OMNI
Hiroshima-Nagasaki
Remembrance, AUGUST 9, 2015
Written
and Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology
Newsletters
Index:
Blog
What’s at stake: Again, after some 45 years of our
Remembrances, we respond to those atrocious bombings with the intention of true
and accurate memory. It is OMNI's most solemn event. There has
never been nor could there be anything upbeat about it, but only sorrow—until
the weapons are totally banned. With Thomas Hardy we say: "if way to a Better there be/it exacts a
full look at the Worst." The nuclear nations have expanded from one
to nine. The 2015
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference failed to reach agreement. The USA has budgeted a trillion dollars
for nuclear weapons maintenance and innovation during the next decade. But now
with the international Abolition Movement and the Marshallese suits against the
nuclear nations, we can at least engage in actions that, whatever their
immediate outcome, transcend revenge and promise some repair, some meaning, for
the atrocities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the global catastrophe of air war.
--Dick
Contents Hiroshima-Nagasaki Remembrance August 9, 2015
2015 Remembrance Program
Seeking
Historical Truth As the Foundation for Action
Dick, Discovering the Truth and Not Forgetting
Johan Galtung: Japanese v. Western Colonialism
Joseph Gerson, Myths and Lessons of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Tomgram: Christian Appy and “The ‘Merciful’ Ending to the
‘Good War’”
Mickey Z, Lies About Hiroshima
Google Search 8-3-15:
Hiroshima Nagasaki names of victims
Poems about Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Take
Action
Dick’s 2015 Essay for the Free Weekly
Union of Concerned Scientists, Tell President Obama to Go
to Hiroshima
NAPF: Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
Nuclear
Abolition Movement
ICAN: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
Lazare on Zarif:
Nuclear Nations Disarm
Nuclear
Zero, Republic of Marshall Islands’ Nuclear Weapons Suits
Aubrey Shepherd’s Film of Remembrance 2014
OMNI Nuclear Weapons Newsletters
The OMNI Center 2015
Remembrance:
From Hiroshima and Nagasaki
to Nuclear Zero: 2015 Abolition Movement /Marshallese Nuclear Suits
Sunday, August 9th, 7PM
Fulbright Peace Fountain
University of Arkansas
Maple, Ave., Fayetteville
PLENTY OF FREE PARKING ON
ARKANSAS AVENUE AND FACULTY YELLOW PARKING AND STUDENT GREEN NORTH OF OLD
MAIN/MAPLE STREET.
2015 PROGRAM
Hiroshima Nagasaki: Shadows, Nuclear Abolition,
Nuclear Zero 2015
MC: Kelly Mulhollan
1. Opening Prayer: “May Peace Prevail on
Earth” Still on the Hill
2. Proclamation: Mayor Lioneld Jordan
3. “The Fulbright Legacy”: Ashlie Hilbun, Director of Development,
Fulbright College UA
4. “Nagasaki”: Dan Dean performs David Rovics’ somber
classic
5. Names of the Dead: Readers David Edwards UUFF, Matt Miller, OMNI
UA President
6. The Marshall Islands Suit v. Nuclear Nations: Carmen
Chong Gum, Consul General for the RMI Consulate, Springdale
7. Poem: Burnetta Hintertheur, biologist poet
8. “The Value of Remembrance”: speaker Bill Williams, disabled Marine
combat veteran and peace advocate
9. “Maitri: May You Know Peace”: Dan Dean
WHAT
HAPPENED AND WHY
TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PAST, Michael Atkinson’s film
review, “Jan Palach: Prague’s Human Torch,” rewritten and condensed by Dick
Bennett
In August 1968,
Soviet tanks invaded Czechoslovakia, ending the Prague Spring. In protest, September, 1968, Ryszard Siwiec,
Polish accountant, set himself aflame in Warsaw. On January 16, 1969, Czech university student
Jan Palach set himself on fire in Prague’s Wenceslas Square. These self-immolations galvanized protests
throughout the Warsaw Pact, particularly in Czechoslovakia.
The Polish government successfully buried
Siwiec’s death for many decades. But
although the Czech leadership tried to discredit and disappear Palach, his
suicide was followed by other “torches.”
And they were not forgotten; their sacrifices were kept alive in public
memory by the many methods of resistance available to an occupied populace
.
Recently a
mini-series for Czech television, Burning
Bush, created by Agnieszka Holland, reminded the nation of what had been at
stake. The plot follows the slanders
about Palach by a high government official, the lawsuit for libel brought by
Palach’s mother, who will pay a severe price, a detective whose career will be
destroyed, and especially the lawyer she hired to plead the case, who struggles
to make the justice system work against a wall of power, secrecy, corruption,
and threats.
