OMNI SYRIA NEWSLETTER #5, SEPTEMBER 2, 2013. Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of
Peace and Justice. (#3 Nov. 11, 2012; #4 March 5, 2013).
My blog: The War
Department and Peace Heroes
Newsletters:
Index:
Contents #4 March 5, 2013
Shower for Shirene Duman-Elkerim Saturday
Kahf: Women Demonstrate for
Nonviolence
Reports on Syria
from Frank Brodhead
(via Historians Against War, HAW)
Dec. 2012
Jan. 1, 2013
Feb. 1, 2013
Feb. 18, 2013
Feb. 26, 2013
[Sorry, I thought
these would be active links. They are
available in the web site. http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/ —Dick]
Contents #5
Sign Petition August 31, 2013
Dick, Non-Violent Options Missing from US Response
Kahf, Analysis of Syrian Revolution
Kahf, Syrian Political Prisoners
Frank Brodhead via HAW
Davies, Why the Civil War Has Worsened
PBS Frontline Program 2011-Present
Gibson, It’s Oil
Hobson, Religious War
Pierce, Making Not Going to War
SIGN MOVE-ON PETITION AUGUST 31, 2013
Dear MoveOn member, In the wake of recent reports of the use of chemical
weapons by the Syrian government, the Obama administration is preparing for air
strikes against Syria.1
MoveOn members are reacting strongly, including many folks who are deeply concerned about the path we seem to be on, and wondering what we can individually do.
Here are three steps you can take.
1) Educate yourself—and others—through our Video Teach-In onSyria . We raced to pull together an emergency
video briefing on Syria
yesterday with several noted progressive thought leaders. The discussion
provided context on what's happening in Syria, explored reactions in the U.S.
and around the world, and outlined some of the major concerns with—and
alternatives to—military strikes.
Click here to watch the Video Teach-In on Syria and pass it along:
MoveOn members are reacting strongly, including many folks who are deeply concerned about the path we seem to be on, and wondering what we can individually do.
Here are three steps you can take.
1) Educate yourself—and others—through our Video Teach-In on
Click here to watch the Video Teach-In on Syria and pass it along:
2. Speak out on how you feel about U.S.
strikes against Syria .
MoveOn members and partner organizations have started circulating a wide range of petitions responding to the looming threat of military strikes. Just a few hours ago, President Obama committed to seek approval from Congress for military action—so we WILL have a chance to make our voices heard with our elected representatives in Washington.2
This petition from MoveOn Council member Rachel Royce in North Carolina is one you might find compelling:
MoveOn members and partner organizations have started circulating a wide range of petitions responding to the looming threat of military strikes. Just a few hours ago, President Obama committed to seek approval from Congress for military action—so we WILL have a chance to make our voices heard with our elected representatives in Washington.2
This petition from MoveOn Council member Rachel Royce in North Carolina is one you might find compelling:
We urge you to show real leadership in protecting the people of Syria with a
more creative, effective, and prudent approach than military action.
· Galvanize world leaders to demand a
multilateral cease-fire
· Arrange to evacuate people who choose
to flee harm's way
· Care for the evacuees
· Assist with re-settlement once the
civil war has ended
Do not be fooled into thinking that war-making will protect or
defend a population.
(If this approach doesn't speak to you, remember: anyone can start their
own petition atmoveon.org—take a look at other
MoveOn member campaigns on Syria here, or start
your own!)
3. Contribute to organizations providing emergency assistance to the Syrian people.
The group Doctors Without Borders is providing emergency healthcare insideSyria
through six field hospitals. They have also worked with the victims of the
reported chemical weapons attacks.
Click here to make a donation to Doctors Without Borders.
3. Contribute to organizations providing emergency assistance to the Syrian people.
The group Doctors Without Borders is providing emergency healthcare inside
Click here to make a donation to Doctors Without Borders.
Thanks for your care and
concern—and for all you do.
–Anna, Matt, Susannah, Joan, and the rest of the team
Sources:
1. "Key Questions on the Conflict inSyria ," The
New York Times, August 27, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=293006&id=74199-17723222-MD4MUtx&t=7
2. "Obama Will Seek Syria Vote in Congress," The New York Times, August 31, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r/?r=293053&id=74199-17723222-MD4MUtx&t=8
Want to support our work? MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.
–Anna, Matt, Susannah, Joan, and the rest of the team
Sources:
1. "Key Questions on the Conflict in
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=293006&id=74199-17723222-MD4MUtx&t=7
2. "Obama Will Seek Syria Vote in Congress," The New York Times, August 31, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r/?r=293053&id=74199-17723222-MD4MUtx&t=8
Want to support our work? MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.
|
PRES. OBAMA’S RED LINE IN THE SAND: WHERE ARE
THE NONVIOLENT, NURTURING ALTERNATIVES?
By Dick Bennett
LAWRENCE WOOCHER, ATROCITY PREVENTION FELLOW AT USAID’s Bureau for
Conflict, Democracy, and Humanitarian Assistance in support of the interagency
Atrocities Prevention Board created by Pres. Obama, part of Woocher’s excellent
ideas in an interview by Kathy Zager in FCNL’s Washington Newsletter (July/August 2013).
“ KZ: What do you think the
U.S. government should do
about Syria
or other violent conflicts already underway?
LW: The difficulty of dealing
with situations like Syria
today should push us to invest more robustly
in prevention. I think responses
to ongoing violent conflicts should support a negotiated resolution of the
conflict; protect civilians, which includes providing life-saving humanitarian
assistance; and help lay the foundation for post-conflict peacebuilding,
accountability and transitional justice.
Most instances of mass atrocities occur in the context of armed
conflict, so special attention needs to be paid to vulnerable civilian
populations. . . .”
Woocher gives a
succinct summary of alternatives to the violence preferred by the U.S.
government. Instead of life-saving
assistance, the Pentagon/Obama propose horrendously destructive cruise
missiles. Instead of air attack as the
last choice in peacemaking, and negotiation and cessation of violence the
first, the US
makes bombs its first choice and calls it peacemaking.
Our leaders frequently
cannot connect their actions by which they could reflect. According to the news report, Sgt. Bales
deliberately murdered 16 Afghan civilians last year and was sentenced to life
in prison without parole. “Prosecutors described Bales as a ‘man of no moral
compass.’” He murdered one of the
children as she lay beside her already murdered father. And the Army followed the law and their
moral revulsion to severe prosecution short of execution, and the general
public and media generally agreed..
Yet now President Obama,
Secretary of State John Kerry, and the Pentagon are preparing to bomb Syria
because its leader allegedly killed some of his own citizens with chemical
weapons, committing, in the words of Kerry,
a “’moral obscenity’ that has shocked the world’s conscience.” The Dallas
Morning News and the Washington Post (reprinted in the ADG 8-24) called on Pres. Obama for strong action, without which, they
opined, Pres. Assad would perceive a
green light for more atrocities. If the allegations of chemical killings by
Assad are true, Pres. Obama, the WP argues, should order “direct U.S. retaliation” against the Syrian military
responsible and a no-fly zone in southern Syria “to protect civilians” (WP). That would be—because it has been so often
in the past—the American way ever since Jamestown .
But how can bombing Syrians for revenge and
punishment save the lives of Syrians?
No weapon so far, not even the supposedly accurate drone, has avoided
killing innocent people, and the cruise is a horrendously powerful bomb.
