OMNI WAR CRIMES NEWSLETTER
#5, June 8, 2013. Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of
Peace. (#1 Oct. 8, 2011; #2 Nov. 25, 2011; #3 March 7, 2012; #4 Oct. 4, 2012).
"To initiate a war of aggression,
therefore, is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international
crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself
the accumulated evil of the whole."
- Robert H. Jackson ,
U.S. Prosecutor, Nuremberg Military
Tribunal
See: International
Justice Day/ICC Newsletter, War on Terror, Victims, individual wars, and
other newsletters.
Dick’s blog: War Department/Peace Department
My
Newsletters:
Index:
Peace, Justice,
Ecology Birthdays
See OMNI’s
Bulletin “Happening”
See INMOtion OMNI’s monthly newsletter.
Visit OMNI’s
Library.
Nos. 2 and 3 at end.
Contents of #4
Why do people attack US soldiers, embassies,
and civilians? How might we stop it?
Afghan Wedding Airstrike Murders to 2010
Afghan Wedding Airstrikes 2012
New Film on Indicting Cheney for Torture
Yoder:
Bush and Obama
Vets for Peace vs. Condoleeza Rice
Hedges: Murder and Sgt. Bales
Poem by Kolki
About War
Crimes Times
Here is the link to all OMNI newsletters: http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/
Contents of #5
Film: Indict Cheney for War Crimes
US War Crimes Google Search
Reporting Child Victims of War
Prosecute US War Crimes
McNamara: Afghanistan
War Crimes, Sgt. Bales, and US Leaders
Chemical War , Vietnam War, Agent Orange , US
Troops and Their Children
No to Naming Freeway After Bush II
Shanley:
Madeleine Albright, “we think the price is worth it”
Sudan Burns Villages in Southern Provinces
THE LAST WAR CRIME - Dick
Cheney Torture Indictment Film - NEWSFLASH!
Last War Crime Movie Production In
Home Stretch
At long last . . . we are now a
couple weeks away for the first film festival submissions for "The Last
War Crime", the new full length, independent feature film about indicting
Cheney for torture. We should have no problem at this point making the
submission deadlines for Slamdance, Santa Barbara ,
SXSW, Ann Arbor ,
San Francisco International, Tribeca, Cinequest and others, perhaps not with
the very final cut, but with something pretty close.
One of the things we are still
working on is getting some union musicians to perform the already completed
score, real strings, etc. So keep an eye and an ear out and we'll keep you
posted.
After you submit the action page
above you can request one of the new bumper stickers for the movie, and there
is no charge, not even shipping, unless you want to voluntarily make a
contribution to help us finish the production. Or you can get one directly
here, where you can also see and video clip from the movie's dramatic closing
argument to the grand jury.
Last War Crime Bumper Stickers:
And here is the Facebook link for
End ALL The Wars Immediately action page further above.
[Facebook] Action Page:
POSTED 1 YEAR AGO #
“In spite of strong
evidence identifying Dick Cheney as the mastermind
behind this torture regime–the subject remains taboo, both in the ‘news’
business and in Hollywood–that is until Hollywood executives watched trailers
for the anti-war documentary.”
During this summer of Occupy and subsequent police brutality, the
subject of torture is hotly denounced by protesters and conveniently ignored by
candidates. Like that ostrich diving head first into the sand of political
expediency–Americans want to focus on the alleged debt crisis or gay
marriage–anything that absolves us from the messy subject of tortures committed
in our names by the Bush/Cheney administration and which continue under Obama
to the present day. The entire Bradley Manning debacle speaks volumes to this
accusation.
In spite of strong evidence identifying Dick Cheney as the
mastermind behind this torture regime–the subject remains taboo, both in the
‘news’ business and in Hollywood–that is until Hollywood executives watched
trailers for the anti-war documentary–The Last War Crime.
Written, produced and directed by a new
talent known only as ‘The Pen,’ this
film documents the torture protocol ordained by the Bush-Cheney administration.
Since it first circulated a trailer on the web; it has been heavily censored
and cyber attacked. You Tube has removed it at intermittent intervals and MTV (which
is owned byViacom) has refused to sell air time for a
commercial.
Apparently, there are some things that Viacom won’t accept money
for—namely any film or story which exposes the regular torture ordered by
Vice-President Cheney. Curious about this documentary and the blatant
censorship–(I couldn’t download it)–I contacted the artist aka The Pen. Here is
the interview.
JM : What are you hoping this film will accomplish in terms
of genuine political change?
The Pen:” The Last War Crime Movie
is about indicting Cheney for torture. And isn’t that something billions of
people want to see? They say sometimes life can imitate art. But first we felt
it was important that we retrace our country’s steps as to how torture was used
to get the false intelligence to sell us on a war with Iraq . The real
story of how this happened has been buried under an avalanche of pseudo
history. They want people to forget the Downing Street minutes and the
foreknowledge that the British had that Cheney and Bush were determined to
invade Iraq, even if they had to “fix the facts around the policy” to do so.
They want to obliterate the memory of the flimsy legal arguments in the torture
memos. So we dig out all the true facts, and put them on the big screen,
together with an entertaining narrative story about what it would have been
like if justice had already prevailed.
The people who committed these war crimes believe they can
escape accountability by changing the way people think, by selling the
American people on the idea that torture was a great thing that got us
wonderful intelligence to protect us. But the only people making these
arguments are the torturers themselves and their propaganda advocates. All
other percipient witnesses confirm the opposite, which we knew already,
that torture does not even work, and that any actionable intelligence they
got was obtained before they started torturing people. So part of the
mission of this movie is to counter their ongoing lies initiative, to
change the way people think back to the truth, and then we can have good
policy change, which is political change.
JM : Do you expect more interference, and if so–in what form?
The Pen: Based on what we have run into
already, the attempted YouTube censorship (which we forced them to reverse
after more than 7,000 direct protests), the rejection of the ad submitted to
MTV (Viacom Inc.), it is clear that we are encountering serious censorship
interference from the very beginning. Obviously we are telling a story that
certain people don’t want heard. The American people believe that we have free
speech. It was on that justification that the Supreme Court said in the
Citizens United decision that the gloves were off, and that corporations with
unlimited war chests should be permitted to flood our political process with
money favoring their point of view. But now we see that the other side of that
bargain was a fraud, that these same corporations believe they can discriminate
against points of view they disagree with. So for the actual people, we find
that even if we have the money, we cannot even BUY “free” speech.
This is not a tolerable situation. Must we generate thousands of
protests every time we want to run an ad when it is rejected for political
reasons?
Already Viacom has received over 12,000 protest messages in
response to our call to action there, and in that situation apparently they
think “we the people” can just be ignored. We are seriously considering a
federal lawsuit, the argument has to be made, that if they accept
political advertising of any kind, at least in that case, it must be some
kind of 14th Amendment equal protection violation to practice what we
would call “speech discrimination”. Only by bringing such a case can we
determine if we actually have free speech or not.
JM: Has there been any direct retaliation or threats connected
with the release of this film aimed at you? Any suspected retaliation?
The Pen : Gandhi is reputed to have said, “First they ignore you,
then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win”. At this point
we are still mostly at the attempted “ignore you” stage.
JM: What has Hollywood ’s
reaction been to this film’s coming debut? Are you encountering the same
kind of cowardice that Michael Moore experienced after his Oscar night comments
about the war?
The Pen: We are just starting to get the word out about this film.
The censorship attempts are doomed to fail, but we still don’t have enough
visibility to where the rest of the Hollywood
film community would be called on to react. It would not surprise me if some of
the censorship we’ve been talking about was based in part on cowardice. Of
course we all remember when Michael Moore called out the fiction of the basis
for the war in Iraq
at the Oscars. But in that case another reasonable possible explanation is that
those who booed him then would object to any attempt to politicize the Academy
Awards ceremony. The problem is that when you say you don’t want to hear about
this political issue here, and you don’t want to hear about it there, you may
end up with the dynamic we are confronting now with The Last War Crime movie,
that the corporations that dominate our media really don’t want these issues
talked about anywhere.
JM: Anything else you would want to add?
The Pen: “The soul of America is on
trial right now. We have thrown not just international law overboard, we have
repudiated our own long established law. We have always considered
waterboarding to be torture. We have always prosecuted waterboarding in the past as torture. So what’s the
difference now, that the war criminals have a big “R” after their names? We are
called by history, the real history, to stand up and speak out about this, to
bring America
back to its highest calling. So if your readers are interested in participating
in the Viacom action they can go to , where you can
also see the ad that MTV
rejected. And there is a Facebook page where we are posting video
clips, still shots from the movie, including behind the scenes shots, and
more on a daily basis, so you can follow our progress and help get this movie
out in real theaters where it belongs and deserves to be.”
It should be noted that as of May 22nd, 2012, The Last War Crime
was presented at the Cannes Film Festival. There was no refusal to air the
film, no censorship–corporate or otherwise. Apparently the independent artistic
community in Cannes and similar venues knows
something that evades the vapid corporate offices of Hollywood .
Get Email
Alerts from
NationofChange
ABOUT
JEANINE MOLLOFF
Jeanine
Molloff is a veteran urban educator specializing in communications
disorders. She moonlights as a political commentator on various issues
including civil liberties in an age of ‘terrorism’, ecological justice,
collateral damage in war zones, economic equity and education. Jeanine
has published with Huffington Post, OpEdNews, FireDogLake, Counterpunch and
Huffington Post Union of Bloggers. In an
era of state and corporate sanctioned censorship; she believes that journalism
which demands answers to the tough questions is the last remaining bulwark of
democracy. Now more than ever we need the likes of I.F. Stone over the
insipid voices of celebrity infotainment. Jeanine works and lives in St. Louis , Missouri .
GOOGLE
SEARCH FOR THE LAST WAR CRIME MOVIE ABOUT CHENEY, PAGE ONE
1.
The Last War Crime movie
www.lastwarcrime.com/
PREVIEW VIDEO CLIPS Here are some great clips from the new full
length feature film,The Last
War Crime. Watch the clips and then demonstrate that you ...
2.
The Last War Crime (2012) - IMDb
www.imdb.com/title/tt2106704/
Rating: 7.7/10 - 5 votes
... tell the
story of a heroic assistant U.S.
attorney, who uncovers evidence of war crimes, and a suspenseful race . ... Test your knowledge of The Last War Crime.
