OMNI
REFUGEES, ASYLUM
NEWSLETTER #6, ARKANSAS, USA, WORLD
September 23, 2016
COMPILED BY DICK
BENNETT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE, JUSTICE, AND ECOLOGY
(#1, August 2, 2014; #2 Nov. 24, 2015;
#3 Dec. 17, 2016; #4 April 7, 2016; #5 June 28, 2016.)
Contents
#5 at end
Contents
Refugees Newsletter #6,
September 23, 2016
CONTENTS:
UNITED STATES AND REFUGEES NEWSLETTER #6
I. ARKANSAS, II. USA, III. WORLD, IV. HISTORY
ARKANSAS
What’s at stake: Just a
few days ago I read a report in the newspaper about the 7 million Colombians
displaced. And then about the 3.3
million Iraqis displaced, and the threatened battle for Mosul to displace
possibly “another 1 million people.”
Many of those millions will become refugees fleeing the violence or
consequences of violence. Some of those
might come or want to come to Arkansas.
Catholic
Immigration Services, Fayetteville, AR, Frank Head, Dir.
“Canopy”
Coalition
Doug Thompson,
Report on “Canopy,” Formation of NWA Refugee
Coalition May 22, 2015
Coalition May 22, 2015
Google Search
May 2015
Google Update
September 2016
Rev.
Jim Parrish, Emily Linn Settlement Director, Creating Teams,
Signing Up, Getting to Work, Raising Funds
Signing Up, Getting to Work, Raising Funds
Lowell Grisham,
“Welcome the Strangers”
USA
President Obama
2016 from June to September
Dick, From
Spain 1614 to US 2016: Rejection, Discrimination, Persecution,
Deportation
Deportation
Daniel
Kanstroom, Deportation Law and the New
American Diaspora
Related:
Mainstream News
Reporting of Immigrants: France and US
The Nation Examines Immigration Reforms
WORLD
65 Million
Displaced
South Sudan
Ban Ki-moon
Video
Education of
Refugees
HISTORY
Majid, We Are All Moors
ARKANSAS
Catholic Charities Immigration
Services provides low-cost immigration counseling and support to families and
individuals who are eligible for immigration benefits and cannot afford private
assistance. The mission of Catholic Charities Immigration Services is to work
for solidarity in our community by welcoming the stranger in the spirit of the
Gospel. We recognize the inalienable right of all persons to human dignity. We
therefore assist and advocate for immigrants to attain family unity, economic
independence and social integration.
Supported by a U.S. Department of
Justice grant supporting a federal law to protect victims of human trafficking
and violence, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) specialist assists
immigrants in safely leaving dangerous situations and obtaining immigration
status that supports them in making decisions for their own future. The Crime
Victims Services Coordinator also works with law enforcement agencies and
parish/community teams to educate them about immigrant victims' rights when
they are victims of a violent crime and to provide access to critical resources
for victims when they are in crisis.
Services
§
Application Assistance: Immigration Services prepares and files
immigration applications and forms to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services.
§
Counseling and Referrals: Counsels clients about
immigration-related needs and refers clients to attorneys for legal assistance
and deportation proceedings.
§
Advocacy: Interacts with congressional representatives on behalf
of immigrants.
§
Education: Immigration Services conducts immigration workshops
and seminars at various events in the community.
§ VAWA is a
program within Catholic Immigration Services that helps get lawful permanent
resident status for victims of domestic violence who are married to U.S.
citizens or other lawful permanent residents. Federal law protects victims of
trafficking and violence. The work of our VAWA specialists is funded by a U.S.
Department of Justice grant.
VAWA Services
§
Security against deportation: VAWA assists victims of certain
crimes, like domestic violence, obtain Delayed Action and Employment
Authorization when the victim is willing to help prosecute the criminal
perpetrator.
§
Immigration Assistance: Helps victims of human trafficking,
where people are forced or coerced into servitude. In these cases, the VAWA
program works with the local office of the FBI.
CANOPY: NEW ORGANIZATION TO BRING REFUGEES
Doug
Thompson, “Group Seeks to Bring 100 Refugees to Region Yearly.” NADG (5-22-16). Local
group called “Canopy” seeks to bring “’one or two families a month.’” Canopy is composed of local representatives
of Catholic Charities Immigration Services, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee
Service, and the participation of other groups is planned. Frank Head directs local Catholic Services;
Rev. Clint Schnekloth is lead pastor of Good Shepard Lutheran. This is a good article about a developing,
complex effort, seeking out several perspectives. [The statistics were confusing. The UN has declared 65 million “displaced”
people, but Thompson refers to 14.5 million “refugees.” It’s a crucial matter because it helps to
determine how adequately US and Arkansas have responded. The problem may be the definition of
“refugees accounted for by the United Nations.” It’s a narrow definition relating to
persecution, when many more people are fleeing the violence of war. See the following item in which the
definition is more inclusive.] —Dick
www.nwaonline.com/.../2016/sep/.../u-n-affirms-rights-of-re...NWAOnline
3 days ago - Updated: September 20, 2016 at 4:07 a.m. ...
According to the U.N.refugee agency, refugees are people forced to flee as a result of armed ...
CANOPY GOOGLE
SEARCH MAY 2016, Bits of History Fall 2015 to Summer 2016
www.arkansasonline.com/.../nw-arkansas-gr...
Arkansas
Democrat‑Gazette
May 23, 2016 - FAYETTEVILLE -- Arkansas took in roughly 1
out of every 1 million refugees seeking shelter worldwide last year -- 13 of the 14.5
million ...
www.arkansasmatters.com/.../official-no-syrian-refugees-appr...
KARK‑TV
No Syrian refugees have been approved
for relocation in The Natural State yet, according to an official with the only
Department of State refugee processing ...
Nov 16, 2015 - FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. —The governor
of Arkansas, Asa Hutchinson, released
a statement Monday saying that he did not want Syrian refugees ...
Jul 11, 2016 - FAYETTEVILLE,Ark.
—Help refugees build a new life as
they get settled in Northwest Arkansas. A group called Canopy Northwest Arkansas's ...
www.volunteermatch.org/.../orgs.jsp?...Fayetteville%2C+...
VolunteerMatch
Fayetteville, AR | ( 1 reviews).
Interest Areas: Community, Education & Literacy, Immigrants & Refugees. Updated: 2007-03-30
00:00:00.0 , Distance: 2.8760252 ...
https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/.../catholic-charities-eyei...
