ARKANSAS' NEEDS VERSUS THE WARS
From: Omnicenter Communications (omninews@listserv.uark.edu) on behalf of Dick Bennett (jbennet@uark.edu)
Sent: Sat 2/27/10 4:32 PM
To: OMNINEWS@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
OMNI NEWSLETTER CONTINUING SERIES ON ARKANSAS’ TRUE NEEDS, 2009, BUILDING A CULTURE OF JUSTICE for PEACE, Compiled by Dick Bennett
Can we afford all of our needs? YES, IF OUR LEADERS HAD NOT INVADED TWO COUNTRIES, AND NOW ATTACKING TWO MORE, AND ARMING FOR MORE.
Your Afghanistan War Bill
$57,077.60. That’s what US public is paying per minute.
As of today the tradeoff calculator page (Trade-Offs Page) estimates:
Taxpayers in Arkansas will pay $9.8 billion for total Iraq and Afghanistan war spending since 2001. For the same amount of money, the following could have been provided:
8,189,196 - Homes with Renewable Electricity for One Year 6,480,823 - People with Health Care for One Year OR
280,718 - Public Safety Officers for One year OR
191,933 - Music and Arts Teachers for One Year OR
1,687,424 - Scholarships for University Students for One Year OR
1,765,867 - Students receiving Pell Grants of $5550 OR
145,659 - Affordable Housing Units OR
5,433,315 - Children with Health Care for One Year OR
1,654,941 - Head Start Places for Children for One Year OR
205,086 - Elementary School Teachers for One Year OR
Here is a shortened link to that estimate for Arkansas.
http://bit.ly/arkansaswardebt
Notes and Sources for the Trade-Offs Page
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/content/notes-and-sources-tradeoffs
The name of the organization is the National Priorities Project.
http://www.nationalpriorities.org
The tradeoff calculator is at the following address.
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/tradeoffs
(thanks to Chris D)
USA COULD BE MADE THE BEST NATION IN THE WORLD BY MONEY SPENT ON IRAQ WAR
Rob Simpson, What We Could Have Done with the Money: 50 Ways to Spend the Trillion Dollars We’ve Spent on Iraq. 2008.
And I’m expect you are familiar with Stiglitz and Bilmes’ The Three Trillion Dollar War, the title of which is an understatement of what the costs will eventually be for these two unjustified and illegal wars.
ADG = Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
NAT = Northwest Arkansas Times
TMN = The Morning News
(Of course, the following list offers only a sampling.)
CHILD OBESITY
“State Plans Child Obesity Figh” by Carolyn Park ADG (1-17-10)
ANIMAL WELL BEING
“Animal Shelter Needs Our Help” Editorial by Jennifer Shreve NAT 10-17-09
CRIME
“Too Many Arkansas Women are Losing Their Lives: Arkansas ranks fourth in the rate of women murdered by men.
Guest Editorial in Benton County Daily Record (10-9-09)
DEBT RELIEF
“Mortgages In Arrears up; State Ranks 26th” by Democrat Gazette Staff ADG 8-21-09
DISABLED
“State Needs Money for Disabled” by Scott F. Davis NAT {11-24-09}
ECOLOGY
“Leave Something for Tomorrow’s Bounty” John Brummett TMN (1-4-09)
FAMILY
“Prison Numbers Evidence Of Broken Society” Editorial by Tom McMahon TMN 4-7-09 “Our most important Support System—the family, is much weaker than it was decades ago.”
HEALTH CARE
“Arkansas 14th Highest Uninsured Rate” From Gallup. 20.1 percent of the state's population is uninsured, 14th highest rate in America. And you still want to listen to the insurance companies' lies?
HEALTH CARE QUALITY
“U.S. Care Rankings Put Arkansas at 48” By Matthew S.L. Cate ADG (10-8-10)
BABY HEALTH
“Infant Mortality Still Too High” Editorial by Meredith Oakly ADG (8-5-09)
CHILDREN’S HEALTH
“State Director Warns of Medicaid Crunch: ARkids Growth Under Review” Seth Bromeley ADG (1-15-10)
WOMEN’S HEALTH
“Breast Screening Funding Gap Hurts” By Seth Blomeley ADG 1-7-10
HUNGER
“Number of Hungry Rising In Arkansas” By Noel E. Oman (ADG 2-15-10)
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
“Jonesboro Bus Service Puts Brakes on Spending” by Kenneth Heard ADG 2-22-10
QUALITY OF LIFE
“Arkansas Ranks 46th In The Nation Overall In a New Survey on Well-Being.” ADG
RURAL AREAS
“Rural Hospitals in State Losing Ground: Funding Sources Can’t Keep Up With Rising Cost, Bad Debt” By Toby Manthey ADG (1-26-09)
SCHOOLS
“Beebe Oversees Cuts for Health, Schools” by Seth Blomely ADG 1-18-10
SUBSTANCE ABUSE SOLUTIONS
“Substance-abuse Program Falls Prey to Budget Trims” by Amy Upshaw ADG (2-14-10)
UNEMPLOYMENT
“Prolonged Aid to Unemployed is Drying Up” by Erik Eckholm
ADG (8-2-09)
YOUTH
“System for Troubled Youth Needs Complete Overhaul” by Amy Upshaw ADG (1-10-09)
--
Dick Bennett
jbennet
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Hidden cost of hydraulic fracturing featured on CAT channel, Cox Cable 18 in Fayetteville, Arkansas
The morning of February 23, 2010, on Democracy Now (every weekday morning 7am CAT Ch. 18) Amy interviewed Josh Fox, the director of the new film, "Gasland."
