OMNI NUCLEAR
WEAPONS NUCLEAR
ABOLITION NEWSLETTER # 17, December 17, 2013. OMNI Building a Culture of PEACE, Compiled
by Dick Bennett. (See #1, June 14, 2007; #2, January 8, 2008; #3 May 16, 2008; #4 June
10; 2009, #5 July 23, 2009, ; #6 Sept.
21, 2009; #7 August 29, 2010; #8 April 11, 2011; #9 August 4, 2011; #10 Feb.
27, 2012; #11 April 4, 2012; #12 June 27, 2012; #13 July 27, 2012; #14 August
11, 2012; #15, Dec. 4, 2012; #16 July 20, 2013) Imagine a world free of nuclear weapons, be committed to that goal, join
OMNI to strive with others for that goal.
US NATIONAL SECURITY
STATE
Contact
your Arkansas
Steve Womack
202-225-4301
Tim
Griffin
202-225-2506
Tom
Cotton
202-225-3772
Rick
Crawford 202-225-4076
For seven years, these seventeen
newsletters, and related newsletters, the OMNI
Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology
has been Arkansas
See OMNI’s Related NEWSLETTERS:
Nuclear Abolition Day June
2.
International Day against
Nuclear Tests August 29.
OMNI NUCLEAR
FREE AND INDEPENDENT PACIFIC DAY AND MARSHALL ISLANDS NUCLEAR VICTIMS
DAY, MARCH 1. NEWSLETTER #1. March 1,
2012.
OMNI’s NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL DAYS PROJECT.
Here is the link to all OMNI newsletters:
http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/ The dozens of newsletters provide OMNI and the
peace and justice movement with subject-focused information and criticism. Here is the link to the Index: http://www.omnicenter.org/omni-newsletter-general-index/
Nos. 12 and 13 at end.
Contents of #14 August 14, 2012
Video
Underground: Hydrogen Bomb Testing in Marshall Islands
From
the Nuclear Abolitionist
Resisters
Receive New Felony Charges
Contents of #15
Protesters
Arrested, Sign Petition
Plutonium
Cores Project Stopped
Mayors
vs. Nukes
Uranium
Mines
The Nuclear Resister (Sept. 3, 2012)
Nuclear
Age Peace Foundation
Contents #16
Disarmament
Video Contest
The Nuclear Resister (March 17, 2013)
WAND,
End the MOX Program
Sign
Declaration Against Nuclear Deterrence
Eiger,
Actions Arguments Against Nuclear Weapons
Chomsky,
Nuclear War Threats
Chomsky’s
New Book, Nuclear War and Environmental
Catastrophe
Green,
Consequences of Nuclear Attack
Contents #17
Nuclear
War: What It Might Be Like
Schillinger,
Novel Envisions Manhattan
Opposition
to Nuclear Weapons, Abolition Movement
Pope
Francis for Abolition
Joseph
Rotblat, Opponent of Nuclear Weapons
History
Past
Nuclear Close Calls
Thirteen Days, Year 2000 Film About
Cuban Missile Crisis
Contact
President Obama
Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the
Book by Eric Schlosser. Penguin, 2013.
· The
New Yorker
“Excellent... hair-raising... Command and
Control is how nonfiction should be written.” (Louis Menand) Famed
investigative journalist Eric Schlosser digs deep to uncover secrets about the
management of America
Published: September
17, 2013
·
Praise
Summary of Command and Control
|
The New Yorker
“Excellent... hair-raising... Command and Control is how nonfiction should be written.” (Louis Menand) A ground-breaking account of accidents, near-misses, extraordinary heroism, and technological breakthroughs, Command and Control explores the dilemma that has existed since the dawn of the nuclear age: how do you deploy weapons of mass destruction without being destroyed by them? That question has never been resolved--and Schlosser reveals how the combination of human fallibility and technological complexity still poses a grave risk to mankind. Written with the vibrancy of a first-rate thriller, Command and Controlinter weaves the minute-by-minute story of an accident at a nuclear missile silo in rural Drawing on recently declassified documents and interviews with men who designed and routinely handled nuclear weapons, Command and Control takes readers into a terrifying but fascinating world that, until now, has been largely hidden from view. Through the details of a single accident, Schlosser illustrates how an unlikely event can become unavoidable, how small risks can have terrible consequences, and how the most brilliant minds in the nation can only provide us with an illusion of control. Audacious, gripping, and unforgettable, Command and Control is a tour de force of investigative journalism, an eye-opening look at the dangers of Time magazine “A devastatingly lucid and detailed new history of nuclear weapons in the U.S.... fascinating.” (Lev Grossman) Financial Times “So incontrovertibly right and so damnably readable... a work with the multilayered density of an ambitiously conceived novel… Schlosser has done what journalism does at its best." “Deeply reported, deeply frightening… a techno-thriller of the first order.” |
NUCLEAR WAR IMAGINED
RICK MOODY, “The Albertine Notes”
Rev. Liesl Schillinger, “Boomtown,” New
York Times Book Review (June 3, 2007).
. . . . But in “The Albertine Notes,” the
third and longest novella in “Right Livelihoods,” he starts with a shocker that
could come from a future season of “24”: a suitcase
bomb has laid waste to Lower Manhattan .
On “24,” such calamities are met with heroic
pronouncements and redoubled resolve, but Moody’s tale takes place in a
hero-free zone. New Yorkers react to the attack with passivity and denial,
applying their energies (such as they are) to avoiding thinking about the
catastrophe. Both the small screen of “24” and the printed page of Moody’s
fiction confound expectations by showing that the most potent fallout is
emotional, not atomic. What holds the audience hostage is the rubbernecking
impulse: curiosity about how these characters will fare in the aftermath of the
blow.
As always, the battlefield that interests
Moody is interior. Barely possessing the fight to make a fist, his disheartened
survivors sedate themselves with a drug called Albertine (a
just-for-the-sake-of-it nod to Proust). For 25 bucks a pop, Albertine sinks its
users into a consoling stupor, allowing them to relive visions of life before
the blast — a first kiss, a concert, even a moment of sexual betrayal — that
had been searing, perhaps, but not radioactive.
At the story’s outset, Albertine abuse has
reached epidemic proportions. As in “The Plague,” the novella takes the form of
a record kept by a man who observes the epidemic at first hand. Kevin Lee, a
gifted, upper-middle-class Chinese-American touchily introduces himself by
saying that he’s “third generation, which doesn’t mean my dad worked in a
delicatessen to get me into M.I.T. It
means my father was an I.T. venture capitalist and my mother was a
microbiologist.” Kevin didn’t go to M.I.T.; he went to (and dropped out of)
Fordham. And as he attempts to retrace the origins of Albertine for the reader,
his hunt for the woman who gave it her name veers into a surreal maze of
conspiracies linked to identity, memory and time.
Like the narrator of a segment of “This
American Life,” Kevin builds empathy with sauntering stealth. The Albertine
fiends aren’t losers, he argues; they’re people very much like you. “When
you’re used to living a comfortable middle-class life, when you’re used to
going to the organic farmers’ market on the weekend, maybe a couple of dinners
out at that new Indian place, you’re bound to become very uncomfortable when 50
square blocks of your city suddenly look like a NASA photo
of Mars. You’re bound to look for some relief when you’re camped in a school
gymnasium pouring condensed milk over government-issued cornflakes.” It’s
Moody’s genius to know that the horror of a nuclear blast is hardly conceivable
— but condensed milk? Now there’s something to cry over.
Moody wrote “The Albertine Notes” as an
experiment in genre fiction at the behest of Dave Eggers and Michael Chabon,
who edited the edition of Eggers’s magazine that became the anthology
“McSweeney’s Mammoth Treasury of Thrilling Tales.” The fact that these three
writers would not only support one another but set one another tasks is a
heartening sign of artistic altruism. Their cooperative impulse is a stroke of
luck for readers.
OPPOSITION TO NUCLEAR WEAPONS
POPE FRANCIS
·
·
·
·
For a world free of nuclear weapons
15
90
Print
2013-09-28 L’Osservatore Romano
Published below is the
intervention given on 26 September in New York by the Archbishop Secretary
for Relations with States, during the High-Level Meeting of the United Nations
General Assembly on Nuclear Disarmament
Mr. President,
The General Assembly
resolution calling for today’s High-Level meeting on Nuclear Disarmament
expressed the common conviction that the complete elimination of nuclear
weapons is essential to remove the danger of nuclear war, a goal that must have
our highest priority. The Holy See, which has long called for the
banishment of these weapons of mass destruction, joins in this concerted effort
to give vigorous expression to the cry of humanity to be freed from the specter
of nuclear warfare.
Under the
terms of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, states are enjoined to make “good faith” efforts to negotiate
the elimination of nuclear weapons. Can we say there is “good faith” when
modernization programs of the nuclear weapons states continue despite their
affirmations of eventual nuclear disarmament? Concern over the
proliferation of nuclear weapons into other countries ring hollow as long as
the nuclear weapons states hold on to their nuclear weapons. If today’s
special meeting is to have any historic significance, it must result in a
meaningful commitment by the nuclear weapons states to divest themselves of
their nuclear weapons.
Five years ago, the
Secretary-General offered a Five-Point Plan for Nuclear Disarmament. It is past time for this plan to be given the serious
attention it deserves. The centre-piece is the negotiation of a Nuclear
Weapons Convention or a framework of instruments leading directly to a global
ban on nuclear weapons. This is a clear-cut goal, fully understandable
and supportable by all those who truly want the world to move beyond the dark
doctrines of mutual assured destruction.
It is now imperative for us to address in a systematic and
coherent manner the legal, political and technical requisites for a world free
from nuclear arms. For this reason, we should begin as soon as possible
preparatory work on the Convention or a framework agreement for a phased
and verifiable elimination of nuclear arms.
The chief obstacle to starting this work is continued
adherence to the doctrine of nuclear deterrence. With the end of the Cold
War, the time for the acceptance of this doctrine is long passed. The Holy
See does not countenance the continuation of nuclear deterrence, since it is
evident it is driving the development of ever newer nuclear arms, thus
preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.
For many years, the world has been told that a number of
steps will lead eventually to nuclear disarmament. Such argumentation is
belied by the extraordinary nature of today’s meeting, which surely would not
have been called if the steps were working. They are not. It is the
military doctrine of nuclear deterrence, politically supported by the nuclear
weapons states, that must be addressed in order to break the chain of
dependence on deterrence. Starting work on a global approach to providing
security without relying on nuclear deterrence is urgent.
We cannot justify the continuation of a permanent nuclear
deterrence policy, given the loss of human, financial and material resources in
time of scarcity of funds for health, education and social services around the
world and in the face of current threats to human security, such as poverty,
climate change, terrorism and transnational crimes. All this should make
us consider the ethical dimension and the moral legitimacy of the production,
processing, development, accumulation, use and threat of use of nuclear arms.
We must emphasize anew that military doctrines based on nuclear arms, as
instruments of security and defence of an élite group, in a show of power and
supremacy, retard and jeopardize the process of nuclear disarmament and
non-proliferation.
It is time to counter the logic of fear with the ethic of
responsibility, fostering a climate of trust and sincere dialogue, capable of
promoting a culture of peace, founded on the primacy of law and the common
good, through a coherent and responsible cooperation between all members of the
international community.
Thank you, Mr. President.
JOSEPH ROTBLAT, OPPONENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS,
PUGWASH PEACEMAKER, ADVOCATE OF BANNING ALL NUCLEAR WEAPONS
GOOGLE SEARCH AUGUST 10, 2013
Obituary
Sir Joseph
Rotblat
Nuclear physicist and
Nobel peace prizewinner who quit the Manhattan
The nuclear scientist Sir Joseph Rotblat.
Photograph: Guardian/Martin Argles
Sir Joseph
Rotblat, who has died aged 96, was a nuclear physicist and a tireless worker
for peace. When he and his creation, the Pugwash Conferences on Science and
World Affairs were jointly awarded the 1995 Nobel peace prize, some newspapers
identified him only as a "little known" physicist. But scientists in
many disciplines, and officialdom in many countries, knew him well.
Born in Warsaw , Poland Liverpool University Poland
In the year
1939 came the discovery of nuclear fission in uranium and Rotblat himself
subsequently worked on fission, briefly in Warsaw
and later in Liverpool , where certain basic
experiments were carried out into the feasibility of an atomic bomb.
Inevitably, with the entry of the United States
into the second world war in 1941, and the subsequent move to develop the
A-bomb, he soon found himself at the centre of the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos , New
Mexico
Like a
minority of the scientists involved, he was concerned then about the morality
of working on a weapon of mass destruction, but convinced himself that the
apparent danger of a German bomb justified it. However, unlike those other
scientists, as soon as this danger had clearly disappeared he left the project
and returned to Liverpool
University
In 1950 he
became professor of physics at London University 's St Bartholomew's Hospital Medical
College
But
Rotblat's real life's work was summed up by Bertrand Russell in his
autobiography: "He can have few rivals in the courage and integrity and
complete self-abnegation with which he has given up his own career (in which,
however, he still remains eminent) to devote himself to combating the nuclear
peril as well as other, allied evils."
Rotblat
first took the lead in setting up, in 1946, the British Atomic Scientists
Association (Basa), following meetings between Liverpool and Oxford physicists
who had worked on the Manhattan Project or its British precursor, code-named
Tube Alloys.
Although
Basa was much smaller than its counterpart, the Federation of American
Scientists, it was able to stimulate public debate through its journal, through
public statements and its atom train travelling exhibition. It had adopted a
non-political stance and its list of vice-presidents - all fellows of the Royal
Society - included many of Britain's most eminent scientists as well as
government advisers, and covering almost the whole political spectrum, from
critics of British defence policy like Patrick Blackett to Winston Churchill's
personal scientific adviser, Lord Cherwell.
Unfortunately,
it turned out to be insufficiently non-political for some of the
vice-presidents, following a public statement in 1957 about the danger of
strontium-90 in fallout from nuclear weapon tests. Basa was wound down and
finally dissolved in 1959. Many of Britain
By this
time Rotblat had become active in other directions. He had helped Russell and
took the chair at the launch of the famous Einstein-Russell Manifesto in 1955,
signed by Albert Einstein two days before his death, and by nine other
world-famous scientists, mostly Nobel prizewinners. At the time of his death,
Rotblat was the last surviving signatory. He was a founder member of the
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, launched in 1958, and was briefly on its
executive committee.
Rotblat's
main contribution, nevertheless, was still to come. It was through the Pugwash
Conference on Science and World Affairs, financed by a Canadian-American
industrialist, Cyrus Eaton, which was first held in 1957 at Pugwash, a small
fishing village in Nova Scotia.
Conferences
followed approximately once a year, organised by Rotblat and his friend
Professor Patricia Lindop of St Bartholomew's. The lists of up to 100
participants, from as many as 40 countries, but mostly from Great Britain , the US
and the Soviet Union were a Who's Who of
international science; the list of locations is a map of the world.
Most
significant was the understanding that participants attended as individuals,
not as representatives of governments, though observers from such organisations
as the UN or the UN's educational scientific and cultural organisation Unesco
were welcome. Scientists from both sides of the iron curtain could talk freely
and informally but could, of course, report back to their governments. A
Unesco/Pugwash symposium: Scientists, The Arms Race And Disarmament (1982),
mentions several instances where Pugwash discussions had clearly contributed to
subsequent international agreements.
Rotblat was
secretary-general of Pugwash from 1957 until 1973, chairman of British Pugwash
from 1978 to 1988 and from 1988 to 1997 president of Pugwash worldwide. Its
annals, many edited by him with various collaborators, have provided continuing
and wide-ranging analyses into current problems of disarmament and world
security.
While
working at Los Alamos, Rotblat had been shocked to hear General Leslie Groves,
director of the Manhattan Project, remark quite casually that the real purpose,
of course, was to subdue the Soviet Union .
When he decided to leave the project, a determined but highly incompetent
attempt had been made to "fit him up" as a Russian spy.
It is a
tribute to his universally recognised integrity, and to his skill in treading
delicately though forcefully (he was very much aware of the cost of
respectability as well as of its advantages) that among his many honours from
east - including several from his native Poland - and west was the CBE, awarded
in 1965. No measure of his real contribution, the honour at least signalled
that his help to the British establishment by then outweighed his nuisance
value.
In 1992,
jointly with Hans Bethe (obituary, March 18 2005), he was awarded the much
coveted Einstein peace prize, and in 1995, unusually late in career for a
distinguished scientist, he was elected to the Royal Society. But perhaps the
accolade that meant most to him was the sometime Soviet leader Mikhail
Gorbachev's statement that Pugwash papers and conferences had helped to guide
the foreign policy that had led to the thaw in the cold war.
Rotblat
wrote or edited more than two dozen books and scores of papers, culminating in
the 1995 Nobel lecture - a powerful and moving exposition of the continuing
danger to the world of the existence of nuclear weapons. In it he appealed to
the nuclear powers to abandon cold-war thinking, to his fellow scientists to
remember their responsibility to humanity, quoting the last passage of the
Russell-Einstein Manifesto: "We appeal, as human beings to human beings.
Remember your humanity and forget the rest. If you can do so, the way lies open
for a new paradise; if you cannot there lies before you the risk of universal
death."
Rotblat
continued to work into his 90s with apparently undiminished energy, lecturing
in dozens of cities in Britain
and abroad - including Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Since his
Nobel prize, he was aware that he was now "somebody" - his own
expression - and spoke out on wider issues. In 1996, he appealed personally to
President Weizman of Israel
to show clemency to Mordechai Vanunu, the former technician who had
"leaked" to the Sunday Times about Israel
Following
the disclosures about cloning experiments, he argued that an international
ethics committee must be set up to monitor developments. He said: "I feel,
however unpleasant it may be for scientists, that science may have to be
controlled. We have got to tackle it because I think the whole future of
mankind is in jeopardy."
Anthony Tucker adds: In accounts of Joseph Rotblat's
important work for the wartime Tube Alloys Project (the British nuclear weapons
programme) at Liverpool University, of his time at Los Alamos, his reasons for
leaving the project and turning to the much harder battle for peace and
disarmament, Rotblat consciously excluded all references to his life before the
war. He called such references "extraneous personal elements", almost
as if his life had begun when he left Poland
Yet his
life and attitudes had, by that time, been profoundly affected by isolation,
family disruption and social deprivation. After the turn of the century, his
father built up and ran a nationwide and prosperous horse-drawn transport
business based in Warsaw
When he was
five, things changed dramatically for the worse. The first world war turned Europe into a charnel house triggering, among other
things, a wave of antisemitism that swept away his family's business and
position. Rotblat grew up as an increasingly deprived, often hungry and
sometimes physically abused child in the breadlines of a starving nation.
Experiencing first-hand the near-insane intolerance and injustice generated as
a political condition of war, these years forged Rotblat's unswerving ideals of
world peace and of the use of science for the benefit of man and the planet.
In spite of
great difficulties, the family remained together in Warsaw
During the
early interwar years, he scratched a living as a teenage domestic electrician
in Warsaw and, through sheer brilliance - for he
was without formal education -won a very rare free place in the physics
department of the University
of Warsaw
During this
period he married but, when he left Poland
for Liverpool University
They
planned that she should follow him to England
Indeed,
when he left Los Alamos in 1944, Rotblat had planned to return to Poland
Rotblat
thought that his parents would be dead. But his mother, sister and two
brothers, who had escaped from the Warsaw ghetto
to go into hiding or join the anti-Nazi guerrillas in Russia England
In his 90th
year Rotblat might be said to have finally entered the public consciousness by
appearing on BBC Radio 4's Desert Island Discs.
In 1998, he surprised some of his
friends by accepting a knighthood at the level (Knight Commander) usually
associated with establishment figures such as lords lieutenant or permanent
secretaries. But all will have appreciated the words of the citation: "for
services to international understanding".
· Anthony Tucker died in 1998. His contribution has been revised and updated.
· Anthony Tucker died in 1998. His contribution has been revised and updated.
· Joseph Rotblat, nuclear physicist and
peace campaigner, born November 4 1908; died August 31 2005
1.
Joseph Rotblat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sir Joseph Rotblat KCMG CBE FRS (4 November
1908 – 31 August 2005), born JózefRotblat, was a Polish-born British-naturalised
physicist. His work on ...
2.
Joseph Rotblat
Joseph Rotblat was born in Warsaw , Poland
3.
