WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS #6
Follow Up of Nuclear Bomb Ban Celebration & Protest, and Future Action
|
10:20
AM (3 hours ago) |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Friends,
https://www.facebook.com/ArkansasNonviolenceAlliance/posts/807426469845262
https://www.change.org/p/university-of-arkansas-stop-helping-build-nuclear-bombs
Time: Jan 31, 2021
03:00 PM Central Time
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us04web.zoom.us/j/78486465575?pwd=RVM3RzRvWVoraGNQbnNTOUhJY1dDUT09
Meeting ID: 784 8646 5575
Passcode: hGr5mm
Toward Peace,
Abel Tomlinson
OMNI Peace Action
Committee, Chair
Arkansas Nonviolence Alliance, Founder
(479)283-5762
NUCLEAR ZERO: Let’s make the next four years count.
|
11:15
AM (6 hours ago) |
|
||
From Global Zero (Nuclear Weapons Abolition) Dear Dick, If you’re concerned about nuclear weapons, you may be
breathing a sigh of relief today as the United States inaugurates a new
president. The past four years have seen some of the darkest moments of the
nuclear age, with hard-won diplomatic achievements cast aside in favor of
dangerous rhetoric and escalatory displays of military might. But when it comes to catastrophic nuclear dangers, we can’t
be satisfied with simply changing who’s in charge. The only way to eliminate
the unacceptable risk that nuclear weapons will be used is to eliminate the
weapons. Can you make a one-time donation to support Global Zero's work? Today, we’re looking forward. President Biden has repeatedly
signaled his commitment to reducing the role of nuclear weapons in national
security. We have a real opportunity to recommit the United States, which
possesses one of the world’s largest nuclear arsenals, to arms control and
global disarmament. There’s plenty of work to be done. New START, the last
treaty limiting U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, is set to expire on February
5 — two short weeks from now. The new administration must move quickly to save
this guardrail against a new arms race.
But at Global Zero, we understand that is only a first step
to getting back on track. That’s why we’re fighting from day one of this new
administration for policies like No First Use, and calling on all nuclear-armed
states to reduce the risk that nuclear weapons will ever be used again. Nuclear weapons anywhere are a threat to people everywhere.
That’s why Global Zero is committed to building a world without them. Can you
donate to help us with this work? Now as before, we need you in this fight with us. Together,
let’s make the most of this opportunity for bold, transformative steps toward a
world without nuclear weapons. Sincerely, Emma Claire Foley Program Associate Global Zero #1. WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS (WWW) December
23, 2020 2
new books on US wars: Vine and Sorensen This
announcement of 2 new books on US aggressive warmaking and empire marks the
inauguration of OMNI’s US War Watch
Wednesdays (WWW) . CHRISTIAN
SORENSEN. UNDERSTANDING THE WAR INDUSTRY. Clarity P, 2020. Publisher’s description: The War Industry infests the American economy
like a cancer, sapping its strength and distorting its creativity while
devouring its treasure. Stunning in the depth of its research, Understanding
the War Industry documents how the war industry commands the other two
sides of the military-industrial-congressional triangle. It lays bare the
multiple levers enabling the vast and proliferating war industry to wield undue
influence, exploiting financial and legal structures, while co-opting Congress,
academia and the media. Spiked with insights into how corporate boardrooms view
the troops, overseas bases, and warzones, it assiduously delineates how
corporations reap enormous profits by providing a myriad of goods and services
devoted to making war, which must be rationalized and used if the game is
to go on: advanced weaponry, drones and nukes; invasive information
technology; space-based weapons; and special operations—with contracts stuffed
with ongoing and proliferating developmental, tertiary and maintenance products
for all of it. DAVID VINE. The
United States of War: A Global History
of America's Endless Conflicts, from Columbus to the Islamic State. U of California P, 2020. Pages: 464. Publisher’s description:
The United States has been fighting wars constantly since invading
Afghanistan in 2001. This nonstop warfare is far less exceptional than it might
seem: the United States has been at war or has invaded other countries almost
every year since independence. In The United States of War, David
Vine traces this pattern of bloody conflict from Columbus’s 1494 arrival in
Guantanamo Bay through the 250-year expansion of a global US empire. Drawing on
historical and firsthand anthropological research in fourteen countries and
territories, The United States
of War demonstrates how US leaders across generations have locked the
United States in a self-perpetuating system of permanent war by constructing
the world’s largest-ever collection of foreign military bases—a global
matrix that has made offensive interventionist wars more likely. Beyond
exposing the profit-making desires, political interests, racism, and toxic
masculinity underlying the country’s relationship to war and empire, The
United States of War shows how the long history of U.S. military
expansion shapes our daily lives, from today’s multi-trillion–dollar wars to
the pervasiveness of violence and militarism in everyday U.S. life. The book
concludes by confronting the catastrophic toll of American wars—which have left
millions dead, wounded, and displaced—while offering proposals for how we can
end the fighting.
#2. WAR WATCH
WEDNESDAYS (WWW) December
30, 2020 Two
Books on US Nuclear Weapons: Ritter and Johnstone & Johnstone Scott Ritter. SCORPION KING: America’s Suicidal Embrace of Nuclear
Weapons from FDR to Trump. Clarity P, 2020. Publisher’s
Description. Scorpion King:
America’s Suicidal Embrace of Nuclear Weapons from FDR to Trump is a
history of America’s corrosive affair with nuclear weapons, and the failed
efforts to curb this radioactive ardor through arms control. The book’s title
refers to the allusion by Robert Oppenheimer, the father of the American atomic
bomb, to dueling scorpions when discussing the deadly nuclear rivalry between
the US and Soviet Union, and signals the dangers inherent in the resumption of
the perilous US drive for nuclear supremacy. Providing a vivid and gripping A-Z
history of America’s deceptive use of arms control as a means of actually
furthering its quest for nuclear dominance, Ritter sheds light on a
contradictory US agenda little understood by the lay reader, while providing
sufficient detail and context to engage the specialist. The Trump administration has
pulled out of one landmark arms control treaty, the 1987 Intermediate Nuclear
Forces treaty, and is threatening to let another, the 2010 New START treaty,
expire. The terrifying Cuban missile crisis of 1962 demonstrated the
apocalyptic folly of nuclear arsenals operating without limitation, and led to
reciprocal constraints that moderated the nuclear ambitions of both the US and
Soviet Union Those constraints, for the most part, no longer exist. The next
missile crisis could prove terminal for humanity. “A comprehensive and illuminating account of
America’s paralyzing infatuation with nuclear weapons. This expanded
edition of Scott Ritter’s 2010 book drives home the point made in the
original: The ominous threat of Doomsday persists, with U.S. policymakers
unable to extricate themselves from the reckless pact with the devil made by
their predecessors more than a half-century ago.” Originally published as Dangerous Ground.
FROM MAD TO MADNESS: Inside Pentagon Nuclear War Planning
BY Diana Johnstone, Paul H. Johnstone
DATE
OF PUB? This deathbed memoir
by Dr. Paul H. Johnstone, former senior analyst in the Strategic Weapons
Evaluation Group (WSEG) in the Pentagon and a co-author of The
Pentagon Papers, provides an authoritative analysis of the
implications of nuclear war that remain insurmountable today. Indeed, such
research has been kept largely secret, with the intention “not to alarm
the public” about what was being cooked up. “From MAD to Madness
could not be more timely reading. In it, a former senior Pentagon analyst from the
last Cold War comes back from the past to warn us of the disaster we are
courting in the new Cold War. We should heed his warning.” — Ron Paul, M.D.Former Member of Congress (R-TX)
Publisher’s SYNOPSIS This deathbed memoir by Dr. Paul H. Johnstone, former senior analyst in the
Strategic Weapons Evaluation Group (WSEG) in the Pentagon and a co-author of
The Pentagon Papers, provides an authoritative analysis of the implications of
nuclear war that remain insurmountable today. Indeed, such research has been
kept largely secret, with the intention “not to alarm the public” about what
was being cooked up. This is the story of
how U.S. strategic planners in the 1950s and 1960s worked their way to the
conclusion that nuclear war was unthinkable. It drives home these key
understandings:
Dr. Johnstone’s
memoirs of twenty years in the Pentagon tell that story succinctly, coolly and
objectively. He largely lets the facts speak for themselves, while commenting
on the influence of the Cold War spirit of the times and its influence on
decision-makers. Johnstone writes:
“Theorizing about nuclear war was a sort of virtuoso exercise in creating an
imaginary world wherein all statements must be consistent with each other, but
nothing need be consistent with reality because there was no reality to be
checked against.” While remaining
highly secret – so much so that Dr. Johnstone himself was denied access to what
he had written – these studies had a major impact on official policy. They
contributed to a shift from the notion that the United States could inflict
“massive retaliation” on its Soviet enemy to recognition that a nuclear exchange
would bring about Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). The alarming truth
today is that these lessons seem to have been forgotten in Washington, just as
United States policy has become as hostile to Russia as it was toward the
Soviet Union during the Cold War. U.S. foreign policy is pursuing hostile
encirclement of two major nuclear powers, Russia and China. Without public
debate, apparently without much of any public interest, the United States is
preparing to allocate a trillion dollars over the next thirty years to
modernize its entire nuclear arsenal. It is as if all that was once understood
about the danger of nuclear war has been forgotten. TAKE ACTION: Your car is a prominent billboard. Put the sticker GOING BROKE PAYING FOR WAR on
your bumper. Or any antiwar sticker you
like.
David Klion. “Foreign
Policy: End the Forever Wars.” The
Nation (1-11/18-21).
WWW#3
was sent out to various social media/Facebook pages and groups, sent to Peace
& Climate Google Group, & posted to Dick’s blog. 3. WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS (WWW) January
6, 2021 DANIEL
SJURSEN. Patriotic Dissent: America in the Age of Endless War. Heyday Books, 2020. 160 pp. Publisher’s description: This incendiary work by Daniel Sjursen is a
personal cry from the heart by a once-model US Army officer and West Point
graduate who became a military dissenter while still on active duty. Set
against the backdrop of the terror wars of the last two decades, Sjursen asks
whether there is a proper space for patriotism that renounces
entitled exceptionalism and narcissistic jingoism. Once a burgeoning
believer and budding conservative, Sjursen performed an intellectual and
spiritual about-face. He now calls for a critical exploration of our allegiances,
and he suggests a path to a new, more complex notion of patriotism. Equal parts
unsentimental and idealistic, this is a story about what it means to be an
American in the midst of perpetual war, and what the future of patriotism might
look like.
REVIEWS
“Tyrants,
oppressors and exploiters, Eugene V.
Debs observed, always wrap themselves in the cloaks of patriotism, or
religion, or both to deceive and overawe the public. The true patriots, as
Danny Sjursen understands, are not the crowds of flag-waving cheerleaders used
and manipulated by the ruling elites to stifle dissent, but those isolated
individuals who find the moral courage to speak uncomfortable truths and demand
justice. True patriots, as Sjursen explains, make us a better people and a
better nation. True patriots, like Martin
Luther King or Debs, are usually viciously attacked in their
lifetimes. But history exposes, long after true patriots are gone, who
stood beside us and who wrapped themselves in the flag to betray us. Sjursen, a
combat veteran and West Point graduate, brings to this book the weight of his
experience and a moral clarity that delineates the true patriots from the
imposters, and with that delineation the meaning of patriotism itself.” —Chris Hedges, author of War
Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning
A scholar/soldier’s jeremiad in favor of
“Participatory Principled Patriotism.” Sjursen, a retired U.S. Army major who served
combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, writes in deft, mordant prose about the
lost tradition of oppositional patriotism and its intersection with the
post–9/11 forever wars. “The vast majority of the citizenry has divorced
attentiveness to America’s wars—or even basic knowledge about them—from their
definition of patriotism,” he writes. The author began questioning his embrace
of a professional military career during “fifteen awful, life-altering months”
in Iraq, when sectarian violence was at its peak: “The horror, the futility,
the farce of the war in Iraq was the turning point of my
life.” Yet the Army selected Sjursen to teach at West Point; although he loved
it, his scholarship was solidifying his anti-war bent. While he “deftly flew
under the radar for quite some time,” his writings eventually were brought to
the Army’s attention, leading to medical retirement. He clearly discusses his
complex relationship to his service, noting that less than 0.5% of Americans
serve in the all-volunteer military, a situation that leads to “pageant
patriotism.” As he notes, “taking this veritable soldier worship to the level
society has in the twenty-first century can be perilous for the republic.”
Later in the narrative, the author pivots toward a broader historical focus,
noting that combatants contributed to counternarratives of dissent during all
American wars (except World War II). The ferocity of the Vietnam War led to the
all-volunteer military; now, dissent has disappeared from the ranks while
“service has become ‘optional,’ the responsibility of a tiny professional warrior
caste.” These pitfalls were disastrously enacted during the years since the
Iraq invasion. “Every one of Bush’s and Obama’s military forays has sown
further chaos,” writes Sjursen, “startling body counts, and increased rates of
terrorism.” Yet with guarded optimism, he concludes by calling for “a
revitalized movement defined by patriotic dissent.” A brisk, approachably radical treatise
bolstered by its rueful veteran’s perspective.
Pub Date: Sept. 8, 2020 KIRKUS Review Posted Online: June
20, 2020 Steve
Early and Suzanne Gordon. “Patriotic
Dissent: How a Soldier Turned Against ‘Forever Wars.’” The
Peace Sentinel (Fall 2020). www.counterpunch.org ›
2020/07/24 › patriotic-dissen...Jul 24, 2020 Daniel A. Sjursen
is a retired US Army Major and contributing editor at antiwar.com. His work has
also appeared in the New York Times,
the Los Angeles Times, Salon, the Nation, TomDispatch, the Huffington Post, and the Hill, among other publications. He
served combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan and later taught history at his
alma mater, West Point. He is the author of a memoir and critical analysis of
the Iraq War, Ghost Riders of Baghdad: Soldiers, Civilians, and the
Myth of the Surge. He cohosts the
progressive veterans’ podcast Fortress on a Hill.
Follow him on Twitter at @SkepticalVet. Sjursen lives in Lawrence, Kansas.
Sent to blog, ws (Marc), #4
WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS January
13, 2021 https://www.blogger.com/blog/posts/2151229136087998997 “Exclusive:
The Pentagon’s Massive Accounting Fraud Exposed. How
US military spending keeps rising even as the Pentagon flunks its audit.” By Dave Lindorff. The Nation (NOVEMBER 27, 2018).
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/pentagon-audit-budget-fraud/
Support Progressive Journalism The Nation is reader supported: Chip
in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter. On November 15, Ernst & Young and
other private firms that were hired to audit the Pentagon announced that they
could not complete the job. Congress had ordered an independent audit of the
Department of Defense, the government’s largest discretionary cost center—the
Pentagon receives 54 cents out of every dollar in federal appropriations—after
the Pentagon failed for decades to audit itself. The firms concluded, however,
that the DoD’s financial records were riddled with so many bookkeeping
deficiencies, irregularities, and errors that a reliable audit was simply
impossible. Deputy Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan tried to put the best
face on things, telling reporters, “We failed the audit, but we never expected
to pass it.” Shanahan suggested that the DoD should get credit for attempting an audit, saying, “It was an audit on a
$2.7 trillion organization, so the fact that we did the audit is substantial.”
The truth, though, is that the DoD was dragged kicking and screaming to this
audit by bipartisan frustration in Congress, and the result, had this been a
major corporation, likely would have been a crashed stock. As Republican Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, a frequent critic
of the DoD’s financial practices, said on the Senate
floor in September 2017, the Pentagon’s long-standing failure to conduct a
proper audit reflects “twenty-six years of hard-core foot-dragging” on the part
of the DoD, where “internal resistance to auditing the books runs deep.” In
1990, Congress passed the Chief Financial Officers Act, which required all
departments and agencies of the federal government to develop auditable
accounting systems and submit to annual audits. Since then, every department
and agency has come into compliance—except the Pentagon.