He traveled about 10 states and discovered widespread pollution of groundwater by hydraulic fracturing. The or a connection to CCTF is the harm caused by the reckless search for additional fossil fuels. There are hidden costs in fracturing; the public needs to know the true costs in this and all energy sources. Also the corruption involved (another cost):
The 2005 Energy Bill exempted the natural-gas industry from the Safe Drinking Water Act especially to give free rein to fracking. Imagine the amount of money spent on campaign contributions and lobbying to produce that special corporate-interest legislature.
--
Dick Bennett
jbennet@uark.edu
He traveled about 10 states and discovered widespread pollution of groundwater by hydraulic fracturing. The or a connection to CCTF is the harm caused by the reckless search for additional fossil fuels. There are hidden costs in fracturing; the public needs to know the true costs in this and all energy sources. Also the corruption involved (another cost):
The 2005 Energy Bill exempted the natural-gas industry from the Safe Drinking Water Act especially to give free rein to fracking. Imagine the amount of money spent on campaign contributions and lobbying to produce that special corporate-interest legislature.
--
Dick Bennett
jbennet@uark.edu
Monday, February 15, 2010
Forum on corporations and the U.S. Supreme Court tonight
REMINDER: FORUM ON CORPORATIONS AND SUPREME COURT TONIGHT
From: Omnicenter Communications (omninews@listserv.uark.edu) on behalf of Dick Bennett (jbennet@uark.edu)
Sent: Mon 2/15/10 11:24 AM
To: OMNINEWS@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
FORUM ON CORPORATE PERSONHOOD AND THE US CORPORATE STATE
Monday, February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology.
At OMNI’s new location: 3274 Lee Avenue
View Larger Map
With the recent Supreme Court decision removing the limits of corporate sponsorship of political advertisement, our Nation plunged into a full-blown Corporate State in which our elected representatives are dominated by corporate money. The voice of the people is in danger of being drowned out by this flood of corporate money. Action is needed soon to reverse this damage...but what action? What can be done? We will be exploring our democratic possibilities during our discussion panel on February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology. Coordinated by John Gray and Dick Bennett. We urge you to read or read about the book by Thom Hartmann, Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights.
Moderator: Claire Detels
Panelists:
John Gray, Mayor of Greenland
Jacob Holloway, Graduate Student UA
Abel Tomlinson, Graduate Student UA
Cliff Hughes, Teacher
OMNI has a new location: 3274 Lee Avenue east of N. College north of Hobby Lobby, south of Fed Ex/Kinko’s and Liquor World.
From: Omnicenter Communications (omninews@listserv.uark.edu) on behalf of Dick Bennett (jbennet@uark.edu)
Sent: Mon 2/15/10 11:24 AM
To: OMNINEWS@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
FORUM ON CORPORATE PERSONHOOD AND THE US CORPORATE STATE
Monday, February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology.
At OMNI’s new location: 3274 Lee Avenue
View Larger Map
With the recent Supreme Court decision removing the limits of corporate sponsorship of political advertisement, our Nation plunged into a full-blown Corporate State in which our elected representatives are dominated by corporate money. The voice of the people is in danger of being drowned out by this flood of corporate money. Action is needed soon to reverse this damage...but what action? What can be done? We will be exploring our democratic possibilities during our discussion panel on February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology. Coordinated by John Gray and Dick Bennett. We urge you to read or read about the book by Thom Hartmann, Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights.
Moderator: Claire Detels
Panelists:
John Gray, Mayor of Greenland
Jacob Holloway, Graduate Student UA
Abel Tomlinson, Graduate Student UA
Cliff Hughes, Teacher
OMNI has a new location: 3274 Lee Avenue east of N. College north of Hobby Lobby, south of Fed Ex/Kinko’s and Liquor World.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Dick Bennett shares news from League of Women Voters history
Joyce Hale share her research on League of Women Voters and St. Valentine's Day
Feb. 14, 1920, BIRTHDAY OF LWV
Ninety years ago, Carrie Chapman Catt first proposed a League of Women Voters to "finish the fight" and work to end all discrimination against women. And so the League of Women Voters was founded on Valentine's Day in 1920, six months before the ratification of the 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote.
Today, the League of Women Voters remains a grassroots organization with more than 150,000 members and supporters and 850 Leagues throughout all 50 states. Though the League is known widely for their voter education efforts, they have also studied and acted upon such issues as health care reform, global climate change, and many others.
“As we enter into a new year, we know that the League will continue to do what it has been trusted to do for more than 90 years:
Discuss the important issues;
ask the difficult questions;
and demand accountability from our government..” Mary Wilson, Pres. of LWV
Feb. 14, 1920, BIRTHDAY OF LWV
Ninety years ago, Carrie Chapman Catt first proposed a League of Women Voters to "finish the fight" and work to end all discrimination against women. And so the League of Women Voters was founded on Valentine's Day in 1920, six months before the ratification of the 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote.
Today, the League of Women Voters remains a grassroots organization with more than 150,000 members and supporters and 850 Leagues throughout all 50 states. Though the League is known widely for their voter education efforts, they have also studied and acted upon such issues as health care reform, global climate change, and many others.
“As we enter into a new year, we know that the League will continue to do what it has been trusted to do for more than 90 years:
Discuss the important issues;
ask the difficult questions;
and demand accountability from our government..” Mary Wilson, Pres. of LWV
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Corporate America: an OMNI newsletter by Dick Bennett
OMNI CORPORATE USA NEWSLETTER #2
Compiled by Dick Bennett, February 11, 2010 (Newsletter #1, August 7, 2008)
SENATOR LINCOLN (202) 224-4843 Fax: (202) 228-1371.
Fayetteville office: 251-1380
Senator Mark Pryor: Phone: (202) 224-2353 Fax: (202) 228-0908
CONGRESSMAN Boozman: Lowell office: 479-725-0400.
SUPREME COURT GIVES unlimited influence over our
Elections: Materials for Action
Contents
OMNI Action Feb. 15, 2010: OMNI Forum on Corporate Personhood
Background and Analysis from NYT
Simple Summary
10 Ways to Stop Corporate Domination
Petitions: Simple Amendment, Move to Amend, Public Citizen
(Go to www.omnicenter.org for full newsletter)
Media Criticism
Cindy Sheehan on History of Ruling
E. J. Dionne for Populist Revolt
Corporations and Chambers of Commerce
New Books and Films
OMNI’s 2008 Forum on Capitalism USA with reading list
OMNI Book Forum on US Capitalism
OMNI FORUM February
NEWS RELEASE
February 8, 2010
Contact: Dick Bennett 442-4600
Sponsor: OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology
FORUM ON CORPORATE POWER AND THE US CORPORATE STATE
Monday, February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology.
At OMNI’s new location: 3274 Lee Avenue
With the recent Supreme Court decision removing the limits of corporate sponsorship of political advertisement, our Nation plunged into a full-blown Corporate State in which our elected representatives are dominated by corporate money. The voice of the people is in danger of being drowned out by this flood of corporate money. Action is needed soon to reverse this damage...but what action? What can be done? We will be exploring our democratic possibilities during our discussion panel on February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology. Coordinated by John Gray and Dick Bennett. We urge you to read or read about the book by Thom Hartmann, Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights.
Moderator: Claire Detels
Panelists:
John Gray, Mayor of Greenland
Jacob Holloway, Graduate Student UA
Abel Tomlinson, Graduate Student UA
Cliff Hughes, Teacher
OMNI has a new location: 3274 Lee Avenue east of N. College north of Hobby Lobby, south of Fed Ex/Kinko’s and Liquor World.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
“SUPREME COURT: U.S. Government For Sale”
January 22, 2010 by Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Matt Corley, Benjamin Armbruster, Zaid Jilani, Matt Duss, and Alex Seitz-Wald (forwarded b Sue S)
Yesterday, in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court held that "the constitutional guarantee of free speech means that corporations can spend unlimited sums to help elect favored candidates or defeat those they oppose." The activist 5-4 decision struck down a 63-year-old ban that ensured corporations may not use their enormous profits to support or oppose candidates. The ruling "declared unconstitutional a large portion of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform act passed in 2002." Ian Millhiser of the Center for American Progress Action Fund observed, "Today's decision does far more than simply provide Fortune 500 companies with a massive megaphone to blast their political views to the masses; it also empowers them to drown out any voices that disagree with them." Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL), who is already pushing legislation to rectify the Court's decision, warned, "The law itself will be bought and sold. It would be political bribery on the largest scale imaginable." "The Supreme Court has thrust politics back to the robber-baron era of the 19th century," the New York Times writes today.
THE BACKGROUND OF THE CASE: The case grew from attempts by the conservative organization Citizens United to promote its anti-Hillary Clinton film, "Hillary: The Movie," in 2008, which "takes viewers on a savaging journey through Clinton's scandals." Because the movie was partially financed with corporate funds, "it fell under restrictions in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002," also known as The McCain-Feingold Act. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) therefore heavily restricted Citizens United's ability to advertise the film. A March 2009 ruling upheld the FEC's decision, writing that the film was "susceptible of no other interpretation than to inform the electorate that Senator Clinton is unfit for office, that the United States would be a dangerous place in a President Hillary Clinton world, and that viewers should vote against her." The film "was the brainchild of Citizens United President David N. Bossie, a former congressional aid" and longtime Clinton critic. According to Nick Nyhart, president of Public Campaign, "The movie was created with the idea of establishing a vehicle to chip away at the decision. ... It was part of a very clear strategy to undo McCain-Feingold."
A RIGHT-WING ACTIVIST COURT: The Washington Post writes that the Court's majority made "a mockery of some justices' pretensions to judicial restraint." Although Chief Justice John Roberts represented himself as an impartial "umpire" during his 2005 confirmation hearings -- acknowledging that "it is a jolt to the legal system when you overrule a precedent on the bench" -- Roberts "has shown himself more willing than his mentor and predecessor, William H. Rehnquist, to question the court's past decisions." During his short tenure thus far, Roberts' "record is not that of a humble moderate but, rather, that of a doctrinaire conservative." Likewise, Samuel Alito's replacement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has tipped the court's balance from supportive of congressional efforts to reduce the influence of special interests to suspicious of how the restrictions curtail free speech. Since Roberts and Alito joined its ranks, the Court ignored longstanding precedents protecting women against paycheck discrimination and older workers against age discrimination. The Court overruled a very recent precedent protecting women's reproductive freedom, and Roberts even had the audacity to claim that the Court's landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision forbids school boards from desegregating public schools. In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote, "At bottom, the Court's opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people. ... While American democracy is imperfect, few outside the majority of this Court would have thought its flaws included a dearth of corporate money in politics."
FURTHER EMPOWERING BIG BUSINESS: In 2008, "the Obama and McCain campaigns combined to spend just over $1.1 billion, an enormous, record-breaking sum at the time," but a small fraction of what corporations have available. "With hundreds of billions of dollars of corporate profits at stake every time Congress begins a session," wrote Millhiser, "wealthy corporations would be foolish not to spend tens of billions of dollars every election cycle to make sure that their interests are protected. No one, including the candidates themselves, have the ability to compete with such giant expenditures." David Kirkpatrick wrote in the New York Times that the Court "has handed a new weapon to lobbyists. If you vote wrong, a lobbyist can now tell any elected official that my company, labor union or interest group will spend unlimited sums explicitly advertising against your re-election." "The good news," wrote Millhiser, "is that lawmakers are already considering ways to mitigate the damage caused by Citizens United, and a number of options exist, such as requiring additional disclosures by corporations engaged in electioneering, empowering shareholders to demand that their investment not be spent to advance candidates they disapprove of, or possibly even requiring shareholders to approve a corporation's decision to influence an election before the company may do so." Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) have been "working for months to draft legislation in response to the anticipated decision." Potential fixes include banning political advertising by corporations that hire lobbyists, receive government money, or collect most of their revenue abroad. "Another would be to tighten rules against coordination between campaigns and outside groups so that, for example, they could not hire the same advertising firms or consultants. A third would be to require shareholder approval of political expenditures, or even to force chief executives to appear as sponsors of commercials their companies pay for."
A SIMPLE SUMMARY
WHAT IS CORPORATE PERSONHOOD?
The claim that corporations are persons under the Fourteenth Amendment, are therefore equal to humans in possessing individual rights, and therefore enjoy all protections extended to individual humans in the Constitution. .
WHEN DID IT HAPPEN?
The 1886 Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad case has been used to this day to justify equal protection under the Constitution for corporations. But Thom Hartmann’s book shows that the Supreme Court never ruled for personhood, the public never voted for it, and it was never enacted by law. This original ambiguity has now been removed by the recent Supreme Court ruling, removing what little restraint had been achieved by campaign regulation.
WHAT DID OUR FOUNDERS BELIEVE?
The Founders and early Presidents specifically warned that the safety of the new republic depended on keeping corporations on a tight leash.
THE HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF PERSONHOOD TO DEMOCRACY:
The enormous rise of the influence of corporate money over government, through lobbying, gifts, and other monetary influences, and through the media through First Amendment free speech protection.
The equally disastrous increase of corporate secrecy under Fourth Amendment right of privacy. And much more.
Unregulated combinations and monopolies of aggregated capital, which should be the servants of the people, became the people’s masters for the profit of a few. The meltdown of our economic system in 2008-09 is the inevitable result.
THE REMEDY:
Not the abolition of the corporation, which has at times and can serve humans and other species well. But the return to the control of corporations by the people through their representatives and courts that prevailed up to 1886. It is up to us to change beliefs and practices that do not serve us. Citizens in California and Pennsylvania had begun to deny corporations the status of personhood. Probably state restrictions will be removed because of the Supreme Court’s decision.
