OMNI
Compiled by Dick Bennett for a
Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology. (#1 May 8, 2012; #2 August 22, 2012; #3 Nov. 25,
2012; #4 Jan. 12, 2013; #5 March 27, 2013; #6 July 5, 2013; #7 August 12, 2013;
#8 Nov. 8, 2013; #9 Jan. 2, 2014; #10 Feb. 3, 2014).
See US Imperialism, US Westward Imperialism Continental
Expansion.doc, Nuclear Free Independent Pacific Day.doc, No
Bases Network, WWII, Nuclear Weapons,
"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an
international crime, it is the supreme international crime differing only from
other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the
whole."
- Robert H.Jackson ,
U.S. Prosecutor, Nuremberg Military
Tribunal
- Robert H.
Here is the link to all OMNI newsletters:
http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/ For a knowledge-based peace, justice, and
ecology movement and an informed citizenry as the foundation for opposition to
empire, militarism, and wars. Here is the
link to the Index: http://www.omnicenter.org/omni-newsletter-general-index/ See: Continental US Westward Expansion,
Genocide, Indigenous People of Americas, Pentagon, TPP, US Imperialism, WWII Colonial
Pacific, and more.
My blog:
It's the War Department
It's the War Department
Nos. 7 - 10 at end
Contents #11
TRANSPACIFIC US GET TOUGH
MISSILES, AMBASSADOR, AND CONGRESSMEN
Gagnon, New US First
Strike Threats by Military-Corporate-Congressional Complex
Dick, New US Ambassador to China Ready for Battle
Frank Olliveri/Dick, Militarist Rationale Analyzed
TRANSPACIFIC
PARTNERSHIP: SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD IDEA
Congresswoman Louise
Slaughter: Petition, Protest TPP
Lee Fang,
Corporate Control of TPP
TRANSPACIFIC
CONTAINMENT ALLIANCES
US Military Alliances Pacific, S. E. Asia, and
Beyond, a Reference Library Under Construction, a Call for 100 Humorous
Scholars.
TRANSPACIFIC 19TH
CENTURY: MELVILLE’S BENITO
Tomgram, Greg
Grandin: 19th Century Slave
Trade, Melville’s Benito Cereno, US
Extractive Industries, US Empire
Write or Call the
President
MORE FIRST STRIKE WAR PREPARATION FOR MARCH WESTWARD
The Pentagon in classic
“duh” thinking, instead of invitations to cooperate in shared
initiatives, has asked for more billions
to increase US missile “defense” (that is, first strike preparation for war, that
is, offense, but also Orwellian threatening is “defense” is peacemaking),
because it has finally occurred to them that the over 50 years of US military
buildup throughout the Pacific and E. Asia against diverse “threats” (and no
counter threats to the US from the Reds, as they were once called) might have
aroused China and North Korea (and throw in Iran another evil but not Red
nation farther westward) to think of actually defending themselves from
tangible, factual threats . So their response to real threats justifies
counter-response, and the military-industrial-congressional complex dances its
deathly jig. –Dick
Global Network
[globalnet@mindspring.com]
To: GN List Serve
[globenet@yahoogroups.com]
Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:29 AM
The Department of Defense,
directed by Congress, is undertaking the completion of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for a potential additional
'Ground-based Mid-Course Missile Defense' (GMD) site in the continental United
States. (The other current GMD site is located at Fort
Greeley in Alaska .) . . . .
There are several types of "missile
defense" systems today. Some are on Navy Aegis destroyers (testing
quite successfully), some are deployed on Army mobile launchers, while the GMD
system is based underground. The GMD system, whose mission is to have an
interceptor missile hit an "enemy" nuclear missile in deep space, has
not had any real success in their testing program - many of the tests have been
scripted to appear successful.
A new GMD site
could cost more than $5 billion to build. Boeing manages the GMD program
while Raytheon and Orbital Sciences Corporation build the interceptors ('kill
vehicles') and the rockets.