3.
Grand
Jury Closing Argument Part 1 (The Last War Crime) - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqLPlp63qu8
Apr
7, 2011 - Uploaded by itsup2usalone
This is the first half of the closing argument to the grand jury
from the new feature length dramatic film, "The ...
4.
The Last War Crime
movie -
PeaceTeam.Net
www.peaceteam.net/youtube_protest.php
Dec
28, 2011
DICK CHENEY'S EXTRAORDINARY VACATION Remember when the former VP
was always in some secret ...
6.
The Last War Crime | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/thelastwarcrime
In The Last
War Crime movie they have the
integrity to follow the trail of torture, but who knows where it will lead?
You'll have to see the movie to find out, and ...
7.
Bush-Cheney Torture Protocol: “The Last War Crime” Debuts at ...
www.globalresearch.ca/bush-cheney-torture...last-war-crime.../31894
Jul 13, 2012 – The Pen:” The Last War Crime Movie is about indicting Cheney for torture.
And isn't that something billions of people want to see? They say ...
8.
'The Last War Crime'
Debuts at Cannes--but Censored in US ...
www.nationofchange.org/last-war-crime-debuts-cannes-censored-us-134...
Apr 4, 2013 – Announcing:
two screenings for The Last
War Crime movie on Saturday,
May 25th, 2013 at The Delancey Street Screening Room, 600 The ...
9.
THE LAST WAR CRIME - Dick Cheney Torture Indictment Film ...
At long last . . . we are now a couple weeks away for the first film festival submissions for "The Last
War Crime", the new full length, independent feature film ...
Searches related
to The Last War Crime film
United
States
war crimes, Google Research Page One
From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia
|
This article is incomplete. (February 2011)
|
The armed forces of the United States of America have committed war crimes throughout every war they had been
involved in. Most - but not all - contemporary war crimes are defined by the International
Criminal Court (ICC),
the Geneva Conventions,
and the associated laws of war under international law.[1] War
crimes can be prosecuted through the War Crimes Act of
1996 in the United States , but the US government
does not accept the jurisdiction of the ICC over its military forces.[2] United
States violations of the laws of war falling
under the rubric of jus in bello are discussed in the present article,
while US violations of jus ad bellum, such as crimes against peace or wars of aggression under the Nuremberg Principles,[3] are
discussed elsewhere[where?].
Contents
[hide]
o
2.4 Rape
|
Philippine–American War [edit]
See also: 1902 Lodge Committee investigating Philippine-American
war crimes and Philippine–American
War
The Committee
on the Philippines was a standing committee of the United States Senate from 1899 to 1921.[1] The
committee was established by Senate resolution on 15 December 1899, to oversee
administration of the Philippines, which Spain
had ceded to the United
States as part of the settlement of the Spanish-American War.
The committee was established by Senate resolution on 15 December 1899, even
though the treaty of 10 December 1899 had not yet been ratified.[2] In
1921, the Committee was terminated and jurisdiction over legislative matters
concerning the Philippines
was transferred to the newly createdCommittee on Territories and Insular Possessions.[3]
World War II [edit]
See also: Allied
war crimes during World War II
Air raids on civilian
population [edit]
See also: Bombing
of Dresden in World War II
During World War II, both Axis and Allied aerial
forces conducted air raids on civilian populations in Europe and over Japan . These
actions have been (retrospectively) called crimes by some historians.[4] At
a conference of top Nazi leaders in Klessheim on
6 June 1944, the German Minister of Foreign AffairsJoachim von
Ribbentrop tried to
introduce a resolution to define air raids on civilians as acts of terror, but
his motion was rejected,[5] for
the bombing of cities prior to invasion was an integral part of Nazi Germany's Blitzkrieg concept
since the beginning of World War II.
Bombing of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki [edit]
Main
article: Atomic
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
In 1963, the atomic
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were
the subject of a judicial review in Ryuichi
Shimoda et al. v. The State.[6] In
this case, the District Court of Tokyo declined to rule on the legality of
nuclear weapons in general, but found that "the attacks upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki
caused such severe and indiscriminate suffering that they did violate the most
basic legal principles governing the conduct of war."[7] In
the opinion of the court, the act of dropping an atomic bomb on cities was then
governed by international law found in the Hague
Regulations on Land Warfare of 1907 and the Hague Draft Rules of Air
Warfare of 1922–1923[8] and
was, therefore, illegal.[9] Francisco
Gómez points out, in an article published in the International
Review of the Red Cross, that with respect to the
"anti-city" or "blitz" strategy, "in examining these
events in the light of international humanitarian law, it should be borne in
mind that during the Second World War there was no agreement, treaty,
convention or any other instrument governing the protection of the civilian
population or civilian property."[10] The
possibility that attacks like the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings could be
considered war crimes is one of the reasons given by George H.W. Bush's U.N.
ambassador John R. Boltonfor the United States not
agreeing to be bound by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court[11] while
he was Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. It
is noteworthy, however, that they would not in any case be prosecutable, due to
their having occurred prior to the ratification of the treaty.
Prisoners of war [edit]
SS concentration
camp guards being executed at Dachau
concentration campduring its day of liberation
(US Army soldier photograph/National Archives)
(US Army soldier photograph/National Archives)
The "Canicattì massacre"
involved the killing of Italian civilians by Lieutenant Colonel Herbert
McCaffrey. A confidential inquiry was made, but McCaffrey was never charged
with an offense relating to the massacre. He died in 1954. This fact remained
virtually unknown in the U.S.A until 2005, when Joseph S. Salemi of New York University , whose father witnessed it,
reported it.[12]
The "Dachau massacre" involved the killing of
German prisoners of war and surrendering SS soldiers at the Dachau concentration camp.[13]
In the "Biscari massacre", which consisted of two
instances of mass murder, U.S.
troops of the 45th
Infantry Divisionkilled roughly 75 unarmed prisoners of war, most of
whom were Italian.[14][15]
"Operation Teardrop"
involved eight surviving captured crewmen from the sunken German submarine U-546 being tortured by US military
personnel. Historian Philip K. Lundeberg has written that the beating and
torture of U-546's survivors was a singular atrocity
motivated by the interrogators' need to quickly get information on what the US
believed were potential missile attacks on the continental US by German
submarines.[16]
In the aftermath of the 1944 Malmedy massacre, in which 80 unarmed US
military personnel were tortured by their German captors, a written order from
Headquarters of the 328th US Army Infantry Regiment, dated 21 December 1944,
stated: "No SS troops or paratroopers will
be taken prisoner but [rather they] will be shot on sight."[17] Major-General
Raymond Hufft (U.S. Army) gave instructions to his troops not to take prisoners
when they crossed the Rhine in 1945.
"After the war, when he reflected on the war crimes he authorized, he
admitted, 'if the Germans had won, I would have been on trial at Nuremberg instead of
them.'"[18] Stephen Ambrose related: "I've interviewed well
over 1000 combat veterans. Only one of them said he shot a prisoner... Perhaps
as many as one-third of the veterans...however, related incidents in which they
saw other GIs shooting unarmed German prisoners who had their hands up."[19]
Near the French village
of Audouville-la-Hubert,
30 German Wehrmacht prisoners
were massacred by U.S.
paratroopers.[20]
Historian Peter Lieb has found that many US
and Canadian units were ordered to not take enemy prisoners during the D-Day
landings in Normandy .
If this view is correct, it may explain the fate of 64 German prisoners (out of
the 130 captured) who did not make it to the POW collecting point on Omaha Beach on
the day of landings.[21]
According to an article in Der Spiegel by Klaus Wiegrefe, many personal memoirs
of Allied soldiers have been willfully ignored by historians until now because
they were at odds with the "Greatest Generation"
mythology surrounding World War II. However, this has recently started to
change, with books such as "The Day of Battle", by Rick Atkinson, where he describes Allied war
crimes in Italy, and "D-Day: The Battle for Normandy," by Antony Beevor.[21] Beevor's
latest work is currently discussed by scholars, and should some of them be
proven right, it suggests that Allied war crimes in Normandy were much more extensive "than
was previously realized".[20]
American soldiers in the Pacific sometimes
deliberately killed Japanese soldiers who had surrendered, according to Richard
Aldrich (Professor of History atNottingham University).
Aldrich published a study of diaries kept by United States and Australian soldiers,
wherein it was stated that they sometimes massacred prisoners of war.[22] According
to John Dower, in "many instances ... Japanese who did become prisoners
were killed on the spot or en
route to prison
compounds."[23] According
to Professor Aldrich, it was common practice for U.S. troops not to take prisoners.[24] His
analysis is supported by British historianNiall Ferguson,[25] who
also says that, in 1943, "a secret [U.S.] intelligence report noted that
only the promise of ice cream and three days leave would ... induce American
troops not to kill surrendering Japanese."[26]
Ulrich Straus, a U.S. Japanologist, suggests that troops on the
front line intensely hated Japanese military personnel and were "not
easily persuaded" to take or protect prisoners, as they believed that
Allied personnel who surrendered got "no mercy" from the Japanese.[28] Allied
soldiers believed that Japanese soldiers were inclined to feign surrender in
order to make surprise attacks.[28] Therefore,
according to Straus, "Senior officers opposed the taking of prisoners on
the grounds that it needlessly exposed American troops to risks ..."[28] When
prisoners nevertheless were taken at Gualdacanal, Army interrogator Captain
Burden noted that many times POW's were shot during transport because "it
was too much bother to take [them] in".[29]
U. S. historian James J. Weingartner
attributes the very low number of Japanese in U.S. prisoner of war compounds to
two important factors, namely (1) a Japanese reluctance to surrender, and (2) a
widespread American "conviction that the Japanese were 'animals' or
'subhuman' and unworthy of the normal treatment accorded to prisoners of war.[31] The
latter reason is supported by Ferguson, who says that "Allied troops often
saw the Japanese in the same way that Germans regarded Russians — as Untermenschen" (i.e.
"subhuman").[32]
Rape [edit]
Main
articles: Rape
during the liberation of France, Rape
during the occupation of Germany, Rape
during the occupation of Japan, and War rape
It has been claimed that some U.S. soldiers
raped Okinawan women during the Battle of Okinawa in 1945.[33]
Based on several years of research, Okinawan
historian Oshiro Masayasu (former director of the Okinawa Prefectural
Historical Archives) writes:
Soon after the U.S.
Marines landed, all the women of a village on Motobu Peninsula fell into the hands of American soldiers.
At the time, there were only women, children, and old people in the village, as
all the young men had been mobilized for the war. Soon after landing, the
Marines "mopped up" the entire village, but found no signs of
Japanese forces. Taking advantage of the situation, they started "hunting
for women" in broad daylight, and women who were hiding in the village or
nearby air raid shelters were dragged out one after another.[34]
However, many other authors have noted
that Japanese civilians "were often surprised at the comparatively humane
treatment they received from the American enemy."[35][36] According
to Islands of Discontent:
Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power by Mark Selden, the Americans "did not
pursue a policy of torture, rape, and murder of
civilians as Japanese military officials had warned."[37]
There were also 1,336 reported rapes
during the first 10 days of the occupation of Kanagawa prefecture after the Japanese surrender.[33]
Secret wartime files made public only
in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed
400 sexual offences in Europe, including 126 rapes in England ,
between 1942 and 1945.[38] A
study by Robert J. Lilly estimates that a total of 14,000 civilian women in England , France
and Germany
were raped by American GIs during World War II.[39][40] It
is estimated that there were around 3,500 rapes by American servicemen in
France between June 1944 and the end of the war and one historian has claimed
that sexual violence against women in liberated France was common.[41]
Korean War [edit]
No Gun Ri
Massacre [edit]
The No Gun Ri Massacre refers to an incident of mass killing
of undetermined numbers of South Korean refugees conducted by U.S. Army forces
of the 7th
Cavalry Regiment (and
in a U.S. air attack) between 26 July and 29 July 1950 at a railroad bridge near
the village of No Gun Ri, 100 miles (160 km) southeast of Seoul. In 2005,
the South Korean government certified the names of 163 dead or missing (mostly
women, children and old men) and 55 wounded. It said many other victims' names
were not reported.[42] Over
the years survivors' estimates of the dead have ranged from 300 to 500. This
episode early in the Korean War gained widespread attention when the Associated
Press (AP) published a series of articles in 1999 that subsequently won a Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting.[43]
Vietnam War [edit]
The Vietnam
War Crimes Working Group Files is
a collection of (formerly secret) documents compiled by Pentagon investigators
in the early 1970s, confirming thatatrocities by
U.S. forces during the Vietnam War were
more extensive than had been officially acknowledged.[44][45] The
documents are housed by the United States National
Archives and Records Administration, and detail 320 alleged
incidents that were substantiated by United States Army investigators (not including the 1968 My Lai Massacre). (See also Winter Soldier
Investigation).
My Lai
Massacre [edit]
Main article: My Lai Massacre
The My Lai Massacre was the mass murder of
347 to 504 unarmed citizens in South
Vietnam , almost entirely civilians, most of them women and children,
conducted by U.S. Army forces
on 16 March 1968. Some of the victims were raped, beaten, tortured, or maimed,
and some of the bodies were found mutilated. The massacre took place in the
hamlets of Mỹ Lai and My Khe of Sơn Mỹ village
during the Vietnam War.[46][47] Of
the 26 US soldiers initially charged with criminal offenses or war crimes for
actions at My Lai, only William Calley was convicted. Calley only served 3
years & a half in 'House Arrest' instead. The incident prompted widespread
outrage around the world, and reduced US domestic support for the Vietnam
War. Three American Servicemen (Hugh Thompson, Jr., Glenn Andreotta, and Lawrence Colburn), who made an effort to halt
the massacre and protect the wounded, were sharply criticized by U.S.
Congressmen, and received hate mail, death threats, and mutilated animals on
their doorsteps.[48] Thirty
years after the event their efforts were honored.[49]
Agent Orange [edit]
Main article: Agent Orange
A panel of legal and political
activists calling themselves the International
Tribunal of Conscience in Support of the Vietnamese Victims of Agent Orange formed in France have claimed that the
use of Agent Orange during Operation Ranch Hand during the Vietnam War was
a violation of laws regarding the use of chemical weapons in the 1907 Hague
Convention, the 1927 Geneva Convention, and the 1949 Geneva Convention.[50][51][52] In
2005 a suit filed against the United States and several companies who produced
Agent Orange was rejected by a United States District Court in Brooklyn. The
court found that "No treaty or agreement, express or implied, of the
United States, operated to make use of herbicides in Vietnam a violation of the
laws of war or any other form of international law until at the earliest April
of 1975."[53] In
2007 the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Court in Brooklyn
saying that "Agent Orange and similar U.S. herbicides cannot be
considered poisons banned under international rules of war" and that the
lack of large-scale research made it impossible to show what caused illnesses.[54]
Yugoslavia [edit]
Main article: Legitimacy
of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia
Amnesty International has condemned the 1999 NATO
bombing of Yugoslavia, which they confirm killed 400 civilians (some
sources place this figure at over 1,000 or as high as 5,000) in what it claims
were violations of international law and war crimes, due to deliberate
targeting of civilian infrastructure and indiscriminate attacks, with lack of
precautionary measures taken to prevent civilian casualties[55]
Human Rights Watch documented approximately 500 civilian
deaths as a result of the NATO bombing campaign. They reported "no
evidence of war crimes" but cited violations of international humanitarian
law.[56]
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia reviewed these events, including HRW's
report, as well as that alleged by the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia. It concluded "either the law is not
sufficiently clear or investigations are unlikely to result in the acquisition
of sufficient evidence."[57]
War on Terror [edit]
Main article: War on Terror
As a reaction to the September 11,
2001 attacks the U.S. Government adopted several controversial measures
(e.g., invading
Iraq, applying "unlawful combatant"
status to prisoners, conducting extraordinary
renditions, enhanced
interrogation methods, kill list and Drone attacks in
Pakistan[58]).
Command
responsibility [edit]
Human Rights Watch had claimed in 2005 that the principle
of "command responsibility" could make high-ranking officials within
the Bush administration guilty of war crimes allegedly committed during the War on Terror, either with their knowledge or
by persons under their control.[59]
A presidential memorandum of September
7, 2002 authorized U.S. interrogators of prisoners captured in Afghanistan to deny
the prisoners basic protections required by the Geneva Conventions, and thus
according to Jordan J. Paust, professor of law and formerly a member of the
faculty of the Judge
Advocate General's School, "necessarily authorized and ordered
violations of the Geneva Conventions, which are war crimes."[60] Based
on the president's memorandum, U.S.
personnel carried out cruel and inhumane treatment on the prisoners,[61] which
necessarily means that the president's memorandum was a plan to violate the
Geneva Convention, and such a plan constitutes a war crime under the Geneva
Conventions, according to Professor Paust.[62]
Alberto Gonzales and others argued that detainees
should be considered "unlawful combatants"
and as such not be protected by the Geneva Conventions in multiple memoranda regarding these
perceived legal gray areas.[63]
Gonzales' statement that denying
coverage under the Geneva Conventions "substantially reduces the threat of
domestic criminal prosecution under the War Crimes Act"
suggests, to some authors, an awareness by those involved in crafting policies
in this area that US officials are involved in acts that could be seen to be war crimes.[64] The US Supreme Court challenged the premise on which this
argument is based in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld,
in which it ruled that Common Article Three of the Geneva Conventions applies
to detainees in Guantanamo Bay and that the Military
Tribunals used to try
these suspects were in violation of US and international law.[65]
On April 14, 2006, Human Rights Watch said that Secretary Donald Rumsfeld could be criminally liable for his
alleged involvement in the abuse of Mohammad al-Qahtani.[66] On
November 14, 2006, invoking universal
jurisdiction, legal proceedings were started in Germany – for their
alleged involvement of prisoner abuse – against Donald Rumsfeld, Alberto Gonzales, John Yoo, George Tenet and
others.[67]
The Military
Commissions Act of 2006 is
seen by some as an amnesty law for
crimes committed in the War on Terror by retroactively rewriting the War Crimes
Act[68] and
by abolishing habeas corpus, effectively making it
impossible for detainees to challenge crimes committed against them.[69]
Luis Moreno-Ocampo has told the Sunday Telegraph he is willing to start an inquiry by
the International
Criminal Court (ICC),
and possibly a trial, for war crimes committed in Iraq involving British Prime
Minister Tony Blair and
American President George W. Bush.[70] Though
under the Rome Statute, the ICC has no jurisdiction over
Bush, since the USA is not a State Party to the relevant treaty—unless Bush
were accused of crimes inside a State Party, or the UN Security Council (where the USA has a veto) requested
an investigation. However Blair does fall under ICC jurisdiction as Britain is a
State Party.[71]
Nat Hentoff wrote
on August 28, 2007, that a leaked report by the International
Committee of the Red Cross and
the July 2007 report by Human Rights First andPhysicians
for Social Responsibility, titled "Leave No Marks: Enhanced
Interrogation Techniques and the Risk of Criminality", might be used as
evidence of American war crimes if there was a Nuremberg-like trial regarding
the War on Terror.[72][unreliable
source?]
Shortly before the end of President
Bush's second term, newsmedia in countries other than the U.S. began publishing the views of those who
believe that under the United Nations Convention Against Torture the US is obligated
to hold those responsible for prisoner abuse to account under criminal law.[73] One
proponent of this view was the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment (Professor Manfred Nowak) who, on January 20, 2009,
remarked on German television that former president George W. Bush had lost his head of state
immunity and under
international law the U.S. would now be mandated to start criminal proceedings against all those involved in these
violations of the UN Convention
Against Torture.[74] Law
professor Dietmar
Herz explained Nowak's
comments by saying that under U.S.
and international law former President Bush is criminally responsible for
adopting torture as interrogation tool.[74]
Michael Ignatieff, then leader of the Liberal Party of
Canada and former
director of the Carr
Center for Human Rights Policy said
that the threat of terrorism requires serious and possibly permanent
abridgement of civil liberties. He stated that governments are justified in
combating terrorism with "lesser evils", ranging from suspension of
civil liberties, through secret uses of executive power, to torture of suspects,
as well as targeted killing, right up to pre-emptive war to destroy terrorist
bases and also to prevent the development or deployment of weapons which may be
used by terrorists or states that support terrorist aims.[75]
Tomas Young, an Iraq War veteran wounded
during that conflict, is one of the more recent critics of the Bush
administration's actions during the War on Terror, accusing Bush and his former
vice-president, Dick Cheney, of committing war crimes in a
letter he wrote to them in March 2013.