THE RESOLUTION:
Let us join with the rising movement of citizens who say: Corporations are not human, not persons, but are legal creations, just one of many methods humans can use to manage their economy. Let us join together in any and every way we can to enable the people to regain control over corporations.
Chief Resource:
The history of and case against corporate personhood in one volume is Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights by Thom Hartmann. Rodale, 2002. In its Nov. 10, 2008 Book Forum, OMNI discussed this book along with other books that demonstrated the harms caused by corporate personhood. (Dick)
10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics by Fran Korten
It's not too late to limit or reverse the impact of the Supreme Court's disastrous decision in Citizens United v. FEC.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/26-3
Also on alternet: http://www.alternet.org/story/145441/10 from Joanna
PETITIONS
[Here are 2 of maybe many petitions and a recommendation, part of the valuable process of finding the thesis and language for the final version.--D]
SIMPLE AMENDMENT NEEDED
So far all the constitutional amendments I've seen are either shooting at the wrong target (limiting corporate spending) or including things they shouldn't (federal and state governmental rights over local government). What we need is something as simple as the 19th or 26th amendments (women and 18-year old votes) - such as "a 'person' is constitutionally defined as a human being" (if necessary make it even more specific "a member of homeo sapiens sapiens" - as silly as "man, wise, wise" is for our species - but something that absolutely cannot be a creation of law). bf
FROM MOVE TO AMEND, PETITITION AND OTHER ACTIONS
http://www.movetoamend.org/motion-amend
MOVE TO AMEND (forwarded by Art Hobson)
Since Thursday, the internet, newspapers and people around kitchen tables across the country have been ablaze with outrage over the Supreme Court's action to open the floodgates to corporate money in our elections. Over 40,000 of you have joined with us in launching a long-term campaign to amend the Constitution, and others have begun to follow your lead.
We think you'll agree that it's time to raise a ruckus! Over the weekend we prepared some ideas for things you can do and materials to get you started. Please check out our new Take Action section right now at:
http://www.movetoamend.org/take-action
Here's some of what you'll find there:
1) Spread the word! Tell your friends about the Motion to Amend. Use our form to forward a message to your contacts. Join our new Facebook page to connect with others.
2) Donate to the cause! Move to Amend is the beginning of a multi-year movement to amend the Constitution. We're gearing up big and we need your financial support.
3) Educate Others! Write a letter to the editor to explain what Citizens United ruling does and let others know how they can take action. Make sure to mention the MovetoAmend.org website. Our website has useful tips and sample letters to help get you started.
In the words of Margaret Mead, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
We agree, which is why we've also included ideas for group action like:
1) Hold a Funeral for Democracy! Organize a mock funeral outside your closest federal building, with mourners, music, speakers, and eulogies for democracy. Let everyone know that the U.S. judiciary has made democracy illegal by granting away our rights to corporations. Take video to post on YouTube, invite the media, and make sure your political officials are invited to speak in memory of democracy.
2) Organize a Study Group or Kitchen Table Discussion! Most folks do not have a deep understanding of what corporate personhood means to democracy and elections. Bring your friends, family, co-workers, fellow students, or neighbors together for a discussion about why this happened, what it means and what needs to be done. We provide materials to help get you started and readings to discuss.
3) Pass a Democracy Resolution! We include a model resolution to start from. Your political party, rotary club, city, township or even state can pass this declaration calling for a Constitutional Amendment to Legalize Democracy and Abolish Corporate Personhood. We also provide some materials to get you started if you'd like to take action at the municipal level. From Art H
FROM PUBLIC CITIZEN
publiccitizen@mail.democracyinaction.org
Dick, [sorry not all the links engaged]
…The Supreme Court ruled last month that corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money in our elections.
I'm asking you to do two things right now to join the fight to defend our democracy from a corporate takeover:
1. Sign our petition at www.DontGetRolled.org for a constitutional amendment to counteract this radical ruling.
2. Help grow the resistance by forwarding this email to 10 friends and family members and asking them to sign the petition, too.
We must preserve First Amendment rights for actual people and the press. The First Amendment was never intended to apply to artificial constructs like profit-hungry corporations.
Many members of Congress are introducing amendments and signaling their support, including Representatives Donna Edwards, John Conyers, Marcy Kaptur, Leonard Boswell and Dennis Kucinich, and Senators John Kerry, Arlen Specter and Chris Dodd.
A real movement is taking shape….
But constitutional amendments do not come easy. We need a groundswell of support from every corner of the nation. We need hundreds of thousands of people to drive the legislative push in Congress.
Thank you, publiccitizen@mail.democracyinaction.org
Robert Weissman, President
GO TO www.omnicenter.org for entire newsletter.
--
Dick Bennett
jbennet@uark.edu
Compiled by Dick Bennett, February 11, 2010 (Newsletter #1, August 7, 2008)
SENATOR LINCOLN (202) 224-4843 Fax: (202) 228-1371.
