OMNI NEWSLETTER #8 ON US “WAR
ON TERRORISM,” May 28, 2013. Compiled
by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace. (#4 Jan. 19, 2012; #5 May 29, 2012; #6 July
19, 2012; #7 Sept. 27, 2012).
“Number of people killed in
mass shootings in the United
States last year [2012]: 66. Number killed by Muslim-American terrorists
since September 11, 2001: 33.” Harper’s Index,” Harper’s Magazine (May 2013).
Here is the link to all OMNI newsletters:
http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/ Here is the link to the
Index: http://www.omnicenter.org/omni-newsletter-general-index/
Related
Newsletters: Afghanistan, Air War, Allende’s Overthrow (9-11), Bases, Bush, CIA,
Domestic Repression, Drones, Fear, Homeland Security, Imperialism, Indefinite
Detention, Iraq, Lawlessness (USA), McCarthyism
(domestic and foreign), Militarism, National Security State, 9-11, Obama, Pakistan, Pentagon,
Secrecy, State Terrorism,
Surveillance, Terrorism, Torture
, War Crimes, Wars, and more.
My blog:
War Department/Peace Department
War Department/Peace Department
See: 9/11 Newsletters
“I wonder how the foreign
policies of the United States would look if we wiped out the national
boundaries of the world, at least in our minds, and thought of all children
everywhere as our own.” Howard Zinn
“Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the
most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every
other. War is the parent of armies; from
these proceed debts and taxes. . . .”
James Madison, “Political Observations,”
April 20, 1795.
“Number of private U.S.
citizens killed in terrorist attacks in 2010: 15. Number killed by falling televisions:
16.” (“Harper’s Index,” August 2012, p. 9).
Our warrior leaders and their war-monger supporters have produced two
wars (or is that four?) to defend “America ” and “freedom” at the price
of trillions of dollars and tens of thousands of innocent people.
INSTEAD OF A WAR ON
TERRORISM LET’S DECLARE WAR ON IGNORANCE, WAR ON HATRED, WAR ON KILLING
Petition
for Peace:
I just signed the petition "The US President and US Congress: End wars and the attack on our civil liberties here in theUS "
on Change.org.
It's important. Will you sign it too? Here's the link:
http://www.change.org/petitions/the-us-president-and-us-congress-end-wars-and-the-attack-on-our-civil-liberties-here-in-the-us?share_id=fGatKXIWJr&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition
Thanks! Dick
I just signed the petition "The US President and US Congress: End wars and the attack on our civil liberties here in the
It's important. Will you sign it too? Here's the link:
http://www.change.org/petitions/the-us-president-and-us-congress-end-wars-and-the-attack-on-our-civil-liberties-here-in-the-us?share_id=fGatKXIWJr&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition
Thanks! Dick
Contents of #4 and #5 at end.
Contents of #6
Two Terrorists:
Shakir Hamoodi
Tarek Mahanna
Bacevitch, Obama’s
Secret Ops
Fox News Misinformation
Two Books on
Terrorism
Contents of #7
Chomsky, Liberties
Destroyed
Hedges, NDAA Lawsuit
Bolen, NDAA Lawsuit
AFSC Defends Salah
Pal, “Islam” Means Peace
Chomsky,
Bibliography
Contents #8
Sirota, “Terrorism” Is Retaliation for US Terrorism
PBS Frontline, Dana Priest and William Arkin’s “Top Secret America ” Notes
by Dick
Dick Bennett, Puritan Roots of US Permanent War, Connecting
Fulbright’s The Arrogance of Power
Greenwald, Scheer,
Ackerman
Honigsberg, Human Consequences of War on Terror: Mass
Killing, Maiming, Exile
Brooks and Manza, Public Opinion Toward War on Terror, Fear
Justifies Mass Slaughter
Film on Canada ’s
“War on ‘Terror’”: “The Secret Trial 5”: US
Infecting Other Nations
Singham, FBI Sets Up “Terrorists’ for Permanent Fear
Greenwald on Andrew Sullivan
Aronson, War on Terror a US Creation
Sibel Edmonds, CIA Whistleblower Gagged
Looking Back
Sirota, Draft Ended 40 Years Ago June 30, 1973. Did it ensure Permanent War for the
Warmongers?
Woodworth, Reviewing Evidence of 9/11
Looking Ahead
Bob Baskin, Peace Alliance:
President Obama’s Speech to Decrease War on Terror
More to be checked.
WHY DO SO MANY PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD HATE US AND BLOW UP OUR SOLDIERS
AND BUILDINGS? US ARROGANCE
AND VIOLENCE.
A Cronkite Moment for the Blowback Era by David Sirota. The
Progressive Populist (June 1, 2013).
"The
stuff we have done overseas is now brought back into our own front yards. America 's
chickens are coming home to roost." — Reverend Jeremiah Wright
In 2008, the hysterical
backlash to the above comment by Barack Obama's minister became a high-profile
example of one of the most insidious rules in American politics: You are not
allowed to honestly discuss the Central Intelligence Agency's concept of
"blowback" without putting yourself at risk of being deemed a traitor
to country.
Now, five years later, with America
having killed thousands of Muslim civilians in its drone strikes and wars, that
rule is thankfully being challenged — and not by someone who is so easily
smeared. Instead, the apostate is one of this epoch's most revered journalists
— and because of that, we will see whether this country is mature enough to
face one of its biggest national security quandaries.
This is the news from Tom Brokaw's appearance on "Meet
the Press" last Sunday. Discussing revelations that the bombing suspects
may be connected to Muslim fundamentalism, he said:
"We have got to look at
the roots of all of this because it exists across the whole (Asian)
subcontinent and the Islamic world around the world. I think we also have to
examine (America 's) use of
drones (because) there are a lot of civilians who are innocently killed in a
drone attack in Pakistan , in
Afghanistan and in Iraq .
And I can tell you having spent a lot of time over there, young people will
come up to me on the streets and say, 'We love America , but if you harm one hair
on the head of my sister, I will fight you forever.' And there is this enormous rage against what they see in that part of the
world as a presumptuousness of the United States ."
As one of the establishment's most venerated voices,
Brokaw is not prone to radical statements.
But in a nation that often avoids
acknowledging its own role in intensifying cycles of violence, it is
unfortunately considered radical to do what the NBC News veteran did and
mention that our violent attacks
abroad increase the chance of retributive attacks at home.
Of course, Brokaw was merely
stating the obvious: With America
having killed thousands of civilians in its wars, we should be appalled by acts
of terrorism — but we shouldn't be surprised by them. We should know that
violence will inevitably come from those like the Boston
bombing suspect who, according to the Washington Post, "told interrogators
that the American wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan
motivated him and his brother to carry out the attack."