See also [edit]
This article may be in
need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. (January
2013)
|
|
References [edit]
3.
^ International Committee of the Red Cross,
"Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the
Nüremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, 1950," ICRC Home page Français International Humanitarian Law -
Treaties & Documents
4.
^ Bloxham, David "Dresden as a War Crime", in Addison,
Paul & Crang, Jeremy A. (eds.). Firestorm: The Bombing of Dresden . Pimlico, 2006. ISBN 1-84413-928-X. Chapter 9 p. 180
7.
^ Falk, Richard A. (1965-02-15). "The
Claimants of Hiroshima ".
The Nation.reprinted
in Richard A. Falk, Saul H. Mendlovitz eds., ed.
(1966). "The Shimoda Case: Challenge and Response". The Strategy of World Order. Volume: 1. New
York : World Law Fund. pp. 307–13.
8.
^ Boyle, Francis A. (2002). The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence. Atlanta :
Clarity Press. p. 58.
10.
^ International Review of the Red Cross no 323, p.347–363
The Law of Air Warfare (1998)[dead link]
11.
^ John Bolton The Risks and Weaknesses of the International Criminal
Court from America's Perspective, (page 4) Law and
Contemporary ProblemsJanuary 2001
13.
^ Albert Panebianco (ed). Dachau
its liberation 57th
Infantry Association, Felix L. Sparks, Secretary 15 June 1989. (backup
site)
14.
^ Weingartner, James J. A Peculiar Crusadee: Willis M. Everett and the Malmedy
massacre, NYU Press, 2000, p. 118. ISBN 0-8147-9366-5
15.
^ James J. Weingartner, "Massacre at
Biscari: Patton and an American War Crime", Historian, Volume 52 Issue 1, Pages 24–39, 23 Aug 2007
16.
^ Lundeberg, Philip K. (1994). "Operation
Teardrop Revisited". In Runyan, Timothy J. and Copes, Jan M. To Die Gallantly : The Battle
of the Atlantic . Boulder :
Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-8815-5., pp. 221–226; Blair, Clay (1998). Hitler's U-Boat War. The Hunted, 1942–1945 (Modern Library ed.). New York : Random House. ISBN 0-679-64033-9., p. 687.
20.
^ a b The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied
War Crimes in WWII, Spiegel Online, 05/04/2010, (part 1), accessed
2010-07-08
21.
^ a b The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied
War Crimes in WWII, Spiegel Online, 05/04/2010, (part 2), accessed
2010-07-08
22.
^ Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese
PoWs'" (Daily
Telegraph (UK ), 06/08/2005), accessed
26/05/2007.
24.
^ Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese
PoWs'" (Daily
Telegraph (UK ), 06/08/2005), accessed
26/05/2007
25.
^ Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and
Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of
Military Defeat", War
in History,
2004, 11 (2): 148–192
26.
^ a b Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and
Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of
Military Defeat", War
in History,
2004, 11 (2): p.150
28.
^ a b c Ulrich Straus, The
Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II (excerpts) (Seattle: University of Washington Press,
2003 ISBN 978-0-295-98336-3, p.116
29.
^ Ulrich Straus, The
Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II(excerpts) (Seattle : University of Washington Press , 2003 ISBN 978-0-295-98336-3, p.117
30.
^ Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and
Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of
Military Defeat", War
in History,
2004, 11 (2): p.176.
31.
^ James J. Weingartner, “Trophies of War: U.S. Troops and
the Mutilation of Japanese War Dead, 1941–1945” Pacific Historical Review (1992) p. 55
32.
^ Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and
Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of
Military Defeat", War
in History,
2004, 11 (2): p.182
33.
^ a b Schrijvers, Peter (2002). The GI War Against Japan . New York City :
New York University Press. p. 212. ISBN 0-8147-9816-0.
34.
^ Tanaka, Toshiyuki. Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution
During World War II, Routledge, 2003, p.111. ISBN 0-203-30275-3
35.
^ Molasky, Michael S. (1999). The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa: Literature
and Memory. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-415-19194-4.
36.
^ Molasky, Michael S.; Rabson, Steve (2000). Southern Exposure: Modern Japanese Literature from
Okinawa. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-8248-2300-9.
37.
^ Sheehan, Susan D; Elizabeth, Laura; Selden,
Hein Mark. Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to
Japanese and American Power. p. 18.
38.
^ David Wilson (27 March 2007). "The secret war". The Guardian (London ). Retrieved 22 November 2008.
39.
^ Lilly, Robert J. (2007). Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe During World War II. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-230-50647-X.
40.
^ Morrow, John H. (October 2008). "Taken
by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe
during World War II By
J. Robert Lilly". The Journal of
Military History72 (4): 1324. doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0151.
41.
^ Schofield, Hugh (5 June 2009). "Revisionists
challenge D-Day story". BBC News. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
42.
^ Committee for the Review and Restoration of
Honor for the No Gun Ri Victims (2009). No Gun Ri Incident Victim Review Report. Seoul :
Government of the Republic
of Korea .
pp. 247–249, 328, 278. ISBN 978-89-957925-1-3.
43.
^ "War's hidden chapter: Ex-GIs tell of
killing Korean refugees". The
Associated Press.
September 29, 1999.
44.
^ Kill Anything That Moves : U.s. War Crimes And
Atrocities In Vietnam, 1965-1973, a doctoral dissertation, by Nick Turse, Columbia University 2005
45.
^ Nick
Turse, “A My Lai a Month: How the US Fought the Vietnam War”, The
Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 47-6-08, November 21, 2008
47.
^ Department of the Army. Report of the Department of the Army Review
of the Preliminary Investigations into the My Lai
Incident (The Peers Report), Volumes I-III (1970).
50.
^ Churchill, Ward (2003). On the justice of roosting chickens. AK
Press. p. 139. ISBN 978-1-902593-79-1.
51.
^ "Executive Summary of the Decision", International Peoples' Tribunal of Conscience
In Support of the Vietnamese Victims of Agent Orange, May 18, 2009
53.
^ William Glaberson (March 10, 2005). "Agent Orange Case for Millions of Vietnamese Is
Dismissed". New York Times.
54.
^ Larry Neumeister (June 18, 2007). "Agent Orange victims get no support in war crimes
push". New York
Daily News.
55.
^ "Frederal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) /NATO:
"Collateral damage" or unlawful killings? Violations of the Laws of
War by NATO during Operation Allied Force". Amnesty International. 5 June 2000. Retrieved August 13, 2010.
57.
^ Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee
Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia
·
Command's Responsibility: Detainee Deaths in U.S. Custody
in Iraq and Afghanistan by Human Rights First
·
Command
Responsibility? by
Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith,Published by Foreign Policy In
Focus (FPIF), a joint project of theInternational
Relations Center (IRC,
online at www.irc-online.org) and theInstitute for
Policy Studies (IPS,
online at www.ips-dc.org), January 10, 2006
·
Abu Ghraib is a Command Responsibility By Ray McGovern Former CIA analyst, CounterPunch, October 1 /
2, 2005
59.
^ Getting Away with Torture? Command Responsibility for the
U.S. Abuse of Detainees Human Rights Watch, April 2005 Vol. 17, No. 1
60.
^ Columbia
Journal of Transnational Law, 43:811, Jordan J. Paust, 2005 May 20,
page 828 "Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law
Concerning Treatment and Interrogation of Detainees,http://www.columbia.edu/cu/jtl/Vol_43_3_files/Paust.pdf
61.
^ Columbia
Journal of Transnational Law, 43:811, Jordan J. Paust, 2005 May 20,
page 845 "Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law
Concerning Treatment and Interrogation of Detainees,http://www.columbia.edu/cu/jtl/Vol_43_3_files/Paust.pdf
62.
^ Columbia
Journal of Transnational Law, 43:811, Jordan J. Paust, 2005 May 20,
page 861 "Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law
Concerning Treatment and Interrogation of Detainees,http://www.columbia.edu/cu/jtl/Vol_43_3_files/Paust.pdf
·
Torture and Accountability by Elizabeth Holtzman article in The Nationposted June 28, 2005 (July 18, 2005
issue) about The Geneva Convention
·
Former NY Congress member Holtzman Calls For President
Bush and His Senior Staff To Be Held Accountable for Abu Ghraib Torture Thursday, June 30, 2005 on Democracy Now
65.
^ The Gitmo Fallout: The fight over the Hamdan ruling heats
up—as fears about its reach escalate. By Michael Isikoff and Stuart Taylor Jr.,
Newsweek, July 17, 2006
66.
^ U.S.: Rumsfeld Potentially Liable for Torture Defense
Secretary Allegedly Involved in Abusive Interrogation Human Rights Watch, April 14, 2006
68.
^ Pushing
Back on Detainee Act by
Michael Ratner is president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, The Nation, October 4, 2006
·
Why
The Military Commissions Act is No Moderate Compromise By MICHAEL C. DORF, FindLaw, Oct. 11, 2006
·
Nat Hentoff (December 8, 2006). "Bush's War Crimes Cover-up". Village Voice. Archived from the original on August 13, 2009. Retrieved April 2, 2007.
70.
^ Court 'can envisage' Blair prosecution By Gethin Chamberlain, Sunday Telegraph,
March 17, 2007
71.
^ Coalition for the International Criminal
Court, 18 July 2008. States Parties to the Rome Statute of the
ICC PDF. Accessed 12 November 2010.
72.
^ History Will Not Absolve Us – Leaked Red Cross report
sets up Bush team for international war-crimes trial by Nat Hentoff, Village Voice, August 28th, 2007
·
Overseas,
Expectations Build for Torture Prosecutions By Scott Horton, No Comment, January 19, 2009
74.
^ a b Special Rapporteur on torture and other
cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment calls for prosecution
·
UN torture investigator calls on Obama to charge Bush for
Guantanamo abuses Ximena
Marinero, JURIST, January 21, 2009
·
UN
Rapporteur: Initiate criminal proceedings against Bush and Rumsfeld now By Scott Horton, No Comment, January 21, 2009
75.
^ Ignatieff, Michael. The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age
of TerrorPrinceton , NJ : Princeton University Press, 2004 ISBN 0-691-11751-9, pp. 1–24
Further reading [edit]
General [edit]
·
Jeremy Brecher, Jill
Cutler, Brendan Smith, ed. (2005). In the name
of democracy: American war crimes in Iraq and beyond. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-8050-7969-2.
