Saturday, October 29, 2016


OMNI Building a Culture of PEACE, Justice, and Ecology.  Compiled by Dick Bennett.
(See #1, June 14, 2007; #2, January 8, 2008; #3 May 16, 2008; #4 June 10; 2009,  #5 July 23, 2009, ; #6 Sept. 21, 2009; #7 August 29, 2010; #8 April 11, 2011; #9 August 4, 2011; #10 Feb. 27, 2012; #11 April 4, 2012; #12 June 27, 2012; #13 July 27, 2012; #14 August 11, 2012; #15, Dec. 4, 2012; #16 July 20, 2013; #17 Dec. 17, 2014; #18 Feb. 8, 2014; $19, May 25, 2014)

Imagine a world free of nuclear weapons, be committed to that goal, join OMNI to strive with others for that goal.  OMNI, a northwest Arkansas advocacy organization, is part of the international peace, justice, and ecology movement against the US NATIONAL SECURITY STATE:   the CORPORATE-PENTAGON-CONGRESS-PRESIDENT-SECRECY-SURVEILLANCE-IMPERIAL-NUCLEAR Complex.

For eight years, these 20 OMNI newsletters, related newsletters (Hiroshima/Nagasaki, etc.), the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology (founded in 2001); WAND in Little Rock; and Little Rock’s Arkansas Center for Peace and Justice have been Arkansas’ sustained resistance to militarism and nuclear weapons, and advocates of the Nuclear Abolition Movement. 

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 6/9
Nuclear Abolition Day June 2. 
International Day against Nuclear Tests August 29.

OMNI’s NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL DAYS PROJECT:  Castle Bravo Explosion 60 Anniversary Feb. 28, 2015.



No. 19 at end of this newsletter.

Contents Nuclear Weapons Abolition #20, 2016
Poem,  “Silos” by Gerald Sloan

Keep Informed
Nuclear Calendar

NAPF Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
Ground Zero Center vs. Tridents
Three Articles from Ground Zero Newsletter
Global Zero, Nuclear Abolition
Marshall Islands Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
Council for a Livable World
Roots Action vs. Missile “Defense”
Ploughshares Fund

Koehler:  Militarized, Nuclear USA Needs a New Vision
Books by Joseph Cirincione

Civil Disobedience
Transform Now Ploughshares Actions

With Allies Like This:  UK Nuclear War Preparation

Call Your Congressmen and the President

Newsletter #19

By Gerald Sloan

Some phallic and shamelessly on display
while others are secretly tucked away,
they signify our national obsession
of preservation versus obliteration.
It's not like we're allowed to choose

which silo we would prefer to use,
the one to house our excess grain,
the other to drown us in black rain,
as though such a strange foreign policy
might somehow resemble democracy.

Partly nspired by the near-disaster at Damascus in central Arkansas when a Titan II missile almost exploded, about which a book has been written, Command and Control,  and a new film produced.  --Dick

Subscribe to the Nuclear Calendar

Subscribe to this weekly update of national and international events related to nuclear weapons and proliferation issues, which is emailed to more than 14,000 people each week.

Email Address
Sign Up
See the 12-month calendar online.

Example from July 5

A Quaker Lobby in the Public Interest

Nuclear Calendar

July 5, 2016

An email version of the Nuclear Calendar is published every Monday morning when Congress is in session. Subscribe on FCNL's website. Unsubscribe by sending an email
© 2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation, 245 Second Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20002 | 202-547-6000 |
The editor is David Culp. The publication is made possible by generous contributions from the Lippincott Foundation, the Nuclear Threat Initiative, the Ploughshares Fund, an anonymous foundation, and the individual contributors and supporters of the Friends Committee on National Legislation and the FCNL Education Fund.

Anti-Nuclear Weapons Organizations

International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.
You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 7/25/15
WHY A BAN? thanksprotest. The case for a ban treaty. Nuclear ...
RESOURCES. Publications. ICAN has produced a suite of high ...