Joseph Rotblat Quotes - BrainyQuote
www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/joseph_rotblat.htmlEnjoy the best Joseph Rotblat Quotes at BrainyQuote.
Quotations by Joseph Rotblat, Polish Physicist, Born
November 4, 1908. Share with your friends.
4.
Nuclear Files: Library: Biographies: Joseph Rotblat
Joseph Rotblat, born in Warsaw in 1908, obtained his M.A. from the Free University
of Poland in 1932 and a doctorate in Physics from the University of Warsaw
5.
Joseph Rotblat - Jewish Virtual Library
Joseph Rotblat, born in Warsaw in 1908, obtained his M.A. from the Free University
of Poland in 1932 and a doctorate in Physics from the University of Warsaw
6.
The
Vega Science Trust - Joseph Rotblat Interview 1 - Tape 6
Nov 10, 2006
A science video interview - Born in Warsaw
7.
Peacejam | Sir Joseph Rotblat
Joseph Rotblat was born on November 4,
1908, in Warsaw , Poland Poland
Reader Supported
News | 27 September 13 PM
Carl Gibson | Washingtonians Fight for GMO
Labeling
Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News
Gibson writes: "This November, voters in Washington State will decide whether or not people have the right to know if there are genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) in the food they buy when they vote on Initiative 522."
READ MORE
Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News
Gibson writes: "This November, voters in Washington State will decide whether or not people have the right to know if there are genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) in the food they buy when they vote on Initiative 522."
READ MORE
A Republican Ransom Note
The New York Times
Excerpt: "The list would be laughable if the threat were not so serious. A failure to raise the debt ceiling would cause a default on government debt."
READ MORE
The New York Times
Excerpt: "The list would be laughable if the threat were not so serious. A failure to raise the debt ceiling would cause a default on government debt."
READ MORE
Louis Menand | Nukes of Hazard
Louis Menand, The New Yorker .
Louis Menand, The New Yorker .
|
27 September 13 PM
Menand
writes: "During the Cold War, there were a few occasions, such as the
Cuban missile crisis, in 1962, when one side or the other was close to a
decision that was likely to start a nuclear war."
READ MORE
READ MORE
THIRTEEN DAYS, FILM
ABOUT CUBAN NUCLEAR MISSILES CRISIS
1.
Thirteen Days - Rotten Tomatoes
Rating: 83% - 117 reviews
Review: Thirteen Days offers a compelling look
at the Cuban Missile Crisis and ...Thirteen Days is a good movie about a profound moment
in world history.
2.
Thirteen Days | Film | The Guardian
Details: 2000, USA
3.
'Thirteen Days' Doesn't Add Up - History Matters
The film Thirteen Days, a Hollywood account of
the Cuban Missile Crisis, purports to take audiences “behind the scenes” at the
White House during the tense ...
4.
Film/Thirteen Days - Television Tropes & Idioms
A description of tropes appearing in Thirteen Days.
5.
Thirteen Days Movie Review & Film Summary (2001) | Roger Ebert www.rogerebert.com/reviews/thirteen-days-2001 Rating:
3/4 - Review by Roger Ebert Jan 12, 2001 - The 1962 Cuban missile crisis was the
closest we've come to a nuclear world war. Nikita Khrushchev installed Soviet
missiles in Cuba
Write or Call the White House
President
Obama has declared his commitment to creating the most open and accessible
administration in American history. That begins with taking comments and
questions from you, the public, through our website.
Call
the President
PHONE NUMBERS
Comments:
202-456-1111Switchboard: 202-456-1414
TTY/TTD
Comments:
202-456-6213Visitor's Office: 202-456-2121
Write a letter to
the President
Here are a
few simple things you can do to make sure your message gets to the White House
as quickly as possible.1. If possible, email us! This is the fastest way to get your message to President Obama.
2. If you write a letter, please consider typing it on an 8 1/2 by 11 inch sheet of paper. If you hand-write your letter, please consider using pen and writing as neatly as possible.
3. Please include your return address on your letter as well as your envelope. If you have an email address, please consider including that as well.
4. And finally, be sure to include the full address of the White House to make sure your message gets to us as quickly and directly as possible:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington , DC 20500
END
NUCLEAR WEAPONS NEWSLETTER #17
No comments:
Post a Comment