Fayetteville office: 251-1380
Senator Mark Pryor: Phone: (202) 224-2353 Fax: (202) 228-0908
CONGRESSMAN Boozman: Lowell office: 479-725-0400.
SUPREME COURT GIVES unlimited influence over our
Elections: Materials for Action
Contents
OMNI Action Feb. 15, 2010: OMNI Forum on Corporate Personhood
Background and Analysis from NYT
Simple Summary
10 Ways to Stop Corporate Domination
Petitions: Simple Amendment, Move to Amend, Public Citizen
(Go to www.omnicenter.org for full newsletter)
Media Criticism
Cindy Sheehan on History of Ruling
E. J. Dionne for Populist Revolt
Corporations and Chambers of Commerce
New Books and Films
OMNI’s 2008 Forum on Capitalism USA with reading list
OMNI Book Forum on US Capitalism
OMNI FORUM February
NEWS RELEASE
February 8, 2010
Contact: Dick Bennett 442-4600
Sponsor: OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology
FORUM ON CORPORATE POWER AND THE US CORPORATE STATE
Monday, February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology.
At OMNI’s new location: 3274 Lee Avenue
With the recent Supreme Court decision removing the limits of corporate sponsorship of political advertisement, our Nation plunged into a full-blown Corporate State in which our elected representatives are dominated by corporate money. The voice of the people is in danger of being drowned out by this flood of corporate money. Action is needed soon to reverse this damage...but what action? What can be done? We will be exploring our democratic possibilities during our discussion panel on February 15 at 6:00 P.M. at the OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology. Coordinated by John Gray and Dick Bennett. We urge you to read or read about the book by Thom Hartmann, Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights.
Moderator: Claire Detels
Panelists:
John Gray, Mayor of Greenland
Jacob Holloway, Graduate Student UA
Abel Tomlinson, Graduate Student UA
Cliff Hughes, Teacher
OMNI has a new location: 3274 Lee Avenue east of N. College north of Hobby Lobby, south of Fed Ex/Kinko’s and Liquor World.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
“SUPREME COURT: U.S. Government For Sale”
January 22, 2010 by Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Matt Corley, Benjamin Armbruster, Zaid Jilani, Matt Duss, and Alex Seitz-Wald (forwarded b Sue S)
Yesterday, in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court held that "the constitutional guarantee of free speech means that corporations can spend unlimited sums to help elect favored candidates or defeat those they oppose." The activist 5-4 decision struck down a 63-year-old ban that ensured corporations may not use their enormous profits to support or oppose candidates. The ruling "declared unconstitutional a large portion of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform act passed in 2002." Ian Millhiser of the Center for American Progress Action Fund observed, "Today's decision does far more than simply provide Fortune 500 companies with a massive megaphone to blast their political views to the masses; it also empowers them to drown out any voices that disagree with them." Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL), who is already pushing legislation to rectify the Court's decision, warned, "The law itself will be bought and sold. It would be political bribery on the largest scale imaginable." "The Supreme Court has thrust politics back to the robber-baron era of the 19th century," the New York Times writes today.
THE BACKGROUND OF THE CASE: The case grew from attempts by the conservative organization Citizens United to promote its anti-Hillary Clinton film, "Hillary: The Movie," in 2008, which "takes viewers on a savaging journey through Clinton's scandals." Because the movie was partially financed with corporate funds, "it fell under restrictions in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002," also known as The McCain-Feingold Act. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) therefore heavily restricted Citizens United's ability to advertise the film. A March 2009 ruling upheld the FEC's decision, writing that the film was "susceptible of no other interpretation than to inform the electorate that Senator Clinton is unfit for office, that the United States would be a dangerous place in a President Hillary Clinton world, and that viewers should vote against her." The film "was the brainchild of Citizens United President David N. Bossie, a former congressional aid" and longtime Clinton critic. According to Nick Nyhart, president of Public Campaign, "The movie was created with the idea of establishing a vehicle to chip away at the decision. ... It was part of a very clear strategy to undo McCain-Feingold."
A RIGHT-WING ACTIVIST COURT: The Washington Post writes that the Court's majority made "a mockery of some justices' pretensions to judicial restraint." Although Chief Justice John Roberts represented himself as an impartial "umpire" during his 2005 confirmation hearings -- acknowledging that "it is a jolt to the legal system when you overrule a precedent on the bench" -- Roberts "has shown himself more willing than his mentor and predecessor, William H. Rehnquist, to question the court's past decisions." During his short tenure thus far, Roberts' "record is not that of a humble moderate but, rather, that of a doctrinaire conservative." Likewise, Samuel Alito's replacement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has tipped the court's balance from supportive of congressional efforts to reduce the influence of special interests to suspicious of how the restrictions curtail free speech. Since Roberts and Alito joined its ranks, the Court ignored longstanding precedents protecting women against paycheck discrimination and older workers against age discrimination. The Court overruled a very recent precedent protecting women's reproductive freedom, and Roberts even had the audacity to claim that the Court's landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision forbids school boards from desegregating public schools. In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote, "At bottom, the Court's opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people. ... While American democracy is imperfect, few outside the majority of this Court would have thought its flaws included a dearth of corporate money in politics."
FURTHER EMPOWERING BIG BUSINESS: In 2008, "the Obama and McCain campaigns combined to spend just over $1.1 billion, an enormous, record-breaking sum at the time," but a small fraction of what corporations have available. "With hundreds of billions of dollars of corporate profits at stake every time Congress begins a session," wrote Millhiser, "wealthy corporations would be foolish not to spend tens of billions of dollars every election cycle to make sure that their interests are protected. No one, including the candidates themselves, have the ability to compete with such giant expenditures." David Kirkpatrick wrote in the New York Times that the Court "has handed a new weapon to lobbyists. If you vote wrong, a lobbyist can now tell any elected official that my company, labor union or interest group will spend unlimited sums explicitly advertising against your re-election." "The good news," wrote Millhiser, "is that lawmakers are already considering ways to mitigate the damage caused by Citizens United, and a number of options exist, such as requiring additional disclosures by corporations engaged in electioneering, empowering shareholders to demand that their investment not be spent to advance candidates they disapprove of, or possibly even requiring shareholders to approve a corporation's decision to influence an election before the company may do so." Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) have been "working for months to draft legislation in response to the anticipated decision." Potential fixes include banning political advertising by corporations that hire lobbyists, receive government money, or collect most of their revenue abroad. "Another would be to tighten rules against coordination between campaigns and outside groups so that, for example, they could not hire the same advertising firms or consultants. A third would be to require shareholder approval of political expenditures, or even to force chief executives to appear as sponsors of commercials their companies pay for."
A SIMPLE SUMMARY
WHAT IS CORPORATE PERSONHOOD?
The claim that corporations are persons under the Fourteenth Amendment, are therefore equal to humans in possessing individual rights, and therefore enjoy all protections extended to individual humans in the Constitution. .
WHEN DID IT HAPPEN?
The 1886 Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad case has been used to this day to justify equal protection under the Constitution for corporations. But Thom Hartmann’s book shows that the Supreme Court never ruled for personhood, the public never voted for it, and it was never enacted by law. This original ambiguity has now been removed by the recent Supreme Court ruling, removing what little restraint had been achieved by campaign regulation.
WHAT DID OUR FOUNDERS BELIEVE?
The Founders and early Presidents specifically warned that the safety of the new republic depended on keeping corporations on a tight leash.
THE HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF PERSONHOOD TO DEMOCRACY:
The enormous rise of the influence of corporate money over government, through lobbying, gifts, and other monetary influences, and through the media through First Amendment free speech protection.
The equally disastrous increase of corporate secrecy under Fourth Amendment right of privacy. And much more.
Unregulated combinations and monopolies of aggregated capital, which should be the servants of the people, became the people’s masters for the profit of a few. The meltdown of our economic system in 2008-09 is the inevitable result.
THE REMEDY:
Not the abolition of the corporation, which has at times and can serve humans and other species well. But the return to the control of corporations by the people through their representatives and courts that prevailed up to 1886. It is up to us to change beliefs and practices that do not serve us. Citizens in California and Pennsylvania had begun to deny corporations the status of personhood. Probably state restrictions will be removed because of the Supreme Court’s decision.
THE RESOLUTION:
Let us join with the rising movement of citizens who say: Corporations are not human, not persons, but are legal creations, just one of many methods humans can use to manage their economy. Let us join together in any and every way we can to enable the people to regain control over corporations.
Chief Resource:
The history of and case against corporate personhood in one volume is Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights by Thom Hartmann. Rodale, 2002. In its Nov. 10, 2008 Book Forum, OMNI discussed this book along with other books that demonstrated the harms caused by corporate personhood. (Dick)
10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics by Fran Korten
It's not too late to limit or reverse the impact of the Supreme Court's disastrous decision in Citizens United v. FEC.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/26-3
Also on alternet: http://www.alternet.org/story/145441/10 from Joanna
PETITIONS
[Here are 2 of maybe many petitions and a recommendation, part of the valuable process of finding the thesis and language for the final version.--D]
SIMPLE AMENDMENT NEEDED
So far all the constitutional amendments I've seen are either shooting at the wrong target (limiting corporate spending) or including things they shouldn't (federal and state governmental rights over local government). What we need is something as simple as the 19th or 26th amendments (women and 18-year old votes) - such as "a 'person' is constitutionally defined as a human being" (if necessary make it even more specific "a member of homeo sapiens sapiens" - as silly as "man, wise, wise" is for our species - but something that absolutely cannot be a creation of law). bf
FROM MOVE TO AMEND, PETITITION AND OTHER ACTIONS
http://www.movetoamend.org/motion-amend
MOVE TO AMEND (forwarded by Art Hobson)
Since Thursday, the internet, newspapers and people around kitchen tables across the country have been ablaze with outrage over the Supreme Court's action to open the floodgates to corporate money in our elections. Over 40,000 of you have joined with us in launching a long-term campaign to amend the Constitution, and others have begun to follow your lead.
We think you'll agree that it's time to raise a ruckus! Over the weekend we prepared some ideas for things you can do and materials to get you started. Please check out our new Take Action section right now at:
http://www.movetoamend.org/take-action
Here's some of what you'll find there:
1) Spread the word! Tell your friends about the Motion to Amend. Use our form to forward a message to your contacts. Join our new Facebook page to connect with others.
2) Donate to the cause! Move to Amend is the beginning of a multi-year movement to amend the Constitution. We're gearing up big and we need your financial support.
3) Educate Others! Write a letter to the editor to explain what Citizens United ruling does and let others know how they can take action. Make sure to mention the MovetoAmend.org website. Our website has useful tips and sample letters to help get you started.
In the words of Margaret Mead, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
We agree, which is why we've also included ideas for group action like:
1) Hold a Funeral for Democracy! Organize a mock funeral outside your closest federal building, with mourners, music, speakers, and eulogies for democracy. Let everyone know that the U.S. judiciary has made democracy illegal by granting away our rights to corporations. Take video to post on YouTube, invite the media, and make sure your political officials are invited to speak in memory of democracy.
2) Organize a Study Group or Kitchen Table Discussion! Most folks do not have a deep understanding of what corporate personhood means to democracy and elections. Bring your friends, family, co-workers, fellow students, or neighbors together for a discussion about why this happened, what it means and what needs to be done. We provide materials to help get you started and readings to discuss.
3) Pass a Democracy Resolution! We include a model resolution to start from. Your political party, rotary club, city, township or even state can pass this declaration calling for a Constitutional Amendment to Legalize Democracy and Abolish Corporate Personhood. We also provide some materials to get you started if you'd like to take action at the municipal level. From Art H
FROM PUBLIC CITIZEN
publiccitizen@mail.democracyinaction.org
Dick, [sorry not all the links engaged]
…The Supreme Court ruled last month that corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money in our elections.
I'm asking you to do two things right now to join the fight to defend our democracy from a corporate takeover:
1. Sign our petition at www.DontGetRolled.org for a constitutional amendment to counteract this radical ruling.
2. Help grow the resistance by forwarding this email to 10 friends and family members and asking them to sign the petition, too.
We must preserve First Amendment rights for actual people and the press. The First Amendment was never intended to apply to artificial constructs like profit-hungry corporations.
Many members of Congress are introducing amendments and signaling their support, including Representatives Donna Edwards, John Conyers, Marcy Kaptur, Leonard Boswell and Dennis Kucinich, and Senators John Kerry, Arlen Specter and Chris Dodd.
A real movement is taking shape….
But constitutional amendments do not come easy. We need a groundswell of support from every corner of the nation. We need hundreds of thousands of people to drive the legislative push in Congress.
Thank you, publiccitizen@mail.democracyinaction.org
Robert Weissman, President
GO TO www.omnicenter.org for entire newsletter.
--
Dick Bennett
jbennet@uark.edu
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Native flowers and pollinators: The peace garden of the late Nancy Cooper Maier on the OMNI Center tour of Peace Gardens in recent years
Richard Drake column on Nancy Maier
Nancy Maier Web site
Obituary of Nancy Cooper Maier
Please click on images individually to go to Flickr site and see Nancy Maier's garden during OMNI Center's Peace Garden tour in 2007.
Nancy Maier Web site
Obituary of Nancy Cooper Maier
Please click on images individually to go to Flickr site and see Nancy Maier's garden during OMNI Center's Peace Garden tour in 2007.
Photo montage of World Peace Wetland Prairie a few blocks west of the National Cemetery in Fayetteville, Arkansas
Please click on image to ENLARGE and navigate up and down, right and left, to see whole montage.
Montage by Lauren D. Hawkins with photos by Aubrey James Shepherd
Saturday, February 6, 2010
OMNI Center for Peace, Justice and Ecology invites all to open house from 3 to 6 p.m. today
View Larger Map
OMNI Center for Peace Justice and Ecology opens new house to all TODAY!
Office Phone: (479)935-4422
omni.center.for.pje@gmail.com
“OMNI Center for Peace, Justice & Ecology
educates and empowers people to actively
build a non-violent, sustainable and just world.”
Saturday,
February 2010
3:00—6:00 PM
3274 N. Lee Ave
OMNI CENTER for PEACE, JUSTICE & ECOLOGY
You are invited to celebrate the dedication of
OMNI Center’s new building! Enjoy music, re-
freshments, good fellowship, speakers, and
tours! Learn more than 35 ways to be involved
in OMNI. Help build a culture of peace in an
earth restored, that includes everyone.
Children
Welcome!
Handicap
Access
Refreshments
Will Be
Served!
Open House!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)