·
Michael Haas (2008). George W.
Bush, war criminal?: the Bush administration's liability for 269 war crimes. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-36499-0.
·
Jordan J. Paust
(2007). Beyond the law: the Bush Administration's unlawful
responses in the "War" on Terror. Cambridge
University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-71120-3.
·
Mark Selden, Alvin Y. So, ed. (2004). War and
state terrorism: the United States ,
Japan ,
and the Asia-Pacific in the long twentieth century. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-2391-3.
·
Frederick Henry
Gareau (2004). State terrorism and the United States : from
counterinsurgency to the war on terrorism. Zed Books. ISBN 978-1-84277-535-6.
·
Vincent Bugliosi (2008). The
Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder. Vanguard. ISBN 978-1-59315-481-3.
·
"Leave No Marks: Enhanced Interrogation Techniques
and the Risk of Criminality". Physicians
for Human Rights / Human Rights First. August
2007.
By nation [edit]
Iraq [edit]
·
Richard A. Falk, Irene L. Gendzier, Robert Jay Lifton, ed. (2006). Crimes of
war: Iraq . Nation Books. ISBN 978-1-56025-803-2.
·
Ramsey Clark (1992). War crimes:
a report on United States
war crimes against Iraq . Maisonneuve Press. ISBN 978-0-944624-15-9.
·
Nafeez Mosaddeq
Ahmed (2003). Behind the war on terror: western secret strategy and the
struggle for Iraq. New Society Publishers. ISBN 978-0-86571-506-6.
·
Ulrike Demmer
(2007-03-26). "Wanted For War Crimes: Rumsfeld Lawsuit Embarrasses
German Authorities". Der Spiegel.
·
Patrick Donahue
(2007-04-27). "German Prosecutor Won't Set Rumsfeld Probe
Following Complaint". Bloomberg
L.P.
Vietnam [edit]
·
Greiner, Bernd; Anne
Wyburd (2009). War Without Fronts: The USA
in Vietnam . New Haven , Conn : Yale
University Press. ISBN 0-300-15451-8.
·
Deborah Nelson
(2008). The war behind me: Vietnam
veterans confront the truth about U.S. war crimes. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-00527-7.
·
Nick Turse (2013). Kill
Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam . New York :
Metropolitan Books. ISBN 0-8050-8691-9.
Yugoslavia [edit]
·
Michael Parenti (2000). To kill a
nation: the attack on Yugoslavia. Verso. ISBN 978-1-85984-776-3.
·
Michael Parenti The
Rational Destruction of Yugoslavia
·
Balkans region archives, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting
External links [edit]
·
Human Rights First; Command’s Responsibility: Detainee Deaths in U.S. Custody
in Iraq and Afghanistan
·
This page was last modified on 30 May 2013 at
13:56.
·
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
GOOGLE
SEARCH FOR US
WAR CRIMES PAGE ONE June 8, 2013
1.
New report documents US war crimes over three administrations ...
www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/04/17/cons-a17.html
Apr 17, 2013 – On Tuesday, the Constitution Project, a
Washington , DC think tank, issued a report by its “Task
Force on Detainee Treatment” on decades of ...
2.
GEORGE W. BUSH, WAR CRIMINAL?
www.uswarcrimes.com/
There are two basic types of war crimes. The most
basic is aggression. In contrast with the aggression conducted by the United
States in Afghanistan
after 9/11, ...
3.
Top Ten American War Criminals Living Freely Today - Rense
rense.com/general69/tpten.htm
Presided during Waco Massacre and
Oklahoma City Bombing, thinly-disguised war crimes against US citizens.. Elder Statesman, walking
around freely today, ...
4.
PressTV - Obama committing war crimes: US Analyst
www.presstv.ir/.../obama-commits-war-crimes-as-pres/
May 25, 2013
A political analyst tells Press TV that US President Barack Obama is committing war crimes by defending his ...
5.
George Galloway : The United States War
Crimes throughout
history ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBSc7Hx42a0
May 8, 2013 - Uploaded by ISLAMICHISTORYTUBE
George Galloway : The United States War Crimes throughout history.
7.
International War Crimes Tribunal: US War Crimes against ... - Deoxy
deoxy.org/wc/warcrime.htm
Includes use of outlawed weapons;
intentionally bombing schools, hospitals, mosques and churches; killing after a
cease-fire; and starvation of citizens.
8.
DailyTech - Pakistani Court Accuses U.S. of War Crimes for Drone ...
www.dailytech.com/Pakistani...US...War+Crimes.../article31537.htm
May 13, 2013 – Unsatisifed with "grief
payments" of a few thousand dollars per dead civilian, Pakistanis demand
action.
9.
18 USC § 2441 - War crimes - Legal Information Institute
Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States , commits a war crime, in any of the
circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title ...
10.
OpEdNews - Article: A litany of US war crimes exposed
www.opednews.com/.../A-litany-of-US-war-crimes-by-Niloufar-Parsi-13...
Apr 22, 2013 – Article: A litany of US war crimes exposed - By projecting its own evil
onto its intended targets, USA
'gets away' with war crime after war crime.
11.
News for US War Crimes
Slate
Magazine - 1 day ago
Perhaps the most famous
convicted U.S. war
criminal, William Calley, was prosecuted under the UCMJ for his
role in the 1968 My Lai massacre...
Huffington
Post - 3 days ago
ABC News - 5 days ago
Searches related to US War Crimes
War Crimes Times Seeking
Stories: Children as Victims of War
The War Crimes Times(WCT) is seeking submissions for its
summer issue. WCT wants to present an emotional appeal to the (missing)
American conscience through empathy for children as victims of war.
>On the Prosecute US
Crimes Against Humanity Now website appears the following
paragraph: (Would be nice to have quote from Cindy, not just her name.)
>http://prosecuteuscrimesagainsthumanitynow.blogspot.com/
>Noam Chomsky-"America must prosecute its own war criminals"; Former US Att. Gen. Ramsey Clark, author of "US War Crimes in the Gulf"; Ed Herman, 1999-"A strict application of international law would,( I believe,) have given every U.S. president of the past 50 years Nuremberg treatment"; Elliot Adams, former President, Veterans For Peace, author of "The indictment of President Obama and all who follow his criminal orders"-read at the US Air Force Drone Base, Hancock, NY; Rev. Jeremiah Wright-"God Damn America for her crimes against humanity"; Cornel West, "Drones [Bombings]are War Crimes!"; Cindy Sheehan; Bill Blum of the AntiEmpire Report; Tom Feeley, publisher of Information Clearing House; Angela Keaton, editor of Antiwar.com and publisher of Come Home America’"; Ron Fisher, Chair,VFP Workshop Prosecute War Criminals and We the People.com; peoples historian jay janson, coordinator, King Condemned US Wars International Awareness and writing
the documented history of US crimes in nineteen and counting nation that follows this list. Full list at very bottom of site.Suggestions welcome atprosecuteuscrimesnow@yahoo.com
>http://prosecuteuscrimesagainsthumanitynow.blogspot.com/
>Noam Chomsky-"America must prosecute its own war criminals"; Former US Att. Gen. Ramsey Clark, author of "US War Crimes in the Gulf"; Ed Herman, 1999-"A strict application of international law would,( I believe,) have given every U.S. president of the past 50 years Nuremberg treatment"; Elliot Adams, former President, Veterans For Peace, author of "The indictment of President Obama and all who follow his criminal orders"-read at the US Air Force Drone Base, Hancock, NY; Rev. Jeremiah Wright-"God Damn America for her crimes against humanity"; Cornel West, "Drones [Bombings]are War Crimes!"; Cindy Sheehan; Bill Blum of the AntiEmpire Report; Tom Feeley, publisher of Information Clearing House; Angela Keaton, editor of Antiwar.com and publisher of Come Home America’"; Ron Fisher, Chair,VFP Workshop Prosecute War Criminals and We the People.com; peoples historian jay janson, coordinator, King Condemned US Wars International Awareness and writing
the documented history of US crimes in nineteen and counting nation that follows this list. Full list at very bottom of site.Suggestions welcome atprosecuteuscrimesnow@yahoo.com
Tue Dec 4, 2012
8:14 am (PST) . Posted by:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/12/04/the-war-crimes-of-a-sergeant-the-war-crimes-of-a-nation/
A Double Standard of Justice
The War Crimes of a Sergeant, the War Crimes of a Nation by TOM McNAMARA
"Whatever grievances a nation may have, however objectionable it finds the status quo, aggressive warfare is an illegal means for settling those grievances or for altering those conditions"
Statement by US Justice Robert Jackson at the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, Germany.Rennes, France.
It is alleged that on the evening of March 10-11, 2012, US Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales left his base inKandahar Province , Afghanistan ,
fully armed and loaded, and murdered 16 civilians in a nearby village. At a
pretrial hearing, the prosecution stated that Sgt. Bales went from house to
house, firing his weapon with intent to kill. Children were shot through the
thighs or in the head. At one point during the massacre 11 bodies, mostly women
and children, were "put in a pile and put on fire." The prosecutor
said that the carnage was so violent that when Sgt. Bales finally returned to
base, the blood of his victims had seeped all the way through his uniform and
down to his underwear.
Witnesses from the camp reported that Sgt. Bales, a decorated veteran of four combat tours in Afghanistan and Iraq, had been upset over an incident that occurred 2 days earlier, when an improvised explosive device (IED) exploded, resulting in one US soldier losing the lower part of a leg.
The murder of the local Afghans is the worst case of civilian slaughter to be blamed on a singleU.S.
soldier since the Vietnam War. For this hideous and blatant war crime, the
prosecution is asking for the death penalty.
A key component ofUS
strategy in the Afghanistan
/ Pakistan
theatre, or "AfPak" as the area is commonly known, is drones. The
Pentagon has about 7,000 at its disposal, with not all of them being for attack
purposes. For several years now, a sustained targeted drone campaign has been
carried out in an effort to weaken the "insurgents" (i.e. local
Afghan resistance). It has been estimated that over the past decade somewhere
between 1,800 to 3,100 people have been killed in the region by US
drone strikes. And while the US
government would argue that the vast majority of these people were militant
combatants, some estimates show that for every "insurgent" killed, 10
civilians were also killed.
TheUS
has taken the position that all of this is legal, with Attorney-General Eric
Holder arguing that the use of "technologically advanced weapons"
(i.e. drones) is based on "adherence to the law." But Article 2(4) of
the UN Charter should give us reason to pause. It expressly prohibits the
threat or use of force by one state against another. One argument that
proponents for drone attacks use is that since the attacks are being carried
out on militants and insurgents, and mostly in regions where the rule of law
has broken down, the phrase "state" doesn�t apply and therefore nullifies this
section of the Charter. But this argument is dubious at best. If it were Iran,
China, or Russia engaging in this type of behavior closer to US shores, say in
Central or South America, there is no doubt that the US government would be in
an uproar over the legality, and morality, of their use.
Compounding all of this is the controversial policy known as "the double tap." This involves striking an initial target and then following up, in quick succession, with repeated attacks on the same site as people arrive to give aid to the original victims. There are reports that innocent bystanders and non-combatants have been intentionally killed as a result. There are also reports that funerals have been deliberately hit by targeted drone strikes as well. In almost any other circumstances these events would be recognized for what they are. War crimes of the highest order. But somehow, for theUS ,
they only raise "contentious legal questions" to quote the New York
Times.
16 civilians (including 9 children) were murdered in cold blood inAfghanistan .
For that, Sgt. Bales is facing the possible loss of his life. America�s drone policy alone has reportedly killed between 474 and 881
civilians in the region, including 176 children. For this, no one is on trial.
But to even talk of war crimes inAfghanistan is a farce. The whole
war, in addition to being undeclared and unfunded, can be considered as a war
crime. That is, if one chooses to respect the principles put forth at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg and the founding
charter of the UN. To talk about the individual atrocities committed by one
lonely Sergeant (if that, indeed, is the case. 2 US soldiers are testifying for
the Government under immunity) while ignoring the war crimes committed by a
Nation, screams of hypocrisy and a double
standard of justice.
After 11 years of fighting, theUS
has now been in Afghanistan
longer than the Soviet Union . 2,000 soldiers
have died in combat, with over 17,000 wounded. The cost of the war is well over
$1 trillion, and still counting. While combat operations are scheduled to cease
by the end of 2014, NATO has stated that it is committed to maintaining a
presence in Afghanistan
well after that. The results will inevitably be more innocent deaths and more
war crimes. Another inevitability will most likely be that only front line
soldiers will be held accountable for their actions, not the senior military
commanders and the leaders in Washington who should ultimately be held
responsible for this senseless and bloody quagmire.
When it comes to America�s war crimes it would appear that some get punished. Most, however, get ignored.
Tom McNamara is an Assistant Professor at theESC Rennes School
of Business, France , and a
Visiting Lecturer at the French
National Military
Academy at Saint-Cyr Co�tquidan, France.
Sources.
"2,000 Dead: Cost of War inAfghanistan " By Amy Bingham,
October 1, 2012, ABC News. Accessed at:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/2000-dead-cost-war-afghanistan/story?id=17367728#.UIguv4bnNGI
"Afghanistan :
Green-on-blue attacks show there�s no easy way out" By Sajjan Gohel, September 18,
2012, CNN. Accessed at:
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/18/opinion/opinion-afghanistan-green-on-blue/index.html
"Afghanistan
forces prepared for NATO withdrawal, Karzai says" by Ned Parker, October
18, 2012, Los Angeles Times. Accessed at:
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/oct/18/world/la-fg-afghan-karzai-20121019
"Army Seeks Death Penalty in Afghan Massacre" by Kirk Johnson, November 13, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/us/army-seeks-death-penalty-for-robert-bales-in-massacre.html
"CIA �revives attacks on rescuers� inPakistan "
by Chris Woods, June 4th, 2012, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
Accessed at:
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/06/04/cia-revives-attacks-on-rescuers-in-pakistan/
"Death from afar" The Economist, November 3rd-9th, 2012. Accessed at:
http://www.economist.com/news/international/21565614-america-uses-drones-lot-secret-and-largely-unencumbered-declared-rules-worries
"Do Targeted Killings Work?" By Daniel L. Byman, Senior Fellow Foreign Policy, Saban Center forMiddle East
Policy, July 14, 2009, The Brookings Institute. Accessed at:
http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2009/07/14-targeted-killings-byman
"Dodging the drones: How militants have responded to the covertUS
campaign" By Aaron Y. Zelin, August 31, 2012, Foreign Policy. Accessed at:
http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/08/31/dodging_the_drones_how_militants_have_responded_to_the_covert_us_campaign
"Get the Data: Obama�s terror drones" by Chris Woods, February 4, 2012, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Accessed at:
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/02/04/get-the-data-obamas-terror-drones/
"Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan" the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School) and the Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of Law), September 2012. Accessed at:
http://livingunderdrones.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Stanford_NYU_LIVING_UNDER_DRONES.pdf
"Second Day, Wednesday, 11/21/1945, Part 04?, in Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal. Volume II. Proceedings: 11/14/1945-11/30/1945. [Official text in the English language.]Nuremberg : IMT, 1947. pp.
98-102. Accessed at:
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/jackson.html
"Predator Drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)" September 26, 2012, TheNew York
Times. Accessed at:http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/unmanned_aerial_vehicles/index.html
"Pretrial Hearing Starts for Soldier Accused of Murdering 16 Afghan Civilians" by Kirk Johnson, November 5, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/06/us/hearing-begins-for-robert-bales-accused-in-afghan-murders.html?_r=0
"Prosecutors seek death for U.S. soldier charged in Afghan rampage" by Bill Rigby, November 5, 2012, Reuters. Accessed at:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/06/us-usa-afghanistan-trial-idUSBRE8A407T20121106
"Prosecution Cites Revenge as Motive for Afghan Massacre" by Neal Karlinsky and Luis Martinez, November 5, 2012, ABC News. Accessed at:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/prosecution-cites-revenge-motive-afghan-massacre/story?id=17646561#.UKY5j4aoEsc
"Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the N�remberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, 1950" Report of the International Law Commission covering its Second Session, 5 june � 29 July 1950, Document A/1316. Accessed at:
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/390
"The Moral Case for Drones" by Scott Shane, July 14, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-moral-case-for-drones.html?ref=opinion
"The Charter of the United Nations" June 26, 1945. Accessed at:
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/intro.shtml
"U.S. hearing on Kandahar massacre to
include video testimony from Afghans" by Laura L. Myers, October 12, 2012,
Reuters. Accessed at:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/13/us-usa-afghanistan-trial-idUSBRE89C01720121013
A Double Standard of Justice
The War Crimes of a Sergeant, the War Crimes of a Nation by TOM McNAMARA
"Whatever grievances a nation may have, however objectionable it finds the status quo, aggressive warfare is an illegal means for settling those grievances or for altering those conditions"
Statement by US Justice Robert Jackson at the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, Germany.Rennes, France.
It is alleged that on the evening of March 10-11, 2012, US Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales left his base in
Witnesses from the camp reported that Sgt. Bales, a decorated veteran of four combat tours in Afghanistan and Iraq, had been upset over an incident that occurred 2 days earlier, when an improvised explosive device (IED) exploded, resulting in one US soldier losing the lower part of a leg.
The murder of the local Afghans is the worst case of civilian slaughter to be blamed on a single
A key component of
The
Compounding all of this is the controversial policy known as "the double tap." This involves striking an initial target and then following up, in quick succession, with repeated attacks on the same site as people arrive to give aid to the original victims. There are reports that innocent bystanders and non-combatants have been intentionally killed as a result. There are also reports that funerals have been deliberately hit by targeted drone strikes as well. In almost any other circumstances these events would be recognized for what they are. War crimes of the highest order. But somehow, for the
16 civilians (including 9 children) were murdered in cold blood in
But to even talk of war crimes in
After 11 years of fighting, the
When it comes to America�s war crimes it would appear that some get punished. Most, however, get ignored.
Tom McNamara is an Assistant Professor at the
Sources.
"2,000 Dead: Cost of War in
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/2000-dead-cost-war-afghanistan/story?id=17367728#.UIguv4bnNGI
"
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/18/opinion/opinion-afghanistan-green-on-blue/index.html
"
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/oct/18/world/la-fg-afghan-karzai-20121019
"Army Seeks Death Penalty in Afghan Massacre" by Kirk Johnson, November 13, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/us/army-seeks-death-penalty-for-robert-bales-in-massacre.html
"CIA �revives attacks on rescuers� in
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/06/04/cia-revives-attacks-on-rescuers-in-pakistan/
"Death from afar" The Economist, November 3rd-9th, 2012. Accessed at:
http://www.economist.com/news/international/21565614-america-uses-drones-lot-secret-and-largely-unencumbered-declared-rules-worries
"Do Targeted Killings Work?" By Daniel L. Byman, Senior Fellow Foreign Policy, Saban Center for
http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2009/07/14-targeted-killings-byman
"Dodging the drones: How militants have responded to the covert
http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/08/31/dodging_the_drones_how_militants_have_responded_to_the_covert_us_campaign
"Get the Data: Obama�s terror drones" by Chris Woods, February 4, 2012, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Accessed at:
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/02/04/get-the-data-obamas-terror-drones/
"Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan" the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School) and the Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of Law), September 2012. Accessed at:
http://livingunderdrones.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Stanford_NYU_LIVING_UNDER_DRONES.pdf
"Second Day, Wednesday, 11/21/1945, Part 04?, in Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal. Volume II. Proceedings: 11/14/1945-11/30/1945. [Official text in the English language.]
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/jackson.html
"Predator Drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)" September 26, 2012, The
"Pretrial Hearing Starts for Soldier Accused of Murdering 16 Afghan Civilians" by Kirk Johnson, November 5, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/06/us/hearing-begins-for-robert-bales-accused-in-afghan-murders.html?_r=0
"Prosecutors seek death for U.S. soldier charged in Afghan rampage" by Bill Rigby, November 5, 2012, Reuters. Accessed at:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/06/us-usa-afghanistan-trial-idUSBRE8A407T20121106
"Prosecution Cites Revenge as Motive for Afghan Massacre" by Neal Karlinsky and Luis Martinez, November 5, 2012, ABC News. Accessed at:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/prosecution-cites-revenge-motive-afghan-massacre/story?id=17646561#.UKY5j4aoEsc
"Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the N�remberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, 1950" Report of the International Law Commission covering its Second Session, 5 june � 29 July 1950, Document A/1316. Accessed at:
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/390
"The Moral Case for Drones" by Scott Shane, July 14, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-moral-case-for-drones.html?ref=opinion
"The Charter of the United Nations" June 26, 1945. Accessed at:
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/intro.shtml
"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/13/us-usa-afghanistan-trial-idUSBRE89C01720121013
CHEMICAL WAR
Tue Dec 4, 2012 8:14 am (PST) .
Posted by:
Chuck Palazzo
Agent Orange Action Group
http://aoag.org/
Hoa Binh Chapter, Veterans For Peace
http://vfp-vn.ning.com/
chuck_pal@yahoo.com
================================
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Children Of Vietnam Veterans Health Alliance <COVVHA@Gmail.com>
To: chuck_pal@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:14 AM
Subject: Children Of Vietnam Veterans Health Alliance
________________________________
VIDEO: The Lingering Effects of Agent Orange
Posted: 03 Dec 2012 01:59 PM PST
This video explores the perspectives of three generations of Agent Orange survivors offering a rare insight into non-Vietnamese survivors highlighting the global scale of this issue. Additionally, Jon Mitchell, a Welsh born journalist now residing inYokohama
explains his groundbreaking work in helping to uncover the use, storage and
burial of Agent Orange on the Japanese islands of Okinawa .
Through the video, viewers can see how these inspiring individuals used their
time aboard Peace Boat to spread the
messages of this issue as well as their time on land in Da Nang , Vietnam ;
where they were able to visit a support center for Vietnamese victims of Agent
Orange.
Special thanks to
Heather Bowser (Children Of Vietnam Veterans Health Alliance), Kenneth H. Young, Jenna Mack,Jon
Mitchell
&
Da Nang Center
for Agent Orange and Disadvantaged Children
The lingering effects of Agent Orange from Peace Boat on Vimeo.
http://vimeo.com/peaceboat
Agent Orange Action Group
http://aoag.org/
Hoa Binh Chapter, Veterans For Peace
http://vfp-vn.ning.com/
chuck_pal@yahoo.com
================================
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Children Of Vietnam Veterans Health Alliance <COVVHA@Gmail.com>
To: chuck_pal@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:14 AM
Subject: Children Of Vietnam Veterans Health Alliance
________________________________
VIDEO: The Lingering Effects of Agent Orange
Posted: 03 Dec 2012 01:59 PM PST
This video explores the perspectives of three generations of Agent Orange survivors offering a rare insight into non-Vietnamese survivors highlighting the global scale of this issue. Additionally, Jon Mitchell, a Welsh born journalist now residing in
Special thanks to
Heather Bowser (Children Of Vietnam Veterans Health Alliance), Kenneth H. Young, Jenna Mack,
&
Da Nang
The lingering effects of Agent Orange from Peace Boat on Vimeo.
http://vimeo.com/peaceboat
Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:14 pm (PDT) .
Posted by:
quister1789 Veterans for Peace
From: microann@yahoo.com
To: campcaseyalumni@yahoogroups.com, middle_east_alumni@googlegroups.com,
code-pink-delegation-to-pakistan@googlegroups.com
Sent: 3/12/2013 10:08:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: [campcaseyalumni] Say NO in poll to name freeway in Dallas after War
Criminial George W. Bush
Please vote NO to change the name of Central Freeway in Dallas to George
W. Bush freeway!!!
Ann Wright
microann@yahoo.com
Facebook: http://www.www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504291178
Twitter: annwright46
"Dissent: Voices of Conscience" www.voicesofconscience.com
--- On Tue, 3/12/13, JHarris866@aol.com <JHarris866@aol.com> wrote:
From: JHarris866@aol.com <JHarris866@aol.com>
Subject: [codepinkhouse] SO embarrassing for Dallas! Please help us say
NOOOOO!
To: codepinkhouse@yahoogroups.com, roseroots@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 12, 2013, 1:32 PM
As if the soon-to-be-dedicated shrine to Bush's presidency weren't enough,
now this. Help us Dallasites keep our sanity!
Please vote in the WFAA poll, share, and make calls. The hearing in the
House may be set for today.
_http://www.wfaa.com/home/Dallas-lawmaker-proposes-new-name-for-Central-Expr
essway-197234321.html_
(http://www.wfaa.com/home/Dallas-lawmaker-proposes-new-name-for-Central-Expressway-197234321.html)
There's already one major highway in DFW named after Daddy Bush. :(
Leslie
...and don't forget to join us in April for this:
_www.thepeoplesresponse.org_ (http://www.thepeoplesresponse.org/) .
Who Will
Speak If We Don’t?
Madeleine
Albright at St. John’s
High
School, Worcester
by Suzanne
Belote Shanley.
When I learned last January,
that former Secretary of
State, Madeleine Albright,
would be a keynote speaker
at St. John ’s
High
School in Worcester , addressing the annual
stunned, outraged, my mind spinning back to
the first Gulf War, and Albright’s infamous 60
Minutes interview in 1996. Responding to a
pointed question by Leslie Stahl, who compared
the US
sanctions in Iraq
to the catastrophic
killing of civilians during the US atomic
bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki , Albright
asserted: “I think this is a very hard choice, but
the price—we think the price is worth it.”
Albright’s reply, later
revised and regretted,
(distinct from repented) but
never spoken of in
terms of sorrow for the slow
starvation of a
civilian population,
decimation of infrastructure
through US bombing and
embargo, and the
preventable deaths of
children, became a
benchmark for self-delusion
and the re-writing
of history to gratify the
ends of empire.
Albright, now on a national
lecture tour,
was to address an audience
of over a thousand
people, including high
school students,
unbelievably, on the subject
of “The Courage
to Listen”, with the
enlightened task of “civility
in discourse, discussion and
decision-making.”
Alternately baffled and
enraged, I attempted
calling headmaster, Michael
Welsh, who was
out of town and unavailable,
and proceeded to
write an open letter to him
and a private letter to
earlier, had dis-invited,
Vicki Kennedy, Ted
Kennedy’s widow, from a
graduation address
at Anna Maria, a local Catholic College , because
of her pro-choice position.
Yet, unlike the
negativity around Kennedy, St. John’s webpage,
glowingly announced
Albright’s (strong prochoice, if not pro-abortion proponent) arrival at
of Paul Farmer, a previous
Abdella lecturer.
In my letter to Bishop
McManus, I outlined
the fact that “as Secretary
of State during the
Clinton Administration, Albright
presided over
the US led United
Nations sanctions against
Ramsey Clark described as a
“war crime,” a
charge supported by The
International Court on
Crimes Against Humanity.
Unless “Albright’s
purpose in coming to a
Catholic high school
was to repent her
participation in such an
unspeakable carnage,” I
wrote “,using Catholic
Social Teaching as a
guideline,” how could the
diocese and the headmaster
ignore, Cardinal
Etchegaray’s, (President of
the Pontifical
Council for Justice in 1998)
condemnation of
the sanctions as “destroying
the soul of the Iraqi
people.”
After my initial letters,
which I emailed to
local peace groups and
peacemakers, inviting
them to begin a
letter-writing campaign, I called
Diocesan Director of
Communication, Ray
Deslile, to clarify that
Agape was not asking
that Albright be disinvited,
(even though some
letter writers did). Rather,
I proposed that a
spokesperson for the
extended Agape peace
community, preferably a
woman, be invited to
speak on nonviolence and
Catholic Social
teaching on war, at the
forum with Albright. I
knew, with less than a week
before her talk, this
might be all but impossible,
but I had hoped to
stir a debate from a
gospel-peacemaking
perspective on the Iraq war, its
consequences
and Madeleine Albright’s
role. Ray and I found
common ground in the
perspective that the
Diocese would do well after
Albright’s talk, to
initiate a district-wide
study of Catholic Social
teaching, with a primary
emphasis on Jesus’
teachings on revenge.
Over the years, Albright
held to the validity
of sanctions “for dealing
with such tyrannies as
observations do not answer
the question of
whether any policy, no
matter how strategically
sound, is worth the deaths
of 500,000 Iraqi
children — a figure that
originated in a Unicef
report on infant mortality
in sanctions-era Iraq
and became the rallying cry
of anti-sanctions
campaigners.” (NYT, 7/23/03;
“Were the
Sanctions Right?”)
Albright’s response to Rieff:
“It was a genuinely stupid
thing to say,” in what
Rieff remarked was
Albright’s search “for the
lesser evil.” Over the
years, it appeared that
“stupid thing to say” never
translated into an
apology to the Iraqi people,
or, as a former
Catholic, now Episcopalian,
into any public
expression of remorse.
Instead, she gets major
billing, creates a minor
stir, appears at a Catholic
institution, which publicly
acclaims its
commitment to peace and
justice. Albright,
many of us in the peace
community agreed,
could not come to Worcester and go
unchallenged.
Scott and Claire
Schaeffer-Duffy, of St.
Therese and St. Francis
Catholic Worker in
vigil. Letters to Headmaster
Welsh came from
people who had observed
first-hand, the effects
of the sanctions on Iraqi
children. John
Schuchardt of the House of
Peace in Ipswich ,
wrote: “In 1991 and 1995 I
was in the hospitals
of Iraq holding the
tiny hands of infants dying
from the naval blockade
imposed by the U.S.
in August, 1990 and
continued by Madeline
Albright during her 4 years
of refusal to listen
to the cries of pain and
suffering.” Albright’s
view of this suffering,
seems appallingly bland
compared to the horrors
reported by John:
“What was so terrible for me
was that I did see
the faces of the people who
were suffering —
even if I thought then and
think now that the
sufferings of the Iraqi
people were Saddam’s
doing, not ours. There’s a
terrible price you pay.
A terrible price.’’ (Ibid.)
That price was further
described by another
first-hand account by George
Capaccio, also
present during “Saddam’s
doings”: “These little
ones, with their parents
beside them, lay on filthy
mattresses in public
hospitals where broken
windows could not be
repaired, where overhead
lights were often missing
and not replaceable,
where oxygen tanks lacked
the necessary valves,
where a lack of
disinfectants left hospital wards
and corridors smelling rank…
in a country that
once had a healthcare system
that was the pride
of the Middle
East . … Denis Halliday and Hans
von Sponek— stationed in Baghdad , resigned
their posts concluding that
the sanctions were
‘genocidal.’”