But this was not
all. Under the surface of this dark film
of loss appears affirmation and hope:
the fog of deception and lies essential to totalitarian states can be
resisted and eventually revealed. A
half-million Czechs joined Palach’s funeral procession despite military
violence against them. And opposition continued underground unceasingly. In 1989 the Czechs celebrated “Palach Week,”
again despite military violence. That
year the Czech
“Velvet Revolution” began, and the Soviet army soon departed.
The struggle
to resist an occupying foreign military regime is in some ways easier than to
resist the tyranny of one’s own government.
The foreign enemy, their harms, are clear, and the occupied are united
in opposition. When one’s own
government acts to destroy the constitution, however, by starting wars without
true cause, as against Vietnam or Iraq and many other countries, or by
universal surveillance of the populace, and using its immense propaganda power
to frighten the public about foreign enemies, the people are uncertain and
divided, and resistance is enfeebled.
Even more
difficult to resist are the myths employed to justify past wars or particular actions
in past wars. How refute the old, deeply
entrenched conviction that the Japanese were more vicious in their wars than
were the Western powers, or the iterated claim that Hiroshima and Nagasaki (and
fire-devastated Tokyo and other cities) and all their residents had to be
destroyed in order to avoid an invasion and the loss, some US leaders
exaggerated, of a million or our soldiers?
But reply we
must. Despite the holocaust against the
civilian cities of Germany and Japan, the United States has glorified its
victory, and its soldiers have become the “Great Generation.” Consequently, more US wars became accepted in
virtually permanent war, modeled on the “Good War”—over forty invasions and
interventions. Also since 1945, atomic
bombs have proliferated, at first by the US with thousands of ever more
powerful bombs, then by the Soviets, and by Britain and France, China, Israel,
and now Pakistan and India.
Tell the truth,
then, we must, to stop the wars; tell the truth to expose the injustices, racism,
the war crimes, from the civilian city annihilations as a mode of war to the
invasions of Grenada, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq --to open
the way to the abolition of nuclear weapons.
We must call on employees in the nuclear industry to become
whistleblowers and on investigative journalists to expose the danger and the
waste. We citizens must no longer avert
our eyes and minds. And, as the Czech people never forgot Jan
Palach and resisted the tyranny’s lies, we must remember the victims of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and refuse to accept our government’s rationalizations
for slaughter that continue today.
PEACE JOURNALISM
PERSPECTIVE
War,
colonialism, atrocities were seen as the essence of Japan, as accidental in
Germany. Western racism at work: impunity for white people-not for yellow.
Judged by Western colonial powers whose colonial crimes cry to the heavens
relative to what Japan did. Including me, attributing Western colonialism to
Japan. Sorry. Read more...
Our
70th Anniversary Homework: Confronting the Myths and Learning the Lessons of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki by
In March of 1946,
eight months after the atomic bomb was dropped, the city of Hiroshima stood in
ruins. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Seventy years
ago, two nuclear weapons targeted against cities which met the criteria of
having “densely packed workers’ homes,” killed more than 200,000 people
in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In the years that have
followed, many more have suffered and died from cancers, radiation disease,
genetic damage and other fallout from the atom bombings.
The myths that the A-bombings were necessary
to end the war against Japan and that they saved the lives of half a million US
troops remain widely believed. The myths serve as the ideological foundation
for continuing U.S. preparations for nuclear war, which in turn has served as
the primary driver of nuclear weapons proliferation and the creation of
deterrent nuclear arsenals
It is no accident that
this wartime propaganda took on a
life of its own. Japanese and other journalists’ film footage and photos
of the devastation wrought by the A-bombs taken within days of the A-bombings,
were seized by U.S. Occupation forces and were locked away in Pentagon vaults
for more than two decades. In 1995, the Smithsonian Museum’s initially
excellent 50th anniversary exhibition was censored beyond recognition to
prevent people from seeing what the A-bombs inflicted on human beings. Also
removed were the facts that U.S. Secretary of War Stimson had advised Truman
that Japan’s surrender “could be arranged on terms acceptable to the United
States” without the atom bombings. (That arrangement was later deemed
acceptable – even necessary – by U.S. military occupation authorities.)
Indeed, before it was sterilized, the exhibit included quotations from
senior US wartime military leaders including Admiral Leahy and General (later
President) Eisenhower who thought, “It wasn’t necessary to hit [Japanese] with
that awful thing.”
Scholars now know that
numerous factors contributed to Truman’s
decision to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki and their civilian populations.
These include Truman’s political calculations as he looked to the 1948
presidential election, vengeance, racism, institutional inertia, and the
callousness that came with already having burned more than sixty Japanese
cities to the ground.
But, as General Leslie
Groves, the commander of the Manhattan Project, told senior scientist Joseph
Rotblat, the bombs came to be designed for the Soviet Union. The determinative reasons for the A-bombings were to
bring the war to an immediate end so that the US could avoid sharing influence
with the USSR in Northern China, Manchuria and Korea and to intimidate Stalin
and other Soviet leaders by demonstrating the apocalyptic power of nuclear
weapons and Washington’s willingness to use them – even against civilians.
Little Boy and Fat Man, as the bombs were named, announced the beginning of the
Cold War.
Americans also
continue to suffer from the misconception that nuclear weapons have not been
used since the Nagasaki A-bombing on August 9, 1945. In fact, the US, and to a
lesser degree the other nuclear powers, have repeatedly used their nuclear arsenals. Long ago, Daniel
Ellsberg, a senior Pentagon nuclear war planner for Presidents Kennedy, Johnson
and Nixon, explained that the US has repeatedly used nuclear weapons “in the
way that you use a gun when you point it at someone’s head in a
confrontation….whether or not you pull the trigger...[and] You’re also using it
when you have it on your hip ostentatiously.” During wars and
international crises, the US has prepared and/or threatened to initiate nuclear
war on at least thirty occasions -
at least 15 times during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and crises with China,
and at least 10 times to reinforce US Middle East hegemony. And
each of the other eight nuclear powers has made such threats or preparations at
least once.
Eric Schlosser, author
of Command and Control, reported last December to the
International Conference on the Consequences of Nuclear Weapons, attended
by representatives of 158 governments that luck, not state policies and
regulations, best explains why humanity has survived nuclear blackmail,
reckless dependence on deterrence, miscalculations and nuclear accidents.
Still more sobering
are the recent scientific studies demonstrating that even a “small” exchange of
50-100 nuclear weapons targeted against cities would result in fires, smoke
that would cause global cooling, and up to two billion deaths from
famine.
All of which lead to a
series of existential questions: As we race against time to save our
civilizations from the impending ravages of climate change, why are our
governments preparing to inflict nuclear annihilation? Why do we tolerate
the continued deployment and stockpiling of nearly 16,000 nuclear weapons, 90%
of them in U.S. and Russian arsenals? Why have the P-5 nuclear powers
(US, Russia, Britain, France and China) refused to implement their 45 year-old
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) obligation to begin negotiations for the
complete elimination of their nuclear arsenals? And why did the US condemn this past spring’s NPT Review Conference to
failure by refusing to honor its long-standing commitment to co-convene a
conference to lay the foundations for a nuclear weapons and weapons of mass
destruction-free zone in the Middle East?
There are high costs
to denying history and reality. In a worst case scenario, the failure of the US
and the other nuclear powers to heed the warning of A-bomb survivors that human
beings and nuclear weapons cannot coexist is the end to life on earth as we
know it.
The majority of the
world’s governments are not in similar denial. The NPT Review Conference’s one achievement was the commitment of the
vast majority of the world’s governments the Humanitarian Pledge. Initiated by Austria, 113 governments pledged
“to cooperate with all relevant stakeholders, states, international
organizations, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, parliamentarians and
civil society, in efforts to stigmatize, prohibit and eliminate nuclear weapons
in light of their unacceptable humanitarian consequences and associated risks.”
The gulf between the non-nuclear weapons states and the nuclear powers has
widened, and in time the former may use their economic, political and other
power in the struggle to secure humanity’s future.
On August 6, many in
Japan will appreciate the silent presence of U.S. Ambassador Caroline Kennedy at Hiroshima’s official 70th
anniversary commemoration, but there will be no apology. And, even as we celebrate
and work for the implementation of the nuclear deal with Iran, the sorry
truth is that the US is now on track to spend one trillion dollars to
“modernize” its nuclear arsenal and delivery systems, with the other nuclear
powers following the U.S. lead. And, despite his pledge in Prague, President Obama has retired fewer
nuclear weapons that any other US post-Cold War President.