Now, a Nation investigation
has uncovered an explanation for the Pentagon’s foot-dragging: For decades, the
DoD’s leaders and accountants have been perpetrating a gigantic,
unconstitutional accounting fraud, deliberately cooking the books to mislead
the Congress and drive the DoD’s budgets ever higher, regardless of military
necessity. DoD has literally been making up numbers in its annual financial
reports to Congress—representing trillions of dollars’ worth of seemingly
nonexistent transactions—knowing that Congress would rely on those misleading
reports when deciding how much money to give the DoD the following year,
according to government records and interviews with current and former DoD
officials, congressional sources, and independent experts. . . .
MORE https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/pentagon-audit-budget-fraud/ So here’s the situation: We have a Pentagon budget that a former
DOD internal-audit supervisor, Jack Armstrong, bluntly labels “garbage.” We
have a Congress unable to evaluate each new fiscal year’s proposed Pentagon
budget because it cannot know how much money was actually spent during prior
years. And we have a Department of Defense that gives only lip service to
fixing any of this. Why should it? The status quo has been generating
ever-higher DoD budgets for decades, not to mention bigger profits for Boeing,
Lockheed, and other military contractors. The losers in this situation are everyone else. The Pentagon’s
accounting fraud diverts many billions of dollars that could be devoted to
other national needs: health care, education, job creation, climate action,
infrastructure modernization, and more. Indeed, the Pentagon’s accounting fraud
amounts to theft on a grand scale—theft not only from America’s taxpayers, but
also from the nation’s well-being and its future. As President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who retired from the military as
a five-star general after leading Allied forces to victory in World War II,
said in a 1953 speech, “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every
rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and
are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.” What would Eisenhower say
today about a Pentagon that deliberately misleads the people’s representatives
in Congress in order to grab more money for itself while hunger, want, climate
breakdown, and other ills increasingly afflict the nation? Dave LindorffNation contributor
Dave Lindorff also writes for Salon, London Review of Books, and Counterpunch. He is founder of ThisCantBeHappening.net. Author of
four books, he was a 1990s Hong Kong/China correspondent for Business Week. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/pentagon-audit-budget-fraud/
Sent 1-19-21 blog, ws, HN list,
Protest list Then placed with newsletter
#1 #5
WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2021/01/celebrate-united-nations-nuclear-bomb.html January
20, 2021 CELEBRATE
THE UNITED NATIONS’ NUCLEAR BOMB BAN TREATY SIGN
PETITION DEMANDING UAF END BOMB BUILDING
CELEBRATE
THE UNITED NATIONS’ NUCLEAR BOMB BAN TREATY
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW)
includes a comprehensive set of prohibitions on participating in any nuclear
weapon activities. These include undertakings not to develop, test,
produce, acquire, possess, stockpile, use or threaten to use nuclear
weapons.
UNITED
NATIONS’ CENTRAL ROLE IN THE TREATY Today we
look back to a long struggle that has brought us to this day. These include previous treaties: the Treaty on the
Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT); the Treaty
Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests In The Atmosphere, In Outer Space
And Under Water, also known as the Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT); the
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was signed in
1996 but has yet to enter into ratified force.
The following entry
offers a comprehensive summary of the new Treaty by the authoritative ACA.
"No one can solve this problem
alone, but together we can change things for the better." – Setsuko Thurlow, Hiroshima Survivor Alicia Sanders-Zakre. “Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty to Enter Into Force: What's
Next?” ARMS
CONTROL TODAY.
November 2020 The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW)
will soon enter into force and become binding international law for its states-parties.
The milestone will be meaningful for those nations, but it will also affect
countries that have yet to ratify or accede to the pact. Earlier weapons
prohibitions have successfully curbed proliferation and advanced norms against
weapons of mass destruction. Within one year of the treaty’s entry into force,
its states-parties will convene to discuss these issues and the next steps to
strengthen the agreement. The treaty’s final text was approved by 122 nations at the
United Nations in July 2017, but nuclear-armed states boycotted treaty
negotiations and have since rejected the treaty as simultaneously irrelevant
and dangerous.1 Nevertheless, the majority of
the world’s countries have continued to support the TPNW, including by signing
and ratifying or acceding.2 States-parties hail from all
regions of the world, with many from Africa and Latin America, and the fewest
from Europe. According to the treaty, 50 ratifications or accessions must be
submitted to the United Nations before the pact can take full legal effect. More https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2020-11/features/nuclear-weapons-ban-treaty-enter-into-force-whats-next
Dick Bennett will speak about the UN’s role in initiating the
Treaty, and will introduce the speakers:
Abel Tomlinson and our guest, Prof. Jeremy Kuzmarov.
Nuclear Bomb Ban Celebration & Protest of U of A
Participation in Building Nuclear Weapons On January 22nd at
11 A.M. at the University of Arkansas Union Mall* (address and parking details below), we're holding a celebration
for the landmark Nuclear Bomb Ban, the Treaty on the Prohibition of
Nuclear Weapons, “entering into force” as international law. One hundred and thirty U.N. member nations have voted to make
nuclear bombs illegal. To mark this momentous occasion, we'll be taking part in
a Global Day of Action, along with a great many peace groups around the world. This event is also a
protest calling on the University of Arkansas and UA College of Engineering to
Stop Participating in Building Nuclear Bombs. The Nobel Peace Prize winning organization ICAN, which spearheaded the nuclear bomb ban, has issued a report
titled Schools of Mass Destruction. Their report found the University of Arkansas is involved in
the production of these increasingly illegal nuclear bombs. We are
demanding that they cancel their Master Collaboration
Agreement with the nuclear weapons
corporation Honeywell International. We'll be holding a rally,
with speakers and music, for one hour, and then we will deliver the following
petition to UA administrators (please sign & share with your friends): https://www.change.org/p/university-of-arkansas-stop-helping-build-nuclear-bombs Please make sure to wear
a mask and stay socially distanced. We want everyone to stay safe and
healthy. *The Arkansas Union Mall address is 435 Garland Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72701. Google Maps
Link: https://goo.gl/maps/7YLnXwqui5KqSQPy6 The best place to park is
the Garland Parking Garage (3rd Floor): 650 Garland Ave,
Fayetteville, AR 72701 Google Maps Link: https://goo.gl/maps/zVvpxeZenCGcj19x6 It costs $1.80 per
hour, coins or card. There is also free parking on nearby streets, if you
can find a space. Please arrive early to have time to find parking, and
to walk 2 blocks. Also, if you are on
Facebook, please join and share our event page: https://www.facebook.com/events/2521268024843251 Feel free to call me if you have any further questions. Thank you,
Abel Tomlinson OMNI Peace Action
Committee, Chair Arkansas Nonviolence Alliance, Founder (479)283-5762
Dear Friends
We're less than a week away from the momentous day when the
Nuclear Bomb Ban Treaty (TPNW) becomes international law! On this day,
we're holding a celebration to mark this moment, and to protest University of
Arkansas participation in building nuclear weapons. The
celebration/protest will begin at 11 A.M. on Friday, January 22nd at the U of
A. Please spread the word & please sign either of the following
petitions calling on U of A to Stop Helping Build Nuclear Bombs. (The petition
was duplicated since ipetitions.com was asking for money, and we're only interested in
signatures) Petition #1: https://www.change.org/p/university-of-arkansas-stop-helping-build-nuclear-bombs Petition #2: https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stop-university-of-arkansas-production-of-banned Also, if you are on Facebook, please sign up and share this
event page: https://www.facebook.com/events/2521268024843251
Abel Tomlinson started
this petition to University of Arkansas The landmark Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons has
now been ratified and "enters into force" as international law on
January 22, 2021*. One hundred and thirty U.N. member nations, a supermajority,
have voted for this treaty to ban nuclear weapons of mass destruction, which
terroristically threaten all Life on Earth. This January 22nd is a momentous
day for peace and many groups will mark this day with celebration and protest.
Petition link:
Date: Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:51 PM Subject: Protest: Stop University of Arkansas Participation in Building Nuclear
Bombs |
||||
No comments:
Post a Comment