May 23, 2016 - Here is news from
the Northwest
Arkansas Democrat
Gazette: Arkansas ... of creating a new refugee resettlement office in northwest Arkansas.
5newsonline.com/.../governor-hutchinson-opposes-relocation...
KFSM‑TV
Nov 16, 2015 - Fort Smith/Fayetteville News | 5newsonline
KFSM 5NEWS ... (KFSM/CNN) — Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson announced Monday (Nov.
www.dolr.org/.../refugee-resettle...
Roman
Catholic Diocese of Little Rock
How do refugees get to Arkansas? The Catholic
Charities Refugee Resettlement Office works with the U.S. Conference of
Catholic Bishops' Office of Migration ...
www.arkansas-catholic.org/.../Canopy-group-will-make-sure-refugees-ar...
Apr 4, 2016 - Clint Schnekloth, stand
with refugee couple Faez Arso and
his wife Ahlam ... The goal is to learn how Canopy can make northwest Arkansas a ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../group-seeks-to-bri...
The
Washington Times
May 29, 2016 - FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. (AP) - Arkansas took in about 1 out
of every 1 million refugees who sought shelter worldwide last year - 13 of the
14.5 ...
CANOPY GOOGLE
UPDATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2016
www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/.../arkansas-among-bot...Arkansas Times
Sep 11, 2015 - Posted By Benjamin Hardy
on Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:51 AM
... May 16,2016 ... Asa Hutchinson:
Syrian refugees unwelcome in Arkansas .... has to ask why
the Marshalese prefer Springdale to, say, Rogers or Bentonville.
www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/.../hutchinson-syrian-r... Arkansas Times
Nov 16, 2015 - Asa Hutchinson says
Syrian refugees aren't welcome in
Arkansas. ... Federal Government to relocate most of those Syrian refugees here, and especially
inNW
Arkansas!
..... Posted by radical centrist; on September 18, 2016 ...
... September 15, 2016.
canopynwa.org/updates/
Blog. Date September 8, 2016 userPosted by:
canopy ... This person will be working face-to-face, one-on-one with refugees every day. They will
be the person ...
CANOPY
ORGANIZING TEAMS
Fwd:
Co-Sponsors-- It's Go time!
|
Inbox
|
x
|
|
Sep 20 (3 days ago)
 |
|
||
|
||||
Hi Folks,
UUFF, Compassion Fayetteville, OMNI, and the Quaker
Meeting joined together to be a co-sponsor for Canopy when it was
being formed, and now it is up and running and needs our attention.
We need to advertise to our people and put together a team
of 8 for the upcoming trainings... either the October training, or January, so
they are ready to welcome and support a new family to the area.
The reason we are a coalition is the difficulty of our
smaller groups to pull together eight volunteers for such an endeavor from
one... so it makes sense to collaborate. It will be interesting to see the
overlap of our people as well;-)
I'm also reaching out to Temple Shalom, and the Muslim
community as well.
Anyhow... Time to contact our constituents and get some
volunteers! Share the Canopy materials with them, and lets get one or
two 8 person teams put together for training. I'll start a central sign up,
when you get names and contact information, share them with me/all, or put them
directly into the sign up sheet on Google Docs (sent to each of you plus a link
below).
Peace,
Jim
Rev. Jim Parrish
Minister, UU Fellowship of Fayetteville, AR
Cell (479) 439-1415, Ofc. (479)
521-8422
---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: Canopy NWA <emily.linn@canopynwa.org>
Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:59 AM
Subject: Co-Sponsors-- It's Go time!
To: revjim@fayettevilleunitarian.org
From: Canopy NWA <emily.linn@canopynwa.org>
Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:59 AM
Subject: Co-Sponsors-- It's Go time!
To: revjim@fayettevilleunitarian.org
|
USA
HOW IS PRESIDENT OBAMA DOING?
Back in June 2016.
|
10:50 AM (2 minutes ago)
|
|
||
|
||||
Read the expose of doublethink, doubletalk, cant, hypocrisy, and
fear by Julie Hirschfeld Davis (The New York Times), "Critics
Call President's Syrian Refugee Talk Hollow," AD-G (June
1, 2016).
The consequence of Obama's and Congress's multilayered
fecklessness (one of many descriptors needed) is their outrageous failure to
embrace the refugees, which raises the work of private rescue to a high value
and urgency. Our national leaders should
say we can do as well as Canada and aspire as high as Germany, instead of that
paltry 10,000 as yet not 3000.
BUT OBAMA’S BEGINNING TO GET A
GRIP IN SEPTEMBER 2016.
ADG Staff. “U. S. Sets Refugees ’17 Goal: 110,000.” September 15, 2016.
That’s “a nearly 30 percent increase from the 85,000 allowed in
over the previous year,” but “still far short” of what is needed advocacy
groups say. “Of the 110,000, 40,000 will
come from the Middle East and South Asia.”
FROM
SPAIN 1614 TO USA 2016
REJECTION,
DISCRIMINATION, PERSECUTION, DEPORTATION by Dick Bennett
During times of crisis, doubt, and fear,
people and governments turn to fundamentalist intolerance and the persecution
of minority groups. We see this
cause-effect throughout history. The
defeat of the Spanish Armada led to a new Spanish fundamentalism preaching
purity and fighting heresy. The Spanish
Christian rulers proscribed Islam, but of the Muslims who remained living in Spain
The US
Some compassionate, tolerant Spanish
nobles opposed the discrimination, the arbitrariness, the proscription, and the
deportations. One Pedro de Valencia
writing in 1606 called for gradual integration through dispersion, mixed
marriages, and better living conditions.
A few recognized that appropriate incentives would eventually lead the
Moriscos to become loyal subjects.
Instead, the majority with the King chose hideous intolerance and
cruelty.
Similarly today, reasonable citizens
recommend a generous enlargement of immigrant quotas. Not of all who seek a better life, not as
Emma Lazarus wrote in her sonnet, “The New Collosus,” inscribed on the pedestal
of the Statue of Liberty, "Give
me your tired, your poor,/Your huddled masses.” But
in that spirit we certainly can and should accept significantly more. Many
other countries absorb immigrants at a higher rate than the U.S. U.S.
in 2009 ranked only 11th out of a selection of 28 advanced industrialized
nations, trailing such countries as Australia ,
Austria , Switzerland , New
Zealand , Norway
and Ireland U.S.
And if
Christian US deportation of Christian illegal workers is less brutal than that
of the seventeenth-century Spaniards’ expulsion of illegal Muslims, the US
deports many more than did ruling Spain.
As Professor Daniel Kanstroom has recounted in his book, Aftermath, since 1996, when new, harsher
deportation laws went into effect under the Clinton
administration, the US United
States US
deportation, Deportation Nation) criticizes the current deportation system of the United States and especially deportation's
aftermath: the actual effects on individuals, families, U.S. communities, and the countries that must
process and repatriate ever-increasing numbers of U.S.
In his letter to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Feb. 20, 2013), Stephen Clark appeals to US clergy to speak out in support of “the worldwide persecution of Christians.” He offers no evidence (but the newspaper restricts contributors to 250 words, or one page), but I join him in deploring any persecution, which has plagued some religions for hundreds of years, including Christianity
In his letter to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Feb. 20, 2013), Stephen Clark appeals to US clergy to speak out in support of “the worldwide persecution of Christians.” He offers no evidence (but the newspaper restricts contributors to 250 words, or one page), but I join him in deploring any persecution, which has plagued some religions for hundreds of years, including Christianity
Mr.
Clark also states that “the persecution is especially severe in North Korea , Saudi
Arabia , Iraq ,
Pakistan , Egypt , and Afghanistan
Had he ended there, no great
intensification of the ancient hatred and bloodshed of the re-conquest would
have been suggested. But he ends his
letter with a quotation from pastor
Dietrich Bonhoeffer warning Germans during WWII that “Silence in the face of
evil is itself evil. God will not hold
us guiltless.” By that quotation,
possibly unintentionally he insinuates that not only are five Islamic countries
and one communist country guilty of “severe” persecution of Christians (no
details given), but that they are “evil” comparable to Hitler. Two of the countries are among the “Axis of Evil,”
President Bush’s war cry: you are either with us or against us.
Such association and call for action
can lead only to continued distrust and conflict. The last century witnessed endless fear,
bitterness, and folly, resulting in the deaths and impoverishment of millions
and grievous damage to the environment.
Now in the twenty-first century, let us reject hatred and aggression,
discrimination and persecution.
REFERENCES
Kanstroom,
Daniel . Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American
Diaspora 2012. Deportation
Nation: Outsiders in American History. 2012.
Majid,
Anouar. We Are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades Against Muslims and
Other Minorities. 2009.
Shear,
Michael. “Advocates Push Obama to Halt
Aggressive Deportation Efforts.” New York Times (Feb. 22, 2013).
Smith-Christopher,
Daniel, ed. Subverting Hatred: The Challenge of Nonviolence in Religious
Traditions. 1998.
Lowell
Grisham. “Welcome the Strangers: U.S. System to Blame for
Illegal Immigration.” NADG (September 13, 2016). “It’s time to give a legal path for good
people to strive for the American dream.
Enough of the deadly, legalistic talk of walls and deportation.” http://www.nwaonline.com/news/2016/sep/13/lowell-grisham-welcome-the-strangers-20/?opinion
Aftermath: Deportation Law
and the New American Diaspora
Daniel Kanstroom
Jun 2012,
Description
Since 1996, when new, harsher deportation laws went into effect,
the United States United
States
Daniel Kanstroom, author of the authoritative history of deportation, Deportation Nation, turns his attention here to the current deportation system of the United States and especially deportation's aftermath: the actual effects on individuals, families, U.S. communities, and the countries that must process and repatriate ever-increasing numbers of U.S. deportees. Few know that once deportees have been expelled to places likeGuatemala ,
Cambodia , Haiti , and El Salvador
Addressing a wide range of political, social, and legal issues, Kanstroom considers whether our deportation system "works" in any meaningful sense. He also asks a number of under-examined legal and philosophical questions: What is the relationship between the "rule of law" and the border? Where do rights begin and end? Do (or should) deportees ever have a "right to return"? After demonstrating that deportation in the U.S. remains an anachronistic, ad hoc, legally questionable affair, the book concludes with specific reform proposals for a more humane and rational deportation system.
Daniel Kanstroom, author of the authoritative history of deportation, Deportation Nation, turns his attention here to the current deportation system of the United States and especially deportation's aftermath: the actual effects on individuals, families, U.S. communities, and the countries that must process and repatriate ever-increasing numbers of U.S. deportees. Few know that once deportees have been expelled to places like
Addressing a wide range of political, social, and legal issues, Kanstroom considers whether our deportation system "works" in any meaningful sense. He also asks a number of under-examined legal and philosophical questions: What is the relationship between the "rule of law" and the border? Where do rights begin and end? Do (or should) deportees ever have a "right to return"? After demonstrating that deportation in the U.S. remains an anachronistic, ad hoc, legally questionable affair, the book concludes with specific reform proposals for a more humane and rational deportation system.
Features
Reviews
"In
Aftermath, Dan Kanstroom accomplishes the impossible: he disassembles the
labyrinthine snarl of our immigration system in a volume that is both readable
and scholarly, accessible and authoritative. Arguing compellingly against
"government behavior and consequences we cannot and should not
accept," he outlines a sensible, sane way forward. This book is ultimately
a volume of hope that appeals to the American spirit of fair play and
resoundingly demonstrates that fairness can be, and is, pragmatic and enlightened
self-interest. A must-read."--Ashley Judd, actor and human rights activist
"Daniel
Kanstroom has written another remarkable book about the U.S. US François-Xavier Bagnoud
Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University
"In
this cogent, well-written and, at times, poignant work of scholarship, Daniel
Kanstroom looks unflinchingly at the understudied issue of deportation's
aftermath. No one interested in immigration policy will be unmoved by his deft
unveiling of the injustices that routinely accompany the US University
of Oxford
"Dan
Kanstroom is among the most daring and inventive migration scholars writing
today. Many studies of immigration law and policy start with the foreign
national's arrival in the United
States Yale
Law School
Daniel Kanstroom is Professor of Law at Boston
College and author of Deportation Nation: Outsiders.
NEWS REPORTING
IMMIGRANTS/IMMIGRATION
“What Makes a Critical Press? A Case Study of French and U.S.
The Nation (August 16/23, 2010) presents 4 articles on
immigration reform.
WORLD
THE MILLIONS DISPLACED AS OF
SEPTEMBER 2016
65 MILLION WORLD WIDE
7 MILLION IN COLOMBIA 2015
MORE THAN 1 MILLION, MOSTLY FROM SYRIA, IRAQ,
AND AFGHANISTAN, FLED TO EUROPE
Conflicts
around the world have displaced 65 million people, many of whom are living in
poverty, said a report by the United Nations refugee agency and the World Bank.
"Extreme poverty is now increasingly concentrated among vulnerable groups,
including people who had to flee in the face of conflict and violence, and their
presence affects development prospects in the communities that are hosting
them," the report contends.
UN: South Sudan conflict has
resulted in more than 1M refugees The Associated Press (9/16). UN Wire (9-16-16).
Related:
- Ban: More
affordable drugs needed to treat low-income populations The Cambridge Times
(Ontario)/The Canadian Press (9/15)
- Study:
Maternal deaths are halved but UN targets still not met The Guardian (London) (9/15)
EDUCATION
OF REFUGEES
Education
for Displaced People
Migrants and Refugees: Equitable
Education for Displaced Populations by Elinor L. Brown, Anna Krasteva, 2013.
- A volume in the series
International Advances in Education: Global Initiatives for Equity and
Social Justice
- International Advances in
Education: Global Initiatives for Equity and Social Justice is an
international research monograph series of scholarly works that
- primarily focus on empowering students (children, adolescents,
and young adults) from diverse current circumstances and historic beliefs
and traditions to
- become
non-exploited/non-exploitive contributing members of the global community. The series draws on the research
and innovative practices of
- investigators, academics, and
community organizers around the globe that have contributed to the
evidence base for developing sound educational policies,
- practices, and programs that
optimize all students' potential. Each volume includes multidisciplinary
theory, research, and practices that provide an enriched
- understanding of the drivers of
human potential via education to assist others in exploring, adapting, and
replicating innovative strategies that enable ALL
- students to realize their full
potential. This volume provides the reader with promising policies and
practices that promote social justice and educational
- opportunity for the many displaced
populations (migrants, asylum-seekers, refugees, and immigrants) around
the globe. The volume is divided into four
- sections that offer: (1) insights
into the educational integration of displaced children in industrialized
nations, (2) methods of creating pedagogies of harmony
- within school environments, (3)
ways to nurture school success by acknowledging and respecting the
cultural traditions of newcomers, and finally (4)
- strategies to forge pathways to
educational equity. Overall, this volume contributes to the body of
knowledge on equitable educational opportunities for
- displaced youth and will be a
valuable resource for all who seek to enable the displaced a place at the
political, economic, and social table of civil society.
OMNI CLIMATE CHANGE
REFUGEES /DISPLACED PERSONS NEWSLETTER #1, August 5, 2013. http://omnicenter.org/dick-bennetts-peace-justice-and-ecology-newsletters/
#2 is being prepared.
HISTORY
We Are All Moors: Ending
Centuries of Crusades against Muslims and Other Minorities by Anouar
Majid. 2012.
An alternate history of xenophobia and how we must overcome it together
In We
Are All Moors, Anouar Majid contends that the acrimonious debates about
immigration and Islam in the West are the cultural legacy of the conflict
between Christians and Moors. Offering a groundbreaking new history, Majid explores
how “the Moor” has served as an unacknowledged but potent metaphor for all
minority peoples in the West, endlessly reincarnated by the majority.
We Are All Moors excited me for its implications. The range is superb and
reading it is a pleasure—Anouar Majid dances across continents, taking a thread
and seeing what comes of it. It reminds us of histories long forgotten, and
provides a useful way to look back to help understand the present. Vijay Prashad, author of The Darker
Nations: A People’s History of the Third World
IMMIGRANT SPONSOR RULES AND REGULATIONS
What Sponsors
Should Know Before Signing Form I-864 Affidavit of Support
Becoming a U.S.
Citizen
U.S. Immigration Made Easy
Fiance & Marriage Visas
How to Get a Green Card
Related Ads
Ads by Google
Get a Marriage
Green Card
99% Approval
Rates! Low Fees with Flexible Payment Plans. Call Now.
www. VisaNow.
com/ Marriage-Green-Card
Free
immigration advice
Talk to a U.S.
Immigration Lawyer. Helpful Tips on Immigration Laws.
USImmigrationLawyers.
com/ Advice
Ask an
Immigration Lawyer
A Lawyer Will
Answer in Minutes! Questions Answered Every 9 Seconds.
Immigration-Law.
JustAnswer. com
Need
Professional Help? Talk to a Lawyer
Enter Your Zip
Code to Connect with a Lawyer Serving Your Area
If you are
sponsoring someone for a family based green card (U.S. lawful permanent
residence) you will, as a condition of the person being approved, need to fill
out an Affidavit of Support for that person. This is done on Form I-864,
published by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
Let's take a
look at the legal implications of the Form I-864 Affidavit of Support. You
should also attempt to read all the instructions that come with the form.
If you are
lucky, you might not have to fill out the long version of the form. Some
sponsors get to use a considerably simpler Form I-864EZ rather than the Form
I-864. If you are sponsoring only one immigrant, and your income alone is
enough to satisfy the required Poverty Guidelines levels, be sure to use this
easier form! (For information on how much income you will need to show, see
"How Much Income an Immigrant's Sponsor Needs to Show According to the
Poverty Guidelines.")
The Sponsor’s
Obligations
The Form I-864
Affidavit of Support is a legally enforceable contract, meaning that either the
government or the sponsored immigrant can take the sponsor to court if the
sponsor fails to provide adequate support.
When the
government sues the sponsor, it collects enough money to reimburse any public
agencies that have given public benefits to the immigrant. When the immigrant
sues, he or she collects cash support up to 125% of the amount listed in the
U.S. government’s Poverty Guidelines (as shown in the chart in Form I-864P).
The sponsor’s
responsibility lasts until the immigrant becomes a U.S. citizen, has earned 40
work quarters credited toward Social Security (a work quarter is about three
months, so this means about ten years of work), dies, or permanently leaves the
United States. If the immigrant has already been living in the U.S. and earned
work credits before applying for the green card, those count toward the 40.
In fact, in
marriage-based cases, work done by the U.S. petitioning spouse during the
marriage can be counted toward these 40 quarters.
CAUTION
A sponsor in a
marriage-based case remains legally obligated even after a divorce. Yes, a
divorced immigrant spouse could decide to sit on a couch all day and sue the
former spouse for support. The sponsor may wish to have the immigrant sign a
separate contract agreeing not to do this, but it is not clear whether courts
would enforce such a contract.
Who Can Serve
as an Immigrant's Financial Sponsor
The person
petitioning the immigrant and any additional financial sponsor(s) must meet
three requirements to serve in this role. Each sponsor must be:
• a U.S.
citizen, national, or permanent resident
• at least 18
years of age, and
• live in the
United States or a U.S. territory or possession.
As a practical
matter, of course, the sponsor will have to doing pretty well financially to
get the immigrant approved for a green card. Even if the sponsor’s income and
assets are lower than the Poverty Guidelines demand, however, he or she must
sign an Affidavit of Support. But in a case of low income, the sponsor will have
to look for additional sponsors to help the foreign-born person immigrate.
Take particular
note of the third requirement if both the sponsor and the would-be immigrant
are presently living overseas. The consulate may require that the sponsor show
that this is a temporary absence, that the sponsor has maintained ties to the
U.S., and that he or she intends to reestablish domicile there no later than
the date that the immigrant is admitted as a permanent resident. Some of the
ways the sponsor can show having maintained ties to the U.S. include having
paid state or local taxes, kept U.S. bank accounts, kept a permanent U.S.
mailing address, or voted in U.S. elections.
CAUTION
Sponsors who
try to run away from their obligations will face fines. The U.S. government has
anticipated that some sponsors might try to escape their financial obligation
by simply moving and leaving no forwarding address. That’s why the law says
that the sponsor must report a new address to USCIS on Form I-865 within 30
days of moving. A sponsor who does not comply faces fines of between $250 and
$2,000; or $5,000 if the sponsor knows the immigrant has collected need-based
public benefits.
by: Ilona Bray,
J.D.
Talk to an
Immigration Attorney
Start here to
find immigration lawyers near you.
Practice
Area:
Zip Code:
HOW IT WORKS
Briefly tell us
about your case
Provide your
contact information
Choose
attorneys to contact you
Legal
Information & Books From Nolo
Immigration
Laws »
Immigration Law
Basics
Getting a Visa,
Green Card or Asylum
How to Get a
Green Card
How to Become a
U.S. Citizen
Facing
Deportation or Removal
Family Sponsors
Petitioning for Immigrants
Employers
Sponsoring Immigrant Workers
Immigration
Books »
How to Get a
Green Card
Becoming a U.S.
Citizen
Fiance & Marriage Visas
Immigration Law Center, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 11032
Montgomery, Alabama 36111-0032 U.S.A.
Telephone: (334) 832-9090
P.O. Box 11032
Montgomery, Alabama 36111-0032 U.S.A.
Telephone: (334) 832-9090
Send
Email: CLICK HERE
Copyright
Boyd F. Campbell, L.L.C., All Rights Reserved
Qualifying
for Political Asylum in the United States
By BOYD F. CAMPBELL
Attorney at Law and Civil Law Notary
Attorney at Law and Civil Law Notary
Political asylum is granted by the U.S. government to people who can prove that
they are afraid to return to their home country because they have a
"well-founded fear of persecution." People may also be granted
political asylum if they left their home country because they were persecuted
in the past. If you win political asylum, you can apply for your "green
card" (permanent residence). To win asylum because you are afraid of
returning to your home country, you must appear at an initial hearing before a
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) asylum officer, usually at a
USCIS district office. If you application for asylum is denied, you may
appeal to an immigration judge, and will have another opportunity to prove that
your fear is "well-founded."
You must convince the asylum officer or immigration judge that you truly believe you are in danger, that you have good reasons for this belief, and that someone else in your position would also be afraid. You must generally present independent, verifiable documentary evidence that shows you fear persecution in your home country or that you have been persecuted in the past. Persecution can mean that you have been, or may be, hurt, kidnapped, detained, jailed, tortured, threatened, killed, or beaten, or that your freedom was or will be taken away in any other way.
The people who persecuted you or whom you're afraid will persecute you if you return to your home country can be the government (army, police, soldiers, elected officials, death squads, or others), the guerrillas, another opposition group, the civil patrol, or any other group that the government cannot or will not control. The people who persecuted you or whom you think will persecute you if you return to your home country must be persecuting you based on one of the following five reasons:
1. The most common reason for being persecuted is because of your political opinion. It doesn't matter whether you support or oppose the government. People who have been persecuted because of their political opinions and have won their asylum cases have included: people who demonstrate as students, are active in labor unions, or are members of political parties or the government. Sometimes, even if you don't have a political opinion, the persecutor may think you have a certain political opinion. He may persecute you because he thinks you have a political opinion due to things you do, groups you belong to, or your family's background.
2. Another common reason for being persecuted is your religion, no matter what religion it is. If you're not allowed to practice your religion or you are persecuted because of your religious beliefs, you may be able to qualify for asylum. Many times people who are religious workers, catechists, or members of Christian Base communities qualify for asylum.
3. Often people are persecuted because they belong to a particular social group. This means people who share certain characteristics such as: age, place where they live, family, ethnic group, race, nationality, gender or community.
4. Sometimes people are persecuted because of their race. This means that if you have been or may be persecuted because of your skin color, origin or background you may qualify for asylum.
5. Some people are persecuted because of their nationality. Nationality is similar to race. It can mean your country of citizenship, country of origin or your ethnic group.
6. Recently, the immigration and federal courts have also created a new ground for persecution based on sex and the treatment of women in foreign countries, and this ground may include the practice of female genital mutilation in the asylum applicant's home country.
If the persons who are persecuting you are doing so for personal reasons only, you will not win your case. Yet, if you have a well-founded belief that the persons who are persecuting you are doing so for a number of reasons, one of which is personal, then you may be able to obtain political asylum in the United States. For example, if a soldier who is off-duty threatened to kill you because he thought you had stolen money from him, that would not qualify as a well-founded fear of persecution for purposes of political asylum because the threat relates to something personal, strictly between the two of you. But if this same soldier then told his commander that you were a guerrilla or an anti-government activist, then you could argue the danger would no longer be just personal; it would also be political.
The closer the persecution came to you, the stronger your case will be. For example, you would have a better case if you yourself were threatened or captured than if a fellow-student or someone else in your town or family were threatened or captured. However, if you can prove that what happened to the other person shows that you are also in danger, you still may have a strong case. Your testimony, if the immigration judge (or INS asylum officer) believes it, can be enough to prove your case. You do not need documents. Even though you do not need them, documents and independently verifiable information are always helpful to show that at least parts of your story are true. For example, it can be helpful to show student or union identification cards, letters from a church or other religious group with whom you've worked, newspaper articles about you, your family or town, as well as general articles showing the problems in your home country, such as reports from the U.S. Department of State or Amnesty International.
Anyone who applies for political asylum and has persecuted someone else because of that person's political opinion, her membership in a social group, her religion, her race or her nationality may not be granted political asylum, no matter how strong the case may be. For example, if a member of the army or a guerrilla group participated in the kidnapping, torture or murder of someone else whom he suspected of opposing his group politically, this could mean he was persecuting another because of political beliefs and he will probably lose his political asylum case. Yet, if you were a guerrilla or soldier and hurt or killed another guerrilla or soldier while you were fighting in a war, then you probably would not be considered to have persecuted another and you may still be able to qualify for asylum.
Besides persecuting others, you can also be denied political asylum if you were convicted of certain bad crimes or for other reasons. You should always check with a lawyer or law office to see if you may be able to qualify for asylum.
To prove your political asylum case, you will likely have to have to have a hearing in front of an immigration judge. The purpose of the hearing is to tell the immigration judge your story of why you fear returning to your home country. The immigration judge will decide if you qualify for political asylum. He will decide in your favor if he feels you fear being persecuted in your home country and if he feels that your fear is real (this means that someone else in your position could have the same fear and you are not just making it up). Your immigration lawyer, an interpreter (if you need one), the lawyer representing USCIS, and the immigration judge will all be at the hearing. Each person has a different role at the hearing.
You must convince the asylum officer or immigration judge that you truly believe you are in danger, that you have good reasons for this belief, and that someone else in your position would also be afraid. You must generally present independent, verifiable documentary evidence that shows you fear persecution in your home country or that you have been persecuted in the past. Persecution can mean that you have been, or may be, hurt, kidnapped, detained, jailed, tortured, threatened, killed, or beaten, or that your freedom was or will be taken away in any other way.
The people who persecuted you or whom you're afraid will persecute you if you return to your home country can be the government (army, police, soldiers, elected officials, death squads, or others), the guerrillas, another opposition group, the civil patrol, or any other group that the government cannot or will not control. The people who persecuted you or whom you think will persecute you if you return to your home country must be persecuting you based on one of the following five reasons:
1. The most common reason for being persecuted is because of your political opinion. It doesn't matter whether you support or oppose the government. People who have been persecuted because of their political opinions and have won their asylum cases have included: people who demonstrate as students, are active in labor unions, or are members of political parties or the government. Sometimes, even if you don't have a political opinion, the persecutor may think you have a certain political opinion. He may persecute you because he thinks you have a political opinion due to things you do, groups you belong to, or your family's background.
2. Another common reason for being persecuted is your religion, no matter what religion it is. If you're not allowed to practice your religion or you are persecuted because of your religious beliefs, you may be able to qualify for asylum. Many times people who are religious workers, catechists, or members of Christian Base communities qualify for asylum.
3. Often people are persecuted because they belong to a particular social group. This means people who share certain characteristics such as: age, place where they live, family, ethnic group, race, nationality, gender or community.
4. Sometimes people are persecuted because of their race. This means that if you have been or may be persecuted because of your skin color, origin or background you may qualify for asylum.
5. Some people are persecuted because of their nationality. Nationality is similar to race. It can mean your country of citizenship, country of origin or your ethnic group.
6. Recently, the immigration and federal courts have also created a new ground for persecution based on sex and the treatment of women in foreign countries, and this ground may include the practice of female genital mutilation in the asylum applicant's home country.
If the persons who are persecuting you are doing so for personal reasons only, you will not win your case. Yet, if you have a well-founded belief that the persons who are persecuting you are doing so for a number of reasons, one of which is personal, then you may be able to obtain political asylum in the United States. For example, if a soldier who is off-duty threatened to kill you because he thought you had stolen money from him, that would not qualify as a well-founded fear of persecution for purposes of political asylum because the threat relates to something personal, strictly between the two of you. But if this same soldier then told his commander that you were a guerrilla or an anti-government activist, then you could argue the danger would no longer be just personal; it would also be political.
The closer the persecution came to you, the stronger your case will be. For example, you would have a better case if you yourself were threatened or captured than if a fellow-student or someone else in your town or family were threatened or captured. However, if you can prove that what happened to the other person shows that you are also in danger, you still may have a strong case. Your testimony, if the immigration judge (or INS asylum officer) believes it, can be enough to prove your case. You do not need documents. Even though you do not need them, documents and independently verifiable information are always helpful to show that at least parts of your story are true. For example, it can be helpful to show student or union identification cards, letters from a church or other religious group with whom you've worked, newspaper articles about you, your family or town, as well as general articles showing the problems in your home country, such as reports from the U.S. Department of State or Amnesty International.
Anyone who applies for political asylum and has persecuted someone else because of that person's political opinion, her membership in a social group, her religion, her race or her nationality may not be granted political asylum, no matter how strong the case may be. For example, if a member of the army or a guerrilla group participated in the kidnapping, torture or murder of someone else whom he suspected of opposing his group politically, this could mean he was persecuting another because of political beliefs and he will probably lose his political asylum case. Yet, if you were a guerrilla or soldier and hurt or killed another guerrilla or soldier while you were fighting in a war, then you probably would not be considered to have persecuted another and you may still be able to qualify for asylum.
Besides persecuting others, you can also be denied political asylum if you were convicted of certain bad crimes or for other reasons. You should always check with a lawyer or law office to see if you may be able to qualify for asylum.
To prove your political asylum case, you will likely have to have to have a hearing in front of an immigration judge. The purpose of the hearing is to tell the immigration judge your story of why you fear returning to your home country. The immigration judge will decide if you qualify for political asylum. He will decide in your favor if he feels you fear being persecuted in your home country and if he feels that your fear is real (this means that someone else in your position could have the same fear and you are not just making it up). Your immigration lawyer, an interpreter (if you need one), the lawyer representing USCIS, and the immigration judge will all be at the hearing. Each person has a different role at the hearing.
Your
immigration lawyer
Your immigration lawyer is on your side. It is his job is to help you explain
to the judge why you fear returning to your home country. You and he will
already have prepared an application and a declaration for the immigration
judge to read, but the immigration judge wants to hear your story live and in
person. The way you have to tell the immigration judge why you are afraid to
return to your home country in the court is different from the way most stories
are told. In the court, the way stories are told is through what is called the
direct exam. The direct exam is when the your immigration lawyer asks you
questions and you'll answer them for the immigration judge. Your answers will
include everything that happened causing you to leave your home country and why
you can't return. Most of the information your lawyer will be asking you will
be based on the information provided in your Form I-589 application for asylum
and what you have told your immigration lawyer in previous interviews.
Immigration
and Naturalization Service (INS) lawyer
The USCIS lawyer (called the "district counsel" or the "Service
attorney") will do what is called the "cross-examination".
The cross-examination is when the USCIS lawyer asks you questions right after
your lawyer finishes asking you questions, and you have to answer these
questions, too. The USCIS lawyer will try to show you don't qualify for asylum.
He will do this by trying to confuse you, to show you are lying or being
inconsistent, or that you really came to the United States to make some money,
escape military service, or for some other reason, instead of because you
feared being persecuted. You and your lawyer will practice the
cross-examination so you are used to it before the hearing. After the USCIS
lawyer asks his questions, your lawyer will have another chance to ask more
questions and then the USCIS lawyer gets another chance, too. So each side
(yours and USCIS) gets two chances to ask questions.
The
interpreter
The interpreter, if needed, will interpret the questions that your lawyer, the
USCIS lawyer and the immigration judge ask you into your language and will
interpret your answers into English. Some interpreters are better than
others. You should learn how to best use a interpreter. It is best to
practice with an interpreter before the hearing. If you speak in short, very
clear sentences, it will help because it is hard for the interpreter to
accurately interpret more than a couple of sentences at a time.
The
immigration judge
The immigration judge will decide the case if a USCIS asylum officer has denied
your application for political asylum. He will want to satisfy himself
that you are telling the truth. Immigration judges feel that they can
determine this. Thus, it is important for you to look him in the eyes
once in a while, act natural, believable, and confident, and not to look down
at the floor. The immigration judge will also be looking for
inconsistencies in your story based on what you say during the hearing and also
what the application and declaration include. Sometimes the immigration
judge may interrupt the questioning by the others, and ask his own
questions. He may also ask questions at the end of the hearing. If
the immigration judge grants you asylum, one year later you can apply for your
"green card."
If your asylum case is denied, you will not necessarily be deported immediately. The immigration judge may give you some time to leave or you can appeal the case, which often takes one to four years. During the appeal process, you will be allowed to remain in the United States with USCIS employment authorization (a "work permit"). But you cannot leave the United States. If you do, you will automatically lose your case.
If your asylum case is denied, you will not necessarily be deported immediately. The immigration judge may give you some time to leave or you can appeal the case, which often takes one to four years. During the appeal process, you will be allowed to remain in the United States with USCIS employment authorization (a "work permit"). But you cannot leave the United States. If you do, you will automatically lose your case.
You must apply
within one year of arriving in the United States
Current federal law requires an asylum applicant in the United States to apply
for asylum no less than one year after entering the United States.
However, USCIS policy with regard to waivers of the one-year requirement is
liberal, and there are many reasons for not applying within this one-year
period.
What about the
children?
With the resolution of the Elian Gonzalez case in June, 2000, there has been
much discussion of the word "capacity" as it is applied to minor
children who may have a colorable claim to political asylum in the United
States. In an excellent article published in the ABA Journal for
August, 2000, writer Siobhan Morrissey researched the issue.
" 'More than a dozen attorneys represented Elian's Miami family,' Bernard Perlmutter, director of the University of Miami's Children and Youth Clinic, was quoted as saying, 'but most refugee minors are not so lucky.' Last year, 5,000 unaccompanied children sought asylum in the United States, he said, explaining that there were 'many instances where they had no access to interpreters or [legal] counsel.
"Some of these children fled the horrors of their homelands: bonded labor, femal genital mutilation, child prostitution and conscription into the military as child soldiers. Last year, 1,200 children voluntarily agreed to deportation from the United States, largely because many of them did not understand their legal options, Perlmutter says.
" 'They may well be children who have bona fide claims to asylum,' he says.
"The United Nations High Commission on Refugees estimates children compose more than half the world's refugee population -- roughly 20 million minors. Those who make it to the United States often don't comprehend the legal process and have difficulty being heard, says Wendy Young, director of government relations with the Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children, a New York City-based nonprofit organization.
" 'An asylum seeker who is represented by an attorney is three times as likely to win asylum as one without,' Young says. 'When you add to that mix a child's capacity, it is virtually impossible to win asylum.'
"Not all children merit asylum, Young concedes. However, all minors should be appointed an attorney to shepherd their cases, as is already done in Britain, she adds."
" 'More than a dozen attorneys represented Elian's Miami family,' Bernard Perlmutter, director of the University of Miami's Children and Youth Clinic, was quoted as saying, 'but most refugee minors are not so lucky.' Last year, 5,000 unaccompanied children sought asylum in the United States, he said, explaining that there were 'many instances where they had no access to interpreters or [legal] counsel.
"Some of these children fled the horrors of their homelands: bonded labor, femal genital mutilation, child prostitution and conscription into the military as child soldiers. Last year, 1,200 children voluntarily agreed to deportation from the United States, largely because many of them did not understand their legal options, Perlmutter says.
" 'They may well be children who have bona fide claims to asylum,' he says.
"The United Nations High Commission on Refugees estimates children compose more than half the world's refugee population -- roughly 20 million minors. Those who make it to the United States often don't comprehend the legal process and have difficulty being heard, says Wendy Young, director of government relations with the Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children, a New York City-based nonprofit organization.
" 'An asylum seeker who is represented by an attorney is three times as likely to win asylum as one without,' Young says. 'When you add to that mix a child's capacity, it is virtually impossible to win asylum.'
"Not all children merit asylum, Young concedes. However, all minors should be appointed an attorney to shepherd their cases, as is already done in Britain, she adds."
Refugees
Refugees are in a separate category from political asylum applicants.
They are admitted to the United States under executive orders that mirror U.S.
participation with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
worldwide. Refugees are admitted for permanent residence, or temporarily
until situations in their home countries are resolved and they are able to
return home.
