OMNI
Compiled by Dick Bennett for a
Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology
What’s at stake on Independence Day:
“. .
.it is practically impossible for us to have any empathy for revolutionary
movements. Yet we pay ritual homage in
our Fourth of July speeches, declaring that ours was indeed the ‘true’
revolution. . . .” J. W. Fulbright, The Price of Empire (161).
We celebrate our revolutionary independence
from the British imperial yoke. But a
remembrance should teach us something about the present. Today other oppressors are more complicated
and dangerous than were our British kinsmen. British uniforms and arrests
without warrant aroused our common indignation. Right and wrong seemed clear
(though not to those colonists who fled to Canada
But
what about our own nation’s oppression of others? What does July 4 today say to our country’s
invasion of or intervention in other countries over 50 times since 1945 with
today over a thousand military bases all over the world? What does it tell us, how does it help us
examine, our long delay and failure to respond constructively as a nation and a
people to the consequences of global warming now multiplying every day? And how does our celebration help us resist
the extraordinary power of money now concentrated in a few hands? Particularly, what does the ritual of fireworks
say, what is its message for our future?
We need to study these questions today, July
4, 2014. For Independence Day we need
not fireworks patriotism and the Marine Band, but reflection.
The
US needs a new Declaration of Independence from the
Corporate-Pentagon-Congressional-Executive-Mainstream Media-Surveillance-Imperial/Wars-National
Security—C02/Warming- Complex. OMNI is
part of the movement to free the culture
from this domination by corporations, war, and warming. The populace is dazzled by the constant
blandishments of consuming and dazed by economic struggle, wars, and denial of
climate change. We would reverse that
bondage by a reaffirmation of the Declaration of Independence and Roosevelt ’s New Deal.
Contents July 4, 2014, Independence Day and Declaration
of Independence
Economics
Independence Day Protests in
Hawaii and Vermont
Concentrated Economic Power
Concentrated Economic Power
Public Citizen vs. Citizens United: US To Be a Nation Ruled Not
by the Wealthiest Few, but by and for ALL of We the People
Dick: The Declaration of Independence,Roosevelt ’s 1932
Economic New Deal, and New Deal Today
by the Wealthiest Few, but by and for ALL of We the People
Dick: The Declaration of Independence,
Economic New Deal, and New Deal Today
The Struggle Continues: Raising Minimum Wage in Arkansas
Permanent War
David Swanson, War No More
Warming
Alan Weisman, Countdown
At Least, Get Informed and
Vote: League of Women Voters
and Electoral Democracy
and Electoral Democracy
4TH OF JULY PARADES IN HAWAII AND VERMONT
Letters from an
unknown person 5-7-14:
In Hawaii we
are batting around the idea of an entry in Kailua Battle
Since the local
CofC runs the parade, we'll have to couch this as a Get Out The Vote entry or
something else dutiful.
Brodie, this is great.
In our Montpelier
The idea is to encourage the onlookers to join us- we'll have
people & signs all along the route.
At the end of the parade we will hold formation & march to the
Capitol steps, which we have reserved for a rally.
Some well-known, iconic VT folks are marching w/ us & speaking
at the rally.
Then we go down on the Statehouse lawn to organize, eat ice cream
& stamp money.
Don't forget to have an American flag in your group.
Love your slogan.
Bill Butler- Jericho
Citizens United event nearby
|
Jun 27 (3 days ago)
 |
|
|
Next week, senators are home for the Independence Day congressional recess. I wanted to send you a special invitation to participate in some important events to support the
Find an event near you and sign up to participate.
Read my earlier email (copied below in case you missed it) to learn more.
Jonah
 |
|
|
|
|
ROOSEVELT 1932 AND THE DECLARATION
OF INDEPENDENCE
He would build from grassroots and upon the
forgotten people at the economic bottom.
Believing the nation needed urgently “more equitable distribution of the
national income,” he pledged a “New Deal” of financial oversight, public-works
projects, environmental defense, easing farmers’ and home-owners’ debts, and
insurance for the old. Decrying how government subsidies had increased business
concentration and monopoly into the hands of “financial Titans” and had decreased
opportunity and freedom for the majority, Roosevelt promised a new economic
declaration of rights and constitutional order, as stated in the guarantee of “life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness” in the Declaration of Independence. Every man and
woman has a right to a decent life by possessing a portion of the nation’s
plenty through opportunity for work.
Roosevelt’s 1932 campaign was a “call to
arms” to “restore America to its own people” through social action for social
justice.
--Dick
THE STRUGGLE FOR WE THE PEOPLE CONTINUES
Minimum wage petitioning resumes
I've learned this morning that petitions for an increase
in the Arkansas minimum wage won't be submitted today, as had been
expected, but will turned in July 7, the deadline. I'm trying to reach Steve Copley, leader
of the campaign for Give Arkansas a Raise Now coalition, by my source indicates
the plan changed so that more signatures could be added to the total gathered
already.
Copley told me yesterday that the group had 75,000 signatures, more than the 62,507 required, but signatures are always disqualified and Copley indicated he expected the auditing process might well reduce the number of valid signatures below the number required. In such cases, groups who meet the raw number limit are given 30 days to gather more valid signatures.
The proposal, backed heavily by organized labor and the Democratic Party as a campaign tool this year, would increase the current minimum in Arkansas, $6.25 an hour, to $8.50 by 2017. Our minimum is the lowest in the country. Democratic candidates support the increase. Republican candidates either oppose it or have refused, in the case of Tom Cotton, to take a position.
One wrinkle in the process that typically has petitioners looking for a cushion is that to qualify for more time, a petitoner must submit 62,5017 "facially valid" signatures. Obvious forgeries — pages and pages of them have been discovered on occasion in other campaigns — can be disqualfied from the total on the front end. Concerns exist among many supporters of the minimum wage initiative on the canvassing effort, which had shut down after the inital financing….
Copley told me yesterday that the group had 75,000 signatures, more than the 62,507 required, but signatures are always disqualified and Copley indicated he expected the auditing process might well reduce the number of valid signatures below the number required. In such cases, groups who meet the raw number limit are given 30 days to gather more valid signatures.
The proposal, backed heavily by organized labor and the Democratic Party as a campaign tool this year, would increase the current minimum in Arkansas, $6.25 an hour, to $8.50 by 2017. Our minimum is the lowest in the country. Democratic candidates support the increase. Republican candidates either oppose it or have refused, in the case of Tom Cotton, to take a position.
One wrinkle in the process that typically has petitioners looking for a cushion is that to qualify for more time, a petitoner must submit 62,5017 "facially valid" signatures. Obvious forgeries — pages and pages of them have been discovered on occasion in other campaigns — can be disqualfied from the total on the front end. Concerns exist among many supporters of the minimum wage initiative on the canvassing effort, which had shut down after the inital financing….
From the Arkansas Times (received
July 3, 2014 from Bonnie Cook)
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE FROM US PERMANENT WAR
WAR NO MORE: The Case for
Abolition
By - Posted on 13 September 2013
' v:shapes="_x0000_s1026">
This book by David Swanson,
with a foreword by Kathy Kelly, presents what numerous reviewers have called
the best existing argument for the abolition of war, demonstrating that war can
be ended, war should be ended, war is not ending on its own, and that we must
end war.
The paperback is available at all the usual online and real world book
sellers. (184 pages, list price $15 US) Here it is on Powells,Amazon, Barnes & Noble. The book ships right away
when ordered, even if Amazon says otherwise; it is print-on-demand. It's below
at a discount when you buy 10 or more.
The PDF is here for $2:
The ePub is here for $2:
The mobi (kindle) is here for $2:
The audio book (mp3) is here for $2:
The iTunes (m4b) is here for $2:
The Paperback: You can get 10 copies for $60 with free shipping, here:
All e and
audio versions of
this book are also available at eBookIt.c
·
HOME
·
ABOUT »
·
MYTHS »
·
WHY »
·
HOW »
·
VIDEOS
·
DONATE
·
MAPS »
FOREWORD by
Kathy Kelly to War No More: The Case for
Abolition by David Swanson
I lived in Iraq during the
2003 Shock and Awe bombing. On April 1st, about two weeks into the aerial
bombardment, a medical doctor who was one of my fellow peace team members urged
me to go with her to the Al Kindi Hospital in Baghdad, where she knew she could
be of some help. With no medical training, I tried to be unobtrusive, as families
raced into the hospital carrying wounded loved ones. At one point, a woman
sitting next to me began to weep uncontrollably. “How I tell him?” she asked,
in broken English. “What I say?” She was Jamela Abbas, the aunt of a young man,
named Ali. Early in the morning on March 31st, U.S. war planes had fired on her
family home, while she alone of all her family was outside. Jamela wept as she
searched for words to tell Ali that surgeons had amputated both of his badly
damaged arms, close to his shoulders. What’s more, she would have to tell him
that she was now his sole surviving relative.
I soon heard how that
conversation had gone. It was reported to me that when Ali, aged 12, learned
that he had lost both of his arms, he responded by asking “Will I always be
this way?”
Returning to the Al Fanar
hotel, I hid in my room. Furious tears flowed. I remember pounding my pillow
and asking “Will we always be this way?”
David Swanson reminds me to
look to humanity’s incredible achievements in resisting war, in choosing the
alternatives which we have yet to show our full power to realize.
A hundred years ago, Eugene Debs campaigned tirelessly in the U.S. to build a better society, where justice and equality would prevail and ordinary people would no longer be sent to fight wars on behalf of tyrannical elites. From 1900 to 1920 Debs ran for president in each of five elections. He waged his 1920 campaign from inside the Atlanta prison to which he’d been sentenced for sedition for having spoken vigorously against U.S. entry into World War I. Insisting that wars throughout history have always been fought for purposes of conquest and plunder, Debs had distinguished between the master class that declares wars and the subjugated who fight the battles. “The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose,” said Debs in the speech for which he was imprisoned, “while the subject class has had nothing to gain and all to lose—especially their lives.”
A hundred years ago, Eugene Debs campaigned tirelessly in the U.S. to build a better society, where justice and equality would prevail and ordinary people would no longer be sent to fight wars on behalf of tyrannical elites. From 1900 to 1920 Debs ran for president in each of five elections. He waged his 1920 campaign from inside the Atlanta prison to which he’d been sentenced for sedition for having spoken vigorously against U.S. entry into World War I. Insisting that wars throughout history have always been fought for purposes of conquest and plunder, Debs had distinguished between the master class that declares wars and the subjugated who fight the battles. “The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose,” said Debs in the speech for which he was imprisoned, “while the subject class has had nothing to gain and all to lose—especially their lives.”
Debs hoped to create a
mindset throughout the American electorate that withstood propaganda and
rejected war. It was no easy process. As a labor historian writes, “With no
radio and television spots, and with little sympathetic coverage of
progressive, third party causes, there was no alternative but to travel
incessantly, one city or whistle-stop at a time, in searing heat or numbing
cold, before crowds large or small, in whatever hall, park or train station
where a crowd could be assembled.”
He didn’t prevent U.S. entry
into World War I, but Swanson tells us in his 2011 book, When the World
Outlawed War, there came a point in U.S. history, in 1928, when wealthy elites
decided that it was in their enlightened self-interest to negotiate the
Kellogg-Briand Pact, intended to avert future wars, and to prevent future U.S.
governments from seeking war. Swanson encourages us to study and build on
moments in history when war was rejected, and to refuse to tell ourselves that
warfare is inevitable.
Surely we must join Swanson
in acknowledging the enormous challenges we face in campaigning to avoid war,
or to abolish it. He writes: “In addition to being immersed in a false world
view of war’s inevitability, people in the United States are up against corrupt
elections, complicit media, shoddy education, slick propaganda, insidious
entertainment, and a gargantuan permanent war machine falsely presented as a
necessary economic program that cannot be dismantled.” Swanson refuses to be
deterred by large challenges. An ethical life is an extraordinary challenge,
and encompasses lesser challenges, such as democratizing our societies. Part of
the challenge is to honestly acknowledge its difficulty: to clear-sightedly
witness the forces that make war more likely in our time and place, but Swanson
refuses to categorize these forces as insurmountable obstacles.
A few years ago, I heard
once more about Jamela Abbas’ nephew, Ali. Now he was 16 years old, living in
London where a BBC reporter had interviewed him. Ali had become an accomplished
artist, using his toes to hold a paint brush. He had also learned to feed
himself using his feet. “Ali,” asked the interviewer, “what would you like to
be when you grow up?” In perfect English, Ali had answered, “I’m not sure. But
I would like to work for peace.” David Swanson reminds us that we will not
always be this way. We will transcend in ways that we cannot yet properly
imagine, through the determination to rise above our incapacities and achieve
our purposes on earth. Obviously Ali’s story is not a feel-good story. Humanity
has lost so much to war and what so often seems its incapacity for peace is
like the most grievous of disfigurements. We don’t know the ways we will
discover in which to work to rise above these disfigurements. We learn from the
past, we keep our eyes on our goal, we fully grieve our losses, and we expect
to be surprised by the fruits of diligent labor and a passion to keep humanity
alive, and to help it create again.
If David is right, if
humanity survives, war itself will go the route of death-duels and infanticide,
child labor and institutionalized slavery. Perhaps someday, beyond being made
illegal, it will even be eliminated. Our other struggles for justice, against
the slow grinding war of rich against poor, against the human sacrifice of
capital punishment, against the tyranny that the fear of war so emboldens, feed
into this one. Our organized movements working for these and countless other
causes often are themselves models of peace, of coordination, a dissolution of
isolation and of conflict in creative fellowship, the end of war made, in
patches, already visible.
In Chicago, where I live, an
annual summer extravaganza has been held on the lakefront for as long as I can
remember. Called “The Air and Water Show,” it grew in the past decade into a
huge display of military force and a significant recruiting event. Prior to the
big show, the Air Force would practice military maneuvers and we’d hear sonic
booms throughout a week of preparation. The event would attract millions of
people, and amid a picnic atmosphere the U.S. military potential to destroy and
maim other people was presented as a set of heroic, triumphant adventures.
In the summer of 2013, word reached me in Afghanistan that the air and water show had occurred but that the U.S. military was a “no show.”
In the summer of 2013, word reached me in Afghanistan that the air and water show had occurred but that the U.S. military was a “no show.”
My friend Sean had staked out
a park entrance for the previous few yearly events in a solo protest, cheerily
encouraging attendees to “enjoy the show” all the more for its incredible cost
to them in tax dollars, in lives and global stability and political freedom
lost to imperial militarization. Eager to acknowledge the human impulse to
marvel at the impressive spectacle and technical achievement on display, he
would insist of the planes, and in as friendly a tone as possible, “They look a
lot cooler when they’re not bombing you!” This year he was expecting smaller
crowds, having heard (although apparently too busy assembling his several
thousand fliers to closely research this year’s particular event) that several
military acts had cancelled. “Two hundred flyers later, I found out that this
was because THE MILITARY HAD BACKED OUT!” he wrote me on the day itself: “They
weren’t there _at all_ save for some desultory Air Force tents that I did find
when I biked through looking for recruitment stations. I suddenly understood
why I hadn’t heard any sonic booms leading up to the weekend.” (I had always
complained to Sean of the yearly agony of listening to those planes rehearse
for the show) “Too pleased to be mortified by my own idiocy, I put away my
fliers and biked happily through the event. It was a lovely morning, and the
skies of Chicago had been healed!”
Our incapacities are never
the whole story; our victories come in small cumulative ways that surprise us.
A movement of millions arises to protest a war, whose onset is delayed, its impact
lessened, by how many months or years, by how many lives never lost, by how
many limbs never torn from the bodies of children? How completely are the cruel
imaginations of the war-makers distracted by having to defend their current
lethal plans, how many new outrages, thanks to our resistance, will they never
so much as conceive? By how many factors as the years proceed will our
demonstrations against war continue, with setbacks, to grow? How acutely will
the humanity of our neighbors be aroused, to what level will their awareness be
raised, how much more tightly knit in community will they learn to be in our
shared efforts to challenge and resist war? Of course we can’t know.
What we know is that we
won’t always be this way. War may exterminate us utterly, and if unchecked,
unchallenged, it shows every potential for doing so. But David Swanson’s War No
More imagines a time where the Ali Abbases of the world exhibit their
tremendous courage in a world that has abolished warfare, where no-one has to
relive their tragedies at the hands of rampaging nations, where we celebrate
the demise of war. Beyond this it envisions a time when humanity has found the
true purpose, meaning, and community of its calling to end warfare together, to
live the challenge that is replacing war with peace, discovering lives of
resistance, and of truly human activity. Rather than glorify armed soldiers as
heroes, let us appreciate a child rendered armless by a U.S. bomb who must know
that few incapacities are an excuse for inaction, that what is or isn’t
possible changes, and who, despite all we’ve done to him, still resolutely
intends to work for peace.
—Kathy Kelly
—Kathy Kelly
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE FROM TWO DECADES OF US FAILURE
TO ACT AGAINST WARMING AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
ONE ADAPTATION:
FAMILY PLANNING, WOMEN, CONTRACEPTIVES
Can We Finally Have a Serious Talk About Population?
Alan Weisman, best-selling author of "The World
Without Us," tackles the world's exploding human population in his new
book, "Countdown."
| Fri Sep. 27, 2013
2:16 PM EDT
·
·
A view of Sao Paulo, Brazil, one of the world's largest megacities
with nearly 20 million people.
Climate Desk has launched a new science podcast, Inquiring Minds, cohosted by contributing writer Chris Mooney and neuroscientist and musician Indre Viskontas. To subscribe via iTunes, click here. You
can also follow the show on Twitter at@inquiringshow, and like us on Facebook.
Today, as the United Nations' Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change releases its latest megareport, averring a 95 percent certainty that
humans are heating up the planet, there's an unavoidable subtext: The growing number
of humans on
the planet in the first place.
The figures, after all, are staggering: In 1900,
there were just 1.65 billion of us; now, there are 7.2 billion. That's more
than two doublings, and the next billion-human increase is expected to occur
over the short space of just 12 years. According to projections,
meanwhile, by 2050 the Earth will be home to some 9.6 billion people, all
living on the same rock, all at once.
So why not talk more about population, and treat
it as a serious issue? It's a topic that Mother Jones has tackled directly in the past, because taboos notwithstanding, it's a
topic that just won't go away.
The bestselling environmental journalist Alan
Weisman agrees. In this episode of Inquiring Minds (click above to stream audio), he
explains why, following on his 2007 smash hit The
World Without Us, he too decided to centrally take on the issue
of human population in his just-published new book Countdown:
Our Last, Best Hope for a Future on Earth?
The new release by Alan
Weisman, bestselling author of The World Without Us.Little, Brown & Co.
"Population is a loaded topic, and people
who otherwise know better, great environmentalists, often times are very, very
timid about going there," Weisman explains on the podcast. "And I
decided as a journalist, I should go there, and find out, is it really a
problem, and if so, is there anything acceptable that we can do about it?"
The
World Without Us imagined
a planet rapidly returning to a natural state in the absence of humans. Where
that book represented an ambitious thought experiment, Weisman's new book is an
experience. He traveled to 21 countries—from
Israel to Mexico, Pakistan to Niger—to
report on how different cultures are responding to booming populations and the
strain this is putting on their governments and resources.
Strikingly, he found that countries are coping
(or not coping) with this problem in vastly different ways. For instance:
• Pakistan: Current population: 193 million.
"By the year 2030, they're going to have about 395 million people,"
Weisman says. "And they're the size of Texas." (Texas' population?
Twenty-six million.)
• The Philippines: Current population:
nearly 105 million. "As the rest of the planet's population quadrupled in
a century, the head count here quintupled in half that time," Weisman
writes in Countdown.
• Iran: Current population: nearly 80
million. Yet unlike Pakistan and the Philippines, Weisman says, Iran managed
its population growth with "probably the most humane program ever in the
history of the planet. They got down toreplacement rate a year faster than China, and it was a
totally voluntary program. No coercion at all." (Note, though, that as
Weisman explains in his book, there was one Iranian government
"disincentive" to having a large number of children:
"elimination of the individual subsidy for food, electricity, telephone,
and appliances for any child after the first three.")
Alan Weisman in Golestan
National Park, Iran Beckie Kravetz
Weisman is well aware of the controversy his
book invites. In particular, political libertarians are very fond of refuting
the concerns of population crusaders, from the Reverend Thomas Malthus to the
ecologist and Population Bomb author Paul Ehrlich, with the
claim that human ingenuity has a history of proving them wrong. The key
episode: the Green Revolution of the late 1960s, led by plant geneticist
Norman Borlaug, in which dramatic new agricultural technologies and crop
strains were credited with averting what might otherwise have been mass
famines.
But Weisman has his response ready (he
chronicles Borlaug's life and triumphs in the book). "Everybody says that
Norman Borlaug, the great plant geneticist, he disproved Malthus and Ehrlich
forever," he explains. "It's kind of cherry-picked, because the part
that they neglect to add, Norman Borlaug's Nobel acceptance speech, he didn't sit
there congratulating himself—as he was congratulated by others—for saving more
lives than any other human in history. He said, 'We have bought the world some
time, but unless population control and increased food production go hand in
hand, we are going to lose this.'"
So what's Weisman's solution? Importantly, he is
no supporter of coercive population control measures such as China's infamous one-child policy. Rather, Weisman makes
a powerful case that the best way to manage the global population is by
empowering women, through both education and access to contraception—so that
they can make more informed choices about family size and the kind of lives
they want for themselves and their children.
"The libertarians are going to like the
solution that ultimately comes up," Weisman says. "And that is,
letting everybody decide how many children they want, which means giving every
woman on Earth—and then every man, because male contraceptives are coming—giving
them universal access to contraception, and letting them decide for
themselves."
You can listen to the full show here:
This episode of Inquiring Minds also features a discussion of the latest myths
circulating on global warming, and the brave new world of gene therapy that
we're entering—where being rich might be your key ticket to the finest health
care.
ELECTORAL DEMOCRACY and CITIZENS’ MINIMAL RESPONSIBILITY
Mark Independence Day by Making Democracy Work
|
Dick,
Election Day 2014 is
fast approaching and the direction of our country hangs in the balance of the
many elections happening on and before November 4.
It is never too early to start getting ready for Election Day – and a key step is registering to vote. This Independence Day join the League of Women Voters in Making Democracy Work® - encourage your fellow citizens to visit VOTE411.org and register to vote or update their registration if they are among the millions of Americans who have moved in the last year. On Election Day, millions of voters will head to the polls to stand up for what matters most – you can help make sure no one is left out. These elections are about our jobs, our health, our communities and our future. They’re about us; we all need to weigh in – share VOTE411.org with your networks and remind the people in your life to update their voter registration or register for the first time. The League of Women Voters is committed to making sure all eligible citizens are registered to vote, and that voters have the information they need to participate in elections and have their vote counted. Since 2006, VOTE411.org has provided tens of millions of voters with information about the election process and information directly from tens of thousands of candidates regarding their vision for their community and America’s future. Every election, whether local, state or federal, is important to ensuring our laws and policies reflect the values and beliefs of our communities. The first step to having a say on the issues that matter most to you is making sure everyone you know is registered to vote. Election Day is the one day when all Americans are equal. Thank you for Making Democracy Work® during this important election year. Happy Independence Day!
P.S. To help us
continue this vital work, please
make a donation today. Your support helps the League keep
VOTE411.org online and available in communities across the country.
|
||
 
League of Women Voters
1730 M Street NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202-429-1965 |
Contents #2 2013 Patriotism
Dick,
Patriotism and the Golden Rule
Dick,
Banish “Defense”
World-wide Definitions and
Comments on Patriotism
Cindy Sheehan, Matriotism
Nathanson, Analysis of
Patriotism
Parenti, Superpatriotism
Blum, US “Exceptionalism”
the Great Myth of Patriotism
Pfaff, “Manifest Destiny”
More Fuel for Patriotism
Woehrle, Patriotism and the
Peace Movement
Recent OMNI Newsletters
Related to Patriotism
Independence Day, the Movie
OMNI
NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL DAYS PROJECT
My blog: It's the War Department
Newsletters:
Index:
END
4TH OF JULY NEWSLETTER 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment