he
gets an absolutely firm guarantee from the Obama administration that it will
not arrest him. Such a guarantee is impossible in an empire of lies.
FILMS ABOUT ASSANGE
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:55 PM,
Susan wrote:
http://t.co/Hc6psnUR
thanks for sending this, I will share it
I watched the 19min animation description of the charges being filed against Assange
and will watch the remaining 46min video about the case later
the topic is also a movie entitled "we steal secrets" shown at sundance this yr. interesting prof producer who seems convinced that assange should be extradited to sweden, came across with a lot of double talk in his interview on Democracy Now, I smell a rat
interesting indeed, assange SHOULD not be having unprotected sex with people he hardly knew but there are MANY men who would be behind bars for practising the same stupid behavior if that was going to make them a criminal (from David Druding)
I watched the 19min animation description of the charges being filed against Assange
and will watch the remaining 46min video about the case later
the topic is also a movie entitled "we steal secrets" shown at sundance this yr. interesting prof producer who seems convinced that assange should be extradited to sweden, came across with a lot of double talk in his interview on Democracy Now, I smell a rat
interesting indeed, assange SHOULD not be having unprotected sex with people he hardly knew but there are MANY men who would be behind bars for practising the same stupid behavior if that was going to make them a criminal (from David Druding)
No comments:
Post a Comment