OMNI
WIKILEAKS/ASSANGE
NEWSLETTER #12, April 14, 2019
https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2019/04/wikileaksassange-newsletter-11-may-25.html
Compiled by Dick
Bennett for a Culture of Peace
(#9
July 21, 2011; #10, Jan. 30, 2012, #11, May 25, 2018).
Special connection to the University
of Arkansas is its motto “Veritate Duce Progredi.” To advance with truth as our leader.
See separate OMNI Manning Newsletters,
OMNI Investigative Journalism Newsletters, OMNI Whistleblower Newsletters, and
more.
http://omnicenter.org/donate/
OMNI’S REPORTING OF US
EFFORTS TO SILENCE ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS, ASSANGE
NEWSLETTER #6, 2-4-11
http://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2011/02/wikileaks-6.html
(#7 I couldn’t find
the http today)
WIKILEAKS, ASSANGE,
MANNING NEWSLETTER, #8, April 4, 2011 http://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2011/04/wikileaks-8.html
OMNI WIKILEAKS, ASSANGE, MANNING
NEWSLETTER #9, JULY 21, 2011,
Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace
http://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2011/07/wikileaks-newsletter-9.html
WIKILEAKS, ASSANGE,
MANNING NEWSLETTER #10, January 30,
2012. https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2019/04/wikileaksassange-newsletter-10-1-30-12.html
(go to Manning Newsletters)
WIKILEAKS/ASSANGE NEWSLETTER #11, May 25, 2018
https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2019/04/wikileaksassange-newsletter-11-may-25.html
Sample Bradley
Manning newsletter 2011 http://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2011/03/bradley-manning-in-danger-irish-call-to.html
WIKILEAKS/ASSANGE NEWSLETTER #12, 4-14-19
CONTENTS
3 NADG
Arrest Reports
Andy Greenberg. US Hacking
Case v. Assange
Tariq Ali. US Motives
to Punish Assange
US vs. Investigative Journalism.
Greenwald and Lee.
Pilger.
Tulsi. Political
Action to Defend Assange
Newsletter #11
TEXTS
ASSANGE ARRESTED, US REQUESTS EXTRADITION
Page one coverage in the Northwest
Arkansas Democrat -Gazette.
Staff. “Assange Extracted from
Embassy.” 4-12-19.
He is
charged by the US with hacking (“conspiracy-to-commit-computer-intrusion”)
“to help former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning break a password to
the Defense Department.” But no evidence
is presented showing their success.
Specifically he was jailed by the British for “breaching his bail
conditions.” Page one importance is enhanced
by his attorney’s claim that “’Journalists around the world should be deeply
troubled by these unprecedented criminal charges.”
Staff. “Assange Extradition
Raises Concern in U.K.” 4-13-19.
Labor
Party leader Jeremy Corbyn opposed extradition to the US seeks to punish him
for exposing “‘evidence of atrocities in
Iraq and Afghanistan.’” Officially he is
charged with “conspiring to break into a classified government computer at the
Pentagon.” The article gives
considerable history, background, and related matters (Trump’s earlier praise of
Wikileaks, his crackdown on leakers, Hillary Clinton, the Vault 7 leak
whistleblower, Daniel Ellsberg’s denunciation of criminalizing investigative
journalism).
Gregory Katz. (AP). “Britons Call for Sending Assange to Sweden,
if Rape Case Reopens.” 4-14-19. Elaborates on the preceding report especially on the possible
Swedish extradition. New are the
inquiries rising over Equador’s president Moreno ‘s possible corruption and “abandonment
of Assange,” and the role of Ola Bini, encryption expert.
(End NADG reports)
Robert Mackey. “Julian Assange Arrested in London
After Ecuador Withdraws Asylum; U.S. Requests Extradition. “ The Intercept (4-13-19).
READ THE STORY →
READ THE STORY →
FOR THE FIRST time since 2012, WikiLeaks founder Julian
Assange no longer has the legal protections of the Ecuadorean Embassy in
London. He now faces the criminal charges he's always suspected and
feared—although it's now clear that he's accused of criminal behavior not as a journalist,
or even a spy, but a hacker.
On Thursday, London's
metropolitan police physically dragged Assange out of his residence at the
embassy and into a police van. Hours later, a grand jury unsealed an indictment
against the WikiLeaks founder for one count of conspiracy to commit computer
intrusion. The UK government has already made clear that it carried out
Assange's arrest on behalf of the US government, implying that it intends to
comply with his extradition to the US to face those hacking charges.
The indictment—which you
can read in full below—centers on an incident nine years ago ago, when Assange
allegedly told his source, then Army private Chelsea Manning, that he would
help crack a password that would have given her deeper access to the military
computers from which she was leaking classified material to WikiLeaks.
"On or about March 8,
2010, Assange agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on United
States Department of Defense Computers connected to the Secret Internet
Protocol Network, a United States government network used for classified
documents and communications," the indictment reads, referring to the
Pentagon's SIPRNet network of computers that store classified information.
That brief alleged offer
of active assistance from Assange may be all the US government needs to charge
him not as a journalist recipient of Manning's leaks, but as a coconspirator
with Manning in the theft of Pentagon data.
"It can be as simple
as that," says Bradley Moss, an attorney for the Washington, DC, law firm
Mark Zaid P.C. who focuses on issues in national security and intelligence
community personnel. MORE
WHY DO THE US AND ITS IMPERIAL SATRAPIES WANT TO PUNISH
ASSANGE and call it rule of law? Assange
revealed their lawlessness!
“Julian
Assange outside the Gate of Hell.”
Posted Apr
13, 2019 by Tariq Ali
Topics: Incarceration
Places: Ecuador
Originally
published: Verso (April 11, 2019) |
I’ve been
to see Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy several times, mainly when
Rafael Correa was President and the Embassy felt like a liberated space. A few
weeks ago I met him again. By now Correa’s successor, LenĂn Moreno, had
capitulated on every level to the American Empire. The Embassy became a prison
and Assange’s health deteriorated. He was in no doubt that Moreno had been
asked and had agreed to expel him from the Embassy. The U.S. demand for
extradition was no longer a secret. The Embassy handed him over to the British
police earlier today.
If we
lived in a world where laws were respected, then Assange would be charged with
jumping bail (a minor offense), fined or kept in prison for a few weeks and
then released to return to his native Australia. But both the UK and Australia
are, effectively, imperial satrapies and likely to bow to U.S. demands. The
secret and not-so-secret state in both countries work closely with (or under)
its U.S. masters. Why do they want him
so badly? To set an example. To incarcerate and isolate him as a warning to others
not to follow the Wikileaks path. Chelsea Manning has been re-arrested
because she refused to testify to a Grand Jury against him. Since the Russian
and Chinese intelligence agencies are pretty much aware of what the U.S. is up
to in most parts of the world, the
threat posed by Wikileaks was that it made its information available to any
citizen, anywhere in the world, who possessed a computer. US/EU foreign policy
and its post 9/11 wars have been based on lies, promoted by global TV and media
networks and often accepted by a majority of North American and European
citizens. Information contradicting these lies challenges the stated motives
for war — human rights, democracy, freedom, etc.
Wikileaks has been exposing all this by publishing classified
documents that shine a light on the real reasons. It is an astonishing
record. Till now WikiLeaks has published almost 3 million diplomatic cables and
other U.S. State Department records, comprising some two billion plus words.
This stupendous and seemingly insurmountable body of internal state literature,
which if printed would amount to some 30,000 volumes, represents something new
in the world. This is where the Internet becomes a subversive force,
challenging the propaganda networks of the existing order. Assange and his
colleagues made no secret that their principal target was the American Empire
and its global operations. The response of U.S. institutions has been
hysterical and comical. The Library of Congress, blocked Internet access to
WikiLeaks. The U.S. National Archives even blocked searches of its own
database for the phrase “WikiLeaks.” So absurd did the taboo become that,
like a dog snapping mindlessly at everything, eventually it found its mark —
its own tail. As Julian Assange pointed out: “By March 2012, the Pentagon had
gone so far as to create an automatic filter to block any emails, including
inbound emails to the Pentagon, containing the word ‘WikiLeaks.'” As a
result, Pentagon prosecutors preparing the case against U.S. intelligence analyst
PFC Manning, the alleged source of the Cablegate cables, found that they were
not receiving important emails from either the judge or the defense.
The
British government is insisting that they will follow the law. We shall see.
The U.S. Department of Justice has stated that Assange could face five years in
a U.S. prison. Diane Abbot, a
leading member of Jeremy Corbyn’s Shadow Cabinet, said in parliament today:
On this side of the house, we want to make the point that the
reason we are debating Julian Assange this afternoon–even though the only
charge he may face in this country is in relation to his bail hearings–is
entirely to do with the whistleblowing
activities of Julian Assange and Wikileaks. It is this
whistleblowing activity into illegal wars, mass murder, murder of civilians and
corruption on a grand scale that has put Julian Assange in the crosshairs of
the U.S. administration. It is for this reason that they have once more issued
an extradition warrant against Julian Assange … Julian Assange is not being
pursued to protect U.S. national security, he is being pursued because he has
exposed wrongdoing by U.S. administrations and their military forces.
We will
learn more in the days and weeks ahead. In the meantime, Wikileaks and its
founder expect and deserve the solidarity of all those of us who believe that
citizens should not be treated like children and that most politicians in the
US/EU orbit are untrustworthy and hate their lies and corruptions being
exposed.
ARREST OF ASSANGE VS. INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM
Glenn Greenwald, Micah Lee “The U.S. Government’s
Indictment of Julian Assange Poses Grave Threats to Press Freedom.”
The Intercept (4-13-19).
The Trump DOJ is exploiting animosity toward Assange to launch a
thinly disguised effort to criminalize core functions of investigative
journalism.
|
"Julian Assange
arrest" - by John Pilger
|
4-14-19,7:05 AM
(2 hours ago)
|
|
||
|
|
POLITICAL ACTION IN DEFENSE OF
ASSANGE
FROM TULSI
|
|
Contents Wikileaks/Assange Newsletter #11, May 25, 2018 (Newsletters 1-10, 714pp.)
2
essays from #7,2011, on Wikileaks,
Assange, and Democracy (copied 4-13-19)
Books
by Assange:
The Wikileaks Files: the World According
to U.S. Empire.
Freedom and the Future of
the Internet.
Film About Assange:
Ales Gibney, We Steal Secrets: The Story
of Wikileaks.
Catching Up with Assange
2017-2018
Roots Action
5-18, Petitioning Equador Not to Cave to US Pressure
1 comment:
Thaanks great blog post
Post a Comment