OMNI
WARS AND WARMING NEWSLETTER
#2, March 5, 2018.
Compiled by Dick
Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology
What’s
at stake: At last the connection of war and warming has begun to
receive the attention its importance demands.
Soon I expect to see a bibliography of books and articles on wars
causing warming and on warming causing wars, the convergence particularly
catastrophic.
Contents
of #1 at end
Contents of #2
CATASTROPHIC
CONVERGENCE
Tamara Lorincz,
“We Must Demilitarize to Decarbonize”
Cleo Paskal, Global Warring
Christian Parenti,
Tropic of Chaos.
Gwynne Dyer, Climate Wars
Bruce Gagnon, “Climate
Change & Militarism: An Arctic Arms Race”
Leah Samberg . “World Hunger Is Increasing, Thanks to Wars and
Climate Change”
RESISTANCE (All
of the above oppose warming and wars and their ruinous convergence by exposing
it:. Branagan provides an oppositional handbook. Chomsky
concludes the newsletter with a comprehensive assessment, returning us to
Lorincz )
Marty
Branagan . Global Warming, Militarism, and Nonviolence: The Art of Active Resistance.
Chomsky
and Polk, Nuclear War and Environmental
Catastrophe.
CATASTROPHIC CONVERGENCE
Tamara Lorincz, “We
Must Demilitarize to Decarbonize.” Space Alert! Winter/Spring 2018. P. 4.
[This
is a precisely organized essay, easily outlined. I. Introduction: Global warming is worsening. II. Instead of preparing to protect humanity
from the consequences of warming, we are exhorbitantly preparing for war: US,
Canada, UK. III. “These exorbitant military expenditures come
at a direct cost to the climate.”
A. Cuts in Environmental Budgets:
US, Canada, UK. B. Military “one of the worst climate
culprits.” Etc. --D
Global
warming is worsening. We see the wreckage all around us. Americans faced
unprecedented forest fires and massive mudslides last year. Half a million
Puerto Ricans are still without power months after the devastating hurricane.
Canadians witnessed the worst forest fires ever in the west and a state of
emergency was called last summer. Northern England again experienced severe
flooding from excessive rainfall this winter. With all of these extreme weather
events, we were woefully unprepared.
Instead
of adequately protecting people and the planet, we are preparing for war.
In November, Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act giving the
Pentagon a budget of $700 billion, the highest in U.S. history.
Last June, Canada released a dangerous new
defence policy committing $553 billion to buy attack helicopters, fighter jets
and armed drones and maintain “highlevel warfighting” over the next two
decades. Repeating President Trump’s rhetoric, the Minister of Global Affairs
Chrystia Freeland declared in Parliament that Canada had to increase military
spending to project “hard power” and secure “the global order.”
British Prime Minister Theresa May
recently pledged to increase defense spending to meet NATO’s target of 2% of
GDP. Last August, she hailed the new £3.5 billion aircraft carrier, the biggest
and most expensive in the Royal Navy, as a symbol of Britain’s “global power.”
This new aircraft carrier, the HMS Queen Elizabeth, was built to carry
Britain’s first order of F-35s purchased from the U.S. at a price tag of £6
billion. Britain, like Canada, plans to build more warships and buy more
fighter jets.
These
exorbitant military expenditures come at a direct cost to the climate.
Trump announced a 25% cut to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s paltry
annual budget of $9 billion. The Trudeau-led Liberal government is also
planning cuts to the miserly $1 billion annual budget of the Department of
Environment and Climate Change over the next three years as described in the
latest departmental plan. May’s Conservative government simply closed the
Department of Energy and Climate Change and moved some of its functions to the
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
As well, the military is one of the worst
climate culprits. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is the largest
institutional consumer of oil in the world spending between $10-17 billion a
year. In the report, Fueling the Energy Balance: A Defense Energy Strategy
Primer, it was estimated that the DoD uses more energy, primarily petroleum,
than any other private or public organization and more than 100 nations. Among
all federal departments in their respective countries, the British Ministry of
Defence (MOD) consumes the most fossils fuels at a cost of approximately £1
billion per year and the Canadian Department of National Defence (DND) consumes
the most petroleum products amounting to $500 million per year. Military
vehicles like tanks, warships and fighter jets are notoriously energy
inefficient and have long life-cycles with locked-in energy platforms that are
difficult to alter.
Worse, all the carbon emissions from
military vehicles and overseas operations are excluded from national greenhouse
gas inventories and country reports required by the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. In testimony before the Senate in 1998, U.S.
Under Secretary Stuart Eizenstat who led the American delegation at the Kyoto
Protocol negotiations explained:
“We took special pains, working with the
Defense Department and with our uniformed military, both before and in Kyoto,
to fully protect the unique position of the United States as the world’s only
super power with global military responsibilities. We achieved everything they
outlined as necessary to protect military operations and our national security.
At Kyoto, the parties, for example, took a decision to exempt key overseas
military activities from any emissions targets, including exemptions for bunker
fuels used in international aviation and maritime transport and from emissions
resulting from multilateral operations.”
These military exemptions became
entrenched in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s 2006
reporting guidelines. Thus, governments do not have to fully account for their
military’s outsized carbon ‘boot print’.
It is no surprise then that the UN
Environment Programme (UNEP) found in their latest Emissions Gap annual report
that there is a serious discrepancy between what states have committed to as
their reductions targets under the Paris Agreement and what reductions are
required to limit the global mean temperature increase. UNEP urged states to
take immediate and more ambitious action to reduce carbon emissions.
How
can we expect to decarbonize when we exempt the military, one of the main
culprits of the climate crisis? The IPCC and the Carbon Tracker have estimated
that there are approximately 700 GtCO2 of greenhouse gas emissions that can be
released to stay within the carbon budget and still limit the global mean
temperature increase to 1.5°C. Leading scientists have determined that 80-90%
of fossil fuel reserves must be left in the ground to achieve net-zero
emissions by 2050. Why are we using the bulk of the remaining fossil fuels for
warfighting instead of transitioning to a clean, green economy?
In
2014, the Campaign Against Arms Trade released a report entitled Arms to Renewables: Work for the Future
about how British defence industries could be converted into manufacturing
renewable energy technologies. This report is an example of the transformative
change we need. In his book Global
Warming, Militarism and Nonviolence: The Art of Active Resistance, peace
scholar and activist Marty Branagan advocates for creative nonviolent
resistance and direct action. Codepink’s campaign to Divest from the War
Machine is an inspiring example of this resistance.
Alongside
climate mitigation and adaptation, we need a parallel process of peace and
disarmament. There is no way we can continue to conduct costly,
carbon-intensive warfare and stay within the carbon budget. If we are serious
about decarbonization, we have to demilitarize.
—Tamara Lorincz is PhD student at the
Balsillie School of International Affairs in Ontario and member of the Canadian
Voice of Women for Peace and the Board of the Global Network. We must
demilitarize to decarbonize. To stop global warming we have to stop war.
To subscribe to
Space Alert contact Global Network
Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space, globalnet@mindspring.com, www.space4peace.org, (207) 443-9502. The US is arming to control space, instead of
international control under the UN. Global
Network (GN) is one of several
organization trying to stop this expansion of US domination of the solar system.
THREE BOOKS
DESCRIBING AND IMAGINING THE EVOLUTION OF WARMING LEADING TO WARS
WARMING
LEADING TO WARS:
PASKAL’S
GLOBAL WARRING: How Environmental,
Economic, and Political Crises Will Redraw the World Map (2010) AND CHRISTIAN
WARMING
AND TODAY’S WARS:
PARENTI’S
TROPIC OF CHAOS: Climate Change and the
New Geography of Violence (2011)
WARMING, WARS, AND
WORLD OF FUTURE:
Gwynne
Dyer’s CLIMATE WARS: The
Fight for Survival as the World Overheats (2010)
Cleo Paskal, Global Warring (2010):
WARMING
CREATING CONDITIONS FOR WAR
These authors
assume readers who already accept the facts of warming. Their concern is with future effects of more
extreme and intense weather globally; for example, Paskal pays attention to India ’s
droughts and flooding monsoon rains.
Thus Paskal seeks to “use the best science
available to understand the implications of the inevitable [climate change] in
order to minimize the geopolitical, economic, and security fallout. That is what this book is about.” “Environmental change” is her encompassing
subject, of which climate change is a part.
Consequently she has read large-scale assessments, such as the Pentagon’s
2007 National Security and the Threat of
Climate Change, and she studies such problems as “massive population and
consumption increases” which have resulted “in major environmental change”
(groundwater depletion, deforestation, etc.).
In her search to understand the carrying capacity of the planet, she
factors in all aspects of environmental change for global stability. Katrina is a recurrent topic “to show how
poor regulations, planning, and emergency response [“the myriad ways we
interact with our environment”] can aggravate the crises that will almost
certainly increase as a result of climate change.” Each nation, state, city must know its
vulnerabilities: New Orleans was struck
by a hurricane made disastrous by large-scale subsidence, caused in part by
wetland drainage and extraction of groundwater, and caused also by poorly
designed waterways, faulty levee design and implementation, poor town planning,
incompetent emergency services, and a breakdown in chain of command. Only knowledge of all conditions will enable
us to minimize the fallout; only such knowledge can “create a solid base upon
which we can start to build a sound analysis of what the future may bring. I hope very much that others will then take
a more detailed look at the range of specific implication.”
She divides her book into four parts: I. How the
West might be affected by rising sea levels and storm surges, and how major
nations are “shockingly vulnerable.”
II. The: importance of
transportation routes and how climate change is changing those routes. III. Changing precipitation patterns and resulting
national relations. IV. Rising sea levels especially as they affect China
and Pacific nations. And the Conclusion
“assesses various national adaptation programs, with a view to finding out
which nations have the best chance of making it….” All sections touch upon internal and
cross-borders disruptions and conflicts, access to natural resources, and
changing political alliances and opponents.
Her hope?
If we have some idea of what is coming, we can plan for it.
But she stops short of assessing the
violence, the wars resulting from the dislocations she describes. --Dick
Parenti’s Tropic of Chaos (2011): WARMING, EXTREME
WEATHER, AND WARS TODAY.
Ominously, the book’s epigraph is from Sven
Lindqvist’s Exterminate All the Brutes, the
title alluding to Conrad’s Heart of
Darkness. Climate wars are upon
us. Global warming—extreme weather—is
“unleashing cascades of unrest and violence across the globe.”
The book opens with the corpse of Ekaru
Loruman, a member of the Turkana tribe in northwest Kenya , killed by members of the
Pokot tribe during a cattle raid by the Pokot.
Rising temperatures and drought have pushed the tribes closer together
in already inadequate grazing lands .
To Parenti, profound social and climatological forces killed Ekaru. “Ekaru’s death was caused by the most
colossal set of events in human history: the catastrophic convergence of poverty, violence, and climate change” (my
italics). “This book is an attempt to
understand the death of Ekaru Loruman, and so many others like him, through the
lens of this catastrophic convergence.”
Parenti divides his book into four Parts:
I.
“Last Call for Illusions,” II. “Africa ,”
III. “Asia ,” and IV. “Latin
America .” In Part I.
he spend only a page on the facts of warming:
it’s happened, happening—the present 390 ppm is the “highest atmospheric
concentration of C02 during the last 10,000 years.” Another page summarizes “The Social
Challenge”: the UN estimated that “all
but one of its emergency appeals for humanitarian aid in 2007 were climate
related.” Several pages on the
“catastrophic convergence” by which traumas and disfunctions accumulate to
eventuate in bad climate adaptations—particularly Cold War militarism and
economic pathologies of neoliberal capitalism (social stability destroyed by CW
military interventions, economic stability by radical privatization and
economic deregulation). Two pages on
mitigation and adaptation, giving higher priority to mitigation—specifically
decarbonizing our economy—because the rising seas, desertification, storms, and
flooding precede and cause the social and political violence.
Even more than with Paskal, take a deep
breath for what’s ahead. Chapter 2
examines the Pentagon’s plans for a world remade by the catastrophic
convergence, including permanent counterinsurgency, massive movement of asylum
seekers and refugees, and massive surveillance and repression-- “armed
lifeboats” (instead of the cooperative
societies we need). Chap. 3: “Adaptation
As Counterinsurgency.” The essences of
“militarized adaptation to climate change”?
“Dirty war forever”? Dick
5-25-12. --Dick
Gwynne
Dyer. CLIMATE WARS: The Fight for Survival as the World
Overheats. 2010.
Unsettling
scenarios depicting the world in the next 50 years, similar
to the current planet but significantly hotter.
Rising from 280 parts per million at the
beginning of the Industrial Revolution, atmospheric carbon dioxide has now
reached 390 ppm. Journalist Dyer (After
Iraq: Where Next for the Middle East?, 2008, etc.) gathers interviews
from global experts who agree that serious efforts to reduce carbon
emissions—which are not happening—cannot prevent a further rise to 500 ppm, which will increase global temperature nearly five degrees Fahrenheit by 2150. Warming will
reduce rainfall over the tropics, expand mid-latitude deserts, eliminate
mountain snowpacks and glaciers—thus reducing flow in great rivers used for
irrigation—and melt arctic permafrost. To illustrate the major consequence, a diminished food supply, Dyer delivers
fictional accounts of how nations may
respond in the coming decades. According to these scenarios, lack of food destabilizes South America and Africa,
producing mass starvation. India and
Pakistan fight a nuclear war over the shrinking
rivers they share for irrigation. Russia
is the only great power that prospers, but China
can no longer feed its population, who migrate north, and its leaders remember
that China has a historical
claim to Siberia . After absorbing millions
fleeing starvation, the United States
successfully seals the Mexican border, adding minefields and
remote-controlled machine guns to the wall. Despite these alarming forecasts,
Dyer remains confident that, as difficulties increase, nations will organize to
vastly reduce carbon emissions. However, he warns that if matters are delayed
for more than a decade [i.e. beyond 2020 --D], civilization will pass through a
catastrophic time.
A reasonable but not rosy view of a subject
that too often produces hysteria. --
By Bruce Gagnon. [Arctic warming, oil and gas profit
“opportunities” for US corporations, Pentagon Global Strike Planning to protect
them, threatening Russia --Dick]
I was recently sent an email alerting me to a conference at
the University of
Maine that appears to be
about dragging us into another one of the oil-i-garchy's latest chaos
zones. I inquired about attending but was told it was "sold
out". Here is a bit from the invite:
The University of Maine School of Policy and International Affairs and
the Maine Army National Guard will co-host a
conference May 20 to 21 to explore challenges and emerging opportunities in the
Arctic . The free conference, "Leadership
in the High North: A Political, Military, Economic and Environmental Symposium
of the Arctic Opening," will be held at the Maine Army National Guard
Regional Training Institute in Bangor .
Speakers will address global, national and state issues and implications
related to diminished sea ice in the Arctic ,
including the changing environment, trade, geopolitics and policy.
Scheduled speakers include: Gen. Charles Jacoby, commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command and United States Northern Command; Rear Admiral Jonathan White, oceanographer and navigator of the Navy, director of Task Force Climate Change; Paul A. Mayewski, director of the UMaine Climate Change Institute; Major-General Christopher Coates, deputy commander, Canadian Joint Operations Command, National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces; Philippe Hebert, director of Policy Development for Canadian Department of National Defence; and John Henshaw, executive director of Maine Port Authority. And officials from theU.S. Army Mountain
Warfare School
will share experiences and display cold-weather operations equipment.
Scheduled speakers include: Gen. Charles Jacoby, commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command and United States Northern Command; Rear Admiral Jonathan White, oceanographer and navigator of the Navy, director of Task Force Climate Change; Paul A. Mayewski, director of the UMaine Climate Change Institute; Major-General Christopher Coates, deputy commander, Canadian Joint Operations Command, National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces; Philippe Hebert, director of Policy Development for Canadian Department of National Defence; and John Henshaw, executive director of Maine Port Authority. And officials from the
The words "emerging opportunities" jumped right out at me. The Arctic region is loaded with oil and natural gas and with extreme melting of the ice the oil corporations are itching to get at it. But look at a map to see which country has the largest land border with the Arctic... it is
The Pentagon has created the "US Navy Arctic Roadmap: 2014-2030". The plan includes such gems as the Navy needing ways to distribute fuel in the [Arctic] region to air and surface platforms. Fuel allocation needs to be staffed and protected which means bases will be built. How close would they be to
Late last March the Navy took New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, Sen. Angus King (I-ME), and others for a submarine ride below the Arctic ice. Friedman wrote:
“In our lifetime, what was [in effect] land and prohibitive to
navigate or explore, is becoming an ocean, and we’d better understand it,”
noted Admiral Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations. “We need to be sure
that our sensors, weapons and people are proficient in this part of the world,”
so that we can “own the undersea domain and get anywhere there.” Because if the
Arctic does open up for shipping, it offers a much shorter route from the
Atlantic to the Pacific than through the Panama Canal, saving huge amounts of
time and fuel.
Our Sen. King here in Maine sent around an email called Impressions from the Arctic. He told his constituents that there has been "a 40% reduction in ice as a result of global warming" He reported that "previously inaccessible" gas and oil reserves were now going to create "new opportunities". King concluded, "I am convinced we need to increase our capacity in the region, something I intend to press upon my colleagues on the Armed Services Committee as we work on our military priorities for the coming years."
King's state of Maine builds destroyers, armed with so-called "missile defense" (MD) systems that are key elements in Pentagon Prompt Global Strike planning. After a
I’m sad that I couldn't get a ticket to get into the Arctic event in
Bruce K. Gagnon, Global Network Against Weapons &
Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652, Brunswick, ME 04011, (207) 443-9502
http://www.space4peace.org ; http://space4peace.blogspot.com (blog)
PO Box 652, Brunswick, ME 04011, (207) 443-9502
http://www.space4peace.org ; http://space4peace.blogspot.com (blog)
Leah
Samberg . “World
Hunger Is Increasing, Thanks to Wars and Climate
Change.” Scientific American .
Reader Supported News (October
21, 2017).
Samberg writes: "Around
the globe, about 815 million people - 11 percent of the world's population -
went hungry in 2016, according to the latest data from the United Nations.” Population increase: conflicts over water
increase: increasing hunger.
RESISTANCE: TEXTS
Dr Marty Branagan. Global Warming, Militarism and Nonviolence:
The Art of Active Resistance. Palgrave, 2013. 272.
See
Bertel, Parenti, Paskal.
Militarism is the elephant in the room of global warming. Of all government sectors,
'Defence' has the highest carbon footprint and expenditure, yet has largely
been exempt from international scrutiny and regulation. Marty Branagan uses
Australian and international case studies to show that nonviolence is a viable
alternative to militarism for national defence and regime change. 'Active
resistance', initiated in Australian environmental blockades and now adopted
globally, makes the song 'We Shall Not Be Moved' much more realistic, as
activists erect tripod villages, bury, chain and cement themselves into the
ground, and 'lock-on' to machinery and gates. Active resistance, 'artistic
activism', and use of new information and communication technologies in
movements such as the Arab Spring and 'Occupy' demonstrate that nonviolence is
an effective, evolving praxis.
Table of contents (7 chapters)
Introduction: Global Warming and Militarism Pages 1-36
Fighting
Fire with Water: Nonviolent Alternatives to Militarism Pages 37-73
Australian
Eco-Pax Activism Pages 74-110
Active
Resistance: We Shall Never Be Moved Pages
111-142
Internetworking Pages 143-175
Artistic
Activism Pages 176-216
Creating
Campaigns and Constructive Programmes Pages
217-242
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pech.12189/abstract by R Tucker - 2016
Book Review. Marty Branagan, ed. Global Warming, Militarism, and Nonviolence: The Art of
Active Resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Author. Richard Tucker.
Close author notes. University of Michigan. Search for more papers by this
author. First published: 30 March 2016 Full publication history; DOI: ...
https://www.amazon.com/Branagan-Global-Warming-Militarism-Nonviolence/.../B00SB...
By Marty Branagan Global
Warming, Militarism and Nonviolence: The Art of Active
Resistance [Hardcover] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Noam Chomsky and Laray Polk. Nuclear War and Environmental Catastrophe. 2013.
“There are two problems for our species’
survival—nuclear war and environmental
catastrophe," says Noam Chomsky in this new book on the two
existential threats of our time and their points of intersection since World
War II.
While
a nuclear strike would require action, environmental catastrophe is partially
defined by willful inaction in response to human-induced climate change. Denial
of the facts is only half the equation. Other contributing factors include
extreme techniques for the extraction of remaining carbon deposits, the
elimination of agricultural land for bio-fuel, the construction of dams, and
the destruction of forests that are crucial for carbon sequestration.
On
the subject of current nuclear tensions, Chomsky revisits the long-established
option of a nuclear-weapon-free zone (NWFZ) in the Middle East, a proposal set
in motion through a joint Egyptian-Iranian General Assembly resolution in 1974.
Intended
as a warning, Nuclear War and Environmental Catastrophe is
also a reminder that talking about the unspeakable can still be done with
humor, wit and indomitable spirit.
Preface by Polk: Because (quoting Parenti’s Tropic of Chaos) wars and cc perpetuate
each other, we urgently need “collaboration and creative adaptation.”
Chap. 1: “Environmental
Catastrophe””: Because the US corporate-market- profit-inequality-Koch
brothers-fossil fuels-warming denying system produces war and warming, we must
reject it and find alternatives. Later
on pp. 67 and 83 Chomsky applauds the Magna Carta, especially its section on
the Charter of the Forests defending the Commons from privatization and
ruthlessness in acquisition. Chap. 2: Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex
(MICC); 3: war crimes; 4: nuclear dangers; 5:US and China; 6: denial, wealth
gap, greed and fear; 7: world peace, Bertrand Russell, Russell/ Einstein
Manifesto, Linus Pauling, Peggy Duff, A Call to Resist Illegitimate Authority,
MLKJr., importance of memory, “persistent danger of nuclear war, and the threat
of environmental disaster”; 8: critique of US business culture of profit, short
term gains, Chamber of Commerce, American Petroleum Institute, mainstream
media--all down-playing “the big twin threats of nuclear weapons and climate
change”, and US double standards by which it rules the world.
The dense little book ends p. 87, followed
by 39pp. of 9 appendices of salient documents regarding nuclear and chemical
war and global warming cited by Chomsky, including an effort to cover up lethal
effects of radiation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki; report of thousands of US
scientists protesting use of chemical and biological weapons; and Senator
Inhofe’s denial of warming at the UN Climate Change Conference in Durban, S.
Africa, Dec. 7, 2011.
Contents: War and Warming Newsletter
#1
One Consequence of Empire:
Refugees from US Wars
Add Warming Wars:
Christian Parenti, Tropic
of Chaos
Gwynne Dyer, Climate
Wars
Joseph Romm, Warming and Wars
Prud’homme, Wars For Water and Food Affected by Warming
Krauthammer on Warming and Responses
END WARS AND
WARMING NEWSLETTER #2
No comments:
Post a Comment