As the US-Russian
confrontation, marked by implicit and explicit nuclear threats reminds us, we
are living on borrowed time. Seventy years after the Hiroshima and
Nagasaki A-bombings, human survival still hanging in the balance. Midst the
carnival of the 2016 presidential election, let us insist that those who seek
to rule us and the world finally learn the lessons of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki: Never again to anyone! No more Hiroshimas! No More Nagasakis!
No more nuclear weapons!
This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
Dr. Joseph Gerson is Director of Programs of the American Friends
Service Committee in New England. His most recent book is Empire
and the Bomb: How the US Uses Nuclear Weapons to Dominate the World. His previous books include The
Sun Never Sets and With
Hiroshima Eyes.
|
[Note for TomDispatch Readers: When
you read today’s piece, remember that you can get a signed, personalized copy
of Christian Appy’s masterful new book, American Reckoning: The Vietnam War and Our National Identity, in return for a $100 donation to this site. I think I know a
reasonable amount about the Vietnam War and yet I found myself surprised
again and again by his highly original account of how its aftermath played
out in American society. Check out our
donation page for the details and know that, in the dog days of summer, we
couldn’t be more appreciative of whatever you offer. It helps us keep
chugging along! Tom]
So many decades later, it’s hard to remember the kind of nuclear thinking top American officials engaged in during the Cold War. In secret National Security Council documents of the early 1950s, for instance, the country’s top strategists descended willingly into the charnel house of futuristic history, imagining life on this planet as an eternal potential holocaust. They wrote in those documents of the possibility that 100 atomic bombs, landing on targets in the United States, might kill or injure 22 million Americans and of a "blow" that might result in the "complete destruction" of the Soviet Union. And they weren’t just whistling Dixie. After all, in 1960, the top military brass found themselves arguing about the country’s first Single Integrated Operational Plan for nuclear war. In it, a scenario was laid out for delivering more than 3,200 nuclear weapons to 1,060 targets in the Communist world. Targets included at least 130 cities, which, if all went well, would cease to exist. Classified estimates of possible casualties from such an attack ran to 285 million dead and 40 million injured. That’s what “the complete destruction” of the Soviet Union and Communist China meant then and, until Dr. Strangelove hit the screens in 1964, those figures were simply part of the sort of “rational” war planning that led to perfectly serious debate about launching a “preemptive strike” -- what, if another country were considering it, would have been a “war of aggression” -- to eradicate that enemy. To give credit where it’s due, Army and Navy officials did worry "about the lethal impact of downwind fallout, with the Army explicitly concerned about limiting exposure of 'friendly forces and people' to radioactive fallout. By contrast, the Air Force saw no need for additional constraints [on surface nuclear blasts]." It's this world that we “celebrate,” having now reached the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945). Today, we know that delivering so many nuclear weapons (or, in fact, many less) would have done a lot more than wipe out the “Communist world.” It would have plunged the planet into nuclear winter and undoubtedly eradicated humanity as definitively as the dinosaurs were wiped out by that asteroid 65 million years ago. Apocalypse was -- and remains -- us. After all, despite the recent nuclear agreement that will stop a country without nuclear weapons from building them, this planet is still loaded with a world-ending arsenal that is constantly being expanded, updated, andmodernized. Call us lucky, but don’t call us particularly thoughtful. Today, Christian Appy, author of American Reckoning: The Vietnam War and Our National Identity, considers the way in which -- except in rare moments when antinuclear movements gained brief strength here -- Americans managed to ignore how this country’s leaders ushered us into the nuclear age by annihilating not one but two cities and killing hundreds of thousands of defenseless civilians. Tom
Our “Merciful”
Ending to the “Good War”
Or How Patriotism Means Never Having To Say You're Sorry By Christian Appy
“Never, never waste
a minute on regret. It's a waste of time.”
-- President Harry
Truman
Here we are, 70
years after the nuclear obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and I'm
wondering if we've come even one step closer to a moral reckoning with our
status as the world's only country to use atomic weapons to slaughter human
beings. Will an American president ever offer a formal apology? Will our
country ever regret the dropping of “Little Boy” and “Fat Man,” those two
bombs that burned hotter than the sun? Will it absorb the way they instantly
vaporized thousands of victims, incinerated tens of thousands more, and
created unimaginably powerful shockwaves and firestorms that ravaged
everything for miles beyond ground zero? Will it finally come to grips
with the “black rain” that spread radiation and killed even more people --
slowly and painfully -- leading in the end to a death toll for the two citiesconservatively estimated at more than 250,000?