These "missile defense"
systems are key elements in US
first-strike attack planning. Each year
the US Space Command runs a computer war game where China
and Russia
are attacked with hypersonic global strike weapons that attempt to take out
their nuclear capability. After that initial attack China or Russia
would attempt to fire their remaining nuclear forces at the US . It is then that the triad
of US
"missile defense" systems (ship-based, mobile, and GMD) would be used
to pick-off those retaliatory strikes. One should call "missile
defense" the shield that is used after the US
first-strike attack sword lunges into the heart of China
or Russia .
This is what the Pentagon and the Missile Defense Agency are now developing.
Maine State Rep.
Andrea Boland (Sanford) told me last week that North
Korea , Iran
and Russia are eager to
attack the US .
The liberal Democrat wants this GMD base in our state. Better us, she
told me, than someone else. I don't see it that way. The aerospace
industry in Maine
wishes to expand their operations across the state....this GMD site appears to
be their major effort to make a big splash.
Now
is the time for public outcry against this East coast GMD site. Activists
in Maine , Ohio ,
Michigan and New York
must speak out against the madness of US first-strike attack planning and
the colossal waste of our $$$$$ at a time of austerity cuts in social spending.
In the end "missile defense" is destabilizing as it forces
Bruce K. Gagnon
Coordinator
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
globalnet@mindspring.com
www.space4peace.org
http://space4peace.blogspot.com/ (blog)
Coordinator
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
globalnet@mindspring.com
www.space4peace.org
http://space4peace.blogspot.com/ (blog)
Thank God men cannot fly, and lay waste the sky
as well as the earth. ~Henry David Thoreau
New
US Ambassador to China Ready
for Battle
By Dick Bennett
Remember John Bolton, US Ambassador to
UN? He entered UN Headquarters like a
soldier landing at Anzio :
armed and shooting at a dangerous enemy.
Cooperation was the last thing on his mind.
Now look at the new US Ambassador to China , former Senator Max Baucus, at
least in the initial report in my state news paper (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Jan. 29, 2014, Compiled by
Democrat-Gazette Staff from Wire Reports). The title tells all: “Ambassador Pick Vows
Rigor with China .” If you have been following my newsletters on
the US in the Pacific and E. Asia , you will be as astonished as was I by this
declaration. The US has not been rigorous with China ? Our governments have confronted China with
the Pacific Ocean as our militarized lake containing some of the largest
concentrations of lethal weapons on the planet, from Hawaii to Guam to Japan
(Okinawa) South Korea north, while developing alliances with the Philippines,
Singapore, Thailand, and other S. E. Asian countries, and Australia as back-up. The US
has not been rigorous with China ? We need to be tougher?
The report opens: “The Obama administration’s choice to be the
next American Ambassador to China. . . signaled a tougher public stance on
simmering commercial and security disputes, pledging to tell Beijing,’Uh-uh, we
won’t be taken advantage of.’”
What? China
has taken advantage of the US ? .
They have military alliances with Canada
and Mexico (and Guatemala and Panama )(and
Peru and Chile , and Iceland
and Ireland ),
including air bases nuclear armed and ready?
Simmering disputes? Who is stirring that pot? The Pentagon has divided the planet into US
Commands. US has Africom and China
is building railroads. The Obama
administration doesn’t like the commercial competition?
The rest of the brief, 3-paragraph report
blames China . Senator Baucus, D-Mont., speaking for the administration,
claims the US wants to be “fair but firm,” wants “trade, engagement, and
international cooperation with China but will stand firm on principles” (can
you guess?) “of human rights” (I gagged here, inconveniently remembering the Guantanamo decimation of the Bill of Rights and the
decimation of Iraq by a
decade of blockade—500,000 children dead in consequence—and the illegal
invasion and occupation of Iraq ).
It happens that I have recently re-read J.
William Fulbright’s book, The Crippled
Giant, which includes a chapter titled ”The Truman Doctrine in Asia .” Fulbright exposes the 180 degree turn by
the US from ally to enemy of
China ,
after Mao’s communists’ defeated Chiang Kai-shek and his Kuomintang party, as a
series of disastrous errors deriving from hysterical, bigoted, false
assumptions toward communism. Over and
over, facts were crushed by the anti-communist ideology and dogmas of the Cold
War, embodied in the imperial Truman Doctrine.
