Tuesday, February 15, 2011

CIVILIAN VICTIMS OF US WARS, NEWSLETTER/ANTHOLOGY #4

 

OMNI

CIVILIAN VICTIMS OF US WARS, February 15, 2012.

NEWSLETTER/ANTHOLOGY #4

Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace and Justice.

(#1 Sept. 6, 2007; #2 Jan. 14, 2011; #3 March 10, 2011; #4 Feb. 15, 2012).

 

 

Contents of #1, Sept. 6, 2007

Dick: Introduction

Two Books on Terror Air War

Iraq and Afghanistan:  Against the Rules of War

Pakistan and Other Countries

 

Contents of #2, Jan. 14, 2011

AFGHANISTAN

Afghan Body Count 2010

Afghan 2002, 2007, 2009

Newspaper Articles

Geneva Conventions

IRAQ

Iraq Body Count 2010

Book:   Al-Arian and Hedges, Collateral Damage

USA Today False Reporting

Newscasters and a Million civilians killed

Google and Body Count

Wikipedia Search

Contractors

Kucinich

Geneva Conventions

PAKISTAN

 

Contents of #3, March 10, 2011

Tokyo March 10, 1945

Japanese Civilians Killed WWII

 

Contents of #4 Feb. 15, 2012

New Book, John Tirman, The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America’s Wars

Hedges and Al Arian, Iraqi Civilians

US Air War

Grosscup, Terror Bombing

Ross, Decision to Bomb

Afghanistan

Carrington and Griffin, Transforming Violence

 

The Progressive VOL. 43

Book Rev.  “Invisible Victims”

The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America’s Wars

By John Tirman  Oxford UP, 2011.    416 pages.

 

“…indifference to the suffering of the

natives,” Tirman writes.

Tirman goes on to critique strategic

bombing in the “Good War,”

echoing the criticisms of Howard

Zinn and John Kenneth Galbraith.

And he then provides a detailed dissection

of the Korean War. According

to Tirman, the U.S. intervention in

Korea was mainly a product of anticommunist

fervor made even more

intense by Mao’s triumph in China

(and linked by Tirman to America’s

gunslinger frontier mentality).

“The intellectual discourse about

the Korean War’s meaning, apart

from predictable lamentations about

the limits of U.S. power, never grappled

with the magnitude of loss,” he

writes about a war that was among

the bloodiest in the post-World War

II era. “This, too, is the apparent fate

of the failed venture in Iraq.”

The Korean toll would have been

far worse if General MacArthur and

President Eisenhower had made good

on their repeated threats to use nuclear

weapons against China and North

Korea. They chose not to, Tirman

reveals, out of a fear that the Soviets

would retaliate.

Racism played a major part then,

as it has done in more recent times.

“At times of national stress,” Tirman

writes, America reverts to “the malevolent

stereotyping of outsiders.”

Astrength of the book is the

way Tirman goes through

each war and analyzes the

many ways that U.S. tactics

brought about death and destruc-

By Amitabh Pal

The Deaths of Others is an

incredibly important venture.

I know of no other book that

so comprehensively catalogues the

victims of U.S. wars.

Tirman opens with an arresting

image: He walks to the Vietnam and

Korean War memorials in Washington,

D.C., and becomes conscious of

a gaping hole in both places: There

isn’t a single mention of the millions

of non-American civilians who were

killed in these conflicts.

“One of the most remarkable

aspects of American wars is how little

we discuss the victims who are not

Americans,” Tirman writes. “As a

nation that has long thought of itself

as built on Christian ethics, even as

an exceptionally compassionate people,

this coldness is a puzzle.”

The book is an attempt to solve

that puzzle.

Tirman begins his analysis in

earnest with the U.S. conquest of the

Philippines during the Spanish-

American War, which set the tone for

every war since then. “The pattern of

the American public’s response to the

war was repeated in every subsequent

conflict abroad—the righteous cause,

the brave American soldiers, the

brutish enemy, and in the consequent

horror of the war, the deep mourning

for fallen Americans, and the cold

Amitabh Pal, the managing editor of

The Progressive, is the author of the

new book “ ‘Islam’ Means Peace:

Understanding the Muslim Principle

of Nonviolence Today” (Praeger).

ERIK RUIN - JUSTSEEDS.ORG

tion. This makes horrifying reading,

such as for Vietnam. “When

we went out, I would say about 50

percent of the villages we passed

through would be burned to the

ground,” he quotes one Marine.

But all of this astonishingly did not

make any difference to Americans,

with one survey cited by Tirman

showing statistically 0 percent of

the U.S. population motivated in

their opposition to the war due to

Vietnamese casualties alone.

Tirman has a number of perceptive

things to say even on the Iraq

War, a conflict I thought I had read

almost too much about.

For one, he shrewdly recognizes

the enormous toll taken by the sanctions

placed on Iraq in between the

1991 Gulf War and the Iraq War. He

combines all three into what he calls

a “twenty-year foreign venture for the

United States and a devastating reality

for the Iraqis.”

For another, he points out that the

U.S. culpability in the aftermath of

the 2003 invasion should not be limited

to the direct toll U.S. forces

exacted; instead, the United States

deserves a good deal of the blame for

overall fatalities due to its failure to

provide adequate security.

Tirman tallies the different ways

that Iraqis were killed, maimed, and

made refugees during the U.S. occupation.

And, yet, among the American

public, there was no recognition

of the bloodbath that had been

wrought.

“When in February 2007, the

American people were asked, for the

first and only time, how many Iraqis

they thought had died in the war, the

response was both disheartening and

unsurprising: 9,890 was the median

answer, a figure that was likely low by

several hundred thousands,” Tirman

writes. “The lack of knowledge or

concern about the war’s victims was

an outcome of several reinforcing

tendencies in American political culture:

news media that only occasionally

reported the costs of the war to

Iraqis, the Bush Administration’s

insistence on how the war effort was

benefitting Iraq, a general avoidance

of the war’s consequences apart from

the U.S. casualty rate, and the longstanding

tendency to view the

‘enemy’ population as a dispensable

side effect of the American global

mission.”

Tirman devotes a chapter to the

Afghanistan intervention, too.

“Based on reports of the U.N.,

Human Rights Watch, and a few others,

the total for civilian deaths ranges

from 15,000 to 35,000, including

nonviolent, ‘excess’ deaths, with about

9,000 directly from U.S. military

action, through the first half of 2010,”

writes Tirman. “The number of

deaths of those not considered civilians

or official Afghan soldiers is unknown

but is likely to be three or four times

higher.” (Emphasis in the original.)

The Bush Administration’s response

was sheer callousness. “We did not

start this war,” exclaimed Donald

Rumsfeld. “So understand, responsibility

for every single casualty in this

war, whether they’re innocent civilians

or innocent Americans, rests at the feet

of the Al Qaeda and the Taliban.”

Tirman has an insightfully detailed

analysis toward the end of the book of

three major U.S. war atrocities: No

Gun Ri during the Korean War, My

Lai in the Vietnam War, and Haditha

during the Iraq War. They reveal

underlying similarities.

“The Haditha massacre followed

the pattern from the earlier wars—

initial shock at the revelations, military

lying and cover-up, investigations

in response to the media

coverage, rightwing backlash against

prosecuting or blaming soldiers, very

little legal culpability achieved, and

ultimate public indifference,” Tirman

writes.

Why such indifference? Tirman

offers a number of reasons:

racism, the frontier

mentality, and something he calls “just

world theory”—the delusional denial

that everything is right with the world.

“The combination of these three

explanations forms a structure, an

architecture of indifference, accounting

for the silence and the animus the

American public displays toward the

civilian victims of U.S. wars,” Tirman

writes. “It is a sturdy forbidding

structure, a fortress that protects its

denizens from the chaos outside.”

This indifference leads to the

absence of necessary checks on U.S.

atrocities. An added consequence is

the anti-American sentiment this attitude

inflames in the rest of the world.

Where Tirman ventures into dubious

territory is in his assertion that

the constant American penchant for

wars (and its perfervid anti-communism)

is in good part a result of a

frontier mentality deeply embedded

in the American psyche.

“Especially after 1945, the ‘Indians’

were Soviet communists and

their allies,” writes Tirman. “The

‘wilderness’ was any country under

the sway of Marxism-Leninism and

the global south generally, just then

released from European colonialism

and hence reverting to a kind of

political and moral wildness to match

its physical and demographic

attributes. The ‘bonanza’ of the frontier

was domination of the world economic

system itself.”

All through the book, Tirman

hammers this thesis home, which

imbues his analysis of every conflict

from Korea to Iraq (with even the

Arab Muslim, according to him, acting

as a modern stand-in for the

Native American).

To me, the analogy seems a bit of

a stretch. Is the cowboy-and-Indian

mentality a part of the American psyche?

Yes. But is it a significant determinant

of U.S. foreign policy?

The other place where the book

doesn’t quite work is that it becomes

too statistically rigorous for a lay audience.

Regardless, Tirman has given us

the definitive study of an extremely

important but neglected subject. It’s a

must-read for anyone concerned with

the lethal impact of U.S. policy on

people in all corners of the world.

 

 

REVIEW IN THE CATHOLIC WORKER BY Bill Griffin (Jan.-Feb. 2012).   High praise for this book on the “poison” of “America’s vast indifference” toward the millions killed by the many illegal, unnecessary, brutal US invasions, occupations, and interventions.  (Dick)

 

 

--Hedges, Chris and Laila Al-Arian.   Collateral Damage: America’s War Against Iraqi Civilians. http://thebloodycrossroads.com/tag/chris-hedges/ 

Chris Hedges - Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi ...

 

► 64:55► 64:55

www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHqYOuK84iA

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Apr 24, 2011 - 65 min - Uploaded by pdxjustice
Independent journalist and author,
Chris Hedges, talks about his latest book, co- authored with Laila Al-Arian ...

1.      

Chris Hedges and Laila Al-Arian on "Collateral Damage: America's ...

 

www.democracynow.org/.../chris_hedges_and_laila_al...

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Jun 10, 2008
In their new book, journalists
Chris Hedges and Laila Al-Arian bring us the voices of fifty American combat ...

2.      

Hedges - Collateral Damage: America's War on Iraqi Civilians ...

 

► 9:59► 9:59

www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL3ToWgtfDA

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Jul 1, 2008 - 10 min - Uploaded by pdxjustice
Hedges -
Collateral Damage: America's War on Iraqi Civilians ... Program Description: Independent ...

3.     More videos for Chris Hedges Collateral Damage »

4.    Tomgram: Chris Hedges, War and Occupation, American-style ...

www.tomdispatch.com/post/174939/chris_hedges_collateral_damageCached

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Jun 3, 2008 – Collateral Damage What It Really Means When America Goes to War By Chris Hedges. Troops, when they battle insurgent forces, as in Iraq, ...

 

 

 

Strategic terror: the politics and ethics of aerial bombardment

 By Beau Grosscup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HISTORY OF US BOMBING CIVILIANS

Sherwood Ross.   “How the United States Reversed Its Policy on Bombing Civilians.”    Ross runs Anti-War News Service.  sherwoodrl@yahoo.com    The War Crimes Times (Summer 2011).  Veterans for Peace, WarCrimesTimes.org   (This is an outstanding anti-war newspaper.)

May Is Deadliest Month for Afghan Civilians Since 2007: U.N.

By BBC News    10 June 11

The UN says May was the deadliest month for civilians in Afghanistan since 2007, when the organisation started recording civilian casualties. The UN said "anti - government elements" were responsible for 82% of the 368 "conflict - related civilian deaths".

"Pro - government forces", including Nato, caused 45 of the deaths. The news came as several deadly insurgent attacks killed at least 18 people, most of them civilians, in the volatile south and east of the country.

Fifteen people, including eight children and four women, were killed when a bomb blast hit their vehicle in the southern province of Kandahar, the Interior Ministry said. READ MORE http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/330-131/4961-rocking-the-cradle

 

 

Afghan Civilians Dying in Record Numbers

Laura King, Los Angeles Times

Intro: "Buried bombs killed 30 Afghan civilians in a 48-hour span in the latest grim illustration of the dangers faced by noncombatants as the season's fighting heats up. Insurgents routinely seed roads and pathways with IEDs, or improvised explosive devices - their favored weapon against Western troops. But most often, those killed and injured by the hidden bombs are civilians."

READ MORE  http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/309-13/6471-afghan-civilians-dying-in-record-numbers

 

“May Is Deadliest Month for Afghan Civilians Since 2007: U.N.”

By BBC News    10 June 11

The UN says May was the deadliest month for civilians in Afghanistan since 2007, when the organisation started recording civilian casualties. The UN said "anti - government elements" were responsible for 82% of the 368 "conflict - related civilian deaths".

"Pro - government forces", including Nato, caused 45 of the deaths. The news came as several deadly insurgent attacks killed at least 18 people, most of them civilians, in the volatile south and east of the country.

Fifteen people, including eight children and four women, were killed when a bomb blast hit their vehicle in the southern province of Kandahar, the Interior Ministry said. READ MORE http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/330-131/4961-rocking-the-cradle

 

 

 

Transforming Terror:

Remembering the Soul of the World

Karin Lofthus Carrington and Susan Griffin, eds.


Paperback, 392 pages  June 2011

From the publisher:   This inspired collection offers a new paradigm for moving the world beyond violence as the first, and often only, response to violence. Through essays and poetry, prayers and mediations, Transforming Terror powerfully demonstrates that terrorist violence—defined here as any attack on unarmed civilians—can never be stopped by a return to the thinking that created it. A diverse array of contributors—writers, healers, spiritual and political leaders, scientists, and activists, including Desmond Tutu, Huston Smith, Riane Eisler, Daniel Ellsberg, Amos Oz, Fatema Mernissi, Fritjof Capra, George Lakoff, Mahmoud Darwish, Terry Tempest Williams, and Jack Kornfield—considers how we might transform the conditions that produce terrorist acts and bring true healing to the victims of these acts. Broadly encompassing both the Islamic and Western worlds, the book explores the nature of consciousness and offers a blueprint for change that makes peace possible. From unforgettable firsthand accounts of terrorism, the book draws us into awareness of our ecological and economic interdependence, the need for connectedness, and the innate human capacity for compassion

 

 

END CIVILIAN VICTIMS #4

No comments: