OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS, #104, December 5, 2022

 

 OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS, #104, December 5, 2022

Jeremy Kuzmarov.  “… Vast Military Spending… Greatly Accelerates Climate Crisis.” 
(Tom Dispatch) Michael Klare.  “What If the U.S. and China Really Cooperated on Climate Change?  

 Jeremy Kuzmarov.  “New Report Details How Vast Military Spending By the Richest Countries Greatly Accelerates Climate Crisis.”  CovertAction Magazine (Dec 05, 2022).
 So why do climate justice groups like 350.org support the war in Ukraine?

While the world’s climate negotiators gathered for the COP27 summit in Egypt, a new report published by the Transnational Institute, a Dutch think tank, emphasizes how rising global military spending is a great threat to efforts to combat climate change.

According to the report’s authors, “every dollar spent on the military not only increases greenhouse gas emissions, but also diverts financial resources, skills and attention away from tackling one of the greatest threats humanity has ever experienced.”

The trajectory of military spending has been rising since the late 1990s, reaching a record of $2 trillion in 2021. Between 2013 and 2021, the richest countries spent a combined $9.45 trillion on the military. By far the biggest military spender was the U.S. which, between 2001 and 2018, emitted an estimated 1.267 trillion tons of greenhouse gases, about 40% of which were attributed to the War on Terror and military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq….

 

TomDispatch.  IMAGINING CHINA AND US COOPERATING TO STOP THE CLIMATE CATASTROPHE:  A MANHATTAN-SHANGHAI PROJECT? Michael Klare, Can (Green) Diplomacy Save Us? November 27, 2022 Once upon a time, the American government was into scientific problem-solving in a big way. I'm thinking of the World War II years when that government invested upwards of $2 billion (no small sum then) to gather together the greatest available scientific minds to develop a war-ending weapon, the atomic bomb. The Manhattan Project, as it came to be called, would employ more than 120,000 people and create that devastating weapon that would obliterate two Japanese cities and, to this day, leaves our world up for grabs. Still, on a planet where, from flooding to megadrought, melting ice to rising sea levels, everything seems increasingly up for grabs, I sometimes wonder why, more than three-quarters of a century later, the country that created the atomic bomb (and is still willing to invest trillions of dollars in "modernizing" its nuclear arsenal) can no longer imagine a Manhattan Project to mitigate the overheating of this planet?  It's true that the United Nations regularly convenes top scientists at its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to assess "the state of scientific, technical and socio-economic knowledge on climate change, its impacts and future risks, and options for reducing the rate at which climate change is taking place." And they do produce increasingly horrifying reports on what a disaster the fossil-fuelization of our planet is proving to be. Despite that, neither this country, nor any other (as far as I know), has been willing to invest big time to come up with breakthrough ways of mitigating climate change in a world where greenhouse gas emissions only continue to rise. Consider it a sorry tale indeed that there is no twenty-first-century Manhattan Project in this country or, for that matter, anywhere else on Earth. Today, TomDispatch regular Michael Klare takes a tiny bit of genuine good news -- the U.S. and China, the globe's two greatest carbon emitters, are again at least talking about climate change -- and tries to imagine where those two governments could actually go if they truly decided to cooperate. All I would add to his thoughts is this: Isn't it time to establish a Manhattan-Shanghai Project to find new ways to save this planet rather than blowing it to smithereens or overheating it beyond repair? Tom     Michael Klare.  “What If the U.S. and China Really Cooperated on Climate Change?   Imagining a Necessary Future.” As President Biden and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping arrived on the resort island of Bali, Indonesia, for their November 14th "summit," relations between their two countries were on a hair-raising downward spiral, with tensions over Taiwan nearing the boiling point. Diplomats hoped, at best, for a modest reduction in tensions, which, to the relief of many, did occur. No policy breakthroughs were expected, however, and none were achieved. In one vital area, though, there was at least a glimmer of hope: the planet's two largest greenhouse-gas emitters agreed to resume their languishing negotiations on joint efforts to overcome the climate crisis. These talks have been an on-again, off-again proposition since President Barack Obama initiated them before the Paris climate summit of December 2015, at which delegates were to vote on a landmark measure to prevent global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (the maximum amount scientists believe this planet can absorb without catastrophic consequences). The U.S.-Chinese consultations continued after the adoption of the Paris climate accord, but were suspended in 2017 by that climate-change-denying president Donald Trump. They were relaunched by President Biden in 2021, only to be suspended again by an angry Chinese leadership in retaliation for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August 2nd visit to Taiwan, viewed in Beijing as a show of support for pro-independence forces on that island. But thanks to Biden's intense lobbying in Bali, President Xi agreed to turn the interactive switch back on. Click here to read more of this dispatch.