Instead, let us call
upon constitutional professor Pres. Obama not to abandon law. US Secretary of State John Kerry said the use
of chemical weapons against civilians in Syria
“is undeniable,” and declared the US
would “hold the Syrian government accountable.” But the lawful way, the method sure to avoid
killing more innocents, would be to initiate the strongest Interpol and
International Criminal Court proceedings against Syrian war criminals. Let us appeal to Pres. Obama not to give up on negotiation, but to support
the United Nations in all the ways for which it was originally intended to pursue
peace and justice. And let oppose our
leaders pretending that a no-fly zone in one part of the country protects Syrians
from US bombs in another part; let them end such hypocrisy. Instead, let us demand they send genuine,
well-financed humanitarian assistance to the refugees-- the food, doctors and
nurses, and housing the homeless, sick, and wounded desperately need. Assistance, not bombing, should be his green
line in the sand, a line to preserve life and assuredly win the gratitude and
friendship of people around the planet.
And as Lawrence Woocher
observed, the experience should inspire US leaders to expand significantly all nonviolent
methods available to humans for preventing wars, so shockingly neglected in the
past.
References
Johnson, Gene (AP).
“Civilian Killer GI Gets Life, No Parole.” Arkansas Democrat/Gazette (August 24,
2013).
ADG Staff. “Kerry: Syria ’s Arms Breach Is
Undeniable.” ADG (8-27-13).
Then and Now: The
Syrian Revolution to Date -
A young nonviolent
resistance and the ensuing armed struggle
By Dr. Mohja Kahf
The uprising in Syria
is now beginning its third year. Today, Friends
for a Non-Violent World (FNVW) released a special report on the Syrian
uprising - one of the first to provide an in-depth historical perspective
as well as an examination of the composition of the nonviolent, armed and
political opposition groups. Please note that the report can be accessed at Syria Special Report Link.
Since 2011, Friends for a Non-Violent World has been
supporting Syrian nonviolent organizations and activists in their struggle for
freedom, justice, inclusivity and democracy. After 11 months the
nonviolent movement was eclipsed, but not eliminated, by armed struggle.
The human toll in the revolution against a brutal dictatorial regime continues
to be staggering.
“We asked Syrian writer, professor and nonviolent activist, Dr.
Mohja Kahf, from the University of Arkansas, to provide us with a deeper
understanding of the development and composition of the various components of
the Syrian opposition, the current role of nonviolent groups and to address the
criticisms that the opposition are pawns or proxies” said Gail Daneker, FNVW
director of Peace Education and Advocacy.
“FNVW gratefully acknowledges Dr. Kahf for the work and commitment
in the writing of this excellent and thought-provoking report.” said Daneker.
In Dr. Kahf’s words: "The Syrian uprising sprang from
the country’s grassroots...not seasoned oppositionists . .
. They share, rather than a particular ideology, a generational
experience of disenfranchisement and brutalization."
"The voices of the original grassroots revolution of Syria are nonviolent, nonsectarian,
noninterventionist, for the fall of the Assad regime, and for the rise of a
democratic, human rights upholding Syria that is bound by the rule of
law. They are still present in this revolution. "
The revolution has shape-shifted since autumn 2011. New
organizations have emerged: military groups, political organizations created by
expatriates, and more developed grassroots structures inside Syria . Dr Kahf
explores the history and interactions of these groups.
About Dr Kahf:
Born inDamascus ,
Dr Mohja Kahf is a member of the Syrian Nonviolence Movement, and an associate
professor of comparative literature. A poet (E-mails from Scheherazad,
2003) and novelist (The Girl in the Tangerine Scarf, 2006), she has
taught Middle East Studies at the University of Arkansas since 1995, with
courses in Palestinian Literature, Syrian Literature, and Arab Women’s Writing.
A signatory to the US Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel and former local
board member of Arkansas ’ chapter of the
American Civil Liberties Union, Kahf has marched against the US war on Iraq
and taken part in environmental protests in northwest Arkansas . She won the Arkansas Artist Award
for poetry in 2002 and a Pushcart Prize for creative nonfiction in 2010. Her
2002-2004 sex columns at the progressive site MuslimWakeUp.com (since defunct)
earned her death threats from Islamist extremists, and she has given keynote
addresses at conferences such as Muslim Women and the Challenge of Authority
(Boston University, 2012) and Arab American Women (Kansas State University,
2009). You can read some of her personal Syria stories athttp://therumpus.net/2011/12/the-daughters%E2%80%99-road-to-syria/ and http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/the-damascene-horse-dealers-daughter/Content?oid=1428935. Kahf
tweets for the Syrian revolution @profkahf, focusing on nonviolence,
nonsectarianism, noninterventionism, prisoners of conscience, and women.
Born in
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Contact: Bob Nechal
Contact: Bob Nechal
Phone: 651-917-0383
Email: fnvwbob@gmail.com
ABOUT FRIENDS FOR A NON-VIOLENT WORLD
Friends for a Non-Violent World is a
state-wide Quaker-inspired organization of over 2500 constituents who affirm
the dignity inherent in each human being. We share a commitment to
advancing nonviolence as an ethic for honoring human dignity and a strategy for
achieving peace and justice.
Seeking OMNI endorsement for video campaign for Syrian
prisoners of conscience
From: Mohja Kahf <damascenequeen@gmail.com>
To: Dick Bennett <j.dick.bennett@gmail.com>; Gladys Tiffany <gladystiffany@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:23 AM
Subject: Seeking OMNI endorsement for video campaign for Syrian prisoners of conscience
To: Dick Bennett <j.dick.bennett@gmail.com>; Gladys Tiffany <gladystiffany@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:23 AM
Subject: Seeking OMNI endorsement for video campaign for Syrian prisoners of conscience
Dear Gladys & Dick,
First,
the link to our video. I hope it works for you:
(Please
note that the video is not for general release yet. Please
don't share it except with those who need to see it as part of your group's
process, and please let them know not to distribute the link. It
will be launched from Freedom Days Syria's Youtube channel when we are ready.)
--made
with the approval of the young man's family for including his personal details.
Then,
my query:
Through
the personal story of one nonviolent prisoner of conscience in Syria , I hope the video conveys the
urgency of releasing all nonviolent prisoners of conscience in Syria ; that
is its aim.
Since
we started working on it, Omar Abdulaziz, a nonviolence activist in his sixties
who was imprisoned in poor health, has died, pressing on me the urgency of
getting this video rolling.
The
Syrian Nonviolence Movement ( https://www.facebook.com/SyrainNonviolence?fref=ts),
has signed on to the video, and SNM's logo is at the video's end, so it is an
SNM project.
I'm
writing to ask if you would add your group's name, OMNI Center
for Peace, Justice, and Ecology, under the video.
Freedom
Days Syria, the grassroots network formed inside Syria connecting some two dozen
small local nonviolence groups there, has agreed to endorse it, as well
as to release the video on its YouTube channel.
Also
endorsing so far are: FOR, the Fellowship of Reconciliation, based in Nyack NY ,
the Association of World Citizens; and the British Association of Muslim
Academics. FOR is partnering with me to link the video to the FOR
website.
A
host of grassroots Syrian groups have endorsed, including:
1.
Syrian Nonviolence Movement
2.
Freedom Days Syria (network of civil resistance groups in Syria )
3.
I Am Not Just a Number (Syrian activists campaigning for Syrian
prisoners of conscience)
4.
Damascus Girls Assembly, Syria
(civil resistance group, Damascus ,
Syria )
5.
Union of Free Syrian Students (civil resistance group, Damascus , Syria )
6.
Nabd Collective , Syria (civil resistance group, Homs , Syria )
7.
Kebreet, (civil resistance news & media group, Syria )
8.
Suria Fowq al-Jamee (civil resistance group, Syria )
9.
Qamishlo House (Syrian collective in southern Turkey
promoting pluralism, nonviolence, women’s rights through arts and workshops)
10.
Free Women of Daraya (civil resistance group, Daraya , Syria )
11.
One Year and Counting campaign for Syrian prisoners of
conscience detained over a year (Syrians, both in-country and expat)
12.
Tuesdays for Free Syrians (Facebook page media group promoting
awareness of Syrian prisoners of conscience, run by Syrians inside and outside
the country in coordination)
Our
current draft of the text to be posted with the video is:
We write to express grave concern over the fate of Syria ’s
nonviolent prisoners of conscience unjustly detained over a year in Syrian
prisons for exercising their inalienable freedoms of opinion, expression, and
assembly. While this video highlights the story of one such prisoner, it is
concerned with all of them. We demand their release and hold the Syrian
government and its security forces responsible for their well-being in custody.
While there is no completely accurate count of Syria ’s current
prisoners of conscience, we know at least that the following nonviolent
prisoners of conscience have been wrongfully detained for more than one year.
We demand their unconditional release.
1. Bassam Sahyouni,
imprisoned since May 7, 2011
2. Anas Shughri,
imprisoned since May 14, 2011
3. Muhammad Said Khoulani,
imprisoned since May 19, 2011
4. Tareq Ziada, imprisoned
since May 19, 2011
5. Shibli Alaysami, age
87, imprisoned since May 24, 2011
6. Khairo Dabbas,
imprisoned since July 2, 2011
7. Jihad Nadim Alian,
imprisoned since July 8, 2011
8. Hassan Walid Mabroukeh,
imprisoned since July 17, 2011
9. Hassan Niameh,
imprisoned since July 21, 2011
10. Eslam Dabbas, imprisoned since July 22, 2011
11. Majd Kholani, imprisoned since August 8, 2011
12. Ali Aladdin, imprisoned since August 8, 2011
13. Ibrahim al-Esa, imprisoned since August 12,
2011
14. Mazen Shurbaji, imprisoned since August 15,
2011
15. Tareq Balsheh, imprisoned since August 19,
2011
16. Hussain Essou, imprisoned since September 3,
2011
17. Mohammad Taysir Kholani, imprisoned since
September 6, 2011
18. Mazen Ziada, imprisoned since September 6,
2011
19. Yahya Shurbaji, imprisoned since September 6,
2011
20. Maan Shurbaji, imprisoned since
September 6, 2011
21. Shepal Ibrahim, imprisoned since September 23,
2011
22. Mostafa Fawwal, imprisoned since September 26,
2011
23. Alaa Shweiti, imprisoned since October 16,
2011
24. Dr Muhammad Bashir Arab, imprisoned since
November 2, 2011
25. Muhammad Ghazzy, imprisoned since November 10,
2011
26. Anas Zuhair Bayad, imprisoned since November
18, 2011
27. Muhammad Karim, imprisoned since November 19,
2011
28. Na’eem Bashir Asaliya, imprisoned since
November 20, 2011
29. Shadi Buqai, imprisoned since November 20,
2011
30. Kenan Sa’deldeen, imprisoned since November
20, 2011
31. Ahmad al-Zeer, imprisoned since November 25,
2011
32. Manaf Abazid, imprisoned since November 20,
2011
33. Mustafa al-Bat’heesh, imprisoned since
December 10, 2011
34. Noor Hallak, imprisoned since February 11,
2012
35. Mazen Darwish, imprisoned since February 16,
2012
36. Husain Ghrer, imprisoned since February 16,
2012
37. Abdulrahman Hamada, imprisoned since February
16, 2012
38. Hani Zitani,imprisoned since February 16, 2012
39. Mansur Omari, imprisoned since February 16,
2012
40. Nabil Shurbaji, imprisoned since February 26,
2012
41. Obaida Baha al-Rakkad, imprisoned since
February 26, 2012
42. Oqba Quwayder, imprisoned since February 26,
2012
43. Cegerxwîn Mullah Ahmad, imprisoned since March
3, 2012
Could
you forward this to the Omni board (again, careful about the video not being
shared anywhere until we launch) and let me know?
Gratefully,
Mohja
YouTube - Videos from this
email
FRANK BRODHEAD’S REPORT ON SYRIA ,
APRIL 2, 2013
CIVIL WAR/INTERVENTION INSYRIA
CIVIL WAR/INTERVENTION IN
By Conn Hallinan, ZNet [April 1, 2013]
---- In some ways the Syrian civil war resembles a proxy chess match between supporters of the Bashar al-Assad regime— Iran, Iraq, Russia and China—and its opponents— Turkey, the oil monarchies, the U.S., Britain and France. But the current conflict only resembles chess if the game is played with multiple sides, backstabbing allies, and conflicting agendas. … According to the Guardian (UK), Netanyahu raised the possibility of joint U.S.-Israeli air strikes againstSyria , which Israel accuses of shifting weapons to its ally
Hezbollah in Lebanon .
There is no evidence that Syria
has actually done that, and logic would suggest that the Assad regime is
unlikely to export weapons when it is fighting for its life and struggling to
overcome an arms embargo imposed on it by the EU and the UN. But Tel Aviv is
spoiling for a re-match with Hezbollah, the organization that fought it to a standstill
in 2006. “What I hear over and over again from Israeli generals is that another
war with Hezbollah is inevitable,” a former U.S. diplomat told the Guardian.http://www.zcommunications.org/syria-a-multi-sided-chess-match-by-conn-hallinan
---- In some ways the Syrian civil war resembles a proxy chess match between supporters of the Bashar al-Assad regime— Iran, Iraq, Russia and China—and its opponents— Turkey, the oil monarchies, the U.S., Britain and France. But the current conflict only resembles chess if the game is played with multiple sides, backstabbing allies, and conflicting agendas. … According to the Guardian (UK), Netanyahu raised the possibility of joint U.S.-Israeli air strikes against
Analysis: World Plans for a Post-Assad Syria
By
James Bays , Aljazeera [April 1, 2013]
----
World leaders have been drawing up contingency plans in case the situation in Syria
decisively changes. Most commentators believe that in the end, Assad's regime
will collapse. Opposition forces have been regularly capturing small villages
and patches of land, and the Assad regime has lost effective control of large
parts of the country and many of its supply lines. Conversations in recent
weeks with ministers, ambassadors, international leaders and military
commanders make clear that detailed planning is now being carried out for what
comes next. Here is what the main stakeholders in Syria are planning in the event of
a major change in the conflict:
Obama’s Syria Policy in Shambles as Assad Opposition Squabbles
By
Hannah Allam, McClatchy Newspapers [March 25, 2013]
----
The Obama administration’s Syria policy was unraveling Monday after weekend
developments left the Syrian Opposition Coalition and its military command in
turmoil, with the status of its leader uncertain and its newly selected prime
minister rejected by the group’s military wing. State Department officials said
they still planned to work with the coalition, to which the United States has pledged $60 million, but
analysts said the developments were one more sign that the Obama administration
and its European allies had no workable Syria policy. The opposition
coalition, already in its second incarnation, has proved to be as beset by
factionalism as its predecessor, the Syrian National Council, exacerbated this
time by the meddling of foreign donors, analysts said. But, the analysts added,
the United States
has no other entity to back in a war that pits the regime of President Bashar
Assad against a jihadist-dominated rebel movement.http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/03/25/v-print/186877/obamas-syria-policy-in-shambles.html
Also useful - Leila Nachawati Rego,
“Reasons to remain optimistic about Syria ” Aljazeera [March 29, 2013]http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/03/201332863239514670.html. For
daily coverage, I find especially useful Joshua Landis’ blog at SyriaComment - http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/. Aljazeera’s coverage on Syria can be
found at http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/spotlight/syria/.
Inside Syria
From Syria Comment [March 31, 2013]
----
Syria Comment Announces a new web service: Syria Video, which can be found at http://syriavideo.net. Syria Video is a web application
that maps and aggregates Syrian war videos by tracking a large number of
YouTube channels. The channels have been identified as reliable and tied to
specific towns or regions of Syria .
Syria Video collects all new videos released on these channels and attempts to
identify their location in Syria
and then displays them in chronological order. Since going online in early
January, Syria Video has collected over 40,000 videos from 42 Syrian cities and
10 governates. http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/?p=18340
Assad Sends Letter to Emerging Powers Seeking Help to End Syrian
War
By
Rick Gladstone and Hala Droubi, New York Times [March 27, 2013]
----
President Bashar al-Assad of Syria
beseeched a five-nation group of emerging powers on Wednesday to help halt the
Syrian conflict, one day after the Arab League moved to further isolate Mr.
Assad by ceremoniously filling his government’s vacant seat with the opposition
coalition that has sworn to topple him. In a letter addressed to the leaders of
Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — the so-called BRICS group of
developing nations, which convened a summit meeting in Durban, South Africa —
Mr. Assad framed his request as a plea for assistance in the fight of good
against evil. He depicted the opposition forces as terrorists bent on
destroying Syria
with help from a conspiracy of hostile Arab and Western countries. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/28/world/middleeast/syrias-developments.html?ref=world
More Arms to Syria
Recent Arms Influx Preparing Rebels to Attack Damascus
By
Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com [March 27, 2013]
----
On Monday, it was revealed that the CIA is overseeing what is being called a
“sharp” increase in weapons being smuggled to the Syrian rebels from abroad.
Officials are not only confirming this, but say it is part of a specific policy
to set up an attack on the capital. Syria ’s
government has mostly given up on fighting rebels in small battles nationwide,
and has the bulk of its military forces in and around the capital city of Damascus . Arab officials
say the surge in arms is part of a “master plan” to conquer Damascus militarily. http://news.antiwar.com/2013/03/27/officials-recent-arms-influx-preparing-rebels-to-attack-damascus/
Where the weapons come from – John Glaser, “Croation
Arms and the Syrian Conflict,” Antiwar.com [April 1, 2013]http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/04/01/croation-arms-and-the-syrian-conflict/;
and from The Daily Star [Lebanon], “Croatia
transit point for Syrian rebel arms: report,” [March 9, 2013] http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2013/Mar-09/209384-croatia-transit-point-for-syrian-rebel-arms-report.ashx#axzz2OZYacg6T
A Regional War?
By
Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor [March 28, 2013]
----
When the Arab League handed Syria ’s
long-vacant seat to the Syrian opposition on March 26 and endorsed military aid
for anti-regime rebels, the first and loudest complaints came from Iran . Despite a
two-year rebellion that has seen 70,000 deaths and 1 million refugees, Iran has
not veered from its staunch support for Syria’s embattled President Bashar
al-Assad, whose regime it considers a critical piece of its anti-US,
anti-Israel "axis of resistance." The Iranian complaints are the
diplomatic side of an on-the-battlefield proxy war in Syria , with
both sides reportedly receiving a surge of weapons from outside powers in recent
months. Iranian military and financial support for Mr. Assad has been
stepped up with near-weekly flights (and Russia still continues normal sales
to its ally). Qatar , Saudi Arabia , and Jordan , meanwhile, have ferried
fresh weaponry to the rebels, with CIA support.http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/0328/Iran-s-support-for-Syria-still-appears-strong-but-is-it-hedging-its-bets?nav=87-frontpage-entryNineItem
From Reuters, [March 29, 2013]
----
Iran , a close ally of Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad, accused Qatar
on Friday of "intensifying the bloodshed" in Syria and criticized it for enabling an opposition
bloc to open its first embassy in Doha .
Syrian opposition leader Moaz Alkhatib, whose group is recognized by the Arab
League as the sole representative for Syria ,
opened the embassy in Qatar
on Wednesday.http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/iran-says-qatar-intensifying-bloodshed-in-syria-with-new-rebel-embassy-1.512608
By Philip Giraldi, American Conservative [March 29, 2013]
----
Turkey is without any doubt
the key player and most essential ally for the United States in the entire Near
East region. It is frequently cited as an example of how democracy can function
in a predominantly Islamic country. It is the NATO member with the largest army
after that of the U.S. ,
fought in the Korean War, has fully supported every U.S.
intervention in its backyard save only Iraq
in 2003, and shares long borders both with Syria
and Iran .
Whatever happens in Syria
will largely be shaped by what Ankara
decides to do, and President Obama knows it.http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/turkey-cracks-the-whip/
By
Harriet Sherwood, The Guardian [UK ] [March 31, 2013]
----
Israel 's
vaunted missile defence system is likely to leave the civilian population
exposed to an incoming barrage of rockets in the event of a war as it is
deployed to protect key strategic and military sites, according the country's
commander of the home front. Despite the success of the Iron Dome anti-missile
batteries at intercepting rockets launched from Gaza during November's
eight-day conflict, the five units currently operational are insufficient to
protect against the superior firepower of Hezbollah in Lebanon.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/31/israel-missile-system-civilians-exposed
By
Joseph Dana, The International [United Arab Emirates ] [Apr 1, 2013]
----
Over the past several years, diplomatic relations soured between the two
traditional allies over Israel 's
stubborn refusal to apologise for the deaths of eight Turkish activists and one
Turkish-American aboard an aid convoy en route to the Gaza strip in 2010. Analysts quickly pegged
the apology to instability in Syria
and even the Iranian nuclear crisis. But there is another possibility that
could be fuelling this rapprochement: a potential stake in the lucrative export
of Israeli natural gas. After years of fruitless exploration in the eastern
Mediterranean, in 2009 Israel
discovered some of the largest offshore reserves of natural gas in the last
decade. The exact size of the gasfields are unknown but they are rumoured to
contain upwards of 150 years' worth of production.http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/israel-and-turkey-restore-ties-with-energy-as-a-motivator
Turkey and Israel Feel the
Effect as Syria’s Civil War Fuels Tensions at Borders
By
Sebnem Arsu and Rick Gladstone, New York Times [March 28, 2013]
UN: Major Increase in Israeli Warplanes Over South
Lebanon
By
Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com [March 25, 2013]
----
The UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has confirmed a dramatic increase in the number of Israeli
violations of Lebanese airspace, with several incidents reported in the past
two weeks alone.
Israeli
warplanes wandering into Lebanon
are not a new phenomenon, but UNIFIL reports that this year has seen twice the
rate of overflights as 2012, and not all of these are small 1-2 plane
incursions. On March 14, an estimated 25 Israeli warplanes conducted four
separate flights into Lebanese airspace, heading up virtually the entire coast
before turning back just short of Syria. Israel launched air strikes along the
Syria-Lebanon border in January and is believed to be considering a full-scale
war with Syria, so many of the incursions have been chalked up as posturing for
a potential Syria war. Yet Israeli military leaders have talked up the “value”
of invading Lebanon
yet again, so this can’t be ruled out either
By
Robert Fisk, The Independent [March 29, 2013]
----
The prime minister has resigned, there’s no government to speak of, there are
further street battles in Tripoli ,
the threat of more kidnappings. Lebanon ,
as we used to say in the civil war, returns to normal. And in some ways, it’s
true. Lebanon
is always living through the greatest crisis since the last greatest crisis.
But the current drama is a little more serious.http://www.zcommunications.org/lebanon-is-like-a-rolls-royce-with-square-wheels-it-has-a-lot-that-s-worthy-of-praise-but-it-doesn-t-run-so-well-by-robert-fisk
Syrian Conflict’s Impact is Felt Across Border in Iraq
By
Ernesto Londoño , Washington Post [March 27, 2013]
----
Syria ’s civil war is
increasingly threatening to destabilize neighboring Iraq , widening a sectarian divide
in a nation still reeling from the messy aftermath of the U.S.-led invasion a
decade ago. Iraqi officials have expressed alarm in recent weeks as fighting
between forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad and the armed opposition has
spilled across the border. After staying on the sidelines for more than a year,
Sunni tribes in Iraq that
straddle the frontier have decisively joined the effort to topple the Alawite
Shiite-led government in Damascus .
Many officials here fear that a growing Iraqi Sunni protest movement that has
found inspiration from the uprising next door could quickly turn into all-out
revolt in regions that formed the heart of the Sunni insurgency over the past
decade.http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/syrian-conflicts-impact-is-felt-across-border-in-iraq/2013/03/27/d7bf14f8-964a-11e2-9e23-09dce87f75a1_print.html
WORLD
[Also published in Z Magazine (May 2013 --Dick].
How the West Fueled the Ever-Growing Carnage in
Syria
The actions of the United States and its allies in Syria have only
led to escalating violence and chaos.
Syrian soldiers, who
have defected to join the Free Syrian Army, hold up their rifles as they secure
a street in Saqba, in Damascus
suburbs, in this January 27, 2012.
Photo Credit: Freedom House/Flickr
Photo Credit: Freedom House/Flickr
April 9, 2013 |
On Tuesday March 27th 2013, Kofi Annan
gave a speech at the Graduate Institute in Geneva. In his
usual careful and diplomatic tone, Annan spoke firmly against Western calls for
more direct military intervention in Syria .
"Further militarization of the
conflict, I'm not sure that is the way to help the Syrian people," Annan
said, "They are waiting for the killing to stop. You find some
people far away from Syria
are the ones very keen for putting in weapons. My own view is that as
late as it is we have to find a way of pouring water on the fire rather than
the other way around."
Like many who seek peace in Syria , Annan looks back on the "Action Group for Syria" agreement that he brokered in Geneva on June 30th 2012 as a foundation for peace that
was promptly squandered by the United
States and its allies. In Geneva, all
five Permanent Members of the UN Security Council signed on to a plan that
would lead to free elections in Syria, with a transitional government of
national unity including members of the existing government and the
opposition. The critical factor which made agreement possible was that
the U.S.
and its allies dropped their demand for the removal of President Assad as a
precondition for the transition to begin.
As Annan wrote in a Financial Times op-ed as he resigned his post as UN
envoy a month later, "We left the meeting believing a Security Council
resolution endorsing the group's decision was assured… Instead, there has been
finger-pointing and name-calling in the Security Council."
A few days after the Geneva
agreement, Russia circulated a draft resolution in the Security
Council as Annan expected. But, instead of honoring the commitments they
made in Geneva , the U.S. ,
U.K. and France rejected
it. They drafted a rival resolution containing all the
elements they had dropped in Geneva
and which had previously prevented consensus: automatic triggers for sanctions;
no commitment to pressure rebel militias to comply; and the invocation of
Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter as a pretext for future military action.
With the Security Council once again
deadlocked, Saudi Arabia sponsored a version of the
West's resolution in the UN General Assembly, calling for Assad to
step down and for sanctions if he did not. The resolution seemed likely
to fail, with Brazil , India , South Africa and much of the
developing world lined up against it, but a watered down version was passed.
The CIA has since stepped up its support
to the rebels, providing satellite intelligence on Syrian military deployments
and managing arms shipments from the Persian Gulf and Croatia via Turkey and Jordan . Predictably, the
bloodshed has only increased on both sides. March was probably the
deadliest month since the war began. In his speech in Geneva , Kofi Annan called the current UN
estimate of 70,000 Syrians killed "a gross under-estimation."
In the early days of the conflict, UN
casualty figures reflected unsubstantiated
and probably exaggerated reports from the Syrian opposition and
their allies in the Western media. Since then, the UN has held down its
estimates as the killing has escalated and the real slaughter has almost
certainly now surpassed the rebel propaganda, with the rebels themselves
committing their fair share of it.
Norwegian General Robert Mood echoed Kofi
Annan's analysis in a recent
interview with the BBC World Service'sHardtalk program.
Mood led the 300-member military observer mission that went into Syria in April
2012 to monitor the ceasefire that was the first step in Annan's six-point
peace plan.
Mood prematurely suspended that mission in June 2012
because the ceasefire had failed to take hold and his unarmed observer teams
were being fired on and threatened by hostile crowds. He said that the
operation could only resume if all parties to the conflict were committed to
the safety and freedom of movement of the observers. "The government
has expressed that very clearly in the last couple of days," Mood said.
"I have not seen the same clear statement from the opposition yet."
Reflecting on his mission 9 months later,
General Mood told Hardtalk's Steven Sackur, "There was an opening,
but that opening was not used, because… the kind of international leadership
that we would need was not there. That leadership could have been Russia , China ,
the U.S. coming together and
at least agreeing on a joint message so that the government in Damascus and the key people in the Free
Syrian Army and the opposition groups were given the same message. That
message could have been one option to both of them that we will push forward
with a plan for bringing Syria
out of this terrible violence and onto a political track - a strong message to
both the government and the opposition that we will accept nothing else.
If such a message had come both from all of them in the P5 and the Security
Council together and united, I do believe still today that it would have had a
strong impact."
Sackur asked Mood about the differences
between the West and Russia
and China
over President Assad's role during a political transition. Mood
explained, "This is how small and how big the differences between the
parties were. In my mind at that time, it would have been possible to
lead Syria
through a transition supported by a united Security Council with Assad as part
of the transition. I believe there was an opening for that and I believe
there was a willingness to do that. The insistence on the removal of
President Assad as a start of the process led them into a corner where the
strategic picture gave them no way out whatsoever…"
The more one studies the actions of the United States
and its allies throughout this crisis, the more they seem to have been designed
only to lead to ever-escalating violence. This raises the inescapable
question whether, in fact, the slaughter and chaos taking place in Syria are in fact the intended result of U.S. policy
rather than the tragic but unintended result of its failure, as Western
propaganda would have us believe.
In stark contrast to cautious statements
by U.S.
officials, their actual policy appears to have consistently fostered the
militarization and escalation of the crisis and to have undermined every peace
initiative. In fact, their public statements may be only a
smokescreen for a darker, more cynical policy:
- As the Arab League tried to broker a
ceasefire in December 2011, ex-CIA officer Philip Giraldi reported that unmarked NATO
planes were flying fighters and weapons from Libya
to a "Free Syrian Army" base in Turkey ; British and French
special forces were training Syrian fighters; and the CIA was providing
communications equipment and intelligence. Giraldi wrote, "Syrian
government claims that it is being assaulted by rebels who are armed, trained
and financed by foreign governments are more true than false."
- As Kofi Annan launched his peace plan
in April 2012, the U.S. joined France and other allies at a series of so-called "Friends of Syria" summits,
where they promised unconditional political support, weapons and money to their
Syrian proxies, making sure that they would not comply with the ceasefire that
was the first step in the Annan peace plan.
- After finally dropping the precondition
of Assad's departure and agreeing publicly to Annan's "Action Group for Syria "
proposal at the end of June 2012, the Western powers returned to the UN
Security Council and reasserted all their preconditions, killing the plan
before it could get off the ground.
- The supply of weapons and fighters to
the rebels has increased steadily since then. Saudi
judges have sent Arab Spring protesters to fight and die in Syria instead
of to prison. Saudi Arabia , Qatar , Libya and other Arab monarchies
send weapons, money and fighters. The Saudis fund shipments of European
weapons from Croatia to Jordan to skirt
the EU arms embargo. And the CIA provides military training to Syrian and foreign
fighters in Jordan .
- Now, as if the U.S. has not been covertly fueling the conflict
all along, the U.S.
government is debating more open military support to the rebels.
To paraphrase an old riddle: "Are we
governed by clever people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really
mean it?" In this case, did the United
States mean to open the gates of Hell in Syria , or did
it just blunder into this mess?
Unfortunately U.S. policymakers have a dismal
record of combining the worst elements of both. As the U.S. Congress
debated war in Iraq in 2002,
there were clever people in Washington who knew that chemical and biological weapons do not remain potent for more than ten
years and that there was no evidence that Iraq had revived the banned weapons
programs it dismantled in 1991. Senator Bob Graham, the Chairman of the
Senate Intelligence Committee, voted against the war authorization and begged
his colleagues to read the classified National Intelligence Estimate, instead
of the fake summary of it that they were given "to strengthen the case for going to war", as one of its authors,
the CIA's Paul Pillar, has since admitted. There were other
"clever" people in Washington who knew as much as Senator Graham but
voted for war anyway: "clever people putting us on."
But the "clever people putting us
on" were really as deluded as the "imbeciles who really meant
it". They saw the WMD fairy tale for what it was, but they failed to
see the inevitable consequences of their own actions - not just for the people
of Iraq , who they were quite
prepared to sacrifice, but for the U.S. interests they hoped to
advance.
As General Mood told Hardtalk,
"It is fairly easy to use the military tool, because, when you launch the
military tool in classical interventions, something will happen and there will
be results. The problem is that the results are almost all the time
different than the political results you were aiming for when you decided to
launch it. So the other position, arguing that it is not the role of the
international community, neither coalitions of the willing nor the UN Security
Council for that matter, to change governments inside a country, is also a
position that should be respected…"
As Mood said, "there will be
results." The use of military force, overt or covert, will kill and
injure a lot of people, because that is what modern weapons are
designed to do. And sufficient violence covertly unleashed within a
society will break down law and order and turn groups of people against each
other. U.S.
military leaders understand this perfectly well based on decades of
experience.
But, despite catastrophic failures in Iraq and Afghanistan ,
the "NATO rebellion" in Libya
provided the U.S.
and its allies with a new model for "regime change." NATO, Qatar and Saudi
Arabia unleashed a war that killed at least 25,000 people and plunged
the most highly
developed country in Africa into an orgy of ethnic cleansing
and unending chaos. They succeeded in butchering Colonel Gaddafi and
installing a comprador regime to govern Libya 's
oil industry, but NATO-trained militias are still fighting each other for
control of many parts of the country and have exported violence and militia
rule to neighboring countries, including Mali ,
as well as to Syria .
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has committed serial aggression,
isolating, demonizing, dividing and destroying Yugoslavia ,
Afghanistan , Iraq , Libya
and now Syria .
In each case, it has cited higher motives and good intentions, even as it
concealed its own covert role in igniting, fueling and militarizing internal
conflicts. As Harold Pinter said, "It has exercised a quite clinical
manipulation of power worldwide, while masquerading as a force for universal
good. It's a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of
hypnosis."
If post-war conditions permit, countries
destroyed by U.S.
aggression and covert war are recruited to join their more submissive neighbors
as entry-level members of the U.S.-led capitalist world. Some American
politicians appear to genuinely believe that this justifies the violence and
slaughter that makes it possible, even though, as General Mood said, "the
results are almost all the time different than the political results you were
aiming for."
The folly and savagery of destroying
country after country like this stems from a fundamental misperception of the
post-Cold War world that is rooted in fantasies like Francis Fukuyama's "The End of
History" theory. U.S.
leaders imagined that, with the demise of the U.S.S.R., they stood at the
threshold of a world made in America 's
image. Politics and history had passed away, to be supplanted by
management, marketing and finance. They would run the world as a giant
business enterprise, of which they would be the executives and majority
shareholders.
But this new global dictatorship, like
all dictatorships, faced the problem of what to do with dissidents who still
resisted integration into America 's
informal global empire. By 1991, this seemed to have been reduced to a
tantalizingly finite number of countries that the new American
"superpower" could surely marginalize and, if necessary, destroy:
Albania; Angola; Burma; Cambodia; Cuba; Iran; Iraq; Laos; Libya; North Korea;
Palestine; Somalia; Syria; Vietnam; Yugoslavia; and, last but not least, China.
Twenty years later, many of those
resistant regimes have been dealt with. But the United States
is no closer to its cherished vision of a unipolar world. Their places on
America's global "kill list" have been taken by newly independent
governments even more solidly committed to resisting American imperialism,
including popular democratic regimes in Latin America, which the U.S. has
"plagued with misery in the name of liberty" for almost two
centuries, as Simon Bolivar predicted: Argentina; Bolivia; Ecuador; El
Salvador; Nepal; Nicaragua; Pakistan; Russia; Sudan; Venezuela. Popular
resistance movements to global capitalism keep emerging in countries around the
world, from Maoists in India
to Islamist groups in the Muslim world; and much of the economically resurgent
global South now has closer ties to China
than to the U.S.
After killing millions and squandering
trillions in its futile quest for dominance, the U.S. confronts a world it has even
less power to control. But the mindset of America 's leaders seems set in
stone. Its rapacious machinery of covert war has only expanded under
President Obama. As in the 1950s, 1970s & 1980s, the CIA has
exploited America 's
military failures to carve out a larger role for itself, and Obama has been
seduced as easily as Eisenhower, Carter and Reagan into becoming its commander,
its patron and its puppet. The U.S. political system is not
designed to produce new leaders who say, "No, thank you, I don't need a
secret private army." True to form, Obama asked only, "What
else can I do with it?"
The secrecy that makes the CIA and its
JSOC foot-soldiers such attractive "tools" to President Obama is the
very thing that makes them so dangerous to the rest of us, as we really should
know by now. A hidden benefit of secret U.S.
military operations has always been that the deferential U.S.
media will report only the cover stories, turning the press into
powerful co-conspirators in these operations. Secrecy and propaganda are
mutually reinforcing.
For a consummate media manipulator like
Obama, who was named "Marketer of the Year" for 2008 by the
American advertising industry, hiding a policy of covert war and assassination
behind a dovish public image was an irresistibly "witty" global
masquerade. His smiling face still beams out from Shepard Fairey's iconic
campaign posters as his assassins ply their trade on a dozen manhunts each night.
In their 2006 book The Foreign Policy Disconnect, Benjamin Page and Marshall
Bouton demonstrated that most of the crises in post-1945 U.S. foreign policy could have ben avoided if U.S.
leaders had paid more attention to the views of the public. But how can
the public have any influence on secret policy-making? U.S. leaders have responded to public alarm at
their aggressive and illegal use of military force, not by restoring law and
order to U.S.
policy, but by moving it farther into the shadows to protect it from public
scrutiny and interference.
But the more this policy succeeds in its
goal of secrecy and deception, the more it fails in the real world.
Whether Presidents Bush or Obama are ever held to account for the death and
destruction they have unleashed on other countries, our children and grandchildren
will pay for our complicity in their crimes, as they struggle to invest what is
left of our country's resources in a belated effort to repair the damage of
war, shattered international relations, looted natural resources, gutted public
services and climate chaos.
Nicolas J. S.
Davies is author of Blood On Our Hands: The American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq .
He wrote the chapter on "Obama At War" for the just released
book, Grading
the 44th President: A Report Card on Barack Obama's First Term as a Progressive
Leader.
April 9, 2013
An unprecedented film documents the new and perilous
reality of everyday life for both
|
|
|
|
FEATURED FROM THIS
REPORT
THE LATEST
Does Syria Face a
Genocidal Future?
A
new report suggests those at risk of ethnic cleansing are not just the Sunni
civilians currently being tortured, assassinated and bombed, but members of Syria ’s
Alawite elite.
Is the Syrian Regime
Deliberately Targeting Civilians?
A
new report says the Syrian Air Force uses methods and means that do not
distinguish between civilians and combatants.
Live Chat Wed. 12:30
ET: Life and Death Behind Syria’s Front Lines
Join
a live chat about “Syria Behind the Lines” on 4/10 at 12:30 p.m. ET with Olly
Lambert, Syria Deeply’s Lara Setrakian and TIME’s Rania Abouzeid.
Where Are Syria’s
Weapons Coming From?
How
much do they cost? And how does the politics of their distribution impact the
conflict on the ground? TIME’s Rania Abouzeid explains.
On Syria, World
Powers Hedge Their Bets
Two
years into Syria ’s
civil war, no nation wants to end up on the losing side. Here’s how the world
powers stack up.
Reporter’s
Reflections: “I Almost Died in Syria”
Before
FRONTLINE filmmaker Olly Lambert crossed into Syria , he had no idea how close
he would come to dying.
A Rare Glimpse
Inside A Syrian Loyalist Stronghold
Everyone
at the public high school in Aziziya knows that the senior boys may soon be
drafted in President Bashar al-Assad’s army to take up the fight in the
country’s escalating civil war.
March Was Deadliest
Month in Syrian Conflict
But
a close look at the figures reveals a shift in who is dying.
Syria Two Years
Later: Bloody Civil War With No End In Sight
The
Syrian revolution started two years ago today in Dara’a, a small farming town
60 miles south of Damascus .
But what began as peaceful protests has grown into a bloody civil war with no
end in sight.
Press Release: A Harrowing
Original Story of Neighbor Against Neighbor Along Syria’s Front Line
FRONTLINE’s
Olly Lambert is the first Western filmmaker to spend an extended period
living on both sides of Syria’s war—and to document, on camera, the realities
of everyday life for rebels, government soldiers and the civilians who
support them.
Is Kerry’s Syrian
Aid Shift a Game Changer?
Earlier
this week, Moaz al-Khatib, the leader of the Syrian opposition coalition, had
no intention of meeting with leaders from the U.S.
and Europe at today’s “Friends of Syria” gathering in Rome .
How Many People Are
Dying in Syria?
The
U.N. says Syria ’s
rising death toll is approaching a staggering 70,000 people killed since the
rebellion broke out almost two years ago. But determining an accurate death
count amidst a conflict is fraught with challenges.
Syria’s Shocking
Civilian Death Toll
August
was the deadliest month since the Syrian rebellion began a year-and a-half
ago — and more deadly for civilians than the bloodiest months in the Iraq and Afghanistan
wars, as well as the recent uprisings in the Middle East .
What’s Known about
Syria’s “Murky” Opposition
What
began as a street uprising among united, angry Syrians has become a
sprawling, scattered opposition force trying to bring down the regime of
President Bashar al-Assad.
Blast in Hama,
Opposition Stronghold, Disrupts Fragile Syrian Ceasefire
An
explosion ripped through a poor neighborhood in the opposition stronghold of Hama this morning,
disrupting the fragile Syrian ceasefire agreement brokered by U.N. envoy Kofi
Annan last month.
Will Syrian Truce Hold?
Despite
apprehensions in the lead-up to yesterday’s deadline, a tenuous ceasefire
agreement brokered by U.N. envoy Kofi Annan took effect in Syria this
morning.
“Syrian Society Is
Beginning to Fall Apart”
Neighbors
are turning on their neighbors, according to new accounts by refugees who
have escaped Syria ’s
bloody conflict for eastern Lebanon .
With Russian
Support, U.N. Security Council Adopts Watered-Down Statement on Syria
After
months of diplomatic stalemate resulting from the the objections of Russia and China ,
the U.N. Security Council unanimously adopted a statement on the crisis in Syria today.
Syrian Opposition
Accused of Serious Human Rights Abuses
Against
the backdrop of the Syrian government’s brutal crackdown, the tactics of the
country’s armed opposition groups have received considerably less scrutiny.
Syria One Year
Later: Growing Evidence of Torture, Detainee Abuse
Bisat
al-rih is Arabic for “flying carpet,” but for those detained by the Syrian
regime, it can mean being blindfolded, stripped down to the underpants and
strapped to a foldable wooden board.
Rare Video Evidence
of Torture in Syrian Hospitals
Last
night Channel 4 aired chilling footage of evidence of what appears to be the
torture of injured Syrian civilians in a military hospital in Homs .
One Woman’s Proposal
to Halt the Violence in Syria
Over
the past few months, one woman has driven the debate over whether and how the
international community should intervene in the Syrian crisis.
Why Hasn’t Syria’s
Assad Been Labeled A War Criminal?
What Is Al Qaeda Doing in Syria?
Yesterday,
Iraqi forces arrested the head of Ansar al-Sunna, an Iraqi insurgent group
Iraqi leaders say has links with Al Qaeda, as he tried to enter the country
through its border with Syria .
U.N. Report Accuses
Syria of Crimes Against Humanity
The
Syrian state has committed “gross human right violations” amounting to crimes
against humanity a panel of independent U.N. investigators concluded in a
72-page report released today.
Violence Intensifies
in Homs after U.N. Resolution on Syria Fails
Diplomatic
efforts to resolve the 11-month-long crisis in Syria have stalled after a
resolution condemning the regime’s crackdown on protesters failed in the
United Nations Security Council on Saturday.
On 30th Anniversary
of Hama Massacre, Syrian Troops Lock Down City
Thirty
years ago today, the regime of then-Syrian President Hafez al-Assad launched
what’s known as one of the bloodiest chapters of modern Arab history: the
Hama Massacre.
High-Stakes Showdown
Over Syria at the U.N.
The
fight to end the Syrian government’s brutal 10-month crackdown moves to the
United Nations today.
Syria: “We No Longer
Want Arab Solutions to the Crisis”
Calling
it a “conspiratorial scheme” hatched against the country, the Syrian
government rejected an Arab League peace plan yesterday proposing that
embattled President Bashar al-Assad cede power.
Pressure Mounts on
Syria as U.N. Calls for Action to Prevent Civil War
Today
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay called for international
intervention to protect Syrians from the government’s brutal nine-month
crackdown, which the organization estimates has now killed more than 4,000
civilians, including 307 children.
UPDATED: A Guide to
Sanctions on Syria
Syria More Isolated
Than Ever as Arab League Suspension Takes Effect
The
Arab League formalized Syria ’s suspension
from the 22-member organization yesterday and threatened to impose economic
sanctions if the government did … Continue reading
Syria Calls Arab
League Suspension “Extremely Dangerous Step”
Report: Violence in
Syria Amounts to Crimes Against Humanity
Human
Rights Watch called on the Arab League today to suspend Syria ’s membership and to support a move by
the United Nations Security Council to impose an arms embargo and refer Syria to the
International Criminal Court.
Syria’s Secretive
Ruling Minority Sect
Because
their secret tenets and practices are known only to the few males deemed
worthy to undergo instruction, the Alawites, Syria ’s long-persecuted minority
sect, remain a mystery to most.
Syria Agrees to
Cease-Fire Proposal
But
the announcement has been greeted with skepticism and reports of new
violence.
Syrian President
Warns Against Western Intervention
Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad warned this weekend that a Libyan-style Western
intervention against his regime will lead to a regional crisis.
Carl Gibson | The US Wants Syrian Oil, Not Democracy
Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News
Gibson writes: "If the US were really concerned about spreading Democracy in the Middle East, we'd be helping the Occupy Gezi movement oust Turkish Prime Minister Ergodan and condemning his violent suppression of human rights, rather than assisting the Free Syrian Army."
READ MORE
Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News
Gibson writes: "If the US were really concerned about spreading Democracy in the Middle East, we'd be helping the Occupy Gezi movement oust Turkish Prime Minister Ergodan and condemning his violent suppression of human rights, rather than assisting the Free Syrian Army."
READ MORE
HOBSON: RELIGIOUS WARS
On
Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Art Hobson <ahobson@uark.edu> wrote:
Dear friends -
Things are getting worse fast in Syria . Egypt 's Pres. Morsi, a Sunni Islamist from the
Muslim Brotherhood, has cut ties to Syria ,
and called for a UN-endorsed no-fly zone over Syria . In other words, Sunni
Egypt has essentially declared war on Shiite Syria, which is strongly backed by
Shiite Iran and their Hezbollah allies in Lebanon . Thus the war has
become an all-out religious war
between the two major Islamic factions in the Middle East .
Saudi Arabia , Qatar , Iraq ?,
Jordan ,
are strongly Sunni and can be expected to join the battle in one way or the
other.
Zbigneiw Brzezinski is one of America 's most intelligent and
level-headed foreign policy experts. He served as National Security
Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981, negotiated the
normalization of relations with China, strongly supported human rights claims
against the Soviet Union during the cold war (he is Polish by birth), helped
finance the mujahideen in Afghanistan in response to the Soviet invasion of
that country, and much more. He is currently at Johns
Hopkins University 's
School of Advanced International Studies , and is a
member of many important boards and councils.
Please view this 2-minute video featuring Brzezinski, on
msnbc. His advice: The US should not support the rebels militarily
but should instead negotiate with the Russians, Chinese, Europeans, and others
toward a settlement.
The rebels are at least as bad as the Syrian regime, maybe worse
because they appear to be more fanatic in their fundamentalist religious
beliefs. We have no business supporting them, yet we are supplying them
weapons and already talking about enforcing a no-fly zone. US military
involvement can only make a bad situation worse. Will we never learn?
I hope a mass protest against US involvement develops quickly.
As the blunder in Iraq
showed, we've got to stop US
involvement before it begins.
- Art
Making War in Syria
[Forwarded by David
D. –Dick]
t looks as though the skids are properly greased, and the United
States will be making some sort of war in Syria
pretty soon. I say "making war in Syria "
because that's different than going to war in Syria . We aren't sending troops.
We're going to be sending cruise missiles and dropping bombs because that is
how you make war without going to war
and, if you make war without going to war, then it's a lot easier to pretend
back home that you're not at war. Again.
The
bipartisan consensus to make war in Syria seems to
be growing. John Kerry played the role of
Colin Powell yesterday, albeit with slightly more actual evidence on his side.
But the proposed response doesn't seem to match the gravity of the rhetoric he
used.
Administration officials said that although President Obama had
not made a final decision on military action, he was likely to order a limited
military operation - cruise missiles launched from American destroyers in the
Mediterranean Sea at military targets in Syria, for example - and not a
sustained air campaign intended to topple Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian
president, or to fundamentally alter the nature of the conflict on the ground.
If
Kerry is to be believed, the "situation on the ground" is that the
Syrian regime used chemical weapons against its own people, a monstrous crime.
If we aren't trying to "fundamentally alter the nature of the conflict on
the ground," then why in the hell are we making war in Syria in the first place? If we
aren't trying to "topple" the Syrian president so he won't use
chemical weapons on his own people again, why are we going to be firing high
explosives into the country that are going to kill some of those people anyway?
This is the difference between making war in a place and going to war in a
place. If you're simply making war in a place, logic doesn't necessarily apply.
Even a lot of the people proposing that we make war in Syria - even a lot of the liberals proposing it
- admit freely that they don't know what will come next, or even on whose side
we will be making war in Syria .
This strikes me as an important thing to determine before you commit the nation
to a course of action like the one proposed, but then, making war in a place
enables you to do it from an antiseptic distance, to believe in the fairy-tale
McNamara concept of "sending a message" by blowing stuff up, to believe
that the most important thing for the World's Last Superpower to do is
anything. The New York Times thinks making war in Syria will make the president a more believable president. And
that, if the president decides to make war in Syria , the Iranians will wonder if
they should still want a nuclear bomb.
This time the use of chemicals was more brazen and the casualties
were much greater, suggesting that Mr. Assad did not take Mr. Obama seriously.
Presidents should not make a habit of drawing red lines in public, but if they
do, they had best follow through. Many countries (including Iran , which Mr.
Obama has often said won't be permitted to have a nuclear weapon) will be
watching.
The
Times declines to tell us how many Syrians have to die to enhance the
president's credibility with the Iranians. Because when you make war in a
place, actual people die actual deaths. Fathers get killed. Children get
killed. School buildings and hospitals fall down all around the people inside
them. The message you are sending with your missiles gets just a trifle
muddled. Make no mistake. If we strike, we will be making actual war in Syria . Ordinary
Syrians will not see our missiles as "bomb-o-grams," telling them
with every deadly explosion that we're really on their side. We will be another
belligerent making their daily lives brutal and deadly, and there will be
enough of them to hate us for that to guarantee that we will have to make more
war in that place, or in some other place, very soon. That is what we do now. We make war in a place without going to war
in a place, and nobody is fooled except ourselves.
Charlie has been a working journalist since
1976. He is the author of four books, most recently "Idiot America ."
He lives near Boston
with his wife but no longer his three children.
No comments:
Post a Comment