Scott Schaeffer-Duffy,
summed it all up:
“I asked an exhausted
doctor, who worked
without electricity, clean
water, medications, or
sterile supplies, what the
life expectancy was in
the Basra hospital, and he replied tearfully, ‘I
have not saved a patient in
6 months.’”
These letters went to the Worcester
chancery, and to
administrators at St. John’s
from
priests, women religious,
and area peacemakers,
including the renowned
scholar on Catholic
Social Teaching, David
O’Brien, who lamented
the lack of dialogue within
the “Catholic
community… of how Catholic
Social teaching”
is “best applied in the
practice of our country’s
foreign and national
security policy.”
Tom Cornell, Catholic Worker
elder and
author, who lived and worked
with Dorothy Day,
delivered a one sentence
chastisement: “Please
let His Excellency know that
many people will
be scandalized if Madeleine
Albright’s views
on war are not
counter-balanced by
representatives of authentic
Catholic Social
Teaching.”
January Witness at John’s
High School
About twenty of us, having
purchased hand
warmers and alert to
possible frost-bite, arrived
at St.
John’s with banners asking for repentance
of the “Sin of Violence”,
and a brief leaflet
with the facts and figures
of the death toll on
Iraqi children and a picture
of a dying Iraqi child.
With the strong police
presence and their
apologetic warnings, we knew
that any thoughts
of leafleting were doomed.
ACatholic Free
Press headline, after the
vigil proclaimed:
“Albright calls for
listening; opponents seek to
be heard” lending truth to
the cliché, “frozen
out”. Albright’s remarks to
several standing
ovations went unchallenged,
except for a
handful of fliers that Pax
Christi members Pat
Ferrone, (Regional Director
of Pax Christi,
MA), and Sue Malone, who
were inside, were
able to distribute.
Pat had written before the
talk of their
intention as attendees: “We
will listen carefully
to what Dr. Albright may
say, hoping that she is
forthright and
self-reflective about the moral
implications of her part in
events that resulted
in ‘perverse and
uncontrollable effects’ during
her reactions to Albright’s
presence and the
dilemma of being an
“observer” at such a forum,
where history goes unnoted
and collective
amnesia is in full display:
“We are up against
‘civilized power’ that
disarms and entices, uses
words like humility,
harmony, listening; takes
advantage of the cultivation
of nice boys and
girls and, despite the fact
that it talks about critical
thinking, doesn’t present
the truth of historical
events (500,000 dead Iraqi
children) so that
critical thinking can be
applied. She who holds
the power, who ‘graces’ the
audience, who is
applauded and lauded by a
full-house
contingent, is certainly not
held under scrutiny.
We’re bamboozled, laugh at
the jokes, pulled
in when she, like a master
comic, plays with us
and gives us tidbits of
‘inside’ gossip. Civility,
in myriad unspoken ways,
invites silence.”
AVisit with Headmaster
Michael Welsh
I carried in my heart, a
strong desire to
follow-up after a terse
phone conversation with
Mr. Welsh, the day of
Albright’s lecture, when
he stated that leafleting or
a presence near the
auditorium would not be
welcome or
“allowable”. Brayton and I
wanted to represent
the compassionate listening
side of nonviolent
communication. After cordial
exchanges, I
began by expressing my
sadness that we didn’t
have enough time to meet
personally before
the public witness, a
Gandhian and Kingian
approach of stating
objections, heading for
compromise, and only after
these options are
exhausted, a public
demonstration or civil
disobedience.
I recalled, but didn’t share
in the meeting,
how I was drawn to
interrupting Albright as she
spoke, but prayed about the
implications of such
a stance, and decided
against it, though in
retrospect, I wish there had
been time to
coordinate a silent presence
with banners inside
the auditorium. I shared
with Mike, that as a
Catholic woman, I believed
that someone had
to speak for the dead
children. I related the
story of Mrs. Shibama, a
survivor of the atom
bomb, who, having been
spared the incineration
deaths of her entire
elementary school at
students at Brookline High School : “My
children have no voices, so
now I must speak.”
The Iraqi children had no
voices, I said: “So we
had to speak.” Mike Welsh
was a good and
respectful listener,
granting my concerns
uninterrupted time.
Headmaster Welsh maintained
about
Madeleine Albright that like
St. Paul ,
everyone
has committed some sin in
life, and none of us
would want to be judged by that
sin alone.
Conversely, Brayton and I
pointed out that when
one opens a Catholic School forum to the author
of a policy opposed by the Vatican ,
considered
an unindicted war crime, we
are into an arena
of accountability, not a
tidy lecture on civility.
Welsh’s notion that past
sins of public
personages should not
condemn them to a
lifetime of ostracism in
public speaking seemed
a dodge from the heart of
the matter—the lies
of empire presented as
truth, a clean return to
public life, without mention
of the horrific deaths
of children.
We weighed and considered
each other’s
insights . . . . http://agapecommunity.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Servant-Song-Spring-2013-final-for-website.pdf
George Clooney: Sudan Village
Burnings A War Crime
By JASON STRAZIUSO 12/06/12 10:31 AM ET EST
American actor
George Clooney attends voting ceremonies during the first day of voting for the
independence referendum in the southern Sudanese city of Juba
January 9, 2011 in Juba , Sudan . (Photo by Spencer
Platt/Getty Images)
NAIROBI, Kenya — Actor George Clooney and a group of U.S.
genocide scholars in the United States are warning that war crimes are taking
place in an obscure conflict in Sudan's southern region.
Clooney has long worked to prevent conflict in Sudan and South Sudan ,
and he co-founded a group that uses satellite imagery to monitor acts of war
there. That group, the Satellite Sentinel Project, said Thursday that 26
villages were intentionally set on fire last month by Sudanese forces.
"Razing a village is a war crime, and the torching of
now at least 26 Nuban villages, plus the systematic destruction of crops and
grasslands for cattle, is a crime against humanity, Clooney said. "What
we're seeing here is a widespread campaign of village and crop burning. We've
seen this in Darfur, and it's happening again in South Kordofan and Blue
Nile," he said, referring to two states in southern Sudan that border the separate country of South Sudan .
"The international community must act more robustly
to counter and create a consequence for these crimes," he said.
Sudanese troops are fighting rebels in the Nuba Mountains
who were once aligned with what is now South Sudan .
When South Sudan peacefully broke away from Sudan
last year, following decades of civil war, the rebels' region was placed in the
Sudan side, though many
there say they wish they would have been put with South
Sudan .
Antonov airplanes have routinely bombed the rebels' region
over the last year, resulting in farmers fleeing their fields. John
Prendergast, a co-founder of the satellite project, said Sudan is carrying out a strategy of
"starvation warfare." More than 100,000 Nuba residents have fled
across the border to refugee camps in South Sudan .
The United States
under President George W. Bush played a large role in ending decades of
conflict between Sudan and
what is now South Sudan . But the fighting in Sudan 's South Kordofan and Blue
Nile states – between Sudanese forces and rebels known as the
SPLM-North – is not generating much international attention by comparison.
Samuel Totten, a professor at the University
of Arkansas and the author of
"Genocide by Attrition: The Nuba Mountains of Sudan ,"
leads an online discussion with scholars and human rights activists about
events in Sudan .
On Wednesday he submitted a letter signed by more than 70 scholars to the
Atrocities Prevention Board, a U.S.
government panel. President Barack Obama created the board in August 2011, when
he declared that the prevention of mass atrocities and genocide to be a
"core national security interest and core moral responsibility."
Totten's letter said Sudan
is carrying out attacks in Nuba much like it once did in Darfur, a region in
western Sudan
that benefited from an international outcry against atrocities committed there.
The letter said the U.S.
and international community are doing little or nothing to prevent the
violence, despite Obama's 2011 directive.
"There is a point, we believe, when it should become
self-evident that the continuation of talk, talk and more talk with a state
that has engaged in serial crimes against humanity, genocidal-like actions,
ethnic cleansing ... is all but a total waste of time," Totten wrote.
"As hundreds of thousands of innocents needlessly suffer, there is a moral
imperative that the continual `diplomatic' talking, negotiating, pleading, and
ultimately begging with leaders of such openly deceptive and destructive
strategies must be replaced by concrete and effective action ... ."
Preventing a return to war between Sudan and South Sudan
appears to be the international community's first priority. A border has not
yet been defined, and major oil disagreements over the last year have seen the
South half its oil production, costing its own government and that of Khartoum 's millions of
dollars in lost revenue. Border skirmishes broke out in April.
The U.S.
special envoy to Sudan and South Sudan , Princeton Lyman, traveled to the region in
late November. Lyman said that without ending the conflict in the Nuba Mountains
it will be hard for Sudan
and South Sudan to sort their outstanding
issues. Khartoum accuses South Sudan of aiding
the SPLM-N rebels, a charge officials in Juba, South Sudan 's
capital, deny.
"There has to be, and I think everybody really recognizes
this, a political channel inside Sudan between the government and
the SPLM-N, to bring this conflict to a close. And the first step has to be a
cessation of hostilities," Lyman said.
E.J. Hogendoorn, a Horn of Africa expert at the
International Crisis Group, a think tank that tracks conflicts, said Sudanese
forces aren't strong enough to take the Nuba Mountains
without heavy casualties, and the SPLM-N isn't strong enough to push outside of
Nuba.
"You have a strategic stalemate that if the
international community doesn't do anything about it could last for a very long
time, and the knock on-effect is that the civilian population is going to get
screwed," he said.
Contents of #2 Nov. 25, 2011
Bush and Blair at 2011 Malaysian Tribunal
Bush Should Have Been Impeached
No Statute of Limitations
Nader:
President Obama
“Kill Anything”: Vietnam War
Hunt for Nazi War Criminals
ICC Warrant for Ntaganda
Contents of #3
Agent Orange
Hedges and Al Arian, Collateral Damage
Tirman, The
Deaths of Others
Haditha Massacre Unpunished
National, Official, Individual Memory of
Atrocities
Film: Al
Doura Atrocities
Greenwald: Why High US Officials Are Not
Prosecuted
Dixson: US
History of Military Atrocities
Global
Samuel Totten and Rafiki Ubaldo, eds. We
Cannot Forget: Interviews with Survivors of the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda . Rutgers
UP, 2011.
END WAR CRIMES NEWSLETTER
#5
No comments:
Post a Comment