As I read Fulbright, I began to compare
his analysis of the absolutist Truman Doctrine with the post-9/11 “War on
Terror.” Like US leaders during the
years of the Cold War Truman Doctrine, nuclear buildup, and counterinsurgency
warfare, leaders after 9/11, despite
impressive evidence to the contrary, embraced assumptions about Islam, Arabs,
swarthy people, Pashtuns, and Taliban, that led to a crusade of endless war
against “terrorists.” Fanatical
anti-communism and anti-terrorism overwhelmed facts, reason, and the rule of
law.
Anouar Majid’s We Are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades Against Muslims and
Other Minorities (2009) provides some of the historical contexts for
understanding the crusades that have marred Western culture and its leading
spear for the last half-century, the United States of America, and contexts too
for Fulbright’s liberal advocacy of internationalism, cosmopolitanism, and
global interdependence.
And we the people, what can we do? Read my essay backwards, and call out Max
Baucus, the new US
ambassador, to seek enlightenment while he is in China ,
and cooperation, instead of US
military muscle and dominance around the world and around China .
511 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington , DC 20510
(202) 224-2651 (Office)
(202) 224-9412 (Fax)
(202) 224-2651 (Office)
(202) 224-9412 (Fax)
THE US MILITARIST
ARGUMENT ANALYZED
Can We Afford Pivot to Asia ?
Global Network
[globalnet@mindspring.com]
Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:03 PM
CQ NEWS – POLICY
“McKeon Questions
Whether Military Can Afford Pivot to Asia” By Frank Oliveri, CQ Roll
Call [with Dick’s
comments in bold]
The chairman
of the House Armed Services Committee, who has criticized the administration in
the past for underfunding its planned rebalance to the Pacific,
questioned the wisdom of pulling resources from the Middle East and Africa to
send them to Asia given the military’s current
budget constraints.
“When the
president framed rebalance, he discussed how we could now safely turn
our attention to Asia because the war in Afghanistan was receding and al-Qaida
was on the path to defeat,” Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Calf.,
said in his opening statement during a hearing on the rebalance. “I’m
concerned those conditions haven’t panned out. Violence and instability rage in
the Middle East and Africa .”
[“rebalance”: “Balance” is a venerable warm word used to
justify all kinds of good things (“balance” means sanity etc., see your
thesaurus) and bad. Here, “rebalance”
well-illustrates chicanery. The Pacific
and E. Asia were out of balance for the US
military; the US
lacked sufficient military force there?
It’s such a preposterous idea, that we wonder if Obama and his
Republican militarist minion Congressman McKeon
think the public suffers from epidemic stupidity. As my newsletters on US westward imperialism emphatically show, the
only thing out of balance is the preponderance of US military power over all the
other countries combined.
“framed”: This technique familiar to students of the
over 2000 years of rhetoical study is perfectly illustrated by the word
“balance.” The President did not want to
say, for example, “reinforce the Pacific/E. Asian military” or “transfer troops
from the illegal and failed Afghan and Iraq wars.” Of course not, such expressions would state
the truth. . He sought a warm-sounding
“reframing” to try to obscure reality of empire, of threatening, of
aggression. “Pivot” is the same kind of hoaxing word any half-awake citizen sees
right through, though apparently not most of corporate media reporters. George Lakoff is a contemporary promoter of
the importance of framing your language and argument in order to reach your
audience’s sympathy, not antipathy.
That’s what the ancient art of rhetoric is about: knowing your audience and selecting the
linguistic devices and tactics that will persuade not dissuade. The problem is that the devices and tactics
are also used by people—and people with boatloads of money—to win hearts and
minds by deception. Orwell is famous for
his writings about the dark side of “framing.”]
He said that
preserving forces, readiness and capabilities for U.S. Pacific Command would
mean less for the areas managed by U.S. Central and Africa Commands, as the
Defense Department’s budgets have declined.
“Can we afford
to take risk in CENTCOM or AFRICOM?” McKeon asked rhetorically. “Budget cuts
only exacerbate the problem. There is some stability for the next two years,
but what happens after that? We’re back to sequestration levels and military
leaders are left with no choice but to cut end-strength, readiness, and
capabilities.” [See Gagnon’s comment
on his State legislator’s support for missile “defense” in a state with large
aerospace industry.]
The 2011 debt
limit law (PL 112-25) and a budget deal reached
late last year (PL 113-67), set new funding levels
for defense in fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015. That agreement eliminated a
significant dip in defense spending. After fiscal 2015, the defense budget
would increase at levels just above inflation.
“That has
consequences for our security and military commitments in PACOM and across the
globe, unless we adequately resource defense,” McKeon said.
Ranking
Democrat Adam Smith of Washington said the Asian
region remains critical to U.S. interests.
[We should keep in mind the bipartisan makeup of Congress, and label it for it is: the Corporate Party.]
He said the
rebalance “is done at a difficult time. Budget challenges remain. I share the
chairman’s concerns that we pass budget in FY 14 and FY 15. That does not
change the fact that cuts will come and sequestration is still out there after
FY 15.”
Smith said the
administration does not contend that other regions are less important, but when
one considers the U.S.
interests in Asia , it makes sense to refocus
on being a Pacific power.
“The
Asia-Pacific region is vital to our national interests, and it includes many
essential allies and partners,” he said. “Without question, U.S. servicemen
and women play crucial roles in maintaining these vital relationships and in
promoting peace in the Asia-Pacific region.”
One third of the world’s trade is done in the Asia-Pacific region.
[“Vital” has gained an
enormous power in the world despite its bogus quality. It is now a key justification for empire. Why did we invade Guatemala, Panama, Grenada,
Nicaragua, Iraq, Afghanistan and all the other at least 40 countries after
WWII? Why did we spend 10 years
destroying Vietnam ,
slaughtering two or three million people, bombing it back to the stone
age? Why, it was each time “vitally”
necessary, our “vital interest.” But
then Democraat Smith reveals his real interest: trade. We can arme the Pacific and East Asia and all
around China . Why? Because we fear Chinese economic
competition. And if the nation of
ruthless competition cannot compete with the Chinese, then ride into town with
the heat.]
Question of
Resources [I won’t spend anymore time
on McKeon and Smith; what follows in just same old same old of the militarist
brain, including Smith’s mouthing of J. William Fulbright’s cooperative values
while supporting the opposite.]
During a
hearing on the rebalance of forces last July, McKeon expressed concerns about
the effects budget cuts would have on the Asia-Pacific rebalance of U.S.
forces.
“Can the
rebalancing be effective without additional resources?” he said. “How will
sequestration impact the capabilities and capacity of the U.S. military to rebalance to Asia ,
especially when we’re still drawn to respond to crises in other regions? And if
the U.S.
can’t effectively and fully execute the strategy, how will the region’s
militaries view us?”
On Tuesday, he
said the Asia strategy still has its merits.
“I welcome the
focus on the Asia-Pacific,” he said. “However, time will tell whether words and
promises are followed by action. There are some positive signs that U.S.
forces in the Pacific are receiving less cuts and readiness is being
maintained, but I am concerned about the total force.”
McKeon’s
concerns about the current shift are based on rising instability in the Middle East in the wake of the Arab Spring. Further, the
civil war in Syria and
rising sectarian violence in Iraq ,
as well as continued tensions with Iran
over its nuclear ambitions further threaten U.S. interests.
Additionally,
continued instability in Afghanistan
creates challenges for the United
States , which plans to draw down most, if
not all, combat forces by the end of 2014.
The United
States currently is awaiting approval of a bilateral agreement with the
Afghanistan government that would allow for a token force of about 10,000 U.S.
troops remain behind after 2014. Afghan President Hamid Karzai, however, in
recent months deepened fissures with the Obama administration, which is
threatening the future of a bilateral agreement. That country will hold new
elections in April, when Karzai is expected to step down.
Nonetheless,
Smith, who supports the administration’s approach, emphasized that the
Asia-Pacific area remains a primary concern.
“As the
rebalance gains momentum, the United
States should continue to provide and
maintain collective security; peaceably address concerns and mitigate disputes;
promote shared interests and objectives; and cultivate healthy multi-lateral
exchange,” Smith said.
He said the United States should work to establish a stable
and mutually beneficial relationship with China ;
continue to contain and marginalize the dangerous and unpredictable North
Korean regime; further develop a security relationship with India ; encourage regional democratization
efforts; and strengthen enduring ties with allies in Japan ,
South Korea , Thailand , Australia ,
New Zealand and the Philippines .
Smith said
transnational threats, such as violent extremism, and illicit trafficking in
persons, narcotics, and weapons continue to threaten the region.
“Unfortunately,
disease, malnourishment, environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and
natural disaster also persist,” he said. “The more we can do to defuse tensions
and to avoid conflict through cooperative efforts with our allies and partners,
the more we can help to realize growth and prosperity in the region.”
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
globalnet@mindspring.com
www.space4peace.org
http://space4peace.blogspot.com/ (blog)
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
globalnet@mindspring.com
www.space4peace.org
http://space4peace.blogspot.com/ (blog)
|
8:20 AM (45 minutes ago)
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Look at
your world map. Start at the Aleutian Islands .
Look closely at the outward and inward rings. Midway Islands, Japan ,
S. Korea (Jeju Island ).
Wake Island, Northern Mariana Islands, Okinawa . Guam ,
Taiwan . Philippines ,
Taiwan , Vietnam . Australia
(Alice Springs, Darwin ), Indonesia , Singapore . Diego
Garcia , India . I’m half way around China , the eastern and
south-eastern half, and starting the southern and south/western. Where is the breakthrough spot, the weak link
in our fences? (Keep the Mexicans out,
the Chinese IN.) Between the Aleutians
and Japan ?! Stay tuned.
See the next newsletter for a more complete map of what we have seen so
far, including the western and North western fences, .and for an unfolding of
the alliances glimpsed here. As our
officials say: the US seeks a rigorous balance to China ’s power. –
Dick
FEAR OF THE CHINA
“THREAT”
“Percentage of Americans who say China ‘can’t be trusted: 68.” (“Harper’s Index” January 2013). Where do you think that fear came from? US encirclement of China
would not happen without the majority of people first having been persuaded by
the warriors to believe China
is an enemy, just as with Vietnam
and the “Axis of Evil.” Who’s next? Not if we are informed and RESIST. --Dick
It is well to remember OMNI’s origins with Gandhi and King:
“Maybe
some day, at the end of this long, painful transition, America will embrace Gandhi's
view as its own. Maybe not. While we are waiting, we should resist the
dangerous policies promoted by people who are terrified at the prospect of
losing absolute "truth."
But
we should also understand why they are terrified. We should remember to give
them our compassion, as Gandhi urged.” [This will require a great deal of thought.]
Ira Chernus is Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder and author of Mythic America: Essays and American Nonviolence: The
History of an Idea. He blogs at MythicAmerica.us.
AND
OMNI’S CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH FULBRIGHT’S DREAM OF INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP
J. William Fulbright
writing in 1964: “It is not impossible
that in time our relations with China
will change again, if not to friendship then perhaps to ‘competitive
coexistence.’ It would therefore be an
extremely useful thing if we could introduce an element of flexibility, or,
more precisely, of the capacity to be flexible, into our relations with
Communist China.” Old Myths and New Realities, p. 39.
Initial Google Searches for US MILITARYAlliances Surrounding
China (see future newsletters)
US Southeast Asia
Military Alliances
GOOGLE SEARCH, US
Southeast Asia Military Alliances, 2-14-14, first page (carry on, I’ve barely begun)
1.
Southeast Asia Treaty Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia
Jump to Military aspects - Both the United
States and Australia
cited the alliance as... for a large-scale U.S. military intervention in Southeast
Asia .
2.
Southeast Asia: U.S. Revives And Expands Cold War Military ...
Jun 9, 2012 - Stop NATO June 8, 2012 Southeast Asia: U.S. Revives And Expands Cold
War Military Alliances Against China Rick
Rozoff On May 30 the two ...
Rappler - 1 day ago
Nevertheless, the Southeast Asia
alliance system as a whole ...The first steps of a
redeployment of the US military to the region has
been ...
3.
Images for US Southeast Asia Military Alliances
4.
[PDF]
U.S. Alliances and Emerging Partnerships in Southeast
Asia
Center for Strategic and I...
Jul 2, 2009 - U.S.–Southeast Asia trade amounts to over
$200 billion annually, and .....alliance. Disillusionment with
the war and with Thai military ...
5.
MILITARIZATION OF ASIA-PACIFIC: America Revives And
Expands ...
Jun 9, 2012 - During the American military chief's visit the
nation's foreign ... wider range of new military partnerships in Southeast
Asia , particularly the role of ...
6.
Pacific Power: The Politics of the US
Military in SE
Asia | The
Diplomat
The Diplomat
Nov 13, 2013 - Pacific Power: The
Politics of the US Military in SE Asia ... open doors for the United States to strengthen security
ties with allies and partners, ...
7.
[PDF]
Assessing U.S. Bilateral Security Alliances in the Asia Pacific's ...
by WT Tow - 1999 - Cited by 16 -
Related articles
Regional security alliances, U.S. military planners argue, promote
joint and .... U.S.and British military strategy and power in
defending Southeast Asia into ...
8.
The Transformation of Southeast Asia: International
Perspectives ...
books.google.com/books?isbn=0765611392
Marc Frey, Ronald W. Pruessen, Tai Yong Tan - 2003 - History
On September 6, 1954, representatives
from the United States, Great Britain, France,... to discuss the formation
of a regional military alliance for Southeast Asia.
9.
Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), 1954 - 1953–1960 ...
Office of the Historian
Finally, U.S. officials believed Southeast
Asia to be a crucial frontier in the fight ... It maintained no military forces of its own, but
the organization hosted joint ...
10.
China, the United States, and South-East Asia: Contending ...
books.google.com/books?isbn=1134087055
Sheldon W. Simon, Evelyn Goh - 2008 - History
systematic way have arrived at similar
conclusions: China 's
interests do not ... US alliances and other less formal
security relationships in Southeast Asia . ... Beijing could use political, economic, and even military pressures on Southeast Asian ...
11.
U.S. and Japan Agree to Broaden Military
Alliance -
NYTimes.com
www.nytimes.com/.../asia/japan-and-us-agree-to-broa...
The New York Times
Oct 3, 2013 - U.S. and Japan Agree to
Broaden Military Alliance ... and said it would expand
assistance to Southeast Asian countries to help them
resist ...
GOOGLE SEARCH: INDONESIA
US MILITARY ALLIANCE, 2-14-14, first page plenty more to come
Search Results
1.
Rights Concerns Shadow U.S. Alliance With Indonesia | Fox News
Fox News
Channel
Aug
30, 2011 - President Barack Obama has embraced Indonesia as a crucial U.S. ally... Timor in 1999 that led
the U.S. to sever military ties for several years.
2.
Indonesia - FOREIGN MILITARY RELATIONS - Country Data
It
did, however, have military aid agreements with the United
States and ... is not adefense alliance, military cooperation
existed between Indonesia and its ...
3.
The US
Military Presence
in Australia: Asymmetrical Alliance ...
The Asia‑Pacific
Journal...
Nov
11, 2013 - Through the ANZUS alliance, Australia , like Japan
and South Korea ,
has... The United States military is fond of talking about
“lily pads” these days, ...... In the Sukarno era
Australian defence planning about Indonesia was ...
4.
Walking among giants: Australia and Indonesia between the US and ...
May
24, 2013 - Finally, the US alliance provides Australian
governments with some ...to project significant military capability in waters
close to Indonesia , ...
5.
MILITARIZATION OF ASIA-PACIFIC: America Revives And Expands ...
Jun
9, 2012 - ... America Revives And Expands Cold
War Military Alliances Against ...of forging military ties
with Myanmar , which like Indonesia , Malaysia , ...
6.
China, Indonesia wary of US
troops in Darwin
- ABC News ...
Australian
Broadcasting...
Nov
17, 2011 - "As for using the form of a military alliance, China has its own concepts .... I am happy to see the US here and China
and Indonesiaattitudes are ...
7.
The Act of Killing, the U.S.-Indonesia Alliance, and ... - Dissident Voice
Oct
15, 2013 - Among the casualties of the U.S. government shutdown is
President ... of six Indonesian generals, killings that
the Indonesian military (TNI) ...
8.
Indonesia-US Military
Alliance Is Being
Revived; Jakarta Mulls ...
Amazon.com
Indonesia-US Military Alliance Is Being Revived;
Jakarta Mulls Leaving OPEC.: An article from: APS Diplomat News Service on
Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping ...
9.
US House considers cutting off aid to Indonesian
military even as ...
Jun
13, 2007 - Last November the US agreed to resume military ties with Indonesiaafter ... import of an alliance between Hawaii and the Indonesian military.
10.
China ready to abandon "no military
alliance" policy | Page 4 ...
Mar 27, 2012 -
16 posts
Tomgram: Greg Grandin, The Terror of Our Age
[Note for TomDispatch Readers: It’s time for TD’s first book offer of 2014, The Empire of Necessity, a remarkable new history by Greg
Grandin, author of the acclaimed Fordlandia. It’s the story
of how the transnational slave trade reorganized our planet, of a dramatic
slave revolt on board a ship, of Muslim Africans trekking across South America in chains, of ecological devastation, and
of Herman Melville's terrifying vision of our future. The New York
Times Book Review just hailed it as a “powerful new book... [and] a
significant contribution to the largely impossible yet imperative effort to
retrieve some trace of the countless lives that slavery
consumed.” Of it, Toni Morrison says: "Scholarship at its best.
Greg Grandin's deft
penetration into the marrow of the slave industry is compelling, brilliant, and necessary." I found it
riveting, and you’ll get a sense of the power of Grandin’s writing from his
post today. In return for a contribution to this site of $100 (or more),
Grandin will sign a personalized copy of his new book for you. The offer
will only last a week, so check it out at
our donation page as soon as possible. Tom]
Okay, Big Oil's latest quarterly profits
weren’t the highest in history. That would be the combined$51.5 billion the top six companies hauled in during a
single quarter in 2008. In the third quarter of 2013, thanks to somewhat
lower oil prices, the Big Five made a mere $23 billion in profits or $175,000 a minute -- slightly
lower, in fact, than the same quarter in 2012. In a similar spirit, the
average temperature for 2013 set no records either. It was in the range
of 58.12 to 58.3 degrees Fahrenheit (depending on how you do the figuring), indicating that
the year will fall somewhere between fourth and seventh hottest since global
records began being kept in 1880.
In other words, it was just another humdrum
year for the oil executives powering the most profitable corporations in history, as they continue
to lend a hand to the warming of the only inhabited planet we know of. In
the meantime, a recent draft report from the prestigious Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change suggests that we have just 15 years left to rein in fossil
fuel carbon emissions -- which could be considered the effluent of energy
industry profits -- before a global crisis looms that will be “virtually
impossible to solve with current technologies.”
So on the one hand, profit; on the other,
destruction at an almost unimaginable level, involving the very habitability of
this planet. The pitilessly
profit-driven logic of those energy execs, TomDispatch regular Greg Grandin points out, is hardly a
new phenomenon. In fact, he’s just written a stunning new history, The Empire of Necessity: Slavery, Freedom, and Deception in the New World,
that lays out how, in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, a similar logic
drove other kinds of extractive destruction in what was then known as “the age
of freedom,” the period in which millions of Indians and Africans were chewed
up in the transnational slave trade. Think of Grandin’s tale as an old
one with a distinctly modern twist, or as the O. Henry story from hell. Tom
LITERARY PERSPECTIVE: MELVILLE’S BENITO CERENO
The Two Faces of Empire
Melville Knew Them, We Still Live With Them
By Greg Grandin
Melville Knew Them, We Still Live With Them
By Greg Grandin
A captain ready to drive himself and all
around him to ruin in the hunt for a white whale. It’s a well-known story, and
over the years, mad Ahab in Herman Melville’s most famous novel, Moby-Dick, has
been used as
an exemplar of unhinged American power, most recently of George W. Bush’s
disastrous invasion of Iraq .
But
what’s really frightening isn't our Ahabs, the hawks who periodically want to
bomb some poor country, be it Vietnam
or Afghanistan ,
back to the Stone Age. The respectable types are the true “terror of our
age,” as Noam Chomsky calledthem
collectively nearly 50 years ago. The really scary characters are our
soberest politicians, scholars, journalists, professionals, and managers, men and women (though mostly men) who imagine themselves as morally serious, and then enable the wars, devastate the
planet, and rationalize the atrocities. They are a type that has been
with us for a long time. More than a century and a half ago, Melville,
who had a captain for every face of empire, found their perfect expression --
for his moment and ours.
MORE
Write or Call the White House
President Obama has declared his commitment to creating the most
open and accessible administration in American history. That begins with taking
comments and questions from you, the public, through our website.
Call
the President
PHONE NUMBERS
Comments:
202-456-1111Switchboard: 202-456-1414
TTY/TTD
Comments:
202-456-6213Visitor's Office: 202-456-2121
Write a letter to
the President
Here are a few simple things you can do to make sure your
message gets to the White House as quickly as possible.
1. If possible, email us!
This is the fastest way to get your message to President Obama.2. If you write a letter, please consider typing it on an 8 1/2 by 11 inch sheet of paper. If you hand-write your letter, please consider using pen and writing as neatly as possible.
3. Please include your return address on your letter as well as your envelope. If you have an email address, please consider including that as well.
4. And finally, be sure to include the full address of the White House to make sure your message gets to us as quickly and directly as possible:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington , DC 20500
Contents #7 8-12-13
Occupied
Pacific
Vitchek,
Missile Test Site, Kwajalein
Dibblin,
Marshall Islands
and Nuclear Testing, NYT Rev. by Mitgang
Occupying
E. Asia Surrounding China
Reed,
Ring Around China
NYT Editorial, Vandenberg AFB Missile Intercept Failure
Dick, Commentary on NYT Editorial
Vandenberg
Protest Case Goes to US Supreme Court
Flowers
and Zeese, TPP: Trans-Pacific Partnership (see earlier newsletters)
Jones,
T-PP and TAFTA
Hightower,
T-PP
Contents #8 11-8-13
TPP, Trans-Pacific Partnership, US Economic Empire (also
see reports in #7 and before)
US Control of Micronesia , Over a Million Square
Miles
Dick, Sixteen
Reports on “The Pivot” from One Number of Space
Alert!
Roots Action, Pagan
Island in the Northern
Marianas : Stop Another
Vieques
Founding Fathers’ Principles
Contents
#9 1-2-14
Several on Philippines
Hemmer, Philippines
Typhoon , US Compassion? Fox News:
Send in the Marines
Reuters, A US
Motive? Generosity Competition with China
Dick: Fulbright’s
Reduced Tensions, Natural and Human Typhoons, China ,
Japan ,
Lashes, Bashes,
Dick, Rising Seas : Aiding Threatened Islands ?;
US Instead of Empire Help the Drowning
Nations
Assange/Wikipedia Reveals TPP Agreement Text
Jolly and Buckley ,
China and US
Emissions Common Ground? Leading to?
Dick: Fulbright’s Key Words and Principles
Dick: Reduced Tensions: China ,
Japan ,
US
Dick: Kerry Attacks China
Defends Asia : Who IS John Kerry?
US Westward Imperialism, Pacific/E. Asia
Contents #10
Tensions
The US “Pivot” Euphemism: Gagnon, Global Network’s Space Alert! See Newsletter
#8
Dorling, Asian and
Australian Allies of US, “5 Eyes” Plus Singapore
Dick: Wong, China Reacts to Japan
Global Network, Stop New
Base on Okinawa
Al Jazeera, Australia ’s
Coal Consumption
Tensions: TPP
BG (thinkcivic) Stop TPP
Fast Track, Protest
Aroneanu, 350.org, TPP:
Tell Your Congressional Representatives
Waren, Friends of the
Earth: Stop TPP
TENSIONS FROM THE
PAST: US Nuclear Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Marshall Islands
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
Dick: OMNI Hiroshima-Nagasaki
Newsletters 2010-2013
Marshallese Residents Gather
Chomsky:
Letter from Anjain to Dr. Conard
Wollerton, Film Nuclear Savage About Marshallese Guinea Pigs Suppressed
Two Articles by Giff
Johnson
Legacy of US Nuclear Testing
Film, Radio Bikini
by Shain Bergen
Niedenthall and Chutero
Film, The Sounds of Crickets at Night
END
PACIFIC/E. ASIA IMPERIALISM NEWSLETTER #11
No comments:
Post a Comment