Sunflower Newsletter
Action Alert Network
Help us create a more peaceful and nuclear weapons-free world.
Our Combined Federal Campaign number is 12455
What Is the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation?
A voice of conscience in the Nuclear Age.  The Foundation views peace as an imperative of the Nuclear Age, believing that any war fought today has the potential to become a nuclear war of mass annihilation. An advocate for peace,…
May 2, 2016
Sunflower Newsletter: May 2016
View More...
April 25, 2016
We Stand With the Marshall Islands
View More...
April 21, 2016
NAPF Letter to the Editor of the Washington Post
View More...
"The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has a vision for a better world - I endorse their work and encourage those who are complacent to make a life long commitment and to join the winning side."

Archbishop Desmond Tutu
NAPF Advisory Council & Nobel Peace Laureate

SSBN-X Program for New Trident Fleet Would Ensure a Dangerous World for the Next Generation
Even though there has been little coverage of it in the Sun, I am concerned about Navy plans to continue to deploy nuclear missiles on board a new generation of Trident submarines, designated SSBN-Xs. Apart from the billions of dollars slated to be spent on the follow-on to the Trident subs, which take money from other more worthy programs and needs, the SSBN-X program continues a legacy whose time has gone. At a time when the United States is leading the way to ensure that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon, it is hypocritical of the country to be forging ahead with a program that will allow it to deploy first-strike nuclear weapons from hidden submarines for decades to come. At this year’s NPT review conference, many nations, looking at programs such as the SSBN-X, were rightfully alarmed and indignant at the U.S.’s blatant disregard for its legal obligation to achieve nuclear disarmament. Replacing the existing Trident fleet with the SSBN-X is a step in the wrong direction. As a father, I want to leave my daughter a world that is better than the one I inherited when I was born at the height of the Cold War. Which is a better world: one with nuclear-armed submarines ready to rain fire and radiation indiscriminately at a moment’s notice, or a world in which such weapons are part of history? I call on our congressional delegation to rethink the SSBN-X program, and to bring the Trident program to an end.


Leonard Eiger.  “No One Should Have Their Finger on the Button: Kazakhstan Shows How Disarmament Can Happen.”  Ground Zero (October 2016). 
     That South Africa stands as the world's first case of nuclear rollback is well-known (google South Africa’s nuclear weapons).   But you might not remember Kazakhstan’s remarkable rejection of its nuclear stockpile.   On August 29, 1991, Kazakhstan-- the president, Nursultan Nazarbayev--not only gave up its arsenal of nuclear weapons, but also closed its nation’s nuclear test site.  (For close-up reporting on US nuclear activities this magazine is very helpful.  Its headquarters is near the US Triton submarines base:  see the following article.)
     “There are…far too many nations today,” Eiger writes,  “including our own, that continue to deploy nuclear weapons in a constant state of readiness, ready to perpetrate genocide on an unimaginable and horrific scale.”  Eiger might have added, and surely an increasing number of world citizens will add, that this danger of nuclear planetary, species genocide will soon be matched by the increasing climate catastrophe, unless fossil fuels are henceforth kept in the ground and massive adaptation investments are initiated.

Sue Ablao.  “What Else Could We Spend a Trillion Dollars On?”  Ground Zero (October 2016).

“In the next 30 years, this government is set to spend one TRILLION dollars to replace, upgrade and maintain these weapons of mass destruction.  In the meantime, our infrastructure is crumbling….” (long list follows).  “So what could one trillion dollars get us today?  Just one example: Investing in the education sector would create 26.7 million jobs….”


What’s this?  “Over an 18-month period between December 2008 and mid-2010…two hundred cement trucks entered the base every two weeks.”  (Hint: military-industrial complex, though not very helpful given its voracious use of cement.)

Hans M. Kristensen.  “Navy Quietly Builds New Underground Nuclear Weapons Storage Facility.”  Ground Zero (October 2016).  At a cost of $294 million, the US Navy has built a new underground nuclear weapons storage complex at Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor near Seattle. Its estimated 1,300 nuclear warheads possess a combined explosive power equivalent to more than 14,000 Hiroshima bombs.”   The weapons serve the Tridents submarine base there.  Read for storage details.  [One question: did the Navy really include “blast-resistant doors”?  14,000 Hiroshima bombs?   Shouldn’t they rather move Seattle to east of the Rockies?  Of course the answer is: Abolish the Bombs.—Dick]

Lilly Daigle, Global Zero  via 
8:01 PM (22 hours ago)
to me  3-24-16

Dear Dick,

The Nuclear Security Summit is part good news, part bad news.

First, the good news. Global leaders are getting together to talk about a really important topic: how to prevent nuclear terrorism.

And the bad news: Nuclear weapons are not on the agenda. And you can’t definitively prevent nuclear terrorism as long as nuclear weapons still exist.

Thousands of Global Zero supporters like you have taken action to let world leaders know that “security” is not 15,000 nuclear weapons, and that we demand urgent action to eliminate them.

I’m emailing you today to let you know that we’re taking the momentum from this call to action and staging a protest at the 2016 NSS in Washington, DC. I hope you’ll stand with me in solidarity.

Stand with Global Zero protesters at the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, DC. Join and share our Facebook event far and wide -- no matter where you live.

We can’t let this protest happen in a vacuum -- we need to remind world leaders that you can’t discuss nuclear “security” without discussing the existential threat posed by nuclear weapons.

By joining our Facebook event, you’ll be letting both protesters in DC as well as leaders from around the world know that there is a global movement behind the call to eliminate nuclear weapons.

We’re relying on you to make sure decision makers and international media hear us loud and clear. So join and share our event today.

Let Global Zero protesters in Washington, DC know that you stand with them in solidarity: Join the Facebook event and invite your friends to do the same, no matter where you live.

Fight on,
Lilly Daigle
U.S. Field Organizer
Global Zero
Global Zero is the international movement for the elimination of all nuclear weapons. Support the movement with a contribution here. Receiving emails is one of the best ways to stay up to date on our campaigns and actions. You can also like Global Zero on Facebook here and follow us on Twitter here. To stop receiving fundraising emails but stay on the Global Zero list, click here. If you really need to cut back, you can unsubscribe here. We're sad to see you go!
Sent by GLOBAL ZERO | 1436 U Street NW, Suite 401 | Washington, DC 20009 USA

Mar 1, 2015 - For a knowledge-based peace, justice, ... Dick, Marshall Islands Nuclear Zero LawsuitsNuclear ...
Aug 3, 2016 - (See OMNI's 2015 Hiroshima-Nagasaki Newsletter: ... With the Marshall Islands facing the rising ocean, U.S. nuclear and warming injury to innocents ... On April 24, 2014, the RMI filed nine groundbreaking lawsuits at
Aug 6, 2015 - Sisters have attended our Remembrance ever since OMNI began. ... and we publish newsletters and demonstrate against wars and nuclear dangers. ... MARSHALL ISLANDS LAWSUITS AGAINST THE NUCLEAR NATIONS. Contents of ... The Abolitionist. Nuclear Zero, Marshall Islands Lawsuits Update July 8, 2015.

FOLLOW US: Follow Us on Twitter Join Us on Facebook
Dear Dick,
It only takes one nuclear weapon to inflict unfathomable destruction. 10 nuclear weapons would inflict devastation never before seen in human history. 100 nuclear weapons would destroy global civilization. 

But today we have more than 15,000 nuclear weapons across the globe.
Together, we can keep the world livable. 
John Tierney, Executive Director
Member of Congress (former)  2015
New Donate.png
Don't want to donate online? Mail a check made out to the candidate of your choice to:
322 4th Street NE Washington, DC 20002 | Tel: (202) 543-4100
Council for A Livable World © 2016 All rights reserved.

No to Missile "Defense" Sites in Ohio, Mich., NY
RootsAction 6-18-16 Team via 
8:49 AM (9 hours ago)
to James
No to New Missile Sites in U.S.

GRAPHIC: Sign here button
The U.S. military has now built missile "defense" sites in Alaska and California (as well as Romania, and under construction in Poland). Next will be New York, Michigan, or Ohio, unless we can stop them.

Please click here to modify and personalize the following draft comments, and to email them and make them part of the public record to be addressed in the final Environmental Impact Statement. 

I strongly oppose building a Ground-Based Mid-Course Missile "Defense" system in New York, Ohio, Michigan, or anywhere else on earth.

These missiles are a highly provocative part of the U.S. arms race, taken as hostile by Russia and China. Arguments in Washington, D.C., for a militarized defense against a supposed Russian threat were rejected by a senior Pentagon officer in Politico on May 12, 2016, in these terms:

"The Army is looking for a purpose, and a bigger chunk of the budget. And the best way to get that is to paint the Russians as being able to land in our rear and on both of our flanks at the same time. What a crock."

Bureaucracy and profiteering are not sufficient justification for constructing these counterproductive systems, which will endanger, rather than protect, us, damage the natural environment, and waste huge sums of money needed for useful projects that answer legitimate human needs.

Click here to submit your comments.

After submitting your commentsplease use the tools on the next webpage to share this action with your friends.

Please forward this email to everyone you can so that we can send more comments before the July 18th deadline.

This work is only possible with your financial support. Please chip in $3 now. 

-- The Team

P.S. RootsAction is an independent online force endorsed by Jim Hightower, Barbara Ehrenreich, Cornel West, Daniel Ellsberg, Glenn Greenwald, Naomi Klein, Bill Fletcher Jr., Laura Flanders, former U.S. Senator James Abourezk, Coleen Rowley, Frances Fox Piven, Lila Garrett, Phil Donahue, Sonali Kolhatkar, and many others.

Organizing Notes: Public Comments Needed on New 'Missile Defense' Deployments
Politico: The U.S. Army’s War Over Russia


Ploughshares Fund
Ploughshares Fund
Joseph Cirincione is president of Ploughshares Fund, a global security foundation. ... He is the author of the new book Nuclear Nightmares: Securing the World Before It ... He is the author of hundreds of articles on nuclear weapons issues, the ...



“Hair-Trigger Alert: On Bombs, Guns, and the Failure of America” By Robert C. Koehler

'Washington, we have a problem.' (Photo: Wendy/flickr/cc)
I feel the finger on the trigger. I also feel it on the button.
“Dear President Obama,” the letter begins. It goes on to remind him of something he said in his 2008 presidential campaign: “Keeping nuclear weapons ready to launch on a moment’s notice is a dangerous relic of the Cold War. Such policies increase the risk of catastrophic accidents or miscalculation.”
The letter, from the Union of Concerned Scientists, is signed by 90 scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates. It continues: “After your election, you called for taking ‘our nuclear weapons off hair-trigger alert.’”
Presidential campaigns, mass killings, war . . . nuclear war. Washington, we have a problem.
The time has come for extraordinary change. Who we are — this monstrous, planet-destroying entity called America — needs to be decommissioned and reconstructed on a foundation more solid than the present myths of greatness, greed and entitlement. We need a new vision, a manifestation of the moral intelligence that is also part of who we are: a vision of how this nuclear-armed, gun-saturated nation can disarm itself and, in the process, become a force for real peace.
“We urge you,” the scientists write, “to take U.S. land-based missiles off hair-trigger alert and to remove from U.S. war plans the option of launching these weapons on warning. The United States should encourage Russia to follow suit, but it should not wait to act. Taking these steps would have profound security benefits for all Americans by reducing the risk of nuclear disaster.”
I think about this in the context of the Orlando murders and see a gruesome similarity between U.S. militarism and the violent forays of armed loners — and the “concentrated horror” both inflict. The main difference, as far as I can tell, is that the human carnage and environmental destruction resulting from U.S. militarism remain emotionally invisible, you might say, to the American public.
In a powerful essay at TomDispatch, William J. Astore, a retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel, takes a harsh look at the wars we have waged from on high since World War II, noting that “for all its promise of devastating power delivered against enemies with remarkable precision and quick victories at low cost (at least to Americans), air power has failed to deliver, not just in the ongoing war on terror but for decades before it. If anything, by providing an illusion of results, it has helped keep the United States in unwinnable wars, while inflicting a heavy toll on innocent victims on our distant battlefields.”
He adds: “At the same time, the cult-like infatuation of American leaders, from the president on down, with the supposed ability of the U.S. military to deliver such results remains remarkably unchallenged in Washington.”
He points out that in the Korean War, in the early ’50s, the U.S. pounded North Korea with 635,000 tons of bombs and 32,557 tons of napalm. Cities were leveled, but the war ended in no better than a stalemate; more than half a century later, Korea remains a bitterly divided nation.
Then came a decade of war in Southeast Asia. By the time this pointless war ended in dishonorable defeat, the U.S. had dropped, according to Astore, “a staggering seven million tons of bombs, the equivalent in explosive yield to more than 450 Hiroshimas,” on Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. We also poisoned the jungle with defoliants, having given ourselves free rein to commit environmental carnage with horrific consequences well into the unforeseeable future for absurdly limited tactical ends.
It took a decade and a half for the military-industrialists to overcome “Vietnam syndrome,” the public’s weariness of war, but eventually they were able to put Iraq in the crosshairs, devastating the country with bombs and missiles — including munitions made of depleted uranium — over the course of several decades, spreading immediate carnage and long-lasting genetic damage, all of course to no end except endless war.
And the War on Terror, which I call the War To Promote Terror, is still going on 15 years later, with no end in sight. The funding for it is unquestioned and seemingly limitless. The point of it is also unquestioned, except at the social and political margins. It certainly is unquestioned in the 2016 presidential race, especially the winnowed down version of it — Trump vs. Clinton — that’s left. The military-corporate branch of the American government remains well beyond public reach.
And so I think about the Orlando murders and the unending grief they have caused in the context of all the murders the U.S. and its allies and its enemies have committed in the name of war.
And I think about the congressional failure to enact any legislation in regard to the sale of assault weapons in the context of the letter 90 scientists associated with the Union of Concerned Scientists wrote to President Obama, reminding him that before he was president he expressed awareness of the danger of having nuclear weapons on hair-trigger alert, and asking him to remove the 450 land-based nuclear missiles (but not the submarine-based missiles) from high alert.
And I wonder at my certainty that the request will be ignored. And I wonder what will happen next.


Top of Form
Bottom of Form, Inc.
Editorial Reviews. Review. Invaluable... [Bomb Scare] ought to be read by everyone as a matter ... Joseph Cirincione has written a 'must read' book for students, scholars, and policymakers alike. He has ... Strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation regime is identified by Cirincione as the guiding principle of any such policy.  Columbia University
Joseph Cirincione surveys the best thinking and worst fears of experts specializing innuclear warfare and assesses the efforts to reduce or eliminate these ... › ... › Arms Control  Google Books
Mar 23, 2007 - A unique blend of history, theory, and security analysis, Bomb Scare not ... the atomic discoveries of the 1930s, Joseph Cirincione unravels the ...
Since their inception, nuclear weapons have multiplied at analarming rate, ... JosephCirincione ... Try searching on JSTOR for other items related to this book.
 Rating: 3.5 - ‎100 votes
With clarity and expertise, Joseph Cirincione presents an even-handed look at the history of .... This book contains a useful brief history of nuclear weapons.
Jun 20, 2014 - Nuclear Nightmares: Securing the World Before It Is Too Late, JosephCirincione. Last, but not least, a book by one of our own, the president
Item #151954 ISBN: 0231135114 Since their inception, nuclear weapons ... With clarity and expertise, Joseph Cirincione presents an even-handed look at › Library › Book Reviews
Bomb Scare: The History and Future of Nuclear Weapons. by Joseph Cirincione. Reviewed November 29, 2007. Book Cover Today's headlines are filled with ...