Many refugees worry that taking advantage of federal public benefits, such as food stamps, and Aid to Families With Dependent Children, will bar them from receiving immigration benefits or U.S. citizenship. Fact sheets on the availability of federal public benefits for refugees are available on our web site by clicking on the following link: Benefits
If you think you may be eligible for political asylum, or you know someone who may be eligible, get good legal guidance. If you cannot afford legal help, contact the Immigration Law Center, at (334) 832-9090. Foreign-language Interpreters are available from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Central Time, Monday through Friday. They will provide you with information about political asylum and how you can file with USCIS for political asylum on your own, without an attorney. The Immigration Law Center uses the language translation and interpretation services of the Linguist Databank. If you can afford to hire a lawyer to help you with a political asylum application, and you need the help of an interpreter fluent in a language other than English, you are invited to call our law offices, after hours, at (334) 832-9090. Leave your message in your native language and ask us to find an interpreter for you. If you leave your name and telephone number, we will get in touch with you to arrange an interview.
If you cannot afford a lawyer, request free or needs-based legal aid through the International Assistance Project of Alabama (IAPA), which provides legal services in meritorious cases. You can read more about IAPA by clicking on the following link: CLICK HERE. If you live outside the southeastern United States and would like to hire a lawyer closer to you, call the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) at (202) 216-2400 and ask for the Lawyer Referral Service. Winning your political asylum case will not be easy. A high percentage of cases are routinely denied. You are three times as likely to lose your case without the help of an attorney who is knowledgeable about U.S. immigration and nationality law and political asylum. If you dedicate yourself to the task and work hard, it may take years to achieve your goal, but you can be successful.
Many refugees worry that taking advantage of federal public benefits, such as food stamps, and Aid to Families With Dependent Children, will bar them from receiving immigration benefits or U.S. citizenship. Fact sheets on the availability of federal public benefits for refugees are available on our web site by clicking on the following link: Benefits
If you think you may be eligible for political asylum, or you know someone who may be eligible, get good legal guidance. If you cannot afford legal help, contact the Immigration Law Center, at (334) 832-9090. Foreign-language Interpreters are available from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Central Time, Monday through Friday. They will provide you with information about political asylum and how you can file with USCIS for political asylum on your own, without an attorney. The Immigration Law Center uses the language translation and interpretation services of the Linguist Databank. If you can afford to hire a lawyer to help you with a political asylum application, and you need the help of an interpreter fluent in a language other than English, you are invited to call our law offices, after hours, at (334) 832-9090. Leave your message in your native language and ask us to find an interpreter for you. If you leave your name and telephone number, we will get in touch with you to arrange an interview.
If you cannot afford a lawyer, request free or needs-based legal aid through the International Assistance Project of Alabama (IAPA), which provides legal services in meritorious cases. You can read more about IAPA by clicking on the following link: CLICK HERE. If you live outside the southeastern United States and would like to hire a lawyer closer to you, call the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) at (202) 216-2400 and ask for the Lawyer Referral Service. Winning your political asylum case will not be easy. A high percentage of cases are routinely denied. You are three times as likely to lose your case without the help of an attorney who is knowledgeable about U.S. immigration and nationality law and political asylum. If you dedicate yourself to the task and work hard, it may take years to achieve your goal, but you can be successful.
WARNING: Your friends, relatives, and fellow
employees are good sources of bad advice concerning immigration and nationality
law. It does not cost much to present you situation to a qualified
immigration lawyer to find out what you should do or get a legal opinion on whether
you are eligible for political asylum. Such advice and guidance is
usually worth much more than you pay for it. You can get professional
help from a member of the American Immigration
Lawyers Association (AILA) by calling (202) 216-2400 in Washington, D.C.,
and asking for the Lawyer Referral Service.
Boyd F. Campbell is a member
of the American Bar Association (ABA) and the American
Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). He is former Chair of the
Immigration Law Committee of the ABA's General Practice, Solo & Small Firm
Lawyers Section. He is also a former Co-Chair of the Immigration Law
Committee of the ABA's Section of Labor and Employment Law and was a member of
the ABA's Coordinating Committee on Immigration Law from 1994 to 1998. He
also serves as Chair of the International
Law Section of the Alabama State Bar.
Mr. Campbell is Alabama's first practicing civil law notary, having been
appointed to this official position by Alabama's Secretary of State in August,
2001. He is also Chairman of the Board and Legal Director of the International Assistance Project of
Alabama, a nonprofit organization whose mission is to encourage economic
development and family orientation among Alabama's new international residents
and long-term visitors. Please consider volunteering with IAPA, and read
more about IAPA by visiting its home page.
Questions
or comment about this article may be directed to:
Immigration Law Center, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 11032
Montgomery, Alabama 36111-0032 U.S.A.
Telephone: (334) 832-9090
Immigration Law Center, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 11032
Montgomery, Alabama 36111-0032 U.S.A.
Telephone: (334) 832-9090
Send
Email: CLICK HERE
|
Arkansas Congressional Delegation Contact
- They work for us too... remind them!
Chamber
|
Name
|
Phone
|
District
|
|
House
|
202-225-4076
|
1
|
|
|
House
|
202-225-2506
|
2
|
|
|
House
|
202-225-4301
|
3
|
|
|
House
|
202-225-3772
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senate
|
(202)
224-4843
|
|
|
|
Senate
|
(202)
224-2353
|
|
For research
purposes, specific subjects can be located in the following alphabetized index,
and searched on the blog using the search box. The search box is located
in the upper left corner of the webpage.
Newsletter Index: http://omnicenter.org/dick-bennetts-peace-justice-and-ecology-newsletters/dicks-newsletter-index/
Newsletter Index: http://omnicenter.org/dick-bennetts-peace-justice-and-ecology-newsletters/dicks-newsletter-index/
(479)
442-4600
Contents Refugees
Newsletter #5, June 28, 2016
United
Nations Refugee Data
Welcoming
Refugees
United Nations
UN for
Displaced Women and Children
The Progressive Magazine
US Big Deal:
10,000 [3000] Syrians [and Central Americans]
Resettling
Refugees in Arkansas
Urgent
Need to Protect Refugees Crossing the Mediterranean
By June ’16,
3400 Dead or Missing
OMNI
Climate Change Refugees Newsletter #1
Ongoing
Effort to Understand Fear and Hatred of Immigrants and Refugees
The Central Delusion of Western
Civilization
Google Fear of Refugees
END REFUGEES, ASYLUM NEWSLETTER #6
No comments:
Post a Comment