CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS, #83, JULY 11, 2022
United
Nations: Women
Teaching Children about CC (Climate Catastrophe)
Monthly Review a socialist perspective
on climate.
Inaction on climate
change because the people lack power:
Eugene Linden,
A People’s History of Climate
Change, and Matthew Huber, Climate Change
as
Class War .
|
|
CLIMATE CATASTROPHE
“American children deserve to be educated about the climate crisis.” The
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (6-23-22).
Anthropogenic climate change is often labeled
as too controversial to be taught properly in some of the most populous states
in the country. But when climate change isn’t properly taught, students aren’t
the only ones impacted. Parents are affected, too. Read more.
Climate & Capitalism
A
socialist source of information on climate:
Monthly Review
Ecosocialist
Bookshelf, June 2022 June 9, 2022
A forgotten
revolutionary: Thomas Spence on saving the commons June 4, 2022
Greenhouse
gases trapped 49% more heat in 2021 than in 1990 May 25, 2022
A major
advance in defining the Anthropocene May 20, 2022
Climate
change indicators set records May 18, 2022
[From a review,
heavily edited, of these two books. --Dick]:
Eugene Linden. Fire and Flood:
A People’s History of Climate Change, from 1979 to the Present.
Matthew T. Huber. Climate Change
as Class War: Building Socialism on a Warming Planet.
Our leaders’ failure
to tackle climate change, according to Matt Huber in Climate Change as Class War, is not “due to misinformation” but a “lack of power”. And the “villain” in Huber’s telling is not “consumerism” nor
collective inertia, not the “market economy” nor the capitalist system in
aggregate, but the “fraction of the
capitalist class that controls the production of energy from fossil fuels and
other carbon-intensive industries”. This
vision of social change as necessitating struggle against powerful groups that
need to be coerced or overcome by a countervailing force, not merely
enlightened or lobbied–let alone implored to “tell the truth”, as Extinction
Rebellion’s first “demand” has it–is daunting. It’s certainly more demanding
than the frictionless model of progress outsourced to technology, or the
market, or responsive politicians. Eco-socialists
are routinely chastised for their lack of realism or unhelpful
combativeness–calling for improbable transformations while the planet burns.
The irony is that ostensibly modest technocratic reforms, which so often omit
to anoint a credible force that can compel their implementation, are beginning
to seem the more irresponsibly utopian. Meanwhile, as a devastating global food
shortage looms, inflamed by crop-withering drought and heat, the future is
already here. If there is no such thing as “success” now, the urgent need
remains to devise and ruthlessly pursue ways of failing better.
No comments:
Post a Comment