John LaForge.  “U.S. Bows Out after Plowshares Conviction Is Vacated.”  The Free Weekly (Fayetteville, AR), 8-27-15.  An appeals court released the three Transform Now Plowshares protesters who poured blood on the Enriched Uranium facility in Oak ridge, TN, the court throwing out the sabotage convictions. A negative aspect of the ruling is the exposure of the ignorance of the court in its distinction between missile and research facility protest: missile protest is sabotage because it endangers US security.  But the US possesses such a plethora of missiles in its 3 tiers of weapons (450 Minuteman III missiles, dozens of nuclear-armed B-52 and B-2 bombers, and 14 Trident subs, each armed with 24 missiles, each of which carry five to eight nuclear war heads that can fly 6,000 miles) that the shutdown of one of these components would not diminish the ability of the US to “incinerate every major city on earth.”   John LaForge is on the staff of Nukewatch, a nuclear watchdog group based at the Plowshares Land Trust in Wisconsin, and edits its Quarterly.  --Dick 

Lib Dem conference: Activists reject 'scrap Trident' call
·         21 September 2015

·         From the sectionUK Politics
TridentImage copyrightPAImage captionThe UK currently has four Trident submarines, which can carry nuclear missiles
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron has survived a challenge over defence policy, after the party voted against scrapping Britain's nuclear weapons.
Some activists at the party conference had called for Trident to be axed, saying it was expensive and unnecessary.
But Mr Farron urged them not to back the motion, calling instead for a review to identify alternatives.
His position was endorsed by 579 votes to 447. Mr Farron said he was "very pleased with the result".
The vote - which was an early test of Mr Farron's leadership - means the party will vote against the like-for-like replacement of the Trident system but not endorse unilateral disarmament.

The article I read also by Lawless was about the Labor Party’s similar hesitation:  Jill Lawless, “British Party Drops Bid to Scrap Nukes,” Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Sept. 28, 2015).   Jeremy Corbyn, the new leader of the Labor Party, who opposes atomic weapons, was defeated in the policy vote especially by trade union rejection of Corbyn’s proposal because of fear of losing jobs.  Corbyn had said “Britain should get rid of its ‘ weapon of mass destruction’ and scrap the Trident nuclear program.”

Contents Nuclear Weapons Abolition #19, May 25, 2014
Anti-Nuclear Organizations
Nuclear Abolition Movement, ICAN
WAND in Action
Council for a Livable World
Latest No. of Nukewatch Quarterly
Catholic Opposition to Nuclear Weapons
    Transform Now Ploughshares
    John Laforge (Nukewatch) on TNP Protesters’ Release and Ignorance of
    The Catholic Worker (May 2014)
     Pax Christi
Articles on Nuclear Weapons, Dr. Strangelove, Radiation Experiments, and Radioactive Wastes
Marshall Islands Nuclear Zero Lawsuits,
Wellen on Masco, Nuclear Weapons Scientists
Schlosser, The New Yorker, a Recent Assessment of Dr. Strangelove
Glenn Alcalay, Radiation Experiments in Pacific, Marshall Islands
Robert Alvarez, US Military Radioactive Wastes

Call Your Congressmen and tell them you want them to work to abolish nuclear weapons, our only possible safety.
None of the senators or representatives publishes his e-mail address, but each can be contacted by filling in forms offered through his website.
Senator John Boozman: (202)224-4843
Senator Tom Cotton: (202)224-2353
Rep. Rick Crawford, 1st District: (202)225-4076
Rep. French Hill, 2nd District: (202)225-2506
Rep. Steve Womack, 3rd District: (202)225-4301
1119 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
3333 Pinnacle Hills, Suite 120
Rogers, Arkansas 72758
Rep. Bruce Westerman, 4th District: (202) 225-3772

President Barack Obama: Comments: 202-456-1111, Switchboard: 202-456-1414
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

For research purposes, specific subjects can be located in the following alphabetized index, and searched on the blog using the search box.  The search box is located in the upper left corner of the webpage.
Newsletter Index:


Dick's Wars and Warming KPSQ Radio Editorials (#1-48)

Dick's Wars and Warming KPSQ Radio Editorials (#1-48)