Noting this is not to argue
that such attacks are justified or that we deserve them. It is only to reiterate what Brokaw
alluded to: Namely, that blowback should
be expected in this age of Permanent War and that one way to potentially avert
such blowback in the future is to try to de-escalate the cycle of violence.
To
be sure, from Reverend Wright to Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul,
many have made these points before. But they have typically been ignored or
lambasted for uttering the truth. Brokaw,
though, can't be so readily dismissed. He is a Walter Cronkite of his age, and, indeed, his declaration recalls
Cronkite's seminal moment 45 years ago.
Back
in 1968, opponents of the Vietnam War were being marginalized in much the same
way critics of today's wars now are. But when such a revered voice as Cronkite
took to television to declare the conflict an unwinnable "stalemate,"
he helped create a tipping point whereby Americans began to reconsider their
assumptions.
In
similarly making such an assumption-challenging statement, Brokaw has followed
in Cronkite's heroic footsteps. The only question is: Will America finally listen?
David
Sirota is the best-selling author of the books "Hostile Takeover,"
"The Uprising" and "Back to Our Future." Email him at
ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at
www.davidsirota.com.
COPYRIGHT
2013 CREATORS.COM
Frontline’s “Top
Secret America,” Notes by Dick
Bennett
April 30, 2013
AFTER
9/11 unprecedented new levels and kinds of information control, surveillance,
imprisonment, torture, and killing.
After 9/11, 2001, for counter-terrorism the CIA built an unprecedented international
prison system entirely in secret.
Leader: CIA’s Copher Black??
Pentagon’s Rumsfeld,
competing for the power, created another unprecedented secret counter-terrorism
organization, JSOC, inside the Pentagon
without Presidential approval, to systematically “target” (murder) Al Qaeda and
Taliban leaders, with less oversight than over the CIA.
2003 Invasion of Iraq . CIA had no evidence of Saddam/Al Q. linkage,
so Rumsfeld claimed to have the
evidence and created another secret Pentagon organization to back up the claim,
the Office of Special Planning. The OSP began? the quickly universal
official reference to WMD.
Bush claimed 9/11 an “attack on freedom
and our way of life.” In addition to
the CIA and the Pentagon he assigned the NSA
to also provide counter-terrorism, the Terrorist Surveillance Program, for
sweeping unconstitutional evesdropping, 1.7 billion unwarranted message
intercepts by today.
One result of these new counterterrorism
roles and the need for additional employees was the rush through Congress of secret, uncounted, unaccountable money. The money spent is still secret. Another
result was the employ of hundreds of
private companies, an enormous expansion of the military-corporate complex.
Another was the secret construction of hundreds of
new buildings throughout the Washington ,
DC , area. And don’t forget Homeland Security, which built a headquarters that rivals the Pentagon.
How do we know all of this? Two Washington Post reporters, Dana Priest and William Arkin dug up the information by among other
methods locating all of the private contractors. Their series in the WP became a book and then a documentary in 2011 shown by PBS’s
“Frontline,” and apparently shown again April 30, 2013. Priest and Arkin must rank among the highest
of US investigative journalist heroes ever, and .PBS deserves the highest award
for the immensely public service program, which PBS was intended to do in 1966.
And
Obama: In his first campaign 2008 he
promised transparency, but almost immediately after inauguration he succumbed
to the realities of the US
Corporate-Pentagon-Congressional-Mainstream Media-Security Complex. (Bob
Woodward makes it all painfully clear in Obama’s
Wars.) He soon reauthorized Bush’s “Greystone” security system,
keeping about everything of Bush’s “War on Terrorism.” Then, without examining the need of each new
contractor, each new building, each new project—without examining Top Secret
America and the War on Terrorism--he expanded it, for example ratcheting up
JSOC raids, financing the continuing expansion of Homeland Security, and supporting
the transformation of local police via “fusion centers” into extensions of the
FBI (which was expanding too). For Bush
had ordered all of his subordinates never to allow another 9/11, and, like
Bush, Obama was afraid, if another attack came, he would be blamed, so we must
attack, bomb, imprison, torture, murder..
Finally, yes bin Laden was captured, not
by Top Secret America, but by basic police investigation, though his murder and
disposal of his body in the ocean were state murder not lawful police methods. And the billions spent for Top Secret America
(and the billions not accounted for), what have they accomplished? Instead of the “freedom” drumbeat our leaders
wrap themselves in (and they hope us and the “troops”) to delude our troops and
send them to kill innocents around the world, our nation and the entire world
is under Top Secret surveillance the Gestapo and NKVD would have envied..
THE WP SERIES
1.
Top Secret America | washingtonpost.com
projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america
Washington Post reporters Dana Priest and William M. Arkin's
investigation of the government's response to 9/11. Top Secret America explores what they found.
THE DOCUMENARY
Dana Priest: Top Secret America Is “Here to Stay” | Top Secret ... - PBS
Sep 6, 2011 – A two-time Pulitzer
Prize-winning investigative reporter for The Washington Post Priest is the author, along
with William Arkin, of Top Secret ...
JOIN OMNI AND
BE A PART OF THE PEACE AND JUSTICE MOVEMENT.
TWO
Reader Supported
News | 23 April 13 PM
Glenn Greenwald | Why Is
Glenn Greenwald, Guardian Greenwald writes: "The overarching principle here should be that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is entitled to a presumption of innocence until he is actually proven guilty. As so many cases have proven ... people who appear to be guilty based on government accusations and trials-by-media are often completely innocent. Media-presented evidence is no substitute for due process and an adversarial trial." READ MORE
Reader Supported
News | 25 April 13 PM
Glenn Greenwald | The Recurring Motive
for Anti-US 'Terrorism'
Glenn Greenwald, Guardian UK Greenwald writes: "In the last several years, there have been four other serious attempted or successful attacks on US soil by Muslims, and in every case, they emphatically all say the same thing." READ MORE
GREENWALD VIA MOYERS 4-28
TWO
Glenn Greenwald, interviewed
by Bill Moyers, Moyers & Co. (April
28, 2013), “Trading Democracy for ‘National Security’.”
The overreaction of some
politicians and much of mainstream media (“enemy combatants”) moves Greenwald
and Moyers to discuss why so many people around the world dislike
Robert Scheer | 277 Million Boston
Bombings
Robert Scheer, Truthdig Scheer writes: "Obama was right to blast the use of weapons that targeted civilians in Boston as inherent acts of terrorism, but by what standard do such weapons change their nature when they are deployed by governments against civilians?" READ MORE
Here's Why Tsarnaev Was Charged With
Using a 'Weapon of Mass Destruction'
Spencer Ackerman, Wired Ackerman writes: "Tsarnaev is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. There appears to be no similar redress scheduled for the way in which the law contorts a common-sense meaning of an already vague term about some of the world's deadliest weapons." READ MORE |
Hundreds of prisoners of the US War of
Terror languish in prisons around the world, in Guantanamo
and on the US
mainland. Some have been there as long as 12 years some have sentences that
extend beyond the span of their life. Many have never been charged with a crime
and more than half the prisoners who remain in Guantanamo have had their
original charges dropped or have served their full sentence, but are barred by
US law from being repatriated to their homeland, therefore can not be released
Our
Nation Unhinged: The Human Consequences of the War on Terror
Peter Jan Honigsberg (Author), Erwin Chemerinsky (Foreword). UP OF CALIFORNIA , 2009.
READ AN EXCERPT
RIGHTS INFORMATION
Jose Padilla short-shackled and
wearing blackened goggles and earmuffs to block out all light and sound on his
way to the dentist. Fifteen-year-old Omar Khadr crying out to an American
soldier, "Kill me!" Hunger strikers at Guantánamo being restrained
and force-fed through tubes up their nostrils. John Walker Lindh lying naked
and blindfolded in a metal container, bound by his hands and feet, in the
freezing Afghan winter night. This is the story of the Bush administration's
response to the attacks of September 11, 2001—and of how we have been led down
a path of executive abuses, human
tragedies, abandonment of the Constitution, and the erosion of due process and
liberty. In this vitally important book, Peter Jan Honigsberg chronicles
the black hole of the American judicial
system from 2001 to the present, providing an incisive analysis of exactly
what we have lost over the past seven years and where we are now headed.
The Secret Trial 5 is a crowdfunded documentary in-progress that
examines the human impact of Canada ’s
“war on terror”; specifically the use of security certificates, a tool that
allows for indefinite detention, with no
charges, and secret evidence. Over the last decade, 5 men have
been held under security certificates in Canada . They spent between 2 and 7
years in prison each. None of them have been charged with a crime.
These men are The
Secret Trial 5, and YOU can help us tell their story.
Recent blog posts:
Our Doc Ignite Campaign Wraps -
THANK YOU!
Well
everyone,
After 36 days, and 148 contributions, I guess all that's left is to
say thank you. Thank you for proving to a couple of young filmmakers that the
last 3 years have been worthwhile. Thanks for showing us, and the security
certificate families that we are all ready to talk about these issues, and
right these wrongs.
We raised just
over $18k during this campaign, which may not be a lot in the life of the
average documentary, but means everything in the life of THIS documentary. We
wish to sincerely thank Hot Docs for this chance, and in particular, Elizabeth
Radshaw, Stephanie McArthur, Chloe Sosa-Sims, and Patrycja Cieniewicz for their
truly personal support, hard-work, and encouragement during the last few months.
We want to take
this last opportunity to talk briefly about crowdfunding, and why it so
important for emerging filmmakers. What we did this last month cannot be
quantified. The money can, but the value of Doc Ignite vastly exceeds the money
raised. We have no real idea how many people just learned about our project,
and are now waiting to see the film. Sure, our FB and twitter accounts
exploded, and we know we are reaching tens of thousands every week, but what
exactly does that mean? The answer, is the aforementioned EVERYTHING. It means
everything.
In a time when audiences
are more fragmented than ever, and old models of funding and even distribution
make less and less sense, crowdfunding just fits. It's a lot of work, but then
filmmaking has always been so, and the results when it works are incredible.
Right now, there are thousands of people waiting to see ST5. A film with little
to no money, about a contentious issue, has a small but devoted audience behind
it before it even enters post-production. This is an enviable position to be in
for any film. . . .
Thank
you all once again, we promise to make a good film. An honest film. Where we go
from there (re: security certificates) will be up to Canadians.
Sincerely,
Amar and Noah
The Secret Trial 5 on the Tarek
Fatah Show
We stopped by Newstalk 1010 yesterday to speak to host
Tarek Fatah about our film. Tarek is known to be controversial. This is a great
example of why we are making this film, blanket statements were being thrown
around left, right and center. Warning, it gets pretty heated! Take a listen!
The Secret Trial 5 on Global’s
The Morning Show
We
are hitting the mainstream! Here is a clip of producer/director Amar Wala on
Global TV's The Morning Show discussing The Secret Trial 5 and our Hot Doc's
Doc Ignite campaign.
We
have until Feb 19 to continue to raise funds. The more we raise the MORE we can
do to spread the word and raise awareness about these important stories! Please
encourage others to become a part of this project.
A Few Words From Hassan Almrei
We'd like to introduce
Hassan Almrei, one of the subjects of our film. We asked him to share a few
words with you all.
1.
The Secret Trial 5
secrettrial5.com/ - Canada
The Secret Trial 5 is a crowdfunded
documentary in-progress that examines the human impact of Canada 's “war on terror”; specifically the use
of security ...
2.
Hot Docs | Docignite : Project : Secret Trial 5
www.hotdocs.ca/docignite/project/secret_trial_5
Many Canadians view the so-called War on Terror as something distant,
something far away. ... The subjects of our film
are known as The Secret Trial 5.
3.
The Secret Trial 5 on the Tarek Fatah Show - SoundCloud
soundcloud.com/the-secret-trial-5/the-secret-trial-5-on-the
Feb 11, 2013 – Listen to The Secret Trial 5 on the Tarek Fatah Show
by The Secret Trial ... It is a film about the
human impact of the "War on Terror" in Canada ...
The Terror Plot in Canada: What You Need to
Know
Ishaan Tharoor, TIME Magazine
Tharoor writes: "Canadian nationals have been known to venture abroad and join jihadist movements, ranging fromSomalia
to Afghanistan .
But the country's history of dealing with terrorist activity on its soil does
not begin with Islamist extremists."
READ MORE
Ishaan Tharoor, TIME Magazine
Tharoor writes: "Canadian nationals have been known to venture abroad and join jihadist movements, ranging from
READ MORE
Mon Mar 4, 2013 1:09 pm (PST) .
Posted by:"Bill Warrick" jedi.knight8
From: Pierce R Date: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:19 PM
Subject: [GvlVetsForPeace] evil masterminds menace the Homeland!
http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/2013/02/28/the-cleveland-bombers-and-other-terrorist-plots/
Feb 28 2013
*
The Cleveland bombers and other terrorist plots
*Politics http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/category/politics/>*
* by Mano Singham http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/author/singham/>*
*One day in April last year, I opened the local newspaper to read a
sensational story of the successful thwarting of a plot by five
‘terrorists’, people from the area, to blow up a bridge south of Cleveland.
They accepted a plea deal in November that
resulted http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/11/would-be_bridge-bomber_sentenc.html>in
four of them receiving sentences ranging from 6 to 11 years with the
remaining person still awaiting mental competency evaluation. TheUS
attorney’s office had asked for sentences ranging from 19 to 30 years.*
*Who were these terrorist masterminds in our neck of the woods and why were
they interested in blowing up a bridge in a fairly sparsely populated area
of the state? Arun Gupta has looked closely into the
case http://www.zcommunications.org/life-interrupted-by-arun-gupta>and
finds that it is a familiar and sordid story that we have heard many
times before, of the government using its agents, criminals, and paid
informants to lure and encourage drifters and homeless and other people on
the margins of society to engage in criminal actions by putting in their
minds crazy plots that they would have no chance of implementing
successfully if not aided by the government in procuring and using the
materials. *
*TheU.S. government described the five
as hell-bent on sowing terror to
fulfill their “violent anarchist ideology.” In reality, the FBI supplied
ten pounds of inert plastic explosives to drifters, suicidal, drug addicts
and emotionally troubled. Like hundreds of post-September 11 cases against Muslim-Americans, the FBI conjured up the terrorism it takes credit for preventing.* [True, hundreds?—Dick]
*The FBI’s most valuable asset was a paid informant and con artist,
Shaquille Azir, who played father figure to the lost men, molding their
childish bravado and drunken fantasies into a terrorist plot. Azir drove
the five around—who lacked cars and drivers’ licenses according to
friends—and provided them with jobs, housing, beer, pot and prescription
drugs. Every time the scheme threatened to collapse into gutterpunk chaos,
Azir kept it on track.*
*FBI tapes reveal Azir led the brainstorming of targets, showed them
bridges to case out, pushed them to buy C-4 military-grade explosives,
provided the contact for weapons, gave them money for the explosives and
demanded they develop a plan because “We on the hook” for the weapons. At
one point, Azir burst out in frustration at their ineptitude: “Every time
we meet, we leave saying, we’re doing some research. And then get back
together and go back to square one.”*
*This case is depressingly similar to those of the past where so-called
terrorist plots that were supposedly foiled by the astute work of federal
agents turn out under close examination to be those that involved luring
people who couldn’t plot their way out of a paper bag into getting involved
in some grand scheme.*
*This articlehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plots>from
The Guardian goes through a list of cases in which there would not have been a
plot if the FBI had not been pushing the people eventually charged with
terrorist acts. It describes one case of David Williams, a youth inNew
York with a criminal background involving drugs.*
*His aunt, Alicia McWilliams, was honest about the tough streets her nephew
was dealing with. “Newburgh
is a hard place,” she said. So it was perhaps
no surprise that in May, 2009, David Williams was arrested again and hit
with a 25-year jail sentence. But it was not for drugs offences. Or any
other common crime. Instead Williams and three other struggling local men
beset by drug, criminal and mental health issues were convicted of an
Islamic terrorist plot to blow up Jewish synagogues and shoot down military
jets with missiles.*
*Even more shocking was that the organisation, money, weapons and
motivation for this plot did not come from real Islamic terrorists. It came
from the FBI, and an informant paid to pose as a terrorist mastermind
paying big bucks for help in carrying out an attack. For McWilliams, her
own government had actually cajoled and paid her beloved nephew into being
a terrorist, created a fake plot and then jailed him for it. “I feel like I
am in the Twilight Zone,” she told the Guardian.*
*David Swanson argueshttp://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/23/290438/fbi-sponsoring-terrorism-across-the-us/>that
if there is one agency that is behind almost all the terrorist plots
in the US, it is the FBI*
*Between 911 and August, 2011, the U.S. government prosecuted 508 people
for terrorism in the United States. 243 had been targeted using an FBI
informant. 158 had been caught in an FBI terrorism sting. 49 (that we know
of, FBI recording devices have completely unbelievable patterns of
“malfunctioning”) had encountered an agent provocateur. Most of the rest
charged with “terrorism” had little or nothing to do with terrorism at all,
most of them charged with more minor offenses like immigration offenses or
making false statements. Three or four people out of the whole list appear
to be men whom one would reasonably call terrorists in the commonly
accepted sense of the word. They intended to and had something at least
approaching the capacity to engage in acts of terrorism.*
*So next time there is a news conference announcing the foiling of a
spectacular plot by terrorists, I would suggest that people look a little
skeptically at the evidence. And you can be sure that there will be a next
time, and fairly soon, because the government does not want people to think
that the terrorist threat has diminished because then we might demand that
all the laws that have undermined civil liberties because of the ‘war on
terror’ be rescinded. *
May The Force be with you,
Bill *
From: Pierce R Date: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:19 PM
Subject: [GvlVetsForPeace] evil masterminds menace the Homeland!
http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/2013/02/28/the-cleveland-bombers-and-other-terrorist-plots/
Feb 28 2013
*
The Cleveland bombers and other terrorist plots
*Politics http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/category/politics/>*
* by Mano Singham http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/author/singham/>*
*One day in April last year, I opened the local newspaper to read a
sensational story of the successful thwarting of a plot by five
‘terrorists’, people from the area, to blow up a bridge south of Cleveland.
They accepted a plea deal in November that
resulted http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/11/would-be_bridge-bomber_sentenc.html>in
four of them receiving sentences ranging from 6 to 11 years with the
remaining person still awaiting mental competency evaluation. The
attorney’s office had asked for sentences ranging from 19 to 30 years.*
*Who were these terrorist masterminds in our neck of the woods and why were
they interested in blowing up a bridge in a fairly sparsely populated area
of the state? Arun Gupta has looked closely into the
case http://www.zcommunications.org/life-interrupted-by-arun-gupta>and
finds that it is a familiar and sordid story that we have heard many
times before, of the government using its agents, criminals, and paid
informants to lure and encourage drifters and homeless and other people on
the margins of society to engage in criminal actions by putting in their
minds crazy plots that they would have no chance of implementing
successfully if not aided by the government in procuring and using the
materials. *
*The
fulfill their “violent anarchist ideology.” In reality, the FBI supplied
ten pounds of inert plastic explosives to drifters, suicidal, drug addicts
and emotionally troubled. Like hundreds of post-September 11 cases against Muslim-Americans, the FBI conjured up the terrorism it takes credit for preventing.* [True, hundreds?—Dick]
*The FBI’s most valuable asset was a paid informant and con artist,
Shaquille Azir, who played father figure to the lost men, molding their
childish bravado and drunken fantasies into a terrorist plot. Azir drove
the five around—who lacked cars and drivers’ licenses according to
friends—and provided them with jobs, housing, beer, pot and prescription
drugs. Every time the scheme threatened to collapse into gutterpunk chaos,
Azir kept it on track.*
*FBI tapes reveal Azir led the brainstorming of targets, showed them
bridges to case out, pushed them to buy C-4 military-grade explosives,
provided the contact for weapons, gave them money for the explosives and
demanded they develop a plan because “We on the hook” for the weapons. At
one point, Azir burst out in frustration at their ineptitude: “Every time
we meet, we leave saying, we’re doing some research. And then get back
together and go back to square one.”*
*This case is depressingly similar to those of the past where so-called
terrorist plots that were supposedly foiled by the astute work of federal
agents turn out under close examination to be those that involved luring
people who couldn’t plot their way out of a paper bag into getting involved
in some grand scheme.*
*This articlehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plots>from
The Guardian goes through a list of cases in which there would not have been a
plot if the FBI had not been pushing the people eventually charged with
terrorist acts. It describes one case of David Williams, a youth in
York
*His aunt, Alicia McWilliams, was honest about the tough streets her nephew
was dealing with. “
no surprise that in May, 2009, David Williams was arrested again and hit
with a 25-year jail sentence. But it was not for drugs offences. Or any
other common crime. Instead Williams and three other struggling local men
beset by drug, criminal and mental health issues were convicted of an
Islamic terrorist plot to blow up Jewish synagogues and shoot down military
jets with missiles.*
*Even more shocking was that the organisation, money, weapons and
motivation for this plot did not come from real Islamic terrorists. It came
from the FBI, and an informant paid to pose as a terrorist mastermind
paying big bucks for help in carrying out an attack. For McWilliams, her
own government had actually cajoled and paid her beloved nephew into being
a terrorist, created a fake plot and then jailed him for it. “I feel like I
am in the Twilight Zone,” she told the Guardian.*
*David Swanson argueshttp://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/23/290438/fbi-sponsoring-terrorism-across-the-us/>that
if there is one agency that is behind almost all the terrorist plots
in the US, it is the FBI*
*Between 911 and August, 2011, the U.S. government prosecuted 508 people
for terrorism in the United States. 243 had been targeted using an FBI
informant. 158 had been caught in an FBI terrorism sting. 49 (that we know
of, FBI recording devices have completely unbelievable patterns of
“malfunctioning”) had encountered an agent provocateur. Most of the rest
charged with “terrorism” had little or nothing to do with terrorism at all,
most of them charged with more minor offenses like immigration offenses or
making false statements. Three or four people out of the whole list appear
to be men whom one would reasonably call terrorists in the commonly
accepted sense of the word. They intended to and had something at least
approaching the capacity to engage in acts of terrorism.*
*So next time there is a news conference announcing the foiling of a
spectacular plot by terrorists, I would suggest that people look a little
skeptically at the evidence. And you can be sure that there will be a next
time, and fairly soon, because the government does not want people to think
that the terrorist threat has diminished because then we might demand that
all the laws that have undermined civil liberties because of the ‘war on
terror’ be rescinded. *
May The Force be with you,
Bill *
Glenn Greenwald | Andrew Sullivan,
Terrorism and the Art of Distortion
Glenn Greenwald, GuardianUK
Excerpt: "Challenging the conventional western narrative on terrorism produces unique amounts of rage and bile. It's worth examining why."
READ MORE [I couldn’t enter this site. See if you can. –Dick]
Glenn Greenwald, Guardian
Excerpt: "Challenging the conventional western narrative on terrorism produces unique amounts of rage and bile. It's worth examining why."
READ MORE [I couldn’t enter this site. See if you can. –Dick]
TREVOR AARONSON, THE TERROR FACTORY: INSIDE THE FBI’S MANUFACTURED WAR ON
TERRORISM. IG Publishing, 2013.
·
TITLES
·
NEWS
·
EVENTS
·
ABOUT IG
·
CONTACT
POSTS TAGGED
"TREVOR AARONSON"
Trevor Aaronson on Democracy Now!
Terror Factory author Trevor Aaronson appeared on Democracy Now!
on Friday, talking about the FBI’s use of terrorism stings and … Continue reading
Posted April 28, 2013 in News | Tags: Boston Marathon bombings, Democracy Now!, FBI, Terror Factory, terrorism stings,Trevor Aaronson
The Terror Factory on C-SPAN’s
Book TV
Terror Factory author Trevor Aaronson recently appeared on Book
TV to talk about his book with Monika Bauerlein of Mother … Continue reading
Posted March 15, 2013 in News | Tags: Book TV, CSPAN, Monika Bauerlein, Mother Jones, Terror Factory, Trevor Aaronson
Trevor Aaronson on Lopate and
On the Media
Terror Factory author Trevor Aaronson appeared on The Leonard Lopate
Show on Friday, February 1, talking about his new book. … Continue reading
Posted February 10, 2013 in News | Tags: Leonard Lopate, On the Media, Terror Factory, Trevor Aaronson, WNYC
Trevor Aaronson on CBS This
Morning
Terror Factory
author Trevor Aaronson appeared on CBS This Morning on Friday January 11 to
discuss his new book.
Posted January 13, 2013 in News | Tags: CBS This Morning, Entrapment, FBI stings, Terror Factory, Terrorism, Trevor Aaronson
Great Reviews Make Us Happy
The Terror Factory received a starred review in the 10/15 issue
of Publishers Weekly. “Compelling, shocking, and gritty with intrigue.” … Continue reading
Posted October 15, 2012 in News | Tags: Andrew Cotto, Booklist, Care and Feeding of Exotic Pets, Diana Wagman,Mystery Scene, Outerborough Blues, Publisher's Weekly, Terror Factory, Trevor Aaronson
Trevor Aaronson on RT America
Terror Factory
author Trevor Aaronson appeared on RT America, talking about the FBI’s use of
informants.
Posted August 21, 2012 in News | Tags: FBI, Informants, RT America, Terror Factory, Terrorism, Trevor Aaronson
The Terror Factory
“Compelling, shocking, and gritty with intrigue.” –Publishers
Weekly (starred review) “A real eye-opener that questions how well the
country’s security … Continue reading
Posted August 12, 2012 in Politics & Current Affairs, Titles | Tags: Entrapment, FBI, Informants, International Data Journalism
Award, Islamic, John Jay College/Harry Frank
Guggenheim 2012 Excellence in Criminal Justice Reporting Award, Molly National Journalism Prize, Mother Jones, Terror Factory, Terrorism, Trevor Aaronson, War on Terror
1.
The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI's Manufactured War on Terrorism ...
The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI's
Manufactured War on Terrorism [Trevor Aaronson] on Amazon.com. *FREE*
super saver shipping on qualifying offers.
2.
Trevor Aaronson | Author of The Terror Factory
trevoraaronson.com/
Articles and contact information for an
award-winning journalist specializing in investigations and narratives.
3.
Trevor Aaronson | Book
trevoraaronson.com/book/
The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI's
Manufactured War on Terror shows how the ... An outgrowth of Trevor Aaronson's work as an investigative
reporting fellow at ...
4.
Inside the Terror Factory | Mother Jones
www.motherjones.com/.../terror-factory-fbi-trevor-aaronson-bo...
Jan 11, 2013 – Editor's note: This
story is adapted from The Terror Factory, Trevor Aaronson's new book documenting how
the Federal Bureau of Investigation ...
5.
Trevor Aaronson -Terror Factory - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xQS-aWQQvY
Apr 13, 2013 - Uploaded by friendshumanrights
Trevor Aaronson - Terror Factory. Trevor Aaronson speaks
about his book "Terror Factory: Inside the FBI's ...
7.
Law and Legal - "The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI's Manufactured ...
www.booktv.org/.../The+Terror+Factory+Inside+the+FBIs+Manufacture...
The book "The Terror Factory" started off as a
Mother Jones magazine cover story that earned Mr. Aaronson several journalism
awards. For more, visit: ...
8.
Manufacturing Terrorists - Reason.com
reason.com/archives/2013/03/15/manufacturing-terrorists
Mar 15, 2013 – According to journalist
Trevor Aaronson's The Terror Factory, this isn't the premise
for a Kafka novel; it's reality in the post-9/11 United States .
9.
The Terror Factory with Trevor Aaronson - Crooks and Liars
Thu, May 16 - Left Bank Books
Terror Factory author Trevor Aaronson appeared on Democracy
Now! on Friday, talking about the FBI's use of terrorism stings and … Continue
reading
Whose Rights? Counterterrorism and
the Dark Side of American Public Opinion by CLEM BROOKS & JEFF MANZA. Russell Sage, 2013.
In the wake of the September 11
attacks, the U.S.
government adopted a series of counterterrorism policies that radically altered
the prevailing balance between civil liberties and security. These changes
allowed for warrantless domestic surveillance, military commissions at Guantanamo Bay and even extralegal assassinations.
Now, more than a decade after 9/11, these sharply contested measures appear
poised to become lasting features of American government. What do Americans think about these policies? Where do they draw
the line on what the government is allowed to do in the name of fighting
terrorism? Drawing from a wealth of survey and experimental data, Whose
Rights? explores the underlying sources of public attitudes toward the
war on terror in a more detailed and comprehensive manner than has ever been
attempted.
In an analysis that deftly deploys
the tools of political science and psychology, Whose Rights? addresses
a vexing puzzle: Why does the counterterrorism agenda persist even as 9/11
recedes in time and the threat from Al Qaeda wanes? Authors Clem Brooks and
Jeff Manza provocatively argue that
American opinion, despite traditionally showing strong support for civil
liberties, exhibits a “dark side” that tolerates illiberal policies in the face
of a threat. Surveillance of
American citizens, heightened airport security, the Patriot Act and targeted assassinations
enjoy broad support among Americans, and these preferences have remained
largely stable over the past decade. There are, however, important variations:
Waterboarding and torture receive notably low levels of support, and
counterterrorism activities sanctioned by formal legislation, as opposed to
covert operations, tend to draw more favor. To better evaluate these
trends, Whose Rights? examines the concept of “threat-priming” and
finds that getting people to think about the specter of terrorism bolsters anew
their willingness to support coercive measures. A series of experimental
surveys also yields fascinating insight into the impact of national identity
cues. When respondents are primed to think that American citizens would be
targeted by harsh counterterrorism policies, support declines significantly. On
the other hand, groups such as Muslims, foreigners, and people of Middle
Eastern background elicit particularly negative attitudes and increase support
for counterterrorism measures. Under the right conditions, Brooks and Manza
show, American support for counterterrorism activities can be propelled upward
by simple reminders of past terrorism plots and communication about disliked
external groups.
Whose Rights? convincingly
argues that mass opinion plays a central role in the politics of contemporary
counterterrorism policy. With their clarity and compelling evidence, Brooks and
Manza offer much-needed insight into the policy responses to the defining
conflict of our age and the psychological impact of terrorism.
CLEM BROOKS is professor of
sociology at Indiana University , Bloomington . JEFF
MANZA is professor of sociology at New York University .
SIBEL
Why was a Sunday Times report
on US government ties to al-Qaeda chief spiked?
by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed. May 16, 2013
FBI whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds was
described as "the most gagged person in the history of the United States " by the American Civil
Liberties Union . Was the Sunday Times pressured to drop its
investigation into her revelations?
A
whistleblower has revealed extraordinary information on the U.S. government’s support for
international terrorist networks and organised crime. The government has denied
the allegations yet gone to extraordinary lengths to silence her. Her critics
have derided her as a fabulist and fabricator. But now comes word that some of
her most serious allegations were confirmed by a major European newspaper only
to be squashed at the request of the U.S. government.
In a
recent book Classified Woman, Sibel
Edmonds, a former translator for the FBI, describes how the Pentagon, CIA
and State Department maintained intimate ties to al-Qaeda militants as late as
2001. Her memoir, Classified
Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story,
published last year, charged senior government officials with negligence,
corruption and collaboration with al Qaeda in illegal arms smuggling and drugs
trafficking in Central Asia .
More:
> David Sirota> The Military’s 40 Year Experiment
Few probably recall the name Dwight Elliott Stone. But even if
that name has faded from the national memory, the man remains historically
significant. That's because on June
30, 1973, the 24-year-old plumber's apprentice became the last American
forced into the armed services before the military draft expired.
Though next month's 40-year anniversary of
the end of conscription will likely be as forgotten as Stone, it shouldn't
be. In operations across the globe, the all-volunteer military has been
employed by policymakers to birth what Gen. George Casey recently called the
"era of persistent conflict." Four decades later, we therefore have
an obligation to ask: How much of the
public's complicity in that epochal shift is a result of the end of the
draft?
There is, of course, no definitive answer to
such a complex question. However, a look back at some lost history shows that
today's public acquiescence to
militarism was exactly what the government wanted when it ended the draft.
That loaded term — "militarism" —
was, in fact, a prominent part of the 1970 report by President Nixon's
Commission on an All-Volunteer Force. In its findings, the panel worried
about "a cycle of anti-militarism" in a nation then questioning
Noting that "the draft is a major
source of antagonism" toward the growing military-industrial complex,
the report praised the fact that "an all-volunteer force offers an obvious
opportunity to curb the growth of anti-militaristic sentiment."
Nixon's commission did devote some empty
rhetoric to downplaying "the fear of increased military aggressiveness
or reduced civilian concern" about military actions in the event of an
all-volunteer force. But the report's political conclusions were clear: By
disconnecting most Americans from the blood-and-guts consequences of war, the
end of the draft would "decrease dissent stemming from
conscription" and "close one of the channels" of anti-war
organizing.
Today, such conclusions read like prophecy.
Though polls showed that many Americans opposed the Iraq War, that invasion
and occupation was historically unprecedented in length and yet never
generated the kind of mass protest that earlier shorter wars evoked. Same
thing for the Afghanistan War. Same thing for all the forward deployments to
far-flung bases and one-off missions.
The pattern suggests that in the absence of
conscription, dissent — if it exists at all — becomes a low-grade affair (an
email, a petition, etc.) but not the kind of serious movement required to
compel military policy changes. Why? Because as former Defense Secretary
Robert Gates put it, without a draft "wars remain an abstraction — a
distant and unpleasant series of news items that does not affect (most
people) personally."
The danger, says
That reality has prompted some lawmakers in
recent years to propose reinstating the draft. They argue it is the only way
to compel Americans to truly care about the foreign policy and national
security decisions of their government.
Well-meaning people can certainly disagree
about whether a modern-day draft is a good idea or not (and it may not be).
But forty years into the all-volunteer experiment, it is clear that ending
conscription was as much about giving citizens the liberty to abstain from as
about quashing popular opposition to martial decisions. By design, it
weakened our democratic connection to the armed forces — a connection that is
the only proven safeguard against unbridled militarism.
David Sirota is the best-selling author of
the books "Hostile Takeover," "The Uprising" and
"Back to Our Future." Email him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him
on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.
COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM
|
REVIEWING EVIDENCE OF 9/11
From: Global
Research E-Newsletter <newsletter@globalresearch.ca>
Date: Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:01 AM Subject: Elizabeth Woodworth: 9/11 in Context The Importance of the Growing Contradictory Evidence To: sam.noumoff@mcgill.ca [forwarded by Sonny San Juan.] 9/11 in Context: The Importance of the Growing Contradictory Evidence By Elizabeth Woodworth
Global Research, May 05,
2013
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-in-context-the-importance-of-the-growing-contradictory-evidence/5333694 This essay provides a brief overview of recent academic evidence, high-level conferences, and media documentaries that raise fresh questions regarding the official account of 9/11. It then describes the 9/11 Consensus Panel as an up-to-date source of evidence-based research for any investigation that may be undertaken to settle 9/11′s unanswered questions. Finally, this essay argues that mortality from all terror events combined lags far behind annual mortality from preventable common causes such as obesity, smoking, and impaired driving. More importantly, all these causes together will be dwarfed by the mortality from predicted “business as usual” global warming events — which cry out for a unified emergency response. Today is the second anniversary of the day the In spite of this announcement, worldwide skepticism and research continue to dog the official account of 9/11. Had the United States Government called an immediate investigation (it did not form the 9/11 Commission until late 2002) and provided consistent and transparent proof of its claims against Osama bin Laden and the 19 alleged hijackers, things might have been different. In the wake of the officially failed evidence, NGO’s continue to dig into the disturbing and unanswered questions that haunt this world-changing event. Year by year, these research bodies have been delving ever more deeply into new photographic, FOIA, and witness evidence. Recent high-level conferences in Kuala Lumpur,[1] Bremen, Germany,[2] and Toronto, Canada,[3] have raised public awareness of the urgent need to revisit the watershed event behind the global war on terror. An issue of the international magazine Nexus, which sold on news-stands across France in March and April this year, devoted 12 pages to the work of the 9/11 Consensus Panel (www.consensus911.org) and its 28 peer-reviewed Consensus Points of evidence against elements of the official story.[4] In late 2012, PBS aired one of its most-watched documentaries, “Experts Speak Out,” in which 40 architects and engineers demonstrate that the structural collapses of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 could only have been caused by controlled demolition.[5] Indeed many serious investigations have been undertaken by the major media, including In February, 2010, the American Behavioral Scientist published six articles introducing the concept of “State Crimes Against Democracy” (SCADS), including “Beyond Conspiracy Theory: Patterns of High Crimes in American Government.”[8] Why has all this effort to establish the truth about 9/11 persisted for nearly 12 years? 1. First, because many high officials have cast doubt on the official story. To name just one, a dismayed General Wesley Clark reported in a 2007 interview with Amy Goodman that on September 20, 2001, and again later in November, his former Pentagon staff told him that the US was going to “take out” seven Middle East countries in the next five years, beginning with Iraq; then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, and Sudan.[9] 2. In carrying out these operations, the “global war on terror” spawned by 9/11 has maintained an unprecedented degree of fear and divisiveness in the world; 3. This war has been justified by a pervasive, shadowy enemy that can only be countered by flawless surveillance, suspension of civil rights, and unlimited military spending; 4. This “forever war” has redefined world relationships (Muslim and Christian) and given the West a new kind of entitlement to occupy lands that might foster terror against it; 5. It has virtually bankrupted the West through trillions spent in 6. September 11th and its offspring terror war have wrecked our confidence in the first principles of democracy. Ever-reminded that terror lurks all around, we must cower and surrender freedoms to contain it. 7. Worst of all, preoccupation with terror has taken our attention off the vital need to address global warming and planetary survival. War-on-terror hawks have done quite the opposite, having manufactured public consent to occupy the very lands that house the cheap oil that is cooking the planet as it approaches 400 ppm of atmospheric CO2.[10] How do we get back to first principles and return to global, survival-oriented priorities? The central question is: “Do we choose to act from what we want our world to be, or from what we fear it might become?” Do we design a harmonious world fit for all humanity, or do we stifle our vision and hopes for peace behind fear, prisons, martial law, and infinite military spending? All great periods of history – the golden ages of optimism, learning, culture and prosperity — have been inspired by the creative, expansive human imagination. This imagination is inspired by the belief that a civilized world is possible because we can make it so. It is inspired by a vision of human beings as a world family whose spirits embrace justice, order, and decency. As President John F. Kennedy said in his famous speech of 1963: “If we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. In the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s futures. And we are all mortal.”[11] Because of 9/11, however, our new century has been dominated by an obsessive fear of Muslim peoples. This fear, fueled daily by the Western media, has persuaded Thus it is crucial to know whether 9/11 transpired as we have been told — and for this we need the means to identify the best evidence possible. The 9/11 Consensus Panel and its Approach to Evidence The 9/11 Consensus Panel was formed in May, 2011. Its purpose and procedures are briefly outlined below: · The media has claimed for a decade that it is unable to evaluate the technical evidence being presented against the official story of 9/11. · A parallel problem existed in medicine during the years when there were contradictory, unranked approaches to evaluating the 22 million articles in the biomedical literature databases. · This problem was greatly reduced by the introduction of “evidence-based” medicine, which applied formal rules of evidence in evaluating the clinical literature. · Using widely accepted tools such as the Delphi Method, medicine has now developed hundreds of standard Consensus Statements to guide physicians in diagnosis and treatment. · Similarly, 20 expert members[12] of the new 9/11 Consensus Panel have now developed Consensus Points of “best evidence” opposing the official account of 9/11. · The Panel Members, who remain blind to one another throughout the process, provide three rounds of review and feedback that are refined into 28 Points (thus far) of “best evidence”. · This scientific process has yielded an unprecedented degree of credibility for points of evidence relating to 9/11 that can be trusted by the media and the public. · The 9/11 Consensus Points provide a ready source of evidence-based research to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution. Conclusion: We have seen that the evidence supporting the official story of 9/11 has become increasingly open to question. We have also seen that preoccupation with 9/11 has continued unabated through the ever-present war on terror. But to keep things in perspective: lives lost to the sum total of terror events are far fewer than those lost annually to preventable deaths from obesity, smoking, and impaired driving.[13] This should translate into the media giving more time to the prevention of obesity, traffic accidents, and smoking, and less time to preventing terror events. That would be fine except that all these things taken together pale by comparison with the disease and mortality[14] that will ensue if we continue with “business as usual” in the face of recent evidence that “observed [fossil fuel] emissions continue to track the top end of all scenarios.”[15] In order to steel ourselves to confront global warming — the most serious challenge ever faced by civilization — we need to reframe our priorities. We need to wage war on our own behaviour, and it’s time to gear up, impose discipline, and win the planet back. This means taking our declared “war on global warming” to the front page of every newspaper, to the top of all social media discussions, and to the Number One item in every town hall meeting on Platform Earth.
Notes
[1]International Conference: “9/11
Revisited — Seeking the Truth,” sponsored by Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Fourth
Prime Minister of [2]“Quo Vadis NATO? — Challenges for Democracy and Law,” [3]The Toronto Hearings, September 2011, chaired by four international judges, including Mr. Ferdinando Imposimato, Honorary President of the Italian Supreme Court (http://torontohearings.org/panelists/). The Proceedings are available at: http://www.amazon.com/The-9-11-Toronto-Report/dp/1478369205/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1367431792&sr=8-2&keywords=toronto+hearings). [4]The Consensus Points are at http://www.consensus911.org/the-911-consensus-points/. [5]“9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out,” produced by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) was the most watched and most shared PBS video nationwide for several weeks, with over a million viewers. (http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138/). [6] CBC. The Fifth Estate. “The Unofficial Story”, November 27, 2009 (http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/ ) The Fifth Estate has won 243 awards, including an Oscar for best documentary, three international Emmy Awards, and 31 Geminis. [7]Elizabeth Woodworth, “The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Part II: A Survey of Attitude Change, 2009-2010,” Global Research, February 15, 2010 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-media-response-to-the-growing-influence-of-the-9-11-truth-movement/17624). [8]These are listed at http://abs.sagepub.com/content/vol53/issue6. The print issue is available for $24 from Sage Journals at journals@sagepub.com, telephone 1-800-818-7243. [9] “The Plan — According to U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.),” Interview with General Wesley Clark, Amy Goodman, March 2, 2007 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXS3vW47mOE). For other military leaders who share General Clark’s concern, see http://patriotsquestion911.com/ [10] Global Carbon Project, “Global Carbon Budget, 2012,” December 12, 2012 (http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/12/files/CarbonBudget2012.pdf). [11] John F. Kennedy. American University Commencement Address, June 10, 1963 (http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/BWC7I4C9QUmLG9J6I8oy8w.aspx). [12]The Panel Members’ photos and biographies are available at http://www.consensus911.org/panel-members/. [13]World Health Organization. “Overweight and obesity are the fifth leading risk for mortality worldwide, accountable for at least 2.8 million deaths each year.” (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html). CDC Atlanta. “The adverse health effects from cigarette smoking account for an estimated 443,000 deaths, or nearly one of every five deaths, each year in the CDC Atlanta. “In 2010, 10,228 people were killed in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (31%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.” http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html [14]Climate Institute, “Human Health,” (http://www.climate.org/topics/health.html). This short summary from 2009 or 2010 estimates the health impacts of global warming. [15] Global Carbon Project, “Global Carbon Budget, 2012,” December 12, 2012 (http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/12/files/CarbonBudget2012.pdf).
Copyright © 2013 Global
Research
PRESIDENT
OBAMA REJECTS PERMANENT WAR?
|
|||||||||
|
Contents of #4
Cole and Lobel, Less
Safe, Less Free
Costs of Privatized War on Terror
Klare: Al Qaeda to China
Obama, Oil ,
China
Allende to Bin Laden
Mother Jones: FBI
vs. Muslims, Continued Rendition
JPN: Islamophobia Around the World
Younge: Bigotry and Europe ’s
Terrorists
FAIR: Perceiving “Islamic Terror” in Norway
Contents of #5
Bacevitch, What Is It?
European Nations and US
Engelhardt and Bacevich, Special Operations
Who’s Winning?
FBI’s Manufactured Plots
Silverstein, “Terrorism Expert”
In Colombia
CHECK THESE OUT
"'Our
(New) Terrorists' the MEK: Have We Seen This Movie Before?"
By Coleen Rowley, Huffington Post, posted September 27
"Boykinism: Joe McCarthy Would Understand"
By Andrew J. Bacevich, TomDispatch.com, posted September 25
The author teaches history and international relations at Boston University
"New Stanford/NYU Study Documents the Civilian Terror from Obama's Drones"
By Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian, posted September 24
"The Siren Song of American Imperialism"
By William Astore, History News Network, posted September 24
The author is a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who teaches history at the Pennsylvania College of Technology
"How Hawkish Are Americans?"
By Lawrence S. Wittner, History News Network, posted September 24
The author is a professor of history emeritus at SUNYAlbany
By Coleen Rowley, Huffington Post, posted September 27
"Boykinism: Joe McCarthy Would Understand"
By Andrew J. Bacevich, TomDispatch.com, posted September 25
The author teaches history and international relations at Boston University
"New Stanford/NYU Study Documents the Civilian Terror from Obama's Drones"
By Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian, posted September 24
"The Siren Song of American Imperialism"
By William Astore, History News Network, posted September 24
The author is a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who teaches history at the Pennsylvania College of Technology
"How Hawkish Are Americans?"
By Lawrence S. Wittner, History News Network, posted September 24
The author is a professor of history emeritus at SUNY
END WAR ON TERRORISM
NEWSLETTER #8
No comments:
Post a Comment