Given the last seven
decades of perpetual militarization andnuclear “modernization” in this country, the answer may seem like
an obvious no. Still, as a historian, I've been trying to dig a little deeper
into our lack of national contrition. As I have, an odd fragment of Americana
kept coming to mind, a line from the popular 1970 tearjerker Love Story: “Love,” says the female lead
when her boyfriend begins to apologize, “means never having to say you're
sorry.” It has to be one of the dumbest definitions ever to lodge in American
memory, since real love often requires the strength to apologize and make
amends.
|
 |
Visit our sister
sites:
   
Recent Posts
2 days ago... Tomgram: Karen J. Greenberg, The Mass Killer and the National Security State 5 days ago... Tomgram: Subhankar Banerjee, Fire at World's End 1 week ago... Tomgram: Peter Van Buren, Washington and Tehran Come in From the Cold 9 days ago... Tomgram: Eduardo Galeano, The Previous Sole Superpower
Recent Highlights
1 month ago... Tomgram: Andrew Bacevich, The Theology of American National Security 1 month ago... Tomgram: Naomi Oreskes, Why Climate Deniers Are Their Own Worst Nightmares |
 |
MICKEY Z, LIES ABOUT HIROSHIMA
Hiroshima: 70 Years of Lies and Propaganda by
Mickey Z.
July 24, 2015 . Via Cindy Shehan’s Soapbox, July 26, 2015
“It is an atomic bomb. It is the greatest thing in history.”
- President Harry S. Truman (August 6, 1945)
July 24, 2015 . Via Cindy Shehan’s Soapbox, July 26, 2015
“It is an atomic bomb. It is the greatest thing in history.”
- President Harry S. Truman (August 6, 1945)
One of the seemingly endless Good (sic) War myths goes a little something like this:
The U.S. had no choice but to drop atomic bombs on Japanese civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Had they not done so, the fanatical Japanese never would have surrendered and millions of brave American soldiers would have perished in the ensuing invasion of the Japanese islands.
As we approach the 70th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima, I’ll try (yet again) to answer the question: Why was the bomb used?
CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST
HIROSHIMA
NAGASAKI NAMES OF VICTIMS, GOOGLE SEARCH, AUGUST 3, 2015
Atomic bomb mushroom
clouds over Hiroshima (left) and Nagasaki (right) ... Little Boy exploded 2,000 feet above Hiroshima in a blast equal to
12-15,000 tons of ...... The dark portions of the garments this victim wore during the flash caused ...
Wikipedia
The surviving victims of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are ...names of more than
450,000 hibakusha; 292,325 in Hiroshima and 165,409 in ...
Since it was located just under
thehypocenter, blast pressure was vertically ... was the
longest one in Hiroshima at that time, were filled with A-bomb victims.
abcnews.go.com ›
International
Aug 6, 2010 - VIDEO: Hiroshima
victims share stories of
survival 65 years after the ... "I saw a bright blast, and I saw yellow and silver and orange and all sorts ...
Feb 5, 2007 - Although the names of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were incised into our memories, ...
Shocking images of the ruins, but where were the victims?
myemail.constantcontact.com/Lists-of-Hiroshima--Nagasaki-A-bomb-vic...
Nagasaki City employees take part in an annual airing out of the
books listing thenames of the victims of the 1945 U.S. atomic bombing of the southwestern ...
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are a reminder of what horrors nuclear
weapons can inflict. CTBTO ... The blast created shock
waves faster than the speed of sound. ... A victim of the Hiroshima bomb (AP Photo/The Association of the ...
ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/.../AJ201205160089
Asahi Shimbun
May 16, 2012 - In addition, there is a volume containing
the names of nine people who lived through the
atomic bombing of Nagasaki three days later and ...
time.com/3879427/hiroshima-portraits-of-survivors/ Time
Mar 20, 2014 - Photographs -- most of them never published in
LIFE magazine -- made in Hiroshima after
the end of the Second World War.
At the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Memorial Halls for the Atomic Bombing Victims we collect, preserve and display memoirs of the atomic
bombing written by ...
POEMS
ABOUT HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI
Bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki How can you do this? Let people die for
no reason! Those innocent faces and innocent lives that you have taken
away ...
The intense heat and
light of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb blasts ... The following is
one of the best poems about Hiroshima that I have read to
date.
Aug 9, 2010 - NAGASAKI 1945 (After an eyewitness account by Dr Tatsuichiro
Akizuki) At 10.30 the siren sounded, at 11 o'clock the all-clear. Sticking
a ...
Jul 29, 2010 - Black Rain: From Hiroshima To Nagasaki by Terence George Craddock (Spectral
Images and Images Of Light). .We dropped the Bomb though ...
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Boom! Is the sound that never leaves? For
peoples skin catch fire like sleeves,. The city is covered in ash,. Now the
flash of light so ...
Atomic Skies Falling
With Hiroshima eyes I weep for a world
self-destructing, never learning lessons from the atomic apocalypse of skies
falling. With Nagasaki ...
Feb 6, 2013 - HIROSHIMA and NAGASAKI Poetry Competitions at the Deep Underground
Poetry forums. Discuss poems and creative writing.
Poems of the Atomic Bomb, 3. - Dedicated to
those stripped of their lives by the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima on August 6 and on Nagasaki on ...
As an invocation, I'd
like to begin with a poem by Hiromu Morishita. Hiroshima ...
bombing of Hiroshima—overcome the powerful urge of silence; they are, in the
..... the bombings of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki came at the end
of World War II, they.
Aug 6, 2012 - Kia Ora folks Sometimes we are too wrapped up
in our own mishaps and self created micro discomforts that we forget the macro
pains of others ...
TAKE ACTION
TO THE EDITOR, THE FREE WEEKLY, by Dick Bennett
To Mourn and Resist
The
OMNI Center for Peace, Justice, and Ecology invites you to attend their annual Remembrance of the atomic
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Sunday, August 9, 7pm, at the Fulbright Peace Fountain, University of
Arkansas.
The Bombings’ Direct
Consequences
During World War II, the United States decimated many Japanese
civilian cities in that mutually merciless war.
Two of the cities were obliterated by just one bomb for each city—the
new nuclear bombs. These were mainly
civilian cities. According to one source, of the 200,000 deaths in Hiroshima and the
140,000 deaths in Nagasaki, over 95 per cent of the combined casualties of the
two cities were civilian. The
deaths directly attributable to the bombings are estimated conservatively at
300,000.
Mourning
These Deaths
The Hebrew religion has a word
for their ceremony of mourning: it’s
called “Kaddish.” One form of this
prayer is recited by mourners. Annually we express our sorrow for those
killed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and for all Japanese civilians killed by
indiscriminate bombings from the air.
Each year we grieve for those civilian dead, who are, to some of us,
murdered innocents. The Remembrance is
our Kaddish of lamentation.
The Long-Range Consequences
But the consequences of
the bombs did not end with the bombings themselves. A nuclear bombs race ensued. To keep ahead the US tested over 60 hydrogen
bombs on some atolls of the Marshall Islands.
Today nine nations have the bombs.
Today the US has budgeted over a trillion dollars for nuclear weapons
innovations in violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Yet most people are silent. Perhaps they think we are no longer
endangered by the existence of thousands of nuclear bombs in the possession of
9 nations some of them in conflict. Or
perhaps the people cannot think or feel what happened at Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, numbed by the constant fear-mongering by our government: Cold War, War on Drugs, War against
Terrorism, War on Islamic State….Permanent War.
Resistance
But you who are reading this
article in this newspaper today, you are not numb or dumb. Together we remember for a purpose.
Each year at the Remembrance we mourn, but
we also resolve to resist. Great union
organizer Mother Jones’ motto was “Don’t Mourn, Organize.” The magnitude of the two bombings, the
callousness and racism they represent, the lack of remorse and apology by our
leaders (when the Japanese leaders have travelled the globe apologizing to the
countries where they had plundered and killed), require a response filled both
with mourning and resolve to abolish nuclear weapons.
In 2015 an international nonviolent
movement exists to end nuclear weapons. Here
are three mainstays of this resistance, one of them close to us: the international network of antinuclear
organizations, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, and the
Marshall Islands Nuclear Zero Law Suits.
Anti-Nuclear Organizations
Pressure has been sustained around the
world by devoted groups working for nuclear disarmament. Here are some of those in the US.
In Arkansas:
WAND, Women Acting for New
Directions, coordinated by Jean Gordon in Little Rock, a branch of the original
Women Against Nuclear Destruction started by the Australian Dr. Helen Caldicott.
Arkansas Center for Peace and
Justice, also in Little Rock, Bob Estes director.
St. Scholastica Catholic
Center in Fort Smith. Sisters have
attended our Remembrance ever since OMNI began.
And OMNI. The Remembrance is one of our earliest
activities, and we publish newsletters and demonstrate against wars and nuclear
dangers.
In the USA
These organizations oppose
nuclear weapons full-time:
Nuclear Age Peace Foundation (NAPF) in California. Founder and president, David
Krieger. Offers many opportunities,
including a speaker’s bureau, The Sunflower
monthly e-newsletter providing information on nuclear weapons abolition, and
assists the Marshall Islands lawsuits.
Ground Zero Organization and Magazine to End Trident Submarines. Ground Zero has a permanent residence and
protest at Bangor, Wash., the Trident submarines base; one submarine is
extraordinarily lethal.
Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear
Power in Space, in Maine,
headed by the indefatigable Bruce Gagnon.
Publishes Space Alert!
Nukewatch and Nukewatch Quarterly. Located in Wisconsin, dedicated in their newspaper and by direct
action to abolish nuclear weapons and power.
Nevada
Desert Experience, annual walk to the nuclear bomb test
sites. Check their newsletter. Another of the many Catholic-founded
oppositions.
The
Nuclear Resister sustained by a couple who keep track of all
individuals resisting nuclear weapons, including all on trial and in jail. See their newspaper.
Look them up your search
engine and assist them. Just a letter or
call of thanks will help, but they have no big donors, especially the first
five. Help them, get involved.
These organizations include
nuclear opposition as a main purpose:
FCNL, the
Friends Committee for National Legislation, the lobbying wing of the Quakers,
has advocate regulation and abolition of nuclear weapons ever since the
bombings.
The
Catholic Worker. For
example, the Jan-Feb 2015 number of their magazine included an extensive eulogy
of the great anti-nuclear writer, Jonathan Schell, and a quotation from Pope
Francis advocating banning nuclear weapons “once and for all.”
Pax
Christi, Catholic Peace organization expressing the best in
Catholic nonviolence.
Peace
Action. For example, their
magazine Action Report (Fall 2010)
includes a report on an encampment in New Mexico between Peace Action and the
youth of Think Outside the Bomb (TOTB) and an article on the New START
agreement to cut US and Russian arsenals.
Veterans
for Peace challenges war, “exposing the true costs of war and militarism
since 1985.”
War
Resisters League “affirms that all war is a crime against
humanity.”
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists sponsors the minutes before midnight doomsday
clock and reports on all topics of nuclear opposition.
Peace &
Planet Mobilization for a nuclear free and sustainable world, to
strengthen the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty and related activities.
Global Zero is the international movement for the elimination of all
nuclear weapons. GLOBAL ZERO | 1436 U
Street NW, Suite 401 | Washington, DC 20009 USA.
International
Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA). Located at the UN.
|
ACTION ALERT
Urge President Obama to Go to Hiroshima Dear James, Seventy years ago this August, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki—with devastating consequences. Today, nuclear weapons continue to represent a real and urgent threat to humanity—and they should never again be used. President Obama understands this, as he made clear in his April 2009 speech in Prague when he called for ending Cold War thinking, reducing the role of nuclear weapons, and ultimately achieving the peace and security of a world free of these weapons. But these efforts have stalled. Today the risks remain unacceptably high, particularly the threat of an accidental, mistaken, or unauthorized launch or use of nuclear weapons. It's time to get the president to take action to make everybody safer. Urge President Obama to visit Japan in early August to commemorate the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, highlight the continuing threat of nuclear weapons, and announce nuclear risk reduction steps he will take before leaving office.
Sincerely,
 Sean Meyer Manager of Strategic Campaigns Global Security Program Union of Concerned Scientists |
 |
|
· Perspectives
o Reflections
on the 70th Anniversary
of the Atomic Bombings by David Krieger
o Hibakusha Thoughts on the 70th Anniversary by Shigeko
Sasamori and Setsuko Thurlow
· Nuclear
Zero Lawsuits
o Marshall
Islands Files Appeal in
Ninth Circuit
o Numerous Amicus Curiae Briefs in Support of
the Marshall Islands
· U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
o Misuse of Taxpayer Funds at Sandia National
Laboratory
· Non-Proliferation
o Iran and P5+1 Reach Nuclear Deal
· Nuclear
Testing
o U.S. Conducts Flight Test of New B61-12
Nuclear Bomb
· War and Peace
o Japanese Government Seeks to Reinterpret
Peace Article in Constitution
· Nuclear Waste
o Companies Responsible for Contamination at
Rocky Flats
· Resources
o August's Featured Blog
o This Month in Nuclear Threat History
· Foundation Activities
o Sadako Peace Day is August 6
o Paul Chappell in Sojourner's Magazine
o NAPF President David Krieger to Speak in
Maui
o Evening for Peace Honoring Setsuko Thurlow
o International Youth Summit for Nuclear
Abolition
· Quotes
· For details go to:
|
NUCLEAR ABOLITION MOVEMENT
The International
Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) is a global
campaign coalition working to mobilize people in all countries to inspire,
persuade, and pressure their governments to initiate negotiations for a treaty
banning nuclear weapons. They call
on states, international organizations, civil society organizations and other
actors to:
§ Acknowledge that any use of nuclear weapons
would cause catastrophic humanitarian and environmental harm.
§ Acknowledge that there is a universal
humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons, even for states that do not
possess them.
§ Acknowledge that the nuclear-armed states have
an obligation to eliminate their nuclear weapons completely.
§ Take immediate action to support a
multilateral process of negotiations for a treaty banning nuclear weapons.
Their campaign brings together humanitarian,
environmental, human rights, peace and development organizations in more than
90 countries to seize the historic opportunity that exists to outlaw and eliminate nuclear weapons.
Prominent individuals such as anti-apartheid leader Desmond Tutu, the Dalai
Lama, Yoko Ono, and Martin Sheen support the campaign.
International
Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons: ICAN
www.icanw.org/
International
Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
International
Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. ... in association with the
Cultural Youth Initiative Movement of
Nigeria, hosted an interfaith roundtable on ...
Iranian Foreign Minister: Time for US, Other Nuclear Powers to Disarm by Sarah Lazare. Common Dreams, August 1, 2015.
Mohammad Javad Zarif calls on US, Israel, and other atomic weapons nations to begin 'new era' of non-proliferation
MARSHALL
ISLANDS LAWSUITS AGAINST THE NUCLEAR NATIONS
The Republic of the Marshall Islands, a former
hydrogen-bomb testing ground for the United States, is challenging the nine nuclear-armed
nations with lawsuits, claiming that the countries have failed to move towards a
world without nuclear weapons as required by treaty. The lawsuit claims the nuclear nations have failed
to comply with the 44-year-old Nuclear
Non-Proliferation treaty, which seeks to eliminate nuclear weapons, and promote the
peaceful use of nuclear power. Filed on April 24, 2014, it adopts the line: If
not us, who? If not now, when?
The Marshall Islands lawsuit, which was filed in
U.S. Federal Court in San Francisco and in the International Court of Justice,
claims that the U.S. has failed its duties under Article VI of the Treaty
because it continues to modernize its weapons with no intention of disarmament
and is failing to pursue good faith negotiations, as set out in the treaty.
NAPF is the administrator for
the Marshall Islands Nuclear Zero lawsuits.
You
and I are not alone; we have much support for action against nuclear
weapons. And they need public pressure
behind them. Contact these
organizations. Get involved with as many
as you have time for. You know what
nuclear bombs can do: help the people
who are trying to ensure our children’s future.
A
global network of determined world nonviolent organizations, a new
international umbrella organization, and lawsuits seeking application of
international law—all determined to bring world pressure on the nuclear
nations. An intransigent US that,
however, under pressure of facts and public demand is at last recognizing the
global threat of Climate Change; we can also make it change its nuclear
policy. This is no time for celebration,
but it is a time when people who understand the dangers of nuclear weapons can
find strength around the world in their opposition.
Here are
three accounts of the Republic of Marshall Islands Nuclear Zero Suits
www.greenpeace.org
› ... › News › Blogs › Making Waves Greenpeace
Nov 19, 2014
- The Republic of the Marshall Islands recently
launched a bold legal action ... The 'Nuclear Zero law suits'
highlight that, in the interest of all ...
Dec 27, 2014
- The Marshall Islands' suit asks
that the nuclear powers begin negotiations on a
disarmament treaty one year after the court's ruling. But, as ...
2014-06: Marshall
Islands Lawsuit Against Nuclear Nations ... of California, San
Francisco Division (both suits known
collectively as Nuclear Zero lawsuits).
2014 REMEMBRANCE
Aubrey Shepherd’s Film of Remembrance 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIDtlxvlBZo&list=UUwcZunxqSV3zcgvRJqBn-Qw
RECENT NEWSLETTER ON
ABOLITION AND RMI LAWSUITS
RECENT NEWSLETTER ON NUCLEAR VICTIMS, PACIFIC, AND RMI
FOLLOW-UP: UN
International Day Against Nuclear Tests August
26 Newsletter
END HIROSHIMA-NAGASAKI REMEMBRANCE 2015
NEWSLETTER